Symptoms of central sensitization in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a case-control study examining the role of musculoskeletal pain and psychological factors

The Bidirectional Relationship Between Sleep and Pain in Crohn's Disease: A Daily Diary Study

BACKGROUND

Pain is common in Crohn's disease (CD) even after endoscopic healing is achieved. Depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and worry about pain impact the pain experience. There is a bidirectional relationship between sleep and pain, though it has received minimal attention in CD. Herein, we sought to comprehensively assess this relationship in CD using daily diaries.

METHOD

Patients with active symptoms of insomnia and CD were recruited as part of an ongoing clinical trial. Participants completed 14-day diaries on sleep patterns and CD symptoms. Temporal associations between sleep and pain were assessed using cross-lagged path analysis and controlled for age, sex, and menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 participants completed 14-day diaries. All assessed aspects of sleep continuity disturbance were associated with worse next-day abdominal pain (Ps < 0.01). When assessed microlongitudinally, sleep onset latency predicted next-day pain (P = 0.07) and vice versa (P = 0.03). Similarly, nightly awakenings predicted next day pain (P = 0.02) and vice versa (P = 0.04). Sleep efficiency (P = 0.003), sleep quality (P < 0.001), and total sleep time (P = 0.04) predicted next-day pain whereas models with pain as the predictor were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep continuity and abdominal pain are closely related, with sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and sleep quality potentially driving next-day abdominal pain. As interventions for pain in IBD are limited, it may be important to capitalize on the impact of sleep disturbances on pain to optimize overall wellbeing in people with CD.

Establishing central sensitization inventory cut-off values in Dutch-speaking patients with chronic low back pain by unsupervised machine learning

BACKGROUND

Human Assumed Central Sensitization (HACS) is involved in the development and maintenance of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was developed to evaluate the presence of HACS, with a cut-off value of 40/100. However, various factors including pain conditions (e.g., CLBP), contexts, and gender may influence this cut-off value. Unsupervised clustering approaches can address these complexities by considering diverse factors and exploring possible HACS-related subgroups. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the cut-off values for a Dutch-speaking population with CLBP based on unsupervised machine learning.

METHODS

Questionnaire data covering pain, physical, and psychological aspects were collected from patients with CLBP and aged-matched healthy controls (HC). Four clustering approaches were applied to identify HACS-related subgroups based on the questionnaire data and gender. The clustering performance was assessed using internal and external indicators. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted on the best clustering results to determine the optimal cut-off values.

RESULTS

The study included 63 HCs and 88 patients with CLBP. Hierarchical clustering yielded the best results, identifying three clusters: healthy group, CLBP with low HACS level, and CLBP with high HACS level groups. The cut-off value for the overall groups were 35 (sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.76).

CONCLUSION

This study found distinct patient subgroups. An overall CSI cut-off value of 35 was suggested. This study may provide new insights into identifying HACS-related patterns and contributes to establishing accurate cut-off values.

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory to Address Human Assumed Central Sensitization: Newly Proposed Clinically Relevant Values and Associations

Central sensitization cannot be directly demonstrated in humans and thus a gold standard is missing. Therefore, we used human assumed central sensitization (HACS) when associated with humans. The central sensitization inventory (CSI) is a screening questionnaire for addressing symptoms that are associated with HACS. This cross-sectional study compared patients with chronic pain and at least one central sensitivity syndrome with healthy, pain-free controls via ROC analyses. Analyses were performed for all participants together and for each sex separately. Regression analyses were performed on patients with chronic pain with and without central sensitivity syndromes. Based on 1730 patients and 250 healthy controls, cutoff values for the CSI for the total group were established at 30 points: women: 33 points; men: 25 points. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify possible predictors for the CSI score in 2890 patients with chronic pain. The CSI score is associated with all independent factors and has a low association with pain severity in women and a low association with pain severity, age, and body mass index in men. The newly established CSI cutoff values are lower than in previous studies and different per sex, which might be of clinical relevance in daily practice and importance in research.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pain Interference: A Conceptual Model for the Role of Insomnia, Fatigue, and Pain Catastrophizing

Background

People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience pain influenced by complex interactions among factors, including disease activity, sleep, psychopathology, and changes in pain processing pathways. Treatments for pain in IBD are limited, highlighting the need for research that explores modifiable factors linked to pain. The aim of this study was to investigate relationships among multiple patient factors and to construct a conceptual model for pain interference in IBD.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of adults with IBD. Study domains included demographic, comorbidity, psychological, IBD, insomnia, fatigue, and pain features. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine relationships and interactions among active IBD, insomnia, fatigue, pain experiences (severity, catastrophizing, and interference), and additional patient factors (demographics and psychological).

Results

One hundred and seventy-four participants, aged 18-85 years, reported the presence of pain. Combining the questionnaire data using SEM resulted in a final model with an excellent fit (χ 2(8) = 9.579, P = .297, χ 2/N = 1.197, CFIN = 0.997, TLI = 0.987, RMSEA = 0.034). The presence of anxiety and depression was the additional patient factors to be retained in the path analysis. SEM results indicated that greater pain interference was directly influenced by greater fatigue, worse pain catastrophizing, and worse pain severity. Pain interference was indirectly impacted by IBD activity, worse insomnia, and the presence of depression and anxiety.

Conclusions

The proposed conceptual model highlights the role of multiple potentially modifiable factors, including insomnia, pain catastrophizing, and fatigue, contributing to worse pain interference in people with IBD.

Prevalence of Central Sensitization in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Importance

Chronic pain is one of the most prominent symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and an independent domain in the core outcome set for HS. Previously, the chronic, recurrent, inflammatory nature of HS was hypothesized to induce central sensitization (CS; alteration and amplification of pain perception). However, evidence for this hypothesis is currently lacking.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of CS in patients with HS compared with sex- and age-matched controls.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cross-sectional, survey-based, case-control study conducted from February to November 2020 that included all consecutive adult patients with HS attending the outpatient clinic of the Department of Dermatology of the Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Age- and sex-matched controls without chronic inflammatory dermatologic diseases were recruited from the same department.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score (ranging from 0-100) as a screening tool for presence of CS. Based on current literature, a score of 40 or higher was deemed to indicate the presence of CS.

Results

Overall, 100 patients with HS (median [IQR] age, 34.5 [27.3-47.0] years; 71 [71%] female) and 100 controls (median [IQR] age, 33.5 [27.0-48.8] years; 71 [71%] female) were included, of which 36% and 12%, respectively, had a CSI score of 40 or higher (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients with HS had 4.46 (95% CI, 1.89-10.52; P = .001) times the odds of having a positive CSI compared with controls. In addition, CS was significantly associated with previously diagnosed depression (odds ratio, 6.16; 95% CI, 2.81-13.54; P < .001). No association between CSI score and disease severity was found.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional, case-control study, patients with HS had more than 4 times the odds of having CS, indicated by a positive CSI, compared with age- and sex-matched controls. This new insight in the presence of CS in patients with HS raises the question of whether we are adequately measuring and treating HS-associated pain. Active screening for CS and depressive symptoms in patients with a discrepant pain experience is recommended.