Tedisamil: a new novel antiarrhythmic

Cardiac ion channels and mechanisms for protection against atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognised as the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. Ongoing drug development is aiming at obtaining atrial specific effects in order to prevent pro-arrhythmic, devastating ventricular effects. In principle, this is possible due to a different ion channel composition in the atria and ventricles. The present text will review the aetiology of arrhythmias with focus on AF and include a description of cardiac ion channels. Channels that constitute potentially atria-selective targets will be described in details. Specific focus is addressed to the recent discovery that Ca(2+)-activated small conductance K(+) channels (SK channels) are important for the repolarisation of atrial action potentials. Finally, an overview of current pharmacological treatment of AF is included.

Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation: update on anticoagulation and invasive management strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Its increasing prevalence, particularly among the elderly, renders it one of the most serious current medical epidemics. Several management questions confront the clinician treating a patient with AF: Should the condition be treated? Is the patient at risk of death or serious morbidity as a result of this diagnosis? If treatment is necessary, is rate control or rhythm control superior? Which patients need anticoagulation therapy, and for how long? This review of articles obtained by a search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases presents the available evidence that can guide the clinician in answering these questions. After discussing the merits of available therapy, including medications aimed at controlling rate, rhythm, or both, we focus on the present status of ablative therapy for AF. Catheter ablation, particularly targeting the pulmonary veins, is being increasingly performed, although the precise indications for this approach and its effectiveness and safety are being actively investigated. We briefly discuss other invasive options that are less frequently used, such as pacemakers, defibrillators, left atrial appendage closure devices, and the surgical maze procedure.

New antiarrhythmic treatment of atrial fibrillation

Antiarrhythmic pharmaceutical development for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is moving in several directions. The efficacy of existing drugs, such as carvedilol, for rate control and, possibly, suppression of AF, is more appreciated. Efforts are being made to modify existing agents, such as amiodarone, in an attempt to ameliorate safety and adverse effect concerns. This has resulted in promising data from the deiodinated amiodarone analog, dronedarone, and further work with celivarone and ATI-2042. In an attempt to minimize ventricular proarrhythmia, atrial selective drugs, such as intravenous vernakalant, have demonstrated efficacy in terminating AF in addition to promising data in suppression recurrences when used orally. Several other atrial selective drugs are being developed by multiple manufacturers. Other novel therapeutic mechanisms, such as drugs that enhance GAP junction conduction, are being developed to achieve more effective drug therapy than is offered by existing compounds. Finally, nonantiarrhythmic drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, high-mobility group coenzyme A enzyme inhibitors and omega-3 fatty acids/fish oil, appear to have a role in suppressing AF in certain patient subtypes. Future studies will clarify the role of these drugs in treating AF.

Experimental therapy of genetic arrhythmias: disease-specific pharmacology

The integration between molecular biology and clinical practice requires the achievement of fundamental steps to link basic science to diagnosis and management of patients. In the last decade, the study of genetic bases of human diseases has achieved several milestones, and it is now possible to apply the knowledge that stems from the identification of the genetic substrate of diseases to clinical practice. The first step along the process of linking molecular biology to clinical medicine is the identification of the genetic bases of inherited diseases. After this important goal is achieved, it becomes possible to extend research to understand the functional impairments of mutant protein(s) and to link them to clinical manifestations (genotype-phenotype correlation). In genetically heterogeneous diseases, it may be possible to identify locus-specific risk stratification and management algorithms. Finally, the most ambitious step in the study of genetic disease is to discover a novel pharmacological therapy targeted at correcting the inborn defect (locus-specific therapy) or even to "cure" the DNA abnormality by replacing the defective gene with gene therapy. At present, this curative goal has been successful only for very few diseases. In the field of inherited arrhythmogenic diseases, several genes have been discovered, and genetics is now emerging as a source of information contributing not only to a better diagnosis but also to risk stratification and management of patients. The functional characterization of mutant proteins has opened new perspectives about the possibility of performing gene-specific or mutation-specific therapy. In this chapter, we will briefly summarize the genetic bases of inherited arrhythmogenic conditions and we will point out how the information derived from molecular genetics has influenced the "optimal use of traditional therapies" and has paved the way to the development of gene-specific therapy.

Gene-specific therapy for inherited arrhythmogenic diseases

In the last few years, major advancement has been made in the understanding of the genetic basis of inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. Interestingly, the information obtained with the application of molecular genetics to these diseases is now influencing their clinical management, allowing gene-specific risk stratification and gene-specific management. The first attempt for a gene-specific therapy was made in 1995 with the use of mexiletine in long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients with mutations in the SCN5A gene. Since then, several investigators have proposed novel therapeutic approaches based on the identification of the functional consequences of genetic mutations. In some instances, these novel therapies have already been introduced in clinical practice, and data are being collected to establish their long-term efficacy. In this review, we will summarize the current understanding of the molecular bases of inherited arrhythmias, with a specific focus toward discussing the most recent advancements toward the development of gene-specific therapies.