Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension

Do antihypertensive medications have an effect on dental implants? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical outcomes of dental implants in users of antihypertensive medication with those of nonusers.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under the number CRD42022319336. The electronic databases Medline (PubMed) and Central Cochrane were searched for relevant scientific literature published in English through May 2022. The focused question was, "Do patients taking antihypertensive medications have a similar impact on the clinical outcome and survival of dental implants compared with nonusers?".

RESULTS

A total of 49 articles were found, of which 3 articles were finally selected for a qualitative synthesis. The three studies included 959 patients. In all three studies, the commonly used medication was renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. Two studies mentioned implant survival rate, which was 99.4% in antihypertensive medication users and 96.1% in the nonusers. One study found a higher implant stability quotient (ISQ) in patients taking antihypertensive medication (75.7 ± 5.9) compared with patients not taking antihypertensive medication (73.7 ± 8.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The limited available evidence showed that patient taking antihypertensive medications had comparable success rate and implant stability to patients not taking medications. The studies included patients taking different antihypertensive medications, so a drug-specific conclusion regarding the clinical outcome of dental implants is not possible. Further studies are needed, including patients taking certain antihypertensive medications, to determine their effects on dental implants.

Effect of the structural modification of Candesartan with Zinc on hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy

Hypertension is the most common cause of left ventricular hypertrophy, contributing to heart failure progression. Candesartan (Cand) is an angiotensin receptor antagonist widely used for hypertension treatment. Structural modifications were previously performed by our group using Zinc (ZnCand) as a strategy for improving its pharmacological properties. The measurements showed that ZnCand exerts a stronger interaction with the angiotensin II receptor, type 1 (AT1 receptor), reducing oxidative stress and intracellular calcium flux, a mechanism implied in cell contraction. These results were accompanied by the reduction of the contractile capacity of mesangial cells. In vivo experiments showed that the complex causes a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The reduction of heart hypertrophy was evidenced by echocardiography, the histologic cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes, collagen content, the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) marker and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and the matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) expression. Besides, the complex restored the redox status. In this study, we demonstrated that the complexation with Zn(II) improves the antihypertensive and cardiac effects of the parental drug.

Effect of Soluplus® on γ-cyclodextrin solubilization of irbesartan and candesartan and their nanoaggregates formation

The poor aqueous solubility of irbesartan (IRB) and candesartan cilexetil (CAC) may hamper their bioavailability when orally or topically administered. Among several attempts, the promising nanoaggregate formation by γ-cyclodextrin (γCD) complexation of drugs in aqueous solution with or without water-soluble polymers was investigated. According to phase solubility studies, Soluplus® showed the highest complexation efficiency (CE) of drug/γCD complexes among the polymers tested. The aqueous solubility of IRB and CAC was markedly increased as a function of Soluplus^® concentrations. The binary drug/γCD and ternary drug/γCD/Soluplus^® complex formations were supported and confirmed by solid-state characterizations, including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The true inclusion mode was also proved by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H-NMR) spectroscopy. The nanoaggregate size and morphology of binary and ternary systems were observed using dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. The size of these nanocarriers depends on the concentration of Soluplus^®. The use of Soluplus^® could significantly enhance drug solubility and stabilize complex nanoaggregates, which could be a prospective platform for drug delivery systems.

Simultaneous Determination of Nitrite and Azide Ions in Valsartan

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish an ion chromatography for the simultaneous determination of nitrite and azide ions in valsartan.

METHODS

Dionex IonpacAG18 (4 × 50 mm2) and Dionex IonpacAS18 (4 × 250 mm2) were used as the 2D guard column and analytical column, respectively. Dionex AMGTMC18 (4 × 30 mm2) was used as a 1D pre-separation column and Dionex UTAC-ULP1 as the concentration column. KOH solution generated by an online eluent generator (EG) was used as the 2D mobile phase, and gradient elution was performed at 1 mL/min. Water and acetonitrile were used as 1D mobile phase, and gradient elution was performed at 0.5 mL/min. Suppressed conductivity detector (suppressor, ASRS 300 4 mm) was used for detection. The column temperature was 30°C, while that of the detector was 35°C.

RESULTS

This method showed satisfactory reproducibility and recovery. The linear range and the correlation coefficient for both nitrite and azide ions were 0.01-0.2 mg/L and 0.9998, respectively. However, the recovery rate was 85-115% for nitrite and 90-110% for azide ions.

CONCLUSION

This method was suitable for the simultaneous determination of nitrite and azide ions in valsartan and other sartan drugs.

Losartan improves alveolar bone dynamics in normotensive rats but not in hypertensive rats

Hypertension is one of the main causes of premature death in the world; also, it is associated with several bone alterations. Preclinical studies have demonstrated delayed alveolar bone healing in hypertensive rats. However, losartan has been favorable for consolidation of bone grafts and reduction in active periodontitis. Therefore, losartan is suggested to be effective in bone formation stages, as well as in the synthesis of matrix proteins and mineralization.

Clinical and economic outcomes associated with amlodipine/renin–angiotensin system blocker combinations

Objectives:

Since treatment regimen type can influence adherence and other outcomes, this study examined adherence, cardiovascular events, and economic outcomes in patients with hypertension treated with fixed-dose combination (FDC) amlodipine/olmesartan (AML/OM), FDC AML/benazepril (AML/BEN), and loose-dose combination AML plus angiotensin II receptor blockers (LDC AML/ARBs).

Methods:

Commercial health plan enrolees aged at least 18 years with index claim(s) for AML/OM, AML/BEN, or LDC AML/ARB were identified. Absence of study drug 6 months pre index, and continuous enrolment for at least 12 months post index were required. Descriptive analyses were executed to make comparisons between treatments, as well as multivariate models adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including propensity for assignment to study drug.

Results:

Descriptive results suggested mean follow-up adherence was higher in the AML/OM cohort [proportion of days covered (PDC) = 0.63] compared with the AML/BEN (PDC = 0.55; p < 0.001) and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (PDC = 0.34; p < 0.001). The proportion of individuals with an incident follow-up cardiovascular event composite was lower in the AML/OM cohort versus the AML/BEN and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (5.94% versus 7.85% and 16.89% respectively). Adjusted Cox models suggested that patients initiated on LDC AML/ARB (hazard ratio 1.35; p < 0.001), but not on AML/BEN, were at greater risk of a follow-up cardiovascular event (composite) compared with AML/OM. Adjusted generalized linear models suggested that mean follow-up per-member-per-month overall costs were higher in the AML/BEN (cost ratio = 1.169; p < 0.001; unadjusted mean cost US$780) and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (cost ratio = 1.286; p < 0.001; unadjusted mean cost US$1394) compared with the AML/OM cohort (unadjusted mean cost US$740).

Conclusion:

The results suggested that treatment with FDC AML/OM was associated with greater likelihood of adherence and lower overall costs than with FDC AML/BEN and LDC AML/ARB, and lower risk of cardiovascular event composite versus LDC AML/ARB.

Angiotensin receptor blocker and dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker combinations: an emerging strategy in hypertension therapy

Hypertension is a leading contributor to the burden of cardiovascular disease. The importance of lowering blood pressure (BP) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events has been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Most patients require combination antihypertensive therapy utilizing agents from complementary drug classes to achieve BP goals. A calcium channel blocker (CCB)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combination is a rational approach for such an antihypertensive strategy. Benefits of CCB/ARB combination therapy include additive BP-lowering effects and lower incidences of adverse events (AEs). These agents demonstrate benefits associated with their respective drug classes. The ARBs confer stroke protection, renal protection, and tolerability similar to placebo, without dose-related symptomatic and metabolic AEs, while CCBs are beneficial in reducing stroke and treating angina and cardiac ischemia. The efficacy of this combination has been recently investigated in clinical trials wherein amlodipine was combined with olmesartan medoxomil or valsartan. This article discusses the rationale for using CCB/ARB combinations in patients with hypertension.

Prescribing patterns in hypertension: the emerging role of fixed-dose combinations for attaining BP goals in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

The attainment of clinical blood pressure (BP) goals can markedly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet approximately two-thirds of treated hypertensive patients in the United States have uncontrolled BP. Consequently, more aggressive management of hypertension, frequently involving combination therapy (e.g., fixed-dose combination [FDC] therapy), is needed to achieve the recommended BP goals of <140/90 mmHg for most patients, and <130/80 mmHg for high-risk patients.

SCOPE

This article, based on data from an extensive Medline search ('hypertension' AND 'prescribe', 'prescribing' OR 'prescription', date range: 1995-2007), focuses on prescribing patterns for antihypertensive medication, and on the emerging role of combination therapy, specifically FDC therapy, in treating hypertensive patients to target BP levels.

FINDINGS

Although the use of antihypertensive combination therapy has increased substantially in US adults over the last 20 years, such therapy remains considerably underutilized. Numerous studies have shown that combination therapies, including FDCs, can markedly reduce BP and adverse events relative to monotherapies, and this paper overviews data for various combination therapies: angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) + diuretic; angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor + diuretic; calcium-channel blocker (CCB) + ACE inhibitor; and CCB + ARB. Specifically, fixed-dose CCB/ARB combinations of amlodipine with losartan, valsartan, or olmesartan medoxomil have recently been developed, and combination therapy schedules of amlodipine plus one of these ARBs have shown greater BP-lowering efficacy compared with the constituent monotherapies. Furthermore, in two large studies in a total of >3000 patients, CCB + ARB combination therapy was associated with significantly lower incidences of headache and peripheral edema than CCB monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for hypertension management clearly support the greater use of multidrug therapy, especially in high-risk patients. FDCs (e.g., various emerging CCB/ARB combinations) are a valuable option for such high-risk patients, as these combinations offer the potential to reduce adverse events, increase compliance, lower treatment costs, and improve BP goal-attainment rates.

Influence of angiotensin II receptors blocking on overall left ventricle's performance of patients with acute myocardial infarction of limited extent. Echocardiographic assessment

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies documented the beneficial effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) combined with left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction. The present study intended to assess the impact of the ARB irbesartan, on the overall LV performance in pts with uncomplicated AMI of limited extent.

METHODS

Forty consecutive pts with first inferior AMI (AMI-I) and preserved LV-systolic function were enrolled. They were allocated into two groups: (a) 20 pts received the conventional treatment of AMI-I and placebo (CT) and (b) 20 pts administered irbesartan additionally to the conventional treatment (IR). Twenty four healthy individuals of matching age and sex were recruited as control group (CG). Complete echocardiographic examination, Tei index of overall LV function and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured on the 8th post-infarct day.

RESULTS

The Tei index of IR group (0.53+/-0.03) was significantly lower compared to that of CT group (0.78+/-0.05) (p<0.001) and was similar to that of CG (0.45+/-0.03)(p=NS). Irbesartan induced a considerable decrease in both isovolumic relaxation (115+/-7 ms vs 140+/-7 ms; p<0.01) and contraction time (52+/-2 ms vs 64+/-3 ms; p<0.01) and a significant increase in ejection time (279+/-6 ms vs 256+/-8 ms; p<0.05). SBP in pts of IR group was similar to that of CT group (112+/-3 mmHg vs 113+/-4 mmHg; p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with Irbesartan improves overall LV function of pts with AMI-I. Irbesartan leads to acceleration of the LV relaxation, which possibly indirectly ameliorates LV systolic performance too. This beneficial influence is possible attributed to a direct tissue effect of the drug and not to its hemodynamic action.

Antihypertensive therapy: special focus on drug interactions

Today, the lifetime risk of patients aged 55-65 years to receive antihypertensive drugs approaches 60%. Yet, recent trials suggest that hypertension is not adequately controlled in the majority of patients. The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age, as does the prevalence of comorbid conditions and the total number of medications taken. Multi-drug therapy, advancing age and comorbid conditions are also key risk factors for adverse drug reactions and drug interactions. In this review, the authors evaluate the most frequently used antihypertensive drugs (diuretics, beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II receptor Type 1 blockers and alpha-adrenergic blockers) with special reference to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions. As the spectrum of drugs prescribed is constantly changing, safety yesterday does not imply safety today and safety today does not imply safety tomorrow. Furthermore, therapeutic efficacy should not be neglected over concerns regarding drug interactions. Many patients are at risk of clinically relevant drug interactions involving antihypertensive drugs but, presently, even more patients may be at risk of suffering from the consequences of their inadequately treated hypertension. In this respect, the authors discuss controversial viewpoints on the overall clinical relevance of drug interactions occurring at the level of cytochrome P450 metabolism.

Angioedema of the Lips and Tongue Induced by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor. A Report of Two Cases

The following case reports describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of two patients who attended Liverpool University Dental Hospital with rapidly increasing swelling of the lips and tongue. Both patients were suffering from angioedema and were taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEI). A provisional diagnosis of ACEI-induced angioedema was made. An intramuscular injection of chlorpheniramine maleate was given to both patients and they were immediately transferred to the local accident and emergency department.

These cases illustrate the potential role of the general dental practitioner in the early recognition and management of this potentially life-threatening condition.