Adverse effects of golimumab in the treatment of rheumatologic diseases

Drug-induced herpes zoster: a pharmacovigilance analysis of FDA adverse event reports from 2004 to 2024

Background

Herpes zoster severely impacts patients' quality of life and therapeutic results. This research utilized data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to examine the prevalence and attributes of drug-induced herpes zoster.

Methods

We analyzed FAERS reports about zoster from Q1 2004 to Q3 2024 and developed a list of possible pathogenic agents. Ranked the 30 medicines with the greatest incidence of reported herpes zoster cases. Statistical disproportionality analysis was employed to identify an elevated reporting frequency of herpes zoster linked to a particular medication.

Results

Herpes zoster was referenced in 50,164 FAERS reports from 2004 to 2024. The majority of the implicated drugs were immunosuppressants. Anifrolumab exhibited the greatest ROR and PRR ratings among the drugs evaluated. Furthermore, rozanolixizumab, tozinameran, elapegademase, and other medications not indicated for inducing herpes zoster were recognized, underscoring the necessity for increased clinical vigilance and awareness. Nonetheless, these correlations should be regarded with caution, as they do not establish a direct causative relationship.

Conclusion

This study underscores the need of pharmacovigilance in recognizing and comprehending drug-induced herpes zoster. Additional research is required to validate these findings and to design strategies for risk management and reduction to enhance treatment outcomes in patients.

Abatacept, Golimumab, and Sarilumab as Selected Bio-Originator Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Diverse Mechanisms of Action in Their Current Use in Treatment

Background/Objectives: Arthritis encompasses a range of joint-related conditions, including osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, along with inflammatory diseases such as gout and lupus. This research study explores the underlying causes, challenges, and treatment options for arthritis, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of therapies. Methods: This research study evaluated current treatment strategies and examined the effectiveness of selected biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), i.e., abatacept, golimumab, and sarilumab, with a focus on emerging drug classes and their distinct mechanisms of action. Results: Biologic DMARDs like abatacept, golimumab, and sarilumab offer hopeful treatment alternatives for patients who fail to respond to conventional therapies. However, individual outcomes differ because of the disease's complexity and the influence of accompanying health conditions. Conclusions: Treating arthritis continues to be challenging due to its numerous underlying causes and the varied ways in which patients respond to treatment. Although biologics and targeted therapies have brought progress, additional research is needed to identify new treatment targets and enhance patient results.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients With Early and Late Disease Through One Year of the GO-ALIVE Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) golimumab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with early disease (ED) versus late disease (LD).

METHODS

The phase 3, double-blind, GO-ALIVE study randomized patients to IV golimumab 2 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 4 and then every 8 weeks through week 52, or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 12 with crossover to IV golimumab at week 16. Clinical efficacy was assessed by ≥20% improvement in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria (ASAS20), ≥50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI 50), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3 (inactive disease). Using self-reported duration of inflammatory back pain (IBP), patients were grouped into quartiles: first = ED and fourth = LD. Descriptive statistics summarized efficacy and safety findings through 1 year.

RESULTS

Early disease patients (n = 60) were ~10 years younger and had shorter median AS (IBP) symptom duration (2-3 years) versus LD patients (n = 52; 21-24 years). At week 16, numerically higher proportions of golimumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved ASAS20 (ED: 71% vs. 32%; LD: 67% vs. 21%), BASDAI 50 (ED: 40% vs. 12%; LD: 33% vs. 7%), and ASDAS <1.3 (ED: 17% vs. 4%; LD 8% vs. 0%) regardless of IBP duration. Efficacy was durable through 1 year of treatment; however, response rates were numerically higher in patients with ED versus LD. Through week 60, adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, were reported by 46% and 3% of ED patients and 61% and 2% of LD patients.

CONCLUSION

Prompt diagnosis of AS and early treatment with IV golimumab may yield more robust improvements in disease activity.

Autophagy: A new concept in autoimmunity regulation and a novel therapeutic option

Nowadays, pharmacologic treatments of autoinflammatory diseases are largely palliative rather than curative. Most of them result in non-specific immunosuppression, which can be associated with broad disruption of natural and induced immunity with significant and sometimes serious unwanted injuries. Among the novel strategies that are under development, tools that modulate the immune system to restore normal tolerance mechanisms are central. In these approaches, peptide therapeutics constitute a class of agents that display many physicochemical advantages. Within this class of potent drugs, the phosphopeptide P140 is very promising for treating patients with lupus, and likely also patients with other chronic inflammatory diseases. We discovered that P140 targets autophagy, a finely orchestrated catabolic process, involved in the regulation of inflammation and in the biology of immune cells. In vitro, P140 acts directly on a particular form of autophagy called chaperone-mediated autophagy, which seems to be hyperactivated in certain subsets of lymphocytes in lupus and in other autoinflammatory settings. In lupus, the "correcting" effect of P140 on autophagy results in a weaker signaling of autoreactive T cells, leading to a significant improvement of pathophysiological status of treated mice. These findings also demonstrated ex vivo in human cells, open novel avenues of therapeutic intervention in pathological conditions, in which specific and not general targeting is highly pursued in the context of the new action plans for personalized medicines.