Alogliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a drug safety evaluation

Changes in clinical trials of endocrine disorder and metabolism and nutrition disorder drugs in mainland China over 2010-2019

With the improvements in relevant policies, laws, and regulations regarding drug clinical trials in China, the quantity and quality of drug clinical trials have gradually improved, and the development prospects of drug clinical trials for endocrine disorders and metabolism and nutrition disorders are promising. Based on information from the clinical trials from the online drug clinical trial registration platform of the National Medical Products Administration, we aimed to review and evaluate the development of clinical trials of drugs for endocrine disorders and metabolism and nutrition disorders in mainland China from 2010 to 2019, as well as the trends over time. A total of 861 trials were carried out on 254 types of drugs for endocrine disorders and metabolism and nutrition disorders, among which 531 (61.67%) involved endocrine disorders, and 330 (38.33%) addressed metabolism and nutrition disorders. The annual number of clinical trials has been increasing gradually, with a significant increase in 2017. Among them, the proportion of clinical trials with Chinese epidemiological characteristics was relatively large (Wu, Annual Report on Development Health Management and Health Industry in China, 2018). The largest number of trials were for diabetes drugs (55.63%), followed by trials of drugs for hyperlipidemia (19.4%) and those for hyperuricemia (7.9%). It was found that the geographical area of the leading units also showed obvious unevenness according to the analysis of the test unit data. Based on the statistics and evaluation of the data, comprehensive information is provided to support the cooperation of global pharmaceutical R&D companies and research units in China and the development of international multicenter clinical trials in China. This work additionally provides clinical trial units with a self‐evaluation of scientific research competitiveness and hospital development strategies. At the same time, it provides a reference with basic data for sponsors and stakeholders in these trials to determine their development strategy goals.

An up-to-date evaluation of alogliptin benzoate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Introduction: A growth in the market for anti-diabetic drugs, along with an ever-increasing population suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), requires a critical re-evaluation of anti-diabetic drugs used for a long time, in order to provide up-to-date practical prescribing information for clinicians. Alogliptin benzoate was firstly approved in 2010 in Japan for T2DM, both as a monotherapy or in combination with other anti-diabetic drugs. Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest data on alogliptin benzoate, including hypoglycemic activity and safety. Expert opinion: The cumulative evidence for alogliptin benzoate is robust with regards to glycemic efficacy and safety. Low hypoglycemia risks and weight changes support its consideration as a first-line medication for T2DM, either as a monotherapy or in combination therapy with other anti-diabetic drugs such as metformin. Ongoing trials will look to better analyze and address its safety and efficacy in pediatric patients and expand our clinical knowledge of this medication.

Protective effects of alogliptin against TNF-α-induced degradation of extracellular matrix in human chondrocytes

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common debilitating disease most prevalent among the elderly population worldwide. Excessive degradation of the articular extracellular matrix is a pivotal event in the development of OA. Preventative treatments against the destruction of type II collagen and aggrecan, the two main components of the articular extracellular matrix, may serve as a novel therapy against the progression of OA. In the current study, we investigated whether the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin could prevent degradation of the articular extracellular matrix in human primary chondrocytes. Pretreatment with alogliptin successfully prevented degradation of type II collagen and aggrecan in a dose-dependent manner by reducing increased expression of MMP-1, -3, and -13 as well as ADAMTS-4 and -5 induced by treatment with TNF-α. Furthermore, pretreatment with alogliptin also reduced TNF-α-induced expression of IKKα/β, IκBα and NF-κB in human primary chondrocytes. This suggests that DPP-4 inhibitors such as alogliptin may be used as an effective preventative therapy against continued destruction of the articular extracellular matrix in OA.

The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on bone fracture among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

The association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), a class of anti-diabetes, and bone fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of DPP-4is on bone fracture in T2DM patients.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through April 28th, 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DPP-4is with placebo or other anti-diabetes in T2DM patients. RCTs lasting more than 12 weeks and having data on bone fracture were included. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and network meta-analysis (NMA) to supplement direct comparisons. Predictive interval plot and node-splitting method were used to evaluate the heterogeneity and inconsistency for NMA, while the funnel plot was applied to explore publication bias. Besides, study quality was assessed according to Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

We identified 75 RCTs with a total of 70,207 patients and 11 treatments: interventions included 5 DPP-4is (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, vildagliptin), while controls included placebo and 5 other anti-diabetes (sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, metformin, thiazolidinediones, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors). In the NMA, the risk of fracture for alogliptin tended to decrease when versus placebo (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.88). Besides, aloglitpin had a lower risk compared with linagliptin (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.99) and saxagliption (OR, 0.46; 95%CI, 0.25 to 0.84); the risk was higher with saxagliptin when versus sitagliptin (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.47) and sulfonylureas (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.71). In the direct pairwise meta-analysis, alogliptin was associated with a non-significant tendency to reduction of bone fracture compared with placebo (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.01). Ranking probability analysis indicated alogliptin decreased the risk of bone fracture most with a probability of 76.3%.

CONCLUSION

Alogliptin may be associated with a lower risk of bone fracture compared with placebo, linagliptin, or saxagliptin, while other anti-diabetes did not seem to have an association with the risk of bone fracture.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and risk of arthralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration has warned that treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors may promote serious arthralgia. However, the clinical evidence for this is relatively lacking.

OBJECTIVE

For this reason, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were carried out to determine the relationship between DPP-4 inhibitors and risk of arthralgia, and also to investigate any potential risk factors.

METHODS

An extensive electronic search for RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors with any comparators was performed up to July 2016. Outcomes of interest were overall and serious arthralgia. Summary risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 67 RCTs (involving 79,110 patients) was ultimately included. Pooled results showed that DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a slightly but significantly increased risk of overall arthralgia (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.22; P=0.003) and a non-significant increased risk of serious arthralgia (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.83-2.51; P=0.20). Also, subgroup analyses showed that add-on/combination therapy and longer diabetes duration (>5years) were possible factors associated with the increased risk of overall arthralgia.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors can increase the risk of arthralgia. Thus, the benefits of glycaemic control must be weighed against the risk of arthralgia when prescribing DPP-4 inhibitors. Further studies are now needed to identify and confirm these risk factors.