Developing a Scale to Measure Interprofessional Collaboration in HIV Prevention and Care: Implications for Research on Patient Access and Retention in the HIV Continuum of Care

Examining Interprofessional Collaboration across case managers, peer educators, and counselors in New York City

Many individuals who are vulnerable to HIV infection and People Living with HIV (PLWH) experience fragmented prevention and care. Prevention and care service integration, pivotal for the HIV care continuum, depends on relationships among service providers and agencies offering HIV services. Case managers, counselors, and peer educators often work together to provide integrated services through interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in HIV prevention and care. Although these providers have distinct job titles, they typically offer complementary services on the HIV care continuum. To better train and allocate professional development resources for these providers, research is needed to assess the overall differences between provider-type and their demographics, intrapersonal factors, and job characteristics most likely to predict IPC engagement. We administered a cross-sectional survey to 75 counselors, 80 peer educators, and 112 case managers in 36 agencies in New York City. We performed a series of linear mixed effects models. Most of the HIV-service providers identified as Black and female and had been working for their agencies for less than a year. Knowledge and skills, self-efficacy, understanding of the community, and greater work hours (> 35 hours) were significant predictors of endorsement of IPC. Peer educators compared to case managers were more likely to reflect on the process as they provide myriad services. Eliciting perspectives from providers allows us to explore interventions, both intra-agency (trainings, greater exposure to collaborative initiatives, and supervision) and interagency (retention programs and websites promoting provider collaboration), that could facilitate IPC engagement and integrated services across the HIV care continuum.

Interprofessional collaboration improves linkages to primary care: a longitudinal analysis

The first steps of the HIV care continuum include patients finding access to HIV testing and primary care. Psychosocial providers ("providers"), such as social workers, health educators, and outreach workers comprise a workforce tasked with linking patients to HIV testing and primary care. This study examines longitudinal associations between provider- and organization-level factors and linkage to HIV testing and primary care. The sample included 245 providers in 36 agencies in New York City. We used longitudinal data (baseline and 12- and 24-months follow-ups) and multilevel ordinal logistic regression to examine associations between factors distributed in three theoretical socioecological domains: individual (demographic and HIV training characteristics); relationship (interprofessional collaboration); and agency (size and capacity), and frequency of HIV testing and primary care linkages. Approximately 30% of providers linked 20 or more patients to HIV testing or HIV primary care in the previous six months. Providers' higher endorsement of interprofessional collaboration at 12 months, formal HIV training, younger age, and Latinx ethnicity had higher odds of making more linkages to HIV testing and HIV primary care at 24 months. Training providers in interprofessional collaboration principles and practice and basic HIV knowledge may improve the frequency of linkages to HIV care continuum services.

Interprofessional Collaboration Improves the Odds of Educating Patients About PrEP over Time

BACKGROUND

Low levels of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake continue among the most vulnerable (e.g., men who have sex with men) for HIV exposure in the USA. Providers of social and public health services ("psychosocial providers") can help improve this situation by educating patients about PrEP before linking them to primary care providers (PCPs).

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of psychosocial providers offering PrEP education to patients vulnerable to HIV infection by determining the frequency with which psychosocial providers offer PrEP education to patients.

DESIGN

Longitudinal overview of PrEP implementation in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

Psychosocial providers of HIV prevention and adjunct treatment services, such as medication adherence counseling in 34 community settings.

MAIN MEASURES

Longitudinal survey data collected in 2014-2016 (baseline) and 2015-2017 (1-year follow-up) from a 5-year longitudinal repeated measures study. Logistic regression modeling tested associations between baseline psychosocial provider-level and organization-level characteristics and frequency of PrEP education at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

KEY RESULTS

Out of 245 participants, the number of psychosocial providers offering PrEP education at least once in the past 6 months increased significantly from baseline (n = 127, 51.8%) to 1-year follow-up (n = 161, 65.7%). Participants with higher odds of offering PrEP education at baseline and at one1-year follow-up were more likely to have reported high levels of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and were also more likely to have received formal HIV prevention training.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IPC and HIV training are predictive of PrEP education, and this association was maintained over time. We recommend expanding educational outreach efforts to psychosocial providers to further improve PrEP education and also training in interprofessional collaboration. This is an important first step toward linking patients to PCPs who prescribe PrEP and may help improve PrEP uptake.