A Role for Second Messengers in Axodendritic Neuronal Polarity

Binding-induced lipid domains: Peptide-membrane interactions with PIP2 and PS

Cell signaling is an important process involving complex interactions between lipids and proteins. The myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) has been established as a key signaling regulator, serving a range of biological roles. Its effector domain (ED), which anchors the protein to the plasma membrane, induces domain formation in membranes containing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and phosphatidylserine (PS). The mechanisms governing the MARCKS-ED binding to membranes remain elusive. Here, we investigate the composition-dependent affinity and MARCKS-ED-binding-induced changes in interfacial environments using two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy and fluorescence anisotropy. Both negatively charged lipids facilitate the MARCKS-ED binding to lipid vesicles. Although the hydrogen-bonding structure at the lipid-water interface remains comparable across vesicles with varied lipid compositions, the dynamics of interfacial water show divergent patterns due to specific interactions between lipids and peptides. Our findings also reveal that PIP2 becomes sequestered by bound peptides, while the distribution of PS exhibits no discernible change upon peptide binding. Interestingly, PIP2 and PS become colocalized into domains both in the presence and absence of MARCKS-ED. More broadly, this work offers molecular insights into the effects of membrane composition on binding.

Phosphodiesterase and psychiatric disorders: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) have been associated with psychiatric disorders in observational studies; however, the causality of associations remains unestablished.

METHODS

Specifically, cyclic nucleotide PDEs were collected from genome-wide association studies (GWASs), including PDEs obtained by hydrolyzing both cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) (PDE1A, PDE2A, and PDE3A), specific to cGMP (PDE5A, PDE6D, and PDE9A) and cAMP (PDE4D and PDE7A). We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the relationship between PDEs and nine psychiatric disorders. The inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) method, MR-Egger, and weighted median were used to estimate causal effects. The Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR Steiger test, leave-one-out analyses, funnel plot, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) were used for sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The PDEs specific to cAMP were associated with higher-odds psychiatric disorders. For example, PDE4D and schizophrenia (SCZ) (odds ratios (OR) = 1.0531, PIVW = 0.0414), as well as major depressive disorder (MDD) (OR = 1.0329, PIVW = 0.0011). Similarly, PDE7A was associated with higher odds of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (OR = 1.0861, PIVW = 0.0038). Exploring specific PDE subtypes and increase intracellular cAMP levels can inform the development of targeted interventions. We also observed PDEs (which hydrolyzes both cAMP and cGMP) was associated with psychiatric disorders [OR of PDE1A was 1.0836 for autism spectrum disorder; OR of PDE2A was 0.8968 for Tourette syndrome (TS) and 0.9449 for SCZ; and OR of PDE3A was 0.9796 for MDD; P < 0.05]. Furthermore, psychiatric disorders also had some causal effects on PDEs [obsessive-compulsive disorder on increased PDE6D and decreased PDE2A and PDE4D; anorexia nervosa on decreased PDE9A]. The results of MR were found to be robust using multiple sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, potential causal relationships between plasma PDE proteins and psychiatric disorders were established. Exploring other PDE subtypes not included in this study could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of PDEs in psychiatric disorders. The development of specific medications targeting PDE subtypes may be a promising therapeutic approach for treating psychiatric disorders.