Phase-Dependent Interactions in Visual Cortex to Combinations of First- and Second-Order Stimuli

Luminance texture boundaries and luminance step boundaries are segmented using different mechanisms

In natural scenes, two adjacent surfaces may differ in mean luminance without any sharp change in luminance at their boundary, but rather due to different relative proportions of light and dark regions within each surface. We refer to such boundaries as luminance texture boundaries (LTBs), and in this study we investigate whether LTBs are segmented using different mechanisms than luminance step boundaries (LSBs). We develop a novel method to generate luminance texture boundaries from natural uniform textures, and using these natural LTB stimuli in a boundary segmentation task, we find that observers are much more sensitive to identical luminance differences which are defined by textures (LTBs) than by uniform luminance steps (LSBs), consistent with the possibility of different mechanisms. In a second and third set of experiments, we characterize observer performance segmenting natural LTBs in the presence of masking LSBs which observers are instructed to ignore. We show that there is very little effect of masking LSBs on LTB segmentation performance. Furthermore, any masking effects we find are far less than those observed in a control experiment where both the masker and target are LSBs, and far less than those predicted by a model assuming identical mechanisms. Finally, we perform a fourth set of boundary segmentation experiments using artificial LTB stimuli comprised of differing proportions of white and black dots on opposite sides of the boundary. We find that these stimuli are also highly robust to masking by supra-threshold LSBs, consistent with our results using natural stimuli, and with our earlier studies using similar stimuli. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that the visual system contains mechanisms well suited to detecting surface boundaries that are robust to interference from luminance differences arising from luminance steps like those formed by cast shadows.

Segmenting surface boundaries using luminance cues

Segmenting scenes into distinct surfaces is a basic visual perception task, and luminance differences between adjacent surfaces often provide an important segmentation cue. However, mean luminance differences between two surfaces may exist without any sharp change in albedo at their boundary, but rather from differences in the proportion of small light and dark areas within each surface, e.g. texture elements, which we refer to as a luminance texture boundary. Here we investigate the performance of human observers segmenting luminance texture boundaries. We demonstrate that a simple model involving a single stage of filtering cannot explain observer performance, unless it incorporates contrast normalization. Performing additional experiments in which observers segment luminance texture boundaries while ignoring super-imposed luminance step boundaries, we demonstrate that the one-stage model, even with contrast normalization, cannot explain performance. We then present a Filter–Rectify–Filter model positing two cascaded stages of filtering, which fits our data well, and explains observers' ability to segment luminance texture boundary stimuli in the presence of interfering luminance step boundaries. We propose that such computations may be useful for boundary segmentation in natural scenes, where shadows often give rise to luminance step edges which do not correspond to surface boundaries.

Modeling second-order boundary perception: A machine learning approach

Visual pattern detection and discrimination are essential first steps for scene analysis. Numerous human psychophysical studies have modeled visual pattern detection and discrimination by estimating linear templates for classifying noisy stimuli defined by spatial variations in pixel intensities. However, such methods are poorly suited to understanding sensory processing mechanisms for complex visual stimuli such as second-order boundaries defined by spatial differences in contrast or texture. We introduce a novel machine learning framework for modeling human perception of second-order visual stimuli, using image-computable hierarchical neural network models fit directly to psychophysical trial data. This framework is applied to modeling visual processing of boundaries defined by differences in the contrast of a carrier texture pattern, in two different psychophysical tasks: (1) boundary orientation identification, and (2) fine orientation discrimination. Cross-validation analysis is employed to optimize model hyper-parameters, and demonstrate that these models are able to accurately predict human performance on novel stimulus sets not used for fitting model parameters. We find that, like the ideal observer, human observers take a region-based approach to the orientation identification task, while taking an edge-based approach to the fine orientation discrimination task. How observers integrate contrast modulation across orientation channels is investigated by fitting psychophysical data with two models representing competing hypotheses, revealing a preference for a model which combines multiple orientations at the earliest possible stage. Our results suggest that this machine learning approach has much potential to advance the study of second-order visual processing, and we outline future steps towards generalizing the method to modeling visual segmentation of natural texture boundaries. This study demonstrates how machine learning methodology can be fruitfully applied to psychophysical studies of second-order visual processing.

Many naturally occurring visual boundaries are defined by spatial differences in features other than luminance, for example by differences in texture or contrast. Quantitative models of such “second-order” boundary perception cannot be estimated using the standard regression techniques (known as “classification images”) commonly applied to “first-order”, luminance-defined stimuli. Here we present a novel machine learning approach to modeling second-order boundary perception using hierarchical neural networks. In contrast to previous quantitative studies of second-order boundary perception, we directly estimate network model parameters using psychophysical trial data. We demonstrate that our method can reveal different spatial summation strategies that human observers utilize for different kinds of second-order boundary perception tasks, and can be used to compare competing hypotheses of how contrast modulation is integrated across orientation channels. We outline extensions of the methodology to other kinds of second-order boundaries, including those in natural images.

Nonlinear Y-Like Receptive Fields in the Early Visual Cortex: An Intermediate Stage for Building Cue-Invariant Receptive Fields from Subcortical Y Cells

Many of the neurons in early visual cortex are selective for the orientation of boundaries defined by first-order cues (luminance) as well as second-order cues (contrast, texture). The neural circuit mechanism underlying this selectivity is still unclear, but some studies have proposed that it emerges from spatial nonlinearities of subcortical Y cells. To understand how inputs from the Y-cell pathway might be pooled to generate cue-invariant receptive fields, we recorded visual responses from single neurons in cat Area 18 using linear multielectrode arrays. We measured responses to drifting and contrast-reversing luminance gratings as well as contrast modulation gratings. We found that a large fraction of these neurons have nonoriented responses to gratings, similar to those of subcortical Y cells: they respond at the second harmonic (F2) to high-spatial frequency contrast-reversing gratings and at the first harmonic (F1) to low-spatial frequency drifting gratings ("Y-cell signature"). For a given neuron, spatial frequency tuning for linear (F1) and nonlinear (F2) responses is quite distinct, similar to orientation-selective cue-invariant neurons. Also, these neurons respond to contrast modulation gratings with selectivity for the carrier (texture) spatial frequency and, in some cases, orientation. Their receptive field properties suggest that they could serve as building blocks for orientation-selective cue-invariant neurons. We propose a circuit model that combines ON- and OFF-center cortical Y-like cells in an unbalanced push-pull manner to generate orientation-selective, cue-invariant receptive fields.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

A significant fraction of neurons in early visual cortex have specialized receptive fields that allow them to selectively respond to the orientation of boundaries that are invariant to the cue (luminance, contrast, texture, motion) that defines them. However, the neural mechanism to construct such versatile receptive fields remains unclear. Using multielectrode recording, we found a large fraction of neurons in early visual cortex with receptive fields not selective for orientation that have spatial nonlinearities like those of subcortical Y cells. These are strong candidates for building cue-invariant orientation-selective neurons; we present a neural circuit model that pools such neurons in an imbalanced "push-pull" manner, to generate orientation-selective cue-invariant receptive fields.