Alternative Splicing of the Flip/Flop Cassette and TARP Auxiliary Subunits Engage in a Privileged Relationship That Fine-Tunes AMPA Receptor Gating

GluA2-containing AMPA receptors form a continuum of Ca2+-permeable channels

Fast excitatory neurotransmission in the mammalian brain is mediated by cation-selective AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptors (AMPARs)1. AMPARs are critical for the learning and memory mechanisms of Hebbian plasticity2 and glutamatergic synapse homeostasis3, with recent work establishing that AMPAR missense mutations can cause autism and intellectual disability4-7. AMPARs have been grouped into two functionally distinct tetrameric assemblies based on the inclusion or exclusion of the GluA2 subunit that determines Ca2+ permeability through RNA editing8,9. GluA2-containing AMPARs are the most abundant in the central nervous system and considered to be Ca2+ impermeable10. Here we show this is not the case. Contrary to conventional understanding, GluA2-containing AMPARs form a continuum of polyamine-insensitive ion channels with varying degrees of Ca2+ permeability. Their ability to transport Ca2+ is shaped by the subunit composition of AMPAR tetramers as well as the spatial orientation of transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins and cornichon auxiliary subunits. Ca2+ crosses the ion-conduction pathway by docking to an extracellular binding site that helps funnel divalent ions into the pore selectivity filter. The dynamic range in Ca2+ permeability, however, arises because auxiliary subunits primarily modify the selectivity filter. Taken together, our work proposes a broader role for AMPARs in Ca2+ signalling in the mammalian brain and offers mechanistic insight into the pathogenic nature of missense mutations.

The impact of subunit type, alternative splicing, and auxiliary proteins on AMPA receptor trafficking

AMPA receptors underlie fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the mammalian nervous system and are critical for the expression of synaptic plasticity. Four genes encode the AMPA receptor subunits, each subject to RNA editing and alternative splicing at multiple positions. In addition, each tetrameric AMPA receptor can harbor up to four auxiliary proteins of which there are multiple types. Subunit type, alternative splicing, and auxiliary proteins are all known to affect AMPA receptor gating and trafficking. However, determining which factors dominate AMPA receptor trafficking requires high-throughput assessment of trafficking across multiple conditions. Here, we deploy two such methods to assess the relative contribution of AMPA receptor subunit type (GluA1 versus GluA2), alternative splicing (flip versus flop), and various transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) to AMPA receptor trafficking. We find that subunit type is the most important factor, with GluA2 showing a much better surface expression than GluA1, and alternative splicing plays a secondary role, with flip subunits consistently outperforming flop variants in surface expression across all conditions. Type 1 TARPs (γ2-4 and γ8) enhance surface trafficking, while Type 2 TARPs (γ5 and γ7) reduce surface expression, although we could not detect differences within each type. These data will be a helpful resource in comparing surface expression across a variety of AMPA receptor compositions. Our assays will also enable high-throughput assessment of novel disease-associated mutations, chimeras, and auxiliary and chaperone proteins.

A Gene-Expression Based Comparison of Murine and Human Inhibitory Interneurons in the Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei

Cerebellar information processing is critically shaped by several types of inhibitory interneurons forming various intra-cerebellar feed-forward and feed-back loops. Evidence gathered over the past decades has focused interest on a non-uniform set of cortical inhibitory interneurons distinct from "classical" Golgi, basket or stellate cells, summarily referred to as PLIs (for Purkinje cell layer interneurons). Similarly, cerebellar nuclear inhibitory interneurons have gained increasing attention. Our understanding of the functions of these cells is still fragmentary. For humans, we lack functional data, and even any dependable morphological classification for these cells. Here, I used publicly available single cell based gene expression data to compare inhibitory interneurons from the cerebellar cortex and inhibitory nuclear neurons of humans and mice. Integration of nuclear and cortical cells revealed transcriptomic similarities between subsets of these cells and suggest known characteristics of cortical cell types may be helpful to devise strategies for the further characterization of nuclear inhibitory interneurons. Comparison of human and murine PLIs indicate that these strongly differ by the expression of genes used to characterize these cells in mice. This limits their utility to identify and classify human PLIs, and leaves the question open as to the number and characteristics of non-Golgi inhibitory interneurons resident in the cerebellar granule cell and Purkinje cell layers in humans.

Recovery from desensitization in GluA2 AMPA receptors is affected by a single mutation in the N-terminal domain interface

AMPA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors (AMPARs) are central to various neurological processes, including memory and learning. They assemble as homo- or heterotetramers of GluA1, GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 subunits, each consisting of an N-terminal domain (NTD), a ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal domain. While AMPAR gating is primarily controlled by reconfiguration in the ligand-binding domain layer, our study focuses on the NTDs, which also influence gating, yet the underlying mechanism remains enigmatic. In this investigation, we employ molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate the NTD interface strength in GluA1, GluA2, and NTD mutants GluA2-H229N and GluA1-N222H. Our findings reveal that GluA1 has a significantly weaker NTD interface than GluA2. The NTD interface of GluA2 can be weakened by a single point mutation in the NTD dimer-of-dimer interface, namely H229N, which renders GluA2 more GluA1-like. Electrophysiology recordings demonstrate that this mutation also leads to slower recovery from desensitization. Moreover, we observe that lowering the pH induces more splayed NTD states and enhances desensitization in GluA2. We hypothesized that H229 was responsible for this pH sensitivity; however, GluA2-H229N was also affected by pH, meaning that H229 is not solely responsible and that protons exert their effect across multiple domains of the AMPAR. In summary, our work unveils an allosteric connection between the NTD interface strength and AMPAR desensitization.

GSG1L-containing AMPA receptor complexes are defined by their spatiotemporal expression, native interactome and allosteric sites

Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) and germ cell-specific gene 1-like protein (GSG1L) are claudin-type AMPA receptor (AMPAR) auxiliary subunits that profoundly regulate glutamatergic synapse strength and plasticity. While AMPAR-TARP complexes have been extensively studied, less is known about GSG1L-containing AMPARs. Here, we show that GSG1L's spatiotemporal expression, native interactome and allosteric sites are distinct. GSG1L generally expresses late during brain development in a region-specific manner, constituting about 5% of all AMPAR complexes in adulthood. While GSG1L can co-assemble with TARPs or cornichons (CNIHs), it also assembles as the sole auxiliary subunit. Unexpectedly, GSG1L acts through two discrete evolutionarily-conserved sites on the agonist-binding domain with a weak allosteric interaction at the TARP/KGK site to slow desensitization, and a stronger interaction at a different site that slows recovery from desensitization. Together, these distinctions help explain GSG1L's evolutionary past and how it fulfills a unique signaling role within glutamatergic synapses.