Hemithyroidectomy and ipsilateral central neck dissection for T1 low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: single-institution retrospective observational study

Risk staging with prophylactic unilateral central neck dissection in low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines favor thyroid lobectomy for intrathyroidal cT1bT2cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Prophylactic neck dissection (PND) is not recommended for these low-risk tumors due to the lack of high-level evidence on improvement in outcomes, but the information from PND may be used for staging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of upstaging with ipsilateral PND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with intrathyroidal unifocal cT1bT2cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma from 2008 to 2021. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy and PND. Tumors were classified as low or intermediate risk based on the information from pathological analysis of the primary tumor and then from adding the analysis of the lymph nodes. The difference between the tumor-only and the PND-added risk staging was evaluated.

RESULTS

Three hundred three patients (241 women, median age 45, median tumor size 17 mm) were included. Microscopic extrathyroidal extension was found in 23.4%, aggressive histology in 6.6%, vascular invasion in 29.3%, and lymph node metastases in 37.3%. One hundred ten patients (36.3%) were intermediate-risk based on the primary tumor. An additional 26 (8.6%) were upstaged to intermediate-risk based on the ipsilateral PND and 2% based on the contralateral PND. Kaplan-Meier 10-year event-free survival in tumors upstaged with ipsilateral PND was not statistically different from intermediate-risk tumors based on the primary tumor characteristics (92% versus 90.9%, Log Rank p = 0.943).

CONCLUSIONS

Ipsilateral PND upstaged low-risk cT1bT2cN0 patients to intermediate risk in only 8.6% of cases, and contralateral PND in an additional 2%. Routinely performing PND may not be warranted.

Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection via breast approach versus gasless transaxillary approach in treating low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective series

Hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) has been adopted as a de-escalating surgical strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two different endoscopic approaches in the treatment of PTC with hemithyroidectomy plus pCND. This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 545 patients receiving breast approach (ETBA) (n = 263) or gasless transaxillary approach (ETGTA) (n = 282) in treating PTC. Demographics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Preoperatively, the two groups were similar in demographics. Regarding surgical outcomes, no differences were found in terms of intraoperative bleeding, total amount of drainage, duration of drainage, postoperative pain, hospital stay, vocal cord palsy, hypoparathyroidism, hemorrhage, wound infection, chyle leakage, or subcutaneous ecchymosis. Conversely, ETBA recorded fewer skin paresthesia (1.5% vs. 5.0%, respectively) but longer operative times (138.1 ± 27.0 vs. 130.9 ± 30.8 min,) and more swallowing disturbances (3.4% vs. 0.7%) compared to ETGTA (p < 0.05). No difference in scar cosmetic results, but ETBA had lower neck assessment score than ETGTA (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p < 0.05). For low-risk PTC, endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus pCND using either ETBA or ETGTA is both feasible and safe. Although the two approaches are comparable in terms of most surgical and oncological outcomes, ETBA is superior to ETGTA in terms of neck cosmetic results and skin paresthesia but is associated with more swallowing disturbances and requires a longer operative time.

Pretracheal Lymph Node Subdivision in Predicting Contralateral Central Lymph Node Metastasis for Unilateral Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to assess the clinical value of pretracheal lymph node subdivision in identifying patients with contralateral central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and risk factors for occult contralateral CLNM in unilateral PTC.

METHODS

A total of 139 unilateral PTC patients with a clinically node-negative neck (cN0) who underwent bilateral central neck dissection (CND) were prospectively enrolled. Intraoperatively, the pretracheal region was further divided into ipsilateral and contralateral subregions. Ipsilateral and contralateral pretracheal lymph nodes (LNs) as well as other CLNs (prelaryngeal, ipsilateral paratracheal and contralateral paratracheal) were labeled separately and sent for pathological examination. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed to identify factors predictive of contralateral CLNM.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients, bilateral CLNM was present in 37 (26.6%) patients. Contralateral pretracheal LNM was significantly associated with contralateral CLNM. In multivariate analysis, prelaryngeal LNM (P = 0.004, odds ratio = 3.457) and contralateral pretracheal LNM (P = 0.006, odds ratio = 3.362) were identified as risk factors for contralateral CLNM. Neither neck recurrence nor distant metastasis was observed within the mean follow-up duration of 9.1 ± 1.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In most unilateral cN0 PTCs, performing ipsilateral CND is appropriate, while patients presenting with evident nodal disease intraoperatively or preoperatively in the contralateral central neck should undergo bilateral CND. Intraoperative re-evaluation of prelaryngeal and contralateral pretracheal LNs may be helpful in determining the extent of CND.