Pre-participation cardiovascular screening: is community screening using hand-held cardiac ultrasound feasible?

Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound in the pre-participation screening of athletes: the SPORT-FoCUS study

AIMS

The role of pre-participation screening (PPS) modalities in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is debated due to a high false-positive rate. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has shown higher sensitivity and specificity, but its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of FoCUS use in PPS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 2111 athletes (77.4% male, mean age 24.9 ± 15.2years) underwent standardized family and medical history collection, physical examination, resting electrocardiography (ECG), FoCUS (10 min/5 views protocol), comprehensive echocardiography and exercise stress test. We prospectively evaluated three PPS incremental models: Model A, standardized medical history and physical examination Model B, Model A plus resting and stress ECG and Model C, Model B plus FoCUS (10 min/5 views protocol). We determined their incremental diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness ratio. A total of 30 athletes were diagnosed with a cardiac condition associated with SCD: 3 were identified by Model A, 14 by Model B, and 13 athletes by Model C. The introduction of FoCUS markedly increased the sensitivity of PPS, compared with Model A and Model B (sensitivity 94% vs. 19% vs. 58% specificity 93% vs. 93% vs. 92%). The total screening costs were as follows: Model A 35.64 euros, Model B 87.68 euros, and Model C 120.89 euros. Considering the sole conditions at risk of SCD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 135.62 euros for Model B and 114.31 for Model C.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of FoCUS into the PPS allows to identify a significantly greater number of athletes at risk of SCD and markedly lowers the false negative rate. Furthermore, the incorporation of FoCUS into the screening process has shown to be cost-effective.

Results of a nationally implemented cardiac screening programme in elite cricket players in England and Wales

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the diagnostic yield and costs of an electrocardiogram-based national screening programme in elite cricket players and the incremental value of transthoracic echocardiography and periodic evaluation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2019, 1208 cricketers underwent screening with a health questionnaire, 12-lead electrocardiogram and cardiology consultation. Athletes with concerning findings underwent on-site transthoracic echocardiography and further investigations as necessary. In addition, despite a normal health questionnaire and electrocardiogram, 342 (28.3%) athletes had a transthoracic echocardiogram and 493 (40.8%) underwent repeat evaluations.

RESULTS

After initial evaluation, 47 (3.9%) athletes underwent on-site transthoracic echocardiography of whom 35 (2.8%) were referred for further evaluation. Four athletes (0.3%) were diagnosed with major cardiac conditions; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern (n = 2). Two athletes were identified with minor valvular abnormalities. Repeat evaluation of 493 athletes identified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a 22-year-old athlete, two years after his initial normal screening. During a follow-up of 5.8 ± 2.9 years no additional diagnoses or adverse cardiac events were reported. The cost of the electrocardiogram-based programme was £127,844, translating to £106 per athlete and £25,569 per major cardiac condition identified.Routine transthoracic echocardiography in 342 athletes identified two athletes with major cardiac conditions (bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortopathy and aortic regurgitation and an atrial septal defect associated with right ventricular volume overload) and 10 athletes with minor abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

An electrocardiogram-based national screening programme identified a major cardiac condition in 0.3% of athletes. Routine transthoracic echocardiography and periodic evaluation increased the diagnostic yield to 0.6%, at an incremental cost.

Impact of incorporating echocardiographic screening into a clinical prediction model to optimise utilisation of echocardiography in primary care

INTRODUCTION

Access to public subspecialty healthcare is limited in underserved areas of Brazil, including echocardiography (echo). Long waiting lines and lack of a prioritisation system lead to diagnostic lag and may contribute to poor outcomes. We developed a prioritisation tool for use in primary care, aimed at improving resource utilisation, by predicting those at highest risk of having an abnormal echo, and thus in highest need of referral.

METHODS

All patients in the existing primary care waiting list for echo were invited for participation and underwent a clinical questionnaire, simplified 7-view echo screening by non-physicians with handheld devices, and standard echo by experts. Two derivation models were developed, one including only clinical variables and a second including clinical variables and findings of major heart disease (HD) on echo screening (cut point for high/low-risk). For validation, patients were risk-classified according to the clinical score. High-risk patients and a sample of low-risk underwent standard echo. Intermediate-risk patients first had screening echo, with a standard echo if HD was suspected. Discrimination and calibration of the two models were assessed to predict HD in standard echo.

RESULTS

In derivation (N = 603), clinical variables associated with HD were female gender, body mass index, Chagas disease, prior cardiac surgery, coronary disease, valve disease, hypertension and heart failure, and this model was well calibrated with C-statistic = 0.781. Performance was improved with the addition of echo screening, with C-statistic = 0.871 after cross-validation. For validation (N = 1526), 227 (14.9%) patients were classified as low risk, 1082 (70.9%) as intermediate risk and 217 (14.2%) as high risk by the clinical model. The final model with two categories had high sensitivity (99%) and negative predictive value (97%) for HD in standard echo. Model performance was good with C-statistic = 0.720.

CONCLUSION

The addition of screening echo to clinical variables significantly improves the performance of a score to predict major HD.

Point-of-care ultrasound: Closing guideline gaps in screening for valvular heart disease

BACKGROUND

A linear increase in the number of valvular heart disease is expected due to the aging population, yet most patients with severe valvular heart disease remain undiagnosed.

HYPOTHESIS

POCUS can serve as a screening tool for valvular heart disease.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature to assess the strengths and limitations of POCUS in screening and diagnosing valvular heart disease.

RESULTS

POCUS is an accurate, affordable, accessible, and comprehensive tool. It has a fast learning curve and can prevent unnecessary and more expensive imaging. Challenges include training availability, lack of simplified screening protocols, and reimbursement. Large scale valvular screening data utilizing POCUS is not available.

CONCLUSION

POCUS can serve as a screening tool and guide the management of patients with valvular heart disease. More data is needed about its efficacy and cost-effectiveness in the screening of patients with valvular heart disease.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound as a Component of Preparticipation Screening of Athletes: A Systematic Review

This review examined whether the addition of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to electrocardiography (ECG)-inclusive preparticipation screening strategies has the potential to reduce false-positive results and detect diseases associated with sudden cardiac death that may not be identified through current modalities. Five studies, representing 2646 athletes, demonstrated that ECG-inclusive preparticipation screening strategies resulted in positive results in 19.9% of the cohort. With the addition of POCUS, positive results were reduced to 4.9%, and 1 additional condition potentially associated with sudden cardiac death was identified. The magnitude of positive results with POCUS may be reduced if current ECG criteria were applied.

The use of handheld ultrasound devices: a position statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (2018 update)

Recent technological advances in echocardiography, with progressive miniaturization of ultrasound machines, have led to the development of handheld ultrasound devices (HUD). These devices, no larger than some mobile phones, can be used to perform partial, focused exams as an extension to the physical examination. The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) acknowledges that the dissemination of appropriate HUD use is inevitable and desirable, because of its potential impact on patient management. However, as a scientific society of cardiac imaging, our role is to provide guidance in order to optimize patient benefit and minimize drawbacks from inappropriate use of this technology. This document provides updated recommendations for the use of HUD, including nomenclature, appropriateness, indications, operators, clinical environments, data management and storage, educational needs, and training of potential users. It also addresses gaps in evidence, controversial issues, and future technological developments.

Usefulness of Focused Screening Echocardiography for Collegiate Athletes

Sudden cardiac death in a young healthy athlete is a rare but catastrophic event. The American Heart Association preparticipation screening guidelines recommend a focused history and physical without routine imaging or electrocardiogram screening. We hypothesized that a focused echocardiogram can identify structural abnormalities that may lead to sudden cardiac death in athletes, which might otherwise go undetected by history and physical. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all incoming collegiate athletes at a single university from 2005 to 2013, all of whom had undergone a focused, 5-minute echocardiogram along with a guideline-based preparticipation history and physical (PPS H&P). Abnormal findings prompted further testing or referral. We report the prevalence of abnormal findings and the relation between an abnormal PPS H&P and screening echocardiogram. A total of 2,898 athletes were screened and 159 (5%) had findings. Forty athletes underwent further testing and evaluation. Of these athletes, 3 had newly diagnosed abnormalities that warranted restriction of participation: 1 apical-variant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 1 large bidirectional atrial septal defect with right ventricular dysfunction, and 1 dilated ascending aorta. Two of these athletes had a normal PPS H&P. Conversely, of the 661 athletes with an abnormal PPS H&P, only 1 (0.15%) had an abnormal screening echocardiogram. In conclusion, although the overall number was low, the 5-minute screening echocardiogram detected athletes at risk for sudden cardiac death not discovered on PPS H&P.

Feasibility and Reliability of Nonexpert POCUS for Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening of Varsity Athletes: The SHARP Protocol

BACKGROUND

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a potential adjunctive cardiovascular preparticipation screening modality for young competitive athletes. A novel cardiac POCUS screening protocol, Screening the Heart of the Athlete Research Program (SHARP), was developed for nonexpert examiners to assess common structural etiologies associated with sudden cardiac arrest/death (SCA/D).

METHODS

Assessment of primary outcomes of feasibility, and reliability of obtained measurements, performed by comparison to formal transthoracic echocardiogram was undertaken. Inter-rater reliability was based on Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) defined as moderate for 0.40 to 0.59, good for 0.60 to 0.79, and excellent for 0.80 or greater. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were also obtained. Identification of disease or other abnormalities was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty varsity athletes at our institution underwent the SHARP protocol, with 19 undergoing formal transthoracic echocardiogram and ECG for comparison. POCUS image quality was good to excellent. Feasibility of assessing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic root dilatation, and left-ventricular function was deemed highly possible but limited in 20% for right-ventricular assessment. Reliability was good for measurements of interventricular septal thickness (0.67), end diastolic left-ventricular diameter (0.61), aortic root diameter (0.63), and moderate for left-ventricular posterior wall thickness (0.42). No cardiovascular abnormalities were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, comprehensive SHARP POCUS protocol performed by nonexpert practitioners demonstrated feasibility and reliability to assess varsity level athletes for common structural etiologies associated with SCA/D. Further large athlete screening cohort studies are required to validate the SHARP protocol and the role of cardiac POCUS as a screening modality.