Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone underlies luteolysis in cattle: A hypothesis

By virtue of the secretion of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) is important not only for normal cyclicity but also for conception and continuation of pregnancy in female mammals. Luteolysis (also called luteal regression) is defined as loss of the capacity to synthesize and secrete P4 followed by the demise of the CL. There is strong evidence that sequential pulses of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) secreted from the uterus near the end of luteal phase induces luteolysis in farm animals. Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone (LH) at the end of menstrual cycle has been reported to be critical for initiation of luteolysis in primates, however this has not been investigated in farm animals. A closer observation of the published real-time profiles of circulating hormones (P4, LH, and PGF) and their inter-relationships around the time of the beginning of spontaneous luteolysis in cattle revealed- 1) A natural pulse of PGF causes a transient P4 suppression lasting a couple of hours followed by a rebound in P4 concentration, 2) The P4 secretions that occur in response to LH pulses before the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., preluteolysis) either fail or do so to a lesser extent during luteolysis indicating a loss of sensitivity to LH, and 3) The loss of sensitivity coincides with the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., transition), and apparently luteolysis does not initiate until there is loss of sensitivity to LH. The CL is sensitive to LH during preluteolysis, and the LH-stimulated P4-dependent and/or independent local survival mechanisms maintain the steroidogenic capability and viability of the CL until the very end of preluteolysis. Luteolysis does not appear to initiate with the PGF pulse(s) that occur during this period. With the loss of sensitivity to LH at the transition, however, a progressive decline in P4 begins initiating luteolysis. Also, the survival mechanisms become compromised making the CL less viable. The uterine PGF pulses that occur after the beginning of luteolysis induces increase in the local luteolytic factors, which contribute to further luteolysis, more importantly, structural luteolysis with ultimate demise of the CL. Therefore, I hypothesize that the loss of luteal sensitivity to LH underlies luteolysis in cattle. The hypothesis not only unifies the basic mechanism of luteolysis in a farm animal and primates but also provides a perspective to view luteolysis as a process rather than a factor-mediated event. A novel unified working model for luteolysis in a farm animal and primates is described. A better understanding of the luteal physiology including how responsiveness to LH diminishes in aging CL would help in the development of novel strategies in modulating CL structure-function to improve and/or control fertility in humans as well as in animals.

Partial luteolysis during early diestrus in cattle downregulates VEGFA expression and reduces large luteal cell and corpus luteum sizes and plasma progesterone concentration

Our objectives were to investigate potential changes in the size of steroidogenic large luteal cells (LLC) during partial luteolysis induced by a sub-dose of cloprostenol in early diestrus and to determine transcriptional variations in genes involved in corpus luteum (CL) functions. Cows were subjected to an Ovsynch protocol, with the time of the second GnRH treatment defined as Day 0 (D0). On D6, cows were randomly allocated into three treatments: Control (2 mL saline, im; n = 10), 2XPGF (two doses of 500 μg of cloprostenol, im, 2 h apart; n = 8) or 1/6PGF (single dose of 83.3 μg of cloprostenol, im; n = 10). Before treatments and every 8 h during the 48-h experimental period, blood samples were collected and CL volumes measured. Furthermore, two CL biopsies were obtained at 24 and 40 h post-treatment. The 1/6PGF treatment caused partial luteolysis, characterized by sudden decreases in plasma progesterone (P₄) concentrations, luteal volume and LLC size, followed by increases (to pretreatment values) in P₄ and luteal volume at 24 and 40 h post-treatment, respectively. However, at the end of the study, P4, luteal volume and LLC size were all significantly smaller than in Control cows. Temporally associated with these phenotypes, there was a lower mRNA abundance of VEGFA at 24 and 40 h, and ABCA1 at 24 h (P < 0.05). In conclusion, a sudden reduction in CL size during partial luteolysis induced by a sub-dose of PGF_2α analog on day 6 of the estrous cycle was attributed to a reduction in LLC size, although these changes did not account for the entire phenomenon. In addition to its involvement in reducing CL size, decreased VEGFA mRNA abundance impaired CL development, resulting in a smaller luteal gland and lower plasma P₄ concentrations compared to Control cows.

Responses to intra-luteal administration of cloprostenol in dairy cows

The aim of the study was to determine the luteolytic dose of cloprostenol administered directly into the corpus luteum (CL; intra-luteal treatment, ILT) in dairy cattle. Cows of two control groups were treated with 500 μg of cloprostenol (Estrumate®) intramuscularly (IM-500) or via ILT with 0.2 mL of physiological solution (ILT-0). Cows of four experimental groups were treated by ILT with cloprostenol in doses 5, 25, 50 and 100 μg (ILT-5, -25, -50 and -100 groups). Progesterone concentrations (P4) and size of CL were evaluated to assess luteolysis at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h or at 0, 24 and 48 h after ILT, respectively. Cows in the ILT-0 and -5 groups were unaffected by ILT. The P4 concentrations were less in cows of the IM-500, as well as ILT-25, -50 and -100 groups at 48 h subsequent to ILT. The size of the CL was less in cows of IM-500, as well as ILT-25, -50 and -100 groups at 48 h after ILT. There were P4 concentrations of about 1 ng/mL 48 h after ILT in cows of the IM-500, as well as ILT-50 and -100 groups. In conclusion, the cloprostenol dose of 50 μg administered intra-luteally is a luteolytic dose in cows.

Ultrasonography-accessed luteal size endpoint that most closely associates with circulating progesterone during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in beef cows

The aim was to evaluate the associations between circulating P4 concentrations, corpus luteum (CL) size (diameter, area or volume) and blood perfusion (BP) in cows. In Experiment 1, Pearson's correlations (P < 0.05) with P4 concentrations were observed during CL development (D8) for total area (TA; r = 0.76), luteal area (ACL; r = 0.72), total and luteal diameter (TD and DCL respectively; r = 0.46). During mid-late diestrus, there was a positive correlation (P < 0.05) only at D15 with TA and ACL (r > 0.60), TD, total volume (TV) and luteal volume (VCL; r > 0.434). During luteal regression, the correlation was only observed at D18 for ACL (r = 0.478) and D20 with several variables. In Experiment 2, CL weight and ACL had the greatest correlation with P4 (r > 0.6). In Experiment 3, TA and ACL were the variables that were most closely correlated with serum P4 concentrations at D7 in recipient cows. Correlation coefficients were greater for luteal measurements when there were compact compared with cavitary CLs. In Experiment 4, there was no correlation (P > 0.05) between P4 and any of the variables measured on D4 and D7 in recipient cows detected in estrus. On D18 to D20, all CL characteristics were correlated (P < 0.05) with plasma P4, and luteal BP and BP area were more closely (P < 0.05) correlated than ACL. In conclusion, CL perimeter area measurements had the greatest association with luteal function during CL development; whereas for BP there was a greater correlation with P4 than luteal size during luteolysis.

Concentrations of a PGF2α metabolite during pregnancy on the days that luteolysis occurs in nonbred heifers

Concentrations of a metabolite of PGF2α (PGFM) were compared between nonbred (n = 6) and pregnant (n = 8) heifers on days 16, 17, and 18 postovulation. On each day, an 8-h session of hourly blood sampling was done. Averaged over the 8-h sessions, mean concentration of PGFM was less (P < 0.0009) in the pregnant group (45.2 ± 3.2 pg/mL) than that in the nonbred group (65.6 ± 7.9 pg/mL), but the minimal concentration per session was not significantly different between groups. Pulses of PGFM (identified by coefficient of variance) were similar in frequency between groups but were less (P < 0.03) prominent at the peak in the pregnant group (60.0 ± 5.3 pg/mL) than that in the nonbred group (92.8 ± 10.7 pg/mL). These results indicated similarity between groups in frequency and initial development of a PGFM pulse but without later development and a reduction in prominence in the pregnant group. The progesterone response to a PGFM pulse of similar prominence was made before the beginning of luteolysis in individuals in the nonbred group and during the hourly sessions on days 16 to 18 in the pregnant group. Progesterone concentration in the nonbred group decreased (P < 0.05) during 2 h before the PGFM peak (8.8 ± 1.6 to 5.6 ± 1.0 ng/mL) and rebounded (P < 0.05) completely during the 2 h after the peak (5.6 ± 1.0 to 9.6 ± 2.2 ng/mL). A transient progesterone decrease during a similar PGFM pulse and similar initial progesterone concentration did not occur in the pregnant group. Results supported the hypotheses that (1) pregnant heifers have identifiable but less prominent PGFM pulses during the days that luteolysis occurs in nonbred heifers and (2) the corpus luteum locally resists the luteolytic effect of PGF2α in pregnant heifers before the days of onset of luteolysis in nonbred heifers.

Hemodynamics of the corpus luteum in mares during experimentally impaired luteogenesis and partial luteolysis

The aim of the current project was to characterize the luteal vascularity and the plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4), prolactin (PRL) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF_2α (PGFM) in mares with luteal disturbances during early and mid-diestrus. In Experiment 1, twenty-one mares were treated with 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl, or 1 mg Dinoprost, or 10 mg Dinoprost on day two after ovulation (Control-D2, 1/10PGF-D2 and PGF-D2 groups, respectively; n = 7 mares/group). In Experiment 2, similar treatments were performed eight days post-ovulation using a different cohort of 21 mares (Control-D8, 1/10PGF-D8 and PGF-D8 groups, respectively; n = 7 mares/group). Blood samples were collected hourly and power-Doppler examinations of the corpus luteum (CL) were performed every 6 h from H0 (moment immediately before treatment) to H48. Data collection was also done once a day from D0 (day of ovulation) to D20. In Experiment 1, the PGF-D2 and 1/10PGF-D2 groups had lower increase of plasma concentration of P4 until H48 and reduced maximum P4 concentrations on D8-D11 than mares from the Control-D2 group. However, no differences among groups were detected for luteal vascularity during early and mid-diestrus. In Experiment 2, complete and partial luteolysis were detected in mares from the PGF-D8 and 1/10PGF-D8 groups, respectively. Luteal vascularity and plasma P4 concentrations differed among Control-D8, PGF-D8 and 1/10PGF-D8 groups on H48. Partially regressed CLs (1/10PGF-D8 group) generated more Doppler signals than completed regressed CLs (PGF-D8 group) between D10 and D13. In both experiments, a transient increase in PRL activity was observed in parallel to the PGFM pulse in mares receiving 1 or 10 mg Dinoprost. The use of prostaglandin on D2 at conventional or 1/10 of the dose impaired the luteal development in mares. Moreover, the low dose of prostaglandin lead to partial regression of mature CLs. The blood supply was reduced in partially regressed CLs, but not in CLs undergoing impaired luteogenesis.

Circulating nitric oxide metabolites during luteolysis and the effect of luteinizing hormone on circulating nitric oxide metabolites in heifers

Temporal relationships among circulating concentrations of nitric oxide metabolites (NOM), progesterone (P4), and luteinizing hormone (LH) within the hours of a PGFM pulse were studied during luteolysis in heifers. The peak of a PGFM pulse was designated Hour 0. All of the following increases and decreases were significant. Within a spontaneous PGFM pulse (experiment 1; n = 7), concentrations of P4 and LH decreased between Hours -1 and 0 and increased between Hours 0 and 1; NOM increased between Hours -1 and 2. In experiment 2, PGFM pulses were simulated by intrauterine infusion of PGF2α (PGF group, n = 6), and another group was also treated with acyline to inhibit LH secretion (acyline-PGF group, n = 6). Averaged over the two groups, concentration of P4 decreased between Hours -2 and 0, increased (rebounded) between Hours 0 and 1, and decreased after Hour 2. In the PGF group, concentration of LH decreased between Hours -2 and -0.5 and increased between Hour 0 and Hour 1.5 to a maximum at Hour 1.5; NOM decreased between Hours -2 and -1.5 and increased between Hours 0 and 1.5. In the acyline-PGF group, the effect of hour was not significant for concentrations of LH and NOM. The absence of an increase in NOM concentration when LH was inhibited is a novel finding. The hypotheses were supported that concentrations of LH and NOM are temporally related, and LH has a role in the increase in NOM within the hours of a PGFM pulse.

Pitfalls in animal reproduction research: how the animal guards nature's secrets

The estrous cycles of heifers and mares are used for illustrating pitfalls at the animal level in research in reproductive biology. Infrequent monitoring for characterizing the change in hormone concentrations or for detecting a reproductive event can be a pitfall when the interval for obtaining data exceeds the interval between events. For example, hourly collection of blood samples has shown that the luteolytic period (decreasing progesterone) encompasses 24 hours in heifers and mares. Collection of samples every 6-24 hours results in the illusion that luteolysis requires 2-3 days, owing to the occurrence of luteolysis on different days in individuals. A single treatment with PGF2α that causes complete regression of the corpus luteum is an example of an overdose pitfall. A nonphysiological progesterone increase occurs and will be misleading if used for making interpretations on the nature of luteolysis. A pitfall can also occur if a chosen reference point or end point is a poor representation of a physiological event. For example, if on a selected day after ovulation the animals in treatment A are closer on average to luteolysis than animals in treatment B, treatment A will appear to have had an earlier luteolytic effect. Among the techniques that are used directly in the animal, ultrasonography appears to be most prone to research pitfalls. Research during a given month can be confounded by seasonal effects, even in species that ovulate throughout the year. The presence of unknown factors or complex interactions among factors and the sensitivity of the animal to a research procedure separate from the direct effect of a treatment are also research challenges. A hidden factor should be considered nature's challenge to open-minded biologists but a pitfall for the close-minded.

Follicular-phase concentrations of progesterone, estradiol-17β, LH, FSH, and a PGF2α metabolite and daily clustering of prolactin pulses, based on hourly blood sampling and hourly detection of ovulation in heifers

Circulating concentrations of hormones were determined each hour in 13 heifers from the end of the luteolytic period to ovulation (follicular phase, 3.5 days). Diameter of the preovulatory follicle was determined every 8 hours, and the time of ovulation was determined hourly. The diameter of the preovulatory follicle decreased 0.8 ± 0.1 mm/h in heifers when there was 1 to 3 hours between the last two diameter measurements before ovulation. The concentration of progesterone (P4) after the end of the luteolytic period (P4 < 1 ng/mL) changed (P < 0.0001), as shown by a continued decrease until Hour -57 (Hour 0 = ovulation), then was maintained at approximately 0.2 ng/mL until 2 hours before the peak of the LH surge at Hour -26, and then a decrease to 0.1 ng/mL along with a decrease in estradiol-17β. Concentrations of LH gradually increased (P < 0.007) and concentrations of FSH gradually decreased (P < 0.0001) after the end of luteolysis until the beginning nadirs of the respective preovulatory surges. A cluster of prolactin (PRL) pulses occurred (P < 0.0001) each day with approximately 24 hours between the maximum value of successive clusters. Hourly concentrations of a PGF2α metabolite decreased (P < 0.007) until Hour -40, but did not differ among hours thereafter. Novel observations included the gradual increase in LH and decrease in FSH until the beginning of the preovulatory surges and follicle diameter decrease a few hours before ovulation. Results supported the following hypotheses: (1) change in the low circulating P4 concentrations during the follicular phase are temporally associated with change in LH concentrations; and (2) PRL pulses occur in a cluster each day during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle.

Life or death decisions in the corpus luteum

The corpus luteum (CL) is an ephemeral endocrine organ. During its lifespan, it undergoes a period of extremely rapid growth that involves hypertrophy, proliferation and differentiation of the steroidogenic cells, as well as extensive angiogenesis. The growth phase is followed by a period in which remodelling of the tissue ceases, but it engages in unparalleled production of steroids, resulting in extraordinarily high metabolic activity within the tissue. It is during this stage that a critical juncture occurs. In the non-fertile cycle, uterine release of prostaglandin (PG)F(2α) initiates a cascade of events that result in rapid loss of steroidogenesis and destruction of the luteal tissue. Alternatively, if a viable embryo is present, signals are produced that result in rescue of the CL. This review article summarizes the major concepts related to the fate of the CL, with particular focus on recent insights into the mechanisms associated with the ability of PGF(2α) to bring about complete luteolysis. It has become clear that the achievement of luteolysis depends on repeated exposure to PGF(2α) and involves coordinated actions of heterogeneous cell types within the CL. Together, these components of the process bring about not only the loss in progesterone production, but also the rapid demise of the structure itself.

Circadian influence on the preovulatory LH surge, ovulation, and prolactin concentrations in heifers

A novel circadian study of the effect of clock hours on the preovulatory LH surge, ovulation, and maximal PRL concentration was done in 13 nontreated Holstein heifers. Hourly blood sampling and hourly ultrasound examinations to detect the hour of ovulation began at 8 and 48 hours, respectively, after CL area (cm(2)) had decreased 15% from the area at 15 days postovulation. The resulting experimental period began at the beginning of postluteolysis (progesterone, <1 ng/mL) and encompassed a mean of 3.5 days until ovulation. The frequency of the peak of the preovulatory LH surge for the three 8-hour periods of a 24-hour day was different (P < 0.02) between 2:00 AM to 9:00 AM (N = 9), 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM (N = 3), and 6:00 PM to 1:00 AM (N = 1). The median was 6:00 AM. The frequency of ovulations for 8-hour periods was different (P < 0.02) between 3:00 AM to 10:00 AM (N = 9), 11:00 AM to 6:00 PM (N = 3), and 7:00 PM to 2:00 AM (N = 1). The median was 7:30 AM. Two or three clusters of PRL pulses occurred during the 3.5 days. Based on all available PRL pulse clusters (N = 36), the clock hours of the maximal concentration/cluster was greater (P < 0.0001) for 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM (N = 33 clusters) than for each of the three other 6-hour periods (N = 0, 1, or 2 per period). The median was 11:30 AM. The hypothesis was supported that the peak of the preovulatory LH surge, ovulation, and maximal PRL concentration during pulse clusters occur with greater frequency during certain clock hours in heifers.

Plasma clearance and half-life of prostaglandin F2alpha: a comparison between mares and heifers

Horses are about five times more sensitive to the luteolytic effect of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) than cattle, as indicated by a recommended clinical dose of 5 mg in horses and 25 mg in cattle. Novel evaluations of the PGF plasma disappearance curves were made in mares and in heifers, and the two species were compared. Mares and heifers (n = 5) of similar body weight were injected (Min 0) intravenously with PGF (5 mg per animal). Blood was sampled every 10 sec until Min 3, every 30 sec until Min 5, every 10 min until Min 60, and every 30 min until Min 240. The mean PGF concentration was greater (P < 0.05) in mares than in heifers at Min 1 through Min 60 and at Mins 180 and 240. The mean time to maximum PGF concentration was not different between mares (42.0 ± 8.6 sec) and heifers (35.0 ± 2.9 sec). The apparent plasma clearance, distribution half-life, elimination half-life, and maximum plasma PGF concentration were 3.3 ± 0.5 L h(-1) kg(-1), 94.2 ± 15.9 sec, 25.9 ± 5.0 min, and 249.1 ± 36.8 ng/ml, respectively, in mares and 15.4 ± 2.3 L h(-1) kg(-1), 29.2 ± 3.9 sec, 9.0 ± 0.9 min, and 51.4 ± 22.6 ng/ml, respectively, in heifers. Plasma clearance was about five times less (P < 0.0005), maximum plasma PGF concentration was five times greater (P < 0.002), and the distribution half-life and elimination half-life were about three times longer (P < 0.005) in mares than in heifers. The fivefold greater plasma clearance of PGF in heifers than in mares corresponds to the recommended fivefold greater clinical dose of PGF in cattle and supported the hypothesis that the metabolic clearance of PGF is slower in mares than heifers.

Dynamics of circulating progesterone concentrations before and during luteolysis: a comparison between cattle and horses

The profile of circulating progesterone concentration is more dynamic in cattle than in horses. Greater prominence of progesterone fluctuations in cattle than in horses reflect periodic interplay in cattle between pulses of a luteotropin (luteinizing hormone; LH) and pulses of a luteolysin (prostaglandin F2alpha; PGF2alpha). A dose of PGF2alpha that induces complete regression of a mature corpus luteum with a single treatment in cattle or horses is an overdose. The overdose effects on the progesterone profile in cattle are an immediate nonphysiological increase taking place over about 30 min, a decrease to below the original concentration, a dose-dependent rebound 2 h after treatment, and a progressive decrease until the end of luteolysis. An overdose of PGF2alpha in horses results in a similar nonphysiological increase in progesterone followed by complete luteolysis; a rebound does not occur. An overdose of PGF2alpha and apparent lack of awareness of the rebound phenomenon has led to faulty interpretations on the nature of spontaneous luteolysis. A transient progesterone suppression and a transient rebound occur within the hours of a natural PGF2alpha pulse in cattle but not in horses. Progesterone rebounds are from the combined effects of an LH pulse and the descending portion of a PGF2alpha pulse. A complete transitional progesterone rebound occurs at the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis and returns progesterone to its original concentration. It is proposed that luteolysis does not begin in cattle until after the transitional rebound. During luteolysis, rebounds are incomplete and gradually wane. A partial rebound during luteolysis in cattle is associated with a concomitant increase in luteal blood flow. A similar increase in luteal blood flow does not occur in mares.

Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis during postluteolysis and effects on CL regression, prolactin, and ovulation in heifers

The beginning of postluteolysis (progesterone, <1 ng mL(-1)) in heifers was targeted by using 8 h after ultrasonic detection of a 25% decrease in CL area (cm2) and was designated Hour 0. Flunixin meglumine (FM; n=10) to inhibit PGF2α secretion or vehicle (n=9) were given intramuscularly at Hours 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40. The dose of FM was 2.5 mg/kg at each treatment. Blood sampling and measurement of the CL and dominant follicle were done every 8 h beginning 14 days postovulation in each group. Blood samples for detection of pulses of PRL and pulses of a metabolite of PGF2α (PGFM) were obtained every hour for 24 h beginning at Hour 0. Pulse concentrations of both PGFM and PRL were lower in the FM group than in the vehicle group. Concentration of PRL was greatest at the peak of a PGFM pulse. Neither CL area (cm2) nor progesterone concentration differed between groups during Hours 0 to 48 (postluteolysis). Ovulation occurred in nine of nine heifers in the vehicle group and in three of 10 heifers in the FM group. The anovulatory follicles in the FM group grew to 36.2±2.9 mm, and the wall became thickened from apparent luteinization. The hypothesis that PGF2α was involved in the continued P4 decrease and structural CL regression during postluteolysis was not supported. However, the hypotheses that pulses of PGFM and PRL were temporally related and that systemic FM treatment induced an anovulatory follicle were supported.

Patterns of gene expression in the bovine corpus luteum following repeated intrauterine infusions of low doses of prostaglandin F2alpha

Natural luteolysis involves multiple pulses of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) released by the nonpregnant uterus. This study investigated expression of 18 genes from five distinct pathways, following multiple low-dose pulses of PGF. Cows on Day 9 of the estrous cycle received four intrauterine infusions of 0.25 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or PGF (0.5 mg of PGF in 0.25 ml of PBS) at 6-h intervals. A luteal biopsy sample was collected 30 min after each PBS or PGF infusion. There were four treatment groups: Control (n = 5; 4 PBS infusions), 4XPGF (4 PGF infusions; n = 5), 2XPGF-non-regressed (2 PGF infusions; n = 5; PGF-PBS-PGF-PBS; no regression after treatments), and 2XPGF-regressed (PGF-PBS-PGF-PBS; regression after treatments; n = 5). As expected, the first PGF pulse increased mRNA for the immediate early genes JUN, FOS, NR4A1, and EGR1 but unexpectedly also increased mRNA for steroidogenic (STAR) and angiogenic (VEGFA) pathways. The second PGF pulse induced immediate early genes and genes related to immune system activation (IL1B, FAS, FASLG, IL8). However, mRNA for VEGFA and STAR were decreased by the second PGF infusion. After the third and fourth PGF pulses, a distinctly luteolytic pattern of gene expression was evident, with inhibition of steroidogenic and angiogenic pathways, whereas, there was induction of pathways for immune system activation and production of PGF. The pattern of PGF-induced gene expression was similar in corpus luteum not destined for luteolysis (2X-non-regressed) after the first PGF pulse but was very distinct after the second PGF pulse. Thus, although the initial PGF pulse induced mRNA for many pathways, the second and later pulses of PGF appear to have set the distinct pattern of gene expression that result in luteolysis.

Induction of PGFM pulses and luteolysis by sequential estradiol-17β treatments in heifers

The effects of sequential induction of PGFM pulses by estradiol-17β (E2) on prominence of PGFM pulses and progesterone (P4) concentration were studied in heifers. Three treatments of vehicle (n = 12) or E2 (n = 12) at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg were given at 12-h intervals beginning on Day 15 postovulation. Blood samples were collected every 12 h from Days 13-24 and hourly for 12 h after the first and third treatments. On Day 15, all heifers were in preluteolysis and on Day 16 were in preluteolysis in the vehicle-treated heifers (n = 11) and either preluteolysis (n = 4) or luteolysis (n = 8) in the E2-treated heifers. Peak concentration of induced PGFM pulses during preluteolysis on Day 15 was greater (P < 0.04) than for pulses during preluteolysis on Day 16. The interval from ovulation to the beginning of luteolysis was shorter (P < 0.04) in the E2-treated heifers than in the vehicle-treated heifers. An E2-induced PGFM pulse was less prominent (P < 0.008) in heifers in temporal association with a transient resurgence in P4 than in heifers with a progressive P4 decrease. The hypothesis that repeated E2 exposure stimulates increasing prominence of PGFM pulses was not supported. Instead, repeated exposure reduced the prominence of PGFM pulses, in contrast to the stimulation from the first E2 treatment. Reduced prominence of a PGF(2α) pulse during luteolysis can lead to a transient resurgence in P4 concentration.

Luteolysis and associated interrelationships among circulating PGF2α, progesterone, LH, and estradiol in mares

The changing concentrations and temporal relationships among a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P(4)), LH, and estradiol-17β (E(2)) before, during, and after luteolysis were studied in 10 mares. Blood samples were collected every hour for ≥4 d beginning on day 12 after ovulation. The luteolytic period extended from a decrease in P(4) at a common transitional hour (Hour 0) at the end of preluteolysis and beginning of luteolysis to a defined ending when P(4) reached 1 ng/mL. The length of luteolysis was 22.9 ± 0.9 h, contrasting with 2 d in published P(4) profiles from sampling every 6 to 24 h. In mares with complete data for Hours -40 to -2 (n = 6), PGFM concentrations remained below assay sensitivity (n = 2) or two or three small pulses (peak, 29 ± 4 pg/mL) occurred. During luteolysis, the pulses became more prominent (peak, 193 ± 36 pg/mL). Rhythmicity of PGFM pulses was not detected by a pulsatility program during preluteolysis but was detected in seven of nine mares during luteolysis and postluteolysis combined. The nadir-to-nadir interval for LH pulses and the peak-to-peak interval between adjacent pulses were longer (P < 0.05) during preluteolysis than during luteolysis (nadir to nadir, 5.2 ± 0.3 h vs 3.6 ± 0.4 h; peak to peak, 9.4 ± 1.0 h vs 4.7 ± 0.5 h). Unlike reported findings in cattle, concentrations of P(4) decreased linearly within the hours of each PGFM pulse during luteolysis, and a positive effect of an LH pulse on P(4) and E(2) concentration was not detected. The reported balancing of P(4) concentrations between a negative effect of PGF2α and a positive effect of LH in heifers was not detected in mares.

Effect of dose of estradiol-17β on prominence of an induced 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2α) (PGFM) pulse and relationship of prominence to progesterone, LH, and luteal blood flow in heifers

Various doses of estradiol-17β (E(2)) were used in heifers to induce a pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2α) (PGFM). The effect of E(2) concentration on the prominence of PGFM pulses and the relationship between prominence and intrapulse concentration of progesterone (P(4)), LH, and luteal blood flow were studied. A single dose of 0 (vehicle), 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1 mg of E(2) was given (n = six/group) 14 d after ovulation. Blood samples were collected, and luteal blood flow was evaluated hourly for 10 h after the treatment. The 0.05-mg dose increased and the 0.1-mg dose further increased the prominence of the induced PGFM pulse, compared with the 0.0-mg dose and the 0.01-mg dose. The PGFM pulses were subdivided into three different prominence categories (<50, 50 to 150, and >150 pg/mL at the peak). In the 50 to 150 category, P(4) concentration increased (P < 0.05) between -2 h and 0 h (0 h = peak of PGFM pulse). In the >150 category, P(4) decreased (P < 0.05) between -1 h and 0 h, LH increased (P < 0.05) at 1 h, and luteal blood flow apparently decreased (P < 0.05) at 2 h of the PGFM pulse. The novel results supported the following hypotheses: (1) an increase in E(2) concentration increases the prominence of a PGFM pulse, and (2) greater prominence of a PGFM pulse is associated with a greater transient intrapulse depression of P(4) at the peak of the PGFM pulse. In addition, the extent of the effect of prostaglandin F(2α) on the increase in LH and changes in blood flow within the hours of a PGFM pulse was related positively to the prominence of the PGFM pulse.

Effect of luteinizing hormone oscillations on progesterone concentrations based on treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in heifers

Close temporality has been reported between the episodic secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P4) during the midluteal phase and preceding the beginning of luteolysis in cattle. In the present studies, the relationship between LH and P4 was examined by blocking LH oscillations with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, acyline. In a titration study, the minimal single acyline dose for blocking LH oscillations in heifers was 3 μg/kg. The main experiment compared LH and P4 concentrations and oscillations between a group treated with acyline on day 15 after ovulation (n = 8) and a control group (n = 4). Concentrations of P4 in blood samples collected every 8 h on days 13 to 18 indicated that acyline treatment did not alter the time that luteolysis began or the length of the luteolytic process. In blood samples collected every hour for 24 h beginning at the hour of treatment, acyline reduced the LH concentrations and blocked LH oscillations. The hourly LH means were 0.06 to 0.08 ng/mL, comparable to the mean concentration at the nadirs of LH oscillations in controls (0.07 ng/mL). During the hourly sampling, the GnRH antagonist produced the following P4 responses: (1) lower P4 concentrations, (2) fewer and reduced prominence of P4 oscillations, and (3) increased length and variability in the interval between the peaks of P4 oscillations. Results indicated that LH oscillations affect both the prominence and the rhythmicity of P4 oscillations during preluteolysis but not the onset and length of luteolysis.

Concomitance of luteinizing hormone and progesterone oscillations during the transition from preluteolysis to luteolysis in cattle

The temporal relationships of episodes of luteinizing hormone (LH) oscillations, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM) pulses, and progesterone (P4) fluctuations during the latter portion of preluteolysis and the early portion of luteolysis were characterized. In Experiment 1, the detection of LH episodes in blood samples collected every 15 min for 8 h was compared with detection in the samples collected every hour in 4 heifers. The number of independently detected episodes/heifer (total = 7) was the same for the 15-min and hourly collection intervals. In Experiment 2, blood samples were collected every hour (n = 7 heifers) and retrospectively assigned to 15 h before and 15 h after the transitional hour between preluteolysis and luteolysis. During preluteolysis, compared with luteolysis, the amplitude of LH oscillations was greater (0.28 ± 0.03 vs 0.18 ± 0.03 ng/mL; P < 0.02) and the interval between peaks of LH oscillations was shorter (3.3 ± 0.3 h vs 4.3 ± 0.6 h; P < 0.04). The LH peaks occurred at the same hour as the peak of a P4 fluctuation in 77% and 29% of LH oscillations (P < 0.0009) during preluteolysis and luteolysis, respectively. In preluteolysis, synchrony between LH and P4 episodes occurred consistently during the P4 rebound after the peak of a PGFM pulse. In luteolysis, the LH peak preceded the peak of the P4 rebound. On a temporal basis, the hypothesis was supported that episodic LH accounts, at least in part, for the reported P4 rebound that occurs after the P4 suppression at the peak of a PGFM pulse.

Intrapulse temporality between pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F 2α and circulating concentrations of progesterone before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis in heifers

Pulses of the prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF) metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2α) (PGFM) and the intrapulse concentrations of progesterone were characterized hourly during the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods in seven heifers. The common hour of the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis was based on a progressive progesterone decrease when assessed only at the peaks of successive oscillations. The end of the luteolytic period was defined as a decrease in progesterone to 1 ng/mL. Blood samples were taken hourly from 15 d after ovulation until luteal regression as determined by color-Doppler ultrasonography. Between Hours -2 and 2 (Hour 0 = PGFM peak) of the last PGFM pulse of the preluteolytic period, progesterone decreased between Hours -1 and 0, and then returned to the prepulse concentration. Concentration did not change significantly thereafter until a PGFM pulse early in the luteolytic period; progesterone decreased by Hour 0 and transiently rebounded after Hour 0, but not to the prepulse concentration. In the later portion of the luteolytic period, progesterone also decreased between Hours -1 and 0 but did not rebound. After the defined end of luteolysis, progesterone decreased slightly throughout a PGFM pulse. Results demonstrated for the first time that the patterns of progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse differ considerably among the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods.