Nuclear structure and chromosome segregation in Drosophila male meiosis depend on the ubiquitin ligase dTopors

MultiCapsNet: A General Framework for Data Integration and Interpretable Classification

The latest progresses of experimental biology have generated a large number of data with different formats and lengths. Deep learning is an ideal tool to deal with complex datasets, but its inherent “black box” nature needs more interpretability. At the same time, traditional interpretable machine learning methods, such as linear regression or random forest, could only deal with numerical features instead of modular features often encountered in the biological field. Here, we present MultiCapsNet (https://github.com/wanglf19/MultiCapsNet), a new deep learning model built on CapsNet and scCapsNet, which possesses the merits such as easy data integration and high model interpretability. To demonstrate the ability of this model as an interpretable classifier to deal with modular inputs, we test MultiCapsNet on three datasets with different data type and application scenarios. Firstly, on the labeled variant call dataset, MultiCapsNet shows a similar classification performance with neural network model, and provides importance scores for data sources directly without an extra importance determination step required by the neural network model. The importance scores generated by these two models are highly correlated. Secondly, on single cell RNA sequence (scRNA-seq) dataset, MultiCapsNet integrates information about protein-protein interaction (PPI), and protein-DNA interaction (PDI). The classification accuracy of MultiCapsNet is comparable to the neural network and random forest model. Meanwhile, MultiCapsNet reveals how each transcription factor (TF) or PPI cluster node contributes to classification of cell type. Thirdly, we made a comparison between MultiCapsNet and SCENIC. The results show several cell type relevant TFs identified by both methods, further proving the validity and interpretability of the MultiCapsNet.

Dynamic localization of DNA topoisomerase I and its functional relevance during Drosophila development

DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) maintains chromatin conformation during transcription. While Top1 is not essential in simple eukaryotic organisms such as yeast, it is required for the development of multicellular organisms. In fact, tissue and cell-type-specific functions of Top1 have been suggested in the fruit fly Drosophila. A better understanding of Top1’s function in the context of development is important as Top1 inhibitors are among the most widely used anticancer drugs. As a step toward such a better understanding, we studied its localization in live cells of Drosophila. Consistent with prior results, Top1 is highly enriched at the nucleolus in transcriptionally active polyploid cells, and this enrichment responds to perturbation of transcription. In diploid cells, we uncovered evidence for Top1 foci formation at genomic regions not limited to the active rDNA locus, suggestive of novel regulation of Top1 recruitment. In the male germline, Top1 is highly enriched at the paired rDNA loci on sex chromosomes suggesting that it might participate in regulating their segregation during meiosis. Results from RNAi-mediated Top1 knockdown lend support to this hypothesis. Our study has provided one of the most comprehensive descriptions of Top1 localization during animal development.

A screen for E3 ubiquitination ligases that genetically interact with the adaptor protein Cindr during Drosophila eye patterning

Ubiquitination is a crucial post-translational modification that can target proteins for degradation. The E3 ubiquitin ligases are responsible for recognizing substrate proteins for ubiquitination, hence providing specificity to the process of protein degradation. Here, we describe a genetic modifier screen that identified E3 ligases that modified the rough-eye phenotype generated by expression of cindr^RNAi transgenes during Drosophila eye development. In total, we identified 36 E3 ligases, as well as 4 Cullins, that modified the mild cindr^RNA mis-patterning phenotype. This indicates possible roles for these E3s/Cullins in processes that require Cindr function, including cytoskeletal regulation, cell adhesion, cell signaling and cell survival. Three E3 ligases identified in our screen had previously been linked to regulating JNK signaling.

Meiosis in male Drosophila

Meiosis entails sorting and separating both homologous and sister chromatids. The mechanisms for connecting sister chromatids and homologs during meiosis are highly conserved and include specialized forms of the cohesin complex and a tightly regulated homolog synapsis/recombination pathway designed to yield regular crossovers between homologous chromatids. Drosophila male meiosis is of special interest because it dispenses with large segments of the standard meiotic script, particularly recombination, synapsis and the associated structures. Instead, Drosophila relies on a unique protein complex composed of at least two novel proteins, SNM and MNM, to provide stable connections between homologs during meiosis I. Sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila is mediated by cohesins, ring-shaped complexes that entrap sister chromatids. However, unlike other eukaryotes Drosophila does not rely on the highly conserved Rec8 cohesin in meiosis, but instead utilizes two novel cohesion proteins, ORD and SOLO, which interact with the SMC1/3 cohesin components in providing meiotic cohesion.

Surviving an identity crisis: a revised view of chromatin insulators in the genomics era

The control of complex, developmentally regulated loci and partitioning of the genome into active and silent domains is in part accomplished through the activity of DNA-protein complexes termed chromatin insulators. Together, the multiple, well-studied classes of insulators in Drosophila melanogaster appear to be generally functionally conserved. In this review, we discuss recent genomic-scale experiments and attempt to reconcile these newer findings in the context of previously defined insulator characteristics based on classical genetic analyses and transgenic approaches. Finally, we discuss the emerging understanding of mechanisms of chromatin insulator regulation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin and epigenetic regulation of animal development.

Drosophila rae1 is required for male meiosis and spermatogenesis

Previous studies of RAE1, a conserved WD40 protein, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and mouse revealed a role in mRNA export and cell cycle progression in mitotic cells. Studies of RAE1 in Drosophila showed that the protein localizes to the nuclear envelope and is required for progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle but not RNA export in tissue culture cells. Drosophila RAE1 also plays an essential developmental role, as it is required for viability and synaptic growth regulation as a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Here we describe characterization of a new Drosophila rae1 mutant that is viable but results in male sterility. The mutant showed striking defects in primary spermatocyte nuclear integrity, meiotic chromosome condensation, segregation, and spindle morphology. These defects led to a failure to complete meiosis but allowed several aspects of spermatid differentiation to proceed, including axoneme formation and elongation. A GFP-RAE1 fusion protein that rescued most of the cytological defects showed a dynamic localization to the nuclear envelope, chromatin and other structures depending on the stage of spermatogenesis. A role for RAE1 in male meiosis, as well as mitotic cells, was also indicated by the defects induced by expression of rae1-RNAi. These studies in Drosophila provide the first evidence for an essential meiotic role of RAE1, and thus define RAE1 as a protein required for both meiotic and mitotic cell cycles.

SUMOylation in Drosophila Development

Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO), an ~90 amino acid ubiquitin-like protein, is highly conserved throughout the eukaryotic domain. Like ubiquitin, SUMO is covalently attached to lysine side chains in a large number of target proteins. In contrast to ubiquitin, SUMO does not have a direct role in targeting proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, like ubiquitin, SUMO does modulate protein function in a variety of other ways. This includes effects on protein conformation, subcellular localization, and protein–protein interactions. Significant insight into the in vivo role of SUMOylation has been provided by studies in Drosophila that combine genetic manipulation, proteomic, and biochemical analysis. Such studies have revealed that the SUMO conjugation pathway regulates a wide variety of critical cellular and developmental processes, including chromatin/chromosome function, eggshell patterning, embryonic pattern formation, metamorphosis, larval and pupal development, neurogenesis, development of the innate immune system, and apoptosis. This review discusses our current understanding of the diverse roles for SUMO in Drosophila development.