Measurement of systemic resistances in aortic regurgitation

Assessment of valve implantation in the descending aorta as an alternative for aortic regurgitation patients not treatable with conventional procedures

BACKGROUND

Aortic Regurgitation (AR) produces the entrance of an abnormal amount of blood in the left ventricle. This disease is responsible for high morbidity and mortality worldwide and may be caused by an aortic valve dysfunction. Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are the current options for treating AR. They have replaced older procedures such as Hufnagel's one. However, some physicians have reconsidered this procedure as a less aggressive alternative for patients not eligible for surgical or TAVR. Although Hufnagel suggested a 75% regurgitation reduction when a valve is placed in the descending aorta, a quantification of this value has not been reported.

METHODS

In this paper, CFD/FSI numerical simulation is conducted on an idealized geometry. We quantify the effect of placing a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in the descending aorta on a moderate-severe AR case. A three-element Windkessel model is employed to prescribe pressure outlet boundary conditions. We calculate the resulting flow rates and pressures at the aorta and first-generation vessels. Moreover, we evaluate several indices to assess the improvement due to the valve introduction.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Regurgitation fraction (RF) is reduced from 37.5% (without valve) to 18.0% (with valve) in a single cardiac cycle. This reduction clearly shows the remarkable efficacy of the rescued technique. It will further ameliorate the left ventricle function in the long-term. Moreover, the calculations show that the implantation in that location introduces fewer incompatibilities' risks than a conventional one. The proposed methodology can be extended to any particular conditions (pressure waveforms/geometry) and is designed to assess usual clinical parameters employed by physicians.

Analytical expression of effective afterload in aortic and mitral regurgitation

Effective arterial elastance (Ea) is the coupling parameter between the left ventricle and peripheral circulation in normal subjects. If left ventricular end systolic pressure (Pes), contractility (Es) and Ea are known, left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and ejection fraction of the ventricle are completely determined. The aim of this study was to give an analytical expression for Ea in patients with mitral and aortic regurgitation, and predict both LVEDV and the effect of vasodilator therapy on LVEDV. Twenty-three subjects with atypical chest pain, 15 patients with mitral insufficiency and 11 with aortic insufficiency underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and left ventricular cineangiography, which was analyzed quantitatively. Ea was 2.05 +/- 0.63 in normal subjects, while it was 1.28 +/- 0.71 and 1.57 +/- 0.87 in patients with mitral and aortic insufficiency, respectively. All these groups differed with ANOVA test (p = 0.0031). We tested the ability of the analytical expressions for Ea in normal subjects, and patients with mitral insufficiency or aortic insufficiency to predict measured Ea and LVEDV. Ea and LVEDV were predicted rather accurately in every case (p < 0.0001). We used published data to test the effect of resistance modulation on LVEDV. Predicted and measured LVEDV were linearly correlated both in aortic (p < 0.0001) and mitral insufficiency (p = 0.027). Moreover, in some cases a left ventricular enlargement after vasodilator therapy could be anticipated because of an unbalanced decrease in resistance and heart rate. Ea seems to be the coupling parameter between the left ventricle and the peripheral circulation not only in normal subjects, but also in patients with mitral or aortic regurgitation; its measurement before administering vasodilating drugs may be useful in order to predict the effects on LVEDV, and achieve an optimal ventriculoarterial coupling.

Impact of vascular adaptation to chronic aortic regurgitation on left ventricular performance

BACKGROUND

This investigation was designed to test the hypothesis that vascular adaptation occurs in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation to maintain left ventricular (LV) performance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-five patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (mean age 50+/-14 years) were studied using a micromanometer LV catheter to obtain LV pressures and radionuclide ventriculography to obtain LV volumes during multiple loading conditions and right atrial pacing. These 45 patients were subgrouped according to their LV contractility (Ees) and ejection fraction values. Group I consisted of 24 patients with a normal Ees. Group IIa consisted of 10 patients with impaired Ees values (Ees <1.00 mm Hg/mL) but normal LV ejection fractions; Group IIb consisted of 11 patients with impaired contractility and reduced LV ejection fractions. The left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio, Ees/Ea, where Ea was calculated by dividing the LV end-systolic pressure by LV stroke volume, averaged 1.60+/-0.91 in Group I. It decreased to 0.91+/-0.27 in Group IIa (P<0.05 versus Group I), and it decreased further in Group IIb to 0.43+/-0.24 (P<0.001 versus Groups I and IIa). The LV ejection fractions were inversely related to the Ea values in both the normal and impaired contractility groups (r=-0.48, P<0.05 and r=-0.56, P<0.01, respectively), although the slopes of these relationships differed (P<0.05). The average LV work was maximal in Group IIa when the left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was near 1.0 because of a significant decrease in total arterial elastance (P<0.01 versus Group I). In contrast, the decrease in the left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio in Group IIb was caused by an increase in total arterial elastance, effectively double loading the LV, contributing to a decrease in LV pump efficiency (P<0.01 versus Group IIa and P<0.001 versus Group I).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular adaptation may be heterogeneous in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. In some, total arterial elastance decreases to maximize LV work and maintain LV performance, whereas in others, it increases, thereby double loading the LV, contributing to afterload excess and a deterioration in LV performance that is most prominent in those with impaired contractility.