Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and left ventricular hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients

Evaluation of atrial and brain natriuretic polypeptides in association with angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in Japanese non-diabetic hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphisms in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene have the potential to serve as a marker for an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Increased plasma levels of human atrial natriuretic polypeptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic polypeptide (BNP) are important indexes of cardiac function. The aim of this study was to examine possible relationships between I/D polymorphisms and the myocardial release of ANP and BNP in Japanese hemodialysis (HD) patients (n=131).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 131 non-diabetic hemodialysis patients. The genotype of ACE gene was determined by polymerase chain reaction with a set of specific timers. ANP and BNP levels were measured before HD.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of ANP and BNP were significantly lower in the DD genotype group compared to those in the II group. Corresponding levels in the ID genotype group were intermediate between those in the DD and II groups. ACE polymorphism was associated with neither ejection fraction nor left ventricular mass/height index (LVMI), as evidenced by echocardiographic findings (n=107). Plasma levels of ANP were significantly correlated with left atrial diameter (LAD) in patients as a whole, but this correlation was only observed in the II genotype group, and not in the DD or ID groups. Plasma levels of BNP were significantly correlated with LAD, left ventricular end systolic diameter and LVMI in patients as a whole, but these correlations were seen only in the II genotype group.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the plasma levels of these natriuretic peptides should be evaluated on the basis of ACE polymorphism for assessing cardiac diseases due to volume overload in Japanese HD patients.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition for cardiac hypertrophy in patients with end-stage renal disease: what is the evidence?

Dialysis patients show a high prevalence of cardiovascular complications among which left ventricular hypertrophy is one of the most frequent and is independently predictive of mortality. A recent study indicates that partial regression of left ventricular hypertrophy improves mortality and reduces cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, suggesting the importance of targeting therapeutic strategies to reduce cardiac hypertrophy and improve the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy in ESRD patients is multifactorial and includes hypertension, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, increased sympathetic activity, chronic volume overload, chronic anaemia and hyperparathyroidism. In this paper, we review the available experimental and clinical evidence showing the important contribution of the renin-angiotensin system as well as its interaction with the sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy in ESRD patients. Furthermore, we summarize the results of currently available clinical studies that examined the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin receptor antagonism on left ventricular hypertrophy in ESRD patients, and review evidences that support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists in the ESRD population.

ACE gene polymorphism, left ventricular geometry, and mortality in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease

The objectives of this study were to determine the association between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism and left ventricular (LV) geometry, and to clarify independent effects of ACE genotype on mortality after commencing dialysis in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A total of 106 diabetic patients, 71 men and 35 women, 11 type 1 and 95 type 2 diabetic, 57 +/- 12 (mean +/- standard deviation (S.D.)) years of age, who started dialysis were studied. Patients with cardiac diseases and those treated with ACE inhibitors were excluded because of potential effects on LV performance. Echocardiographic examination was performed within +/-2 months of the start of dialysis. Relation between ACE genotype and LV mass index (LVMI) or relative wall thickness (RWT) at onset of dialysis, and impact of ACE genotype on survival after commencing dialysis were evaluated. There were no significant differences in LVMI or RWT in the three ACE genotype groups at onset of dialysis. However, mortality of patients with the ACE-DD genotype was significantly higher than patients with the DI and II genotypes (hazard ratio, 2.318; P=0.043), based on a survival analysis with a mean follow-up duration of 60 months. The higher mortality in patients with the DD genotype was confirmed to be independent of LV hypertrophy and increases in RWT. In diabetic patients with ESRD, ACE genotype has no association with LV mass or RWT at the start of dialysis, but does have an independent impact on patient survival thereafter.

Cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in relation to ACE and angiotensinogen genes genotypes in Chinese dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Genetic polymorphisms of the angiotensinogen (AGT) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genes are associated with increased risk of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive subjects. However, the extent to which these polymorphisms are related to LVH and remodeling in dialysis patients remains unknown.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-six end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on peritoneal dialysis and 183 control subjects, all of Chinese origin, were genotyped for the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) and the AGT M235T gene polymorphisms. Left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and relative wall thickness were measured using echocardiography.

RESULTS

Prevalence of ACE DD and AGT TT genotype was 14% and 83%, respectively, in ESRD patients and did not differ significantly from controls. A total percentage of 95% of our patients had LVH (171 with concentric and 63 with eccentric hypertrophy). Adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, duration of dialysis, diabetes, renal diagnosis, hematocrit, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, dialysis urea clearance, residual glomerular filtration rate, and use of converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, AGT TT genotype remained independently associated with greater LVMi (coefficient = 28.73; 95% CI, 5.72 to 51.75; P = 0.015) and relative wall thickness (coefficient = 0.072; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.122; P = 0.005) than MT/MM genotypes. LVMi and relative wall thickness did not differ significantly among patients with DD, DI, and II genotypes. No statistical significant interaction was noted between ACE and AGT gene polymorphism in relation to LVMi and relative wall thickness.

CONCLUSION

Polymorphism of the AGT M235T gene but not ACE I/D gene is associated with greater LVMi and relative wall thickness, indicating more concentric LVH, in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients. Possible synergistic effects between AGT and ACE gene polymorphism require further evaluation in a larger population.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiotensin-receptor blockers in end-stage renal disease

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and more recently angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have become popular therapies in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient. The ability of either of these drug classes to reduce blood pressure in the ESRD patient is well accepted; however, there is considerably less information available to guide the clinician in the safe and effective use of these drugs in the ESRD patient with congestive heart failure and/or coronary artery disease. Head-to-head studies in the ESRD patient are lacking for both drug classes. Several pharmacokinetic factors can influence the selection of these drugs, including dialysability and the propensity for systemic accumulation. ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) and ARBs are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease both thirst drive and erythropoiesis. These drug classes, though, are distinguishable by the unique adverse effect profile for ACE-Is. As is the case in patients without renal failure, ESRD patients can experience cough and, less frequently, angioneurotic oedema with ACE-Is. In the ESRD population, so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions can occur in conjunction with ACE-I use. The use of a drug from within the ARB class carries both less risk and permits a compound with a preferred pharmacokinetic profile limited dialysability and minimal systemic accumulation to be administered. These attributes would favour the increased use of ARBs in this population.

Prediction of left ventricular geometry by clinic, pre-dialysis and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring in hemodialysis patients: CREED investigators

OBJECTIVE

Arterial hypertension is an established risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the uremic population. However, whether 24-h monitoring is a better predictor of LVH than clinic blood pressure and routine pre-dialysis measurements in these patients is still undefined.

METHODS

This problem was studied in 64 nondiabetic hemodialysis patients without heart failure. The echocardiographic study as well as the clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed during the day off-dialysis. Pre-dialysis arterial pressure was calculated as the average value of the 12 routine recordings taken during the month preceding the study.

RESULTS

In multivariate models, including also sex, body mass index, hematocrit and serum cholesterol, pre-dialysis systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures were the only independent BP determinants of heart geometry. Twenty-four hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) did add significant (but weak) information to the prediction of left ventricular internal dimension, i.e. it increased by 9% (P = 0.01) the variance already explained by pre-dialysis diastolic BP and other significant covariates. However, 24-h ABPM did not add any significant and independent explanatory information to the corresponding pre-dialysis measurements for the posterior wall and interventricular septum measurements, and for left ventricular mass (-0.6 to +3.9%; average +1.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In dialysis patients, pre-dialysis BP is at least as strong a predictor of left ventricular mass as 24-h ambulatory monitoring. Thus, the average of 12 routine pre-dialysis measurements may be used to predict heart geometry in dialysis patients without any loss of information in comparison with 24-h ambulatory monitoring.