Comparison of the first dose response of fosinopril and captopril in congestive heart failure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study

[Head-to-head comparison of clinical, biochemical and functional effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with systolic heart failure]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term clinical, biochemical and functional effects of fosinopril versus enalapril in patients with heart failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

59 consecutive patients (mean age 57 +/- 8 years, EF 18.9 +/- 6.3%, NYHA III or IV class 19/59) were randomized to receive fosinopril or enalapril for three months. All patients underwent echocardiography, metabolic testing, and a 6-minute walk test and completed the Minnesota questionnaire on inclusion and three months later. Additionally, serum creatinine, BUN, total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured. Kaplan-Meier curve was created to assess event-free survival for cardiac death and hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in event-free survival between patients on fosinopril and enalapril (86.7% vs. 82.8%, log rank 4.21 p=0.43). However, time to the event was longer in patients on fosinopril (77.0 +/- 25.35 vs. 40.2 +/- 6.8 days, p=0.04). At the end of the study, no difference between fosinopril and enalapril group existed with respect to maximal oxygen consumption (20.90 +/- 4.47 vs. 20.89 +/- 6.86 ml/kg/min), ejection fraction (20.5 +/- 7.4 vs. 21.4 +/- 7.8%), distance during the 6-minute test walk (313 +/- 74 vs. 352 +/- 129 meters) and quality of life (23.8 +/- 15.8 vs. 25.6 +/- 20.3 points), but patients on enalapril had higher creatinine (99 +/- 13 vs. 113 +/- 17 micromol/L, p=0.002) and BUN (7.28 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.89 +/- 2.39 mmol/L, p=0.01) levels. Increase in fosinopril dose during the study was higher than increase in enalapril dose (24.1% +/- 23.8% vs. 9.5 +/- 24.5%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinopril and enalapril have similar short-term effects on event-free survival, ejection fraction, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Patients on fosinopril presented with longer survival without event and had lower creatinine and BUN at the end-of the follow-up. Additionally, fosinopril can be easily titrated to the maximum therapeutic dose.

Heart failure and first dose hypotension after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

The first-dose induced decrease in blood pressure in some patients following the administration of ACE inhibitors is a fact causing some concern among clinicians prescribing these drugs. However, an overview of clinical trials and the authors' own experience clearly point to the possibility of reducing the incidence and/or severity of first-dose hypotension. Apart from appropriate clinical measures to be taken, the choice of the ACE inhibitor seems to be of crucial importance as some (fosinopril, perindopril) produce less hypotension than others. Thus, with due circumspection, ACE inhibitors can safely retain their position as the cornerstone of the treatment of chronic heart failure.