Computational tibial bone remodeling over a population after total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study

Periprosthetic bone loss is an important factor in tibial implant failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to validate computational postoperative bone response using longitudinal clinical DEXA densities. Computational remodeling outcome over a population was obtained by incorporating the strain‐adaptive remodeling theory in finite element (FE) simulations of 26 different tibiae. Physiological loading conditions were applied, and bone mineral density (BMD) in three different regions of interest (ROIs) was considered over a postoperative time of 15 years. BMD outcome was compared directly to previously reported clinical BMD data of a comparable TKA cohort. Similar trends between computational and clinical bone remodeling over time were observed in the two proximal ROIs, with most rapid bone loss taking place in the initial months after TKA and BMD starting to level in the following years. The extent of absolute proximal BMD change was underestimated in the FE population compared with the clinical subject group, which might be the result of significantly higher initial clinical baseline BMD values. Large differences in remodeling response were found in the distal ROI, in which resorption was measured clinically, but a large BMD increase was predicted by the FE models. Multiple computational limitations, related to the FE mesh, loading conditions, and strain‐adaptive algorithm, likely contributed to the extensive local bone formation. Further research incorporating subject‐specific comparisons using follow‐up CT scans and more extensive physiological knee loading is recommended to optimize bone remodeling more distal to the tibial baseplate.

Towards a Standard Approach to Assess Tibial Bone Loss Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Long-term implant failure in the form of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture is the most common cause of revision procedures in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While early loosening can often be attributed to failure of primary fixation, late implant failure could be associated with loss of fixation secondary to bone resorption, as a result of stress shielding in the proximal tibia. This current review study was performed to identify the clinical effects of different implant-, patient-, and surgery-related biomechanical factors on TKA-related tibial bone loss in clinical reality. Implant-related factors considered were the fixation method, and the implant type, geometry, and stiffness. In terms of patient characteristics, the effects of age, sex, knee alignment, bone density, body weight, and activity level were analyzed. The clinical literature on these topics mostly concerned longitudinal radiographic studies investigating the effect of a single factor on changes in the proximal tibia over time using bone densitometry. Implant stiffness, implant geometry and knee alignment were the only factors consistently found to affect regional bone density changes over time. Each clinical study used its own specific study design, with different definitions used for the baseline density, time points of baseline and follow-up measurements, and regions of interest. Due to the differences in study design, direct comparison between the clinical impact of different biomechanical factors was not possible. Based on the findings over the densitometry studies, a standardized guideline was proposed to allow reliable comparison between consistently reported outcome of future radiographic TKA studies.

Changes in femoral bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to periprosthetic fractures that are associated with significant costs (morbidity, economic, etc.) and pose a challenge to operative fixation. This meta-analysis quantifies the change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal femur after primary TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review of six databases was performed by two independent reviewers. Studies that reported bone density after knee arthroplasty were identified and inclusion/exclusion criteria was applied. Data were extracted and analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in the analysis. The average decrease in BMD was 0.09 [0.05, 0.13], 0.14 [0.08, 0.20], 0.16 [0.10, 0.23], and 0.16 [0.12, 0.20] g/cm² at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, corresponding to a 9.3%, 13.2%, 15.8%, and 15.4% BMD loss. A high degree of heterogeneity existed between the studies (I² > 90% at most time points).

CONCLUSION

In summary, there is a rapid and significant 15% decrease in BMD in the first 6 months after TKA that is sustained to 24 months. Better understanding regarding how perioperative optimization of bone health may affect BMD loss and the incidence of periprosthetic fracture is essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II.

Teriparatide Administration Increases Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide is a currently available therapeutic agent for osteoporosis. Previous studies have reported that teriparatide affects periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, little agreement has been reached concerning the treatment of periprosthetic BMD after TKA with teriparatide. Moreover, BMD in the femoral and tibial sides of the joints together has never been examined. We investigated the efficacy of teriparatide to inhibit BMD loss in the femoral and tibial side and considered complications such as migration and periprosthetic fractures after TKA.

METHODS

Twenty-two knees in 17 patients were included in this study, and a control group of patients who underwent TKA was identified according to their medical records. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed for different locations (knee, hip, and lumbar spine), and regions of interest were measured to estimate BMD at initiation of the study as a baseline reference, followed by subsequent measurements at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

As a result of adjusting the difference between the BMDs of the 2 groups at initiation, there was a significant increase in R3 (posterior condyle) and R4 (lateral) at 6 months. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in R2 (anterior condyle), R3 (posterior condyle), and R6 (tibial diaphysis) at 12 months. The study group had a higher adjusted mean BMD in all regions than did the control group at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Teriparatide may be a reasonable treatment option for osteoporotic patients to preserve or improve periprosthetic BMD after TKA.