Contribution of peripheral opioid receptors to the trimebutine-induced contractions of the proximal colon in anesthetized rats

Effects of trimebutine maleate on colonic motility through Ca²+-activated K+ channels and L-type Ca²+ channels

The effects of trimebutine maleate (TM) on spontaneous contractions of colonic longitudinal muscle were investigated in guinea pigs. The contractile responses of smooth muscle strips were recorded by an isometric force transducer. Membrane and action potentials were detected by an intracellular microelectrode technique. The whole-cell patch clamp recording technique was used to record the changes in large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) (BK(ca)) and L-type Ca(2+) currents in colonic smooth muscle cells. At high concentrations (30, 100, and 300 μM), TM inhibited the amplitude of spontaneous contractions. At low concentrations (1 and 10 μM), TM attenuated the frequency and tone of smooth muscle strips, whereas TM had no influence on the amplitude of spontaneous contractions. TM depolarized the membrane potentials, but decreased the amplitude and frequency of action potentials at high concentrations. TM inhibited BK(ca) and L-type Ca(2+) currents in a dose-dependent manner. In the presence of the BK(ca) channel opener, NS1619, TM also inhibited BK(ca) currents. Bayk8644, a L-type Ca(2+) channel opener, increased L-type Ca(2+) currents. This augmentation was also attenuated by TM. These results suggest that TM attenuates intestinal motility through inhibition of L-type Ca(2+) currents, and depolarizes membrane potentials by reducing BK(ca) currents. Thus, TM may be a multiple-ion channel regulator in the gastrointestinal tract.

Effects of trimebutine on intestinal motility after massive small bowel resection

Effects of trimebutine maleate (TM) on intestinal motility in short bowel syndrome (SBS) were studied in conscious canines in both acute and chronic phases following 80% massive distal small bowel resection (MSBR). TM was administered orally to beagles with MSBR or as controls in the postprandial and fasting states, and given simultaneously with meals. Intestinal motility was measured using bipolar electrodes for approximately 1 month after the electrodes were implanted in each beagle and the data compared between treatment groups. When TM was given with meals, the postprandial period without duodenal migrating myoelectric (or motor) complexes (MMCs) was shorter than in those given meals only. When TM was given in the postprandial state in short bowel beagles, the initial duodenal MMCs occurred earlier, i.e. the postprandial period was shorter. Diarrhea did not occur in these beagles. When TM was given in the fasting state, duodenal MMCs occurred and propagated to the distal intestine. In conclusion, oral TM administration can produce a more appropriate intestinal condition for the next food intake and make enteral nutrition possible even in the acute phase after MSBR. Such feeding can be carried out without overloading gut function as a result of the modulation of gastrointestinal motility by TM.

The effect of nociceptin, an endogenous ligand for the ORL1 receptor, on rat colonic contraction and transit

To assess the role of ORL1 (opioid receptor-like 1) receptor in the bowel movement, we investigated the effect of nociceptin on colonic contraction and transit in rats. Nociceptin (0.1-100 nM) concentration-dependently caused an immediate tonic contraction followed by rhythmic waves of contractions in the isolated colon. The response to nociceptin (10 nM) was not affected by the classical opioid receptor antagonists, naloxone, naltrindole and nor-binaltorphimine. Suppression of effect of inhibitory neurotransmitters using pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide(6-38) (PACAP-(6-38); 3 microM), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide(10-28) (VIP-(10-28); 3 microM) and N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 100 microM) did not influence the nociceptin-induced contractions. In anesthetized rats, intravenous administration of nociceptin (1 microg/kg) or morphine (1 mg/kg) caused phasic contractions in the proximal colon. Pretreatment with naloxone (300 microg/kg, i.v.) abolished the contractions induced by morphine, but not by nociceptin. The rate of large intestinal transit was dose-dependently accelerated by nociceptin (0.03-3 microg/kg, s.c.), but was retarded by morphine (1.7-5 mg/kg, s.c.). These results indicate that stimulation of ORL1 receptor accelerates the colonic contraction and transit independently from opioid receptors.