A comparison of three chromogranin A assays in patients with neuroendocrine tumours

Recent developments in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PanNENs) are characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical and biological behavior, making their diagnosis challenging. PanNENs diagnostic work-up mainly relies on biochemical markers, pathological examination, and imaging evaluation. The latter includes radiological imaging (i.e. computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), functional imaging (i.e. 68Gallium [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG PET/CT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with its associated procedures.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the recent advancements in the PanNENs diagnostic field. PubMed and Embase databases were used for the research, performed from inception to October 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of PanNENs biology, recent technological improvements in imaging modalities, as well as progresses achieved in molecular and cytological assays, are fundamental players for the achievement of early diagnosis and enhanced preoperative characterization of PanNENs. A multimodal diagnostic approach is required for a thorough disease assessment.

The role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, chromogranin A, and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in screening for carcinoid heart disease

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a serious complication for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and early detection is crucial. We aimed to investigate N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), chromogranin A (CgA), and plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (P-5-HIAA) as a screening tool for detection of CHD. We prospectively included patients with disseminated small intestinal NETs (SI-NETs) and performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), questionnaires, and biochemical assessment of NT-proBNP, CgA, and P-5-HIAA. The presence and severity of CHD was assessed using a scoring system based on echocardiographic characteristics. A total of 93 patients were included in the final analysis. Fifteen (16%) were diagnosed with CHD. The median NT-proBNP (219 ng/L vs. 124 ng/L, p = .05), CgA (3930 pmol/L vs. 256 pmoL/L, p < .0001), and P-5-HIAA (1160 nmol/L vs. 210 nmoL/L, p < .0001) were significantly higher in patients with CHD compared to non-CHD patients. For NT-proBNP, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for detection of CHD was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.50-0.84), and at a 260 ng/L cutoff level, the sensitivity and specificity were 46% and 79%. For CgA, the AUROC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97), and at a cutoff level of 598 pmol/L, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 69%. For P-5-HIAA, the AUROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98), and at a cutoff level of 752 nmol/L, the sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 85%. In conclusion, CgA and P-5-HIAA proved excellent markers of CHD while NT-proBNP lacked the required diagnostic accuracy to be used as a screening tool.

Comparison of two chromogranin A assays and investigation of nonlinear specimens

Background

As a marker for functional and non-functional neuroendocrine tumors, serum chromogranin A (CgA) concentrations have shown value for detecting and monitoring disease. Here we describe a comparison between an established micro-titer plate assay (Cisbio CgA ELISA) and an analyzer-based assay (B·R·A·H·M·S CgA II KRYPTOR). Reference limits were established along with a performance evaluation of the KRYPTOR assay. Nonlinearity observed in approximately 0.03% of patients was also investigated.

Methods

Samples were tested according to kit manufacturer's protocols. Reference limits were established for both assays testing the same cohort of healthy volunteers. Potential causes of nonlinearity investigated were HAMA, macromolecule effects and elevated serum creatinine.

Results

KRYPTOR vs. Cisbio: slope=0.692, y-intercept=−40.0 (r²=0.967, n=186). Upper reference limits were 160 and 103 ng/mL for the Cisbio and KRYPTOR assays, respectively. Linearity: slope=1.012 (r²=0.998) with 95.0–105.5% recoveries. Precision: repeatability ≤2.4%, within-laboratory ≤3.1% (79 and 738 ng/mL). Limit of detection: 8 ng/mL. Strong nonlinear specimens (n=6) retested for HAMA interference generated differences (block-no block) ranging −3.2–4.2%. Polyethylene glycol precipitation recoveries ranged from 157 to >5714% for affected specimens versus 71–79% for normal specimens. Eight of 14 nonlinear specimens (57%) had elevated serum creatinine results (>1.20 mg/dL).

Conclusions

The CgA II KRYPTOR assay performs acceptably for quantifying CgA in human serum. While adequate correlation is observed against the Cisbio ELISA, there is significant disagreement overall. Efforts to identify a cause of the nonlinearity observed in a small percentage of patients were inconclusive, but neither HAMA interference, macromolecule effects nor renal failure appear as major factors.

•

The Cisbio Chromoa® ELISA is a well-established assay for measuring chromogranin A.

•

The CgA II KRYPTOR® performs acceptably for quantifying chromogranin A in serum.

•

Studies of the CgA II KRYPTOR vs. the established Cisbio Chomoa ELISA are lacking.

•

Agreement between the Cisbio Chromoa CgA ELISA and the CgA II KRYPTOR is suboptimal.

•

Causes for the nonlinearity in approximately 0.02–0.03% of specimens remain unclear.

Role of chromogranin A-derived fragments after resection of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

No single reliable biomarker is available for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). Vasostatin-1 (VS-1), the N-terminal fragment of chromogranin A (CgA), seems to be a more accurate biomarker compared to its precursor. Primary aim was to investigate the ability of VS-1, compared to total-CgA, to assess the effectiveness of surgical resection performed for NF-PanNETs. Secondary aim was to evaluate two additional CgA-derived fragments, pancreastatin (PST) and vasostatin-2 (VS-2), as possible biomarkers for NF-PanNETs.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for NF-PanNETs at San Raffaele Scientific Institute were included (n = 35). Plasma levels of CgA and CgA-derived fragments were measured by Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA), preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative VS-1 was significantly higher compared to VS-1 measured on postoperative day 5 (POD5) (pre: 0.338 nM versus POD5: 0.147 nM, P < 0.001), whereas total-CgA significantly increased after surgery (pre: 1.123 nM versus POD5: 1.949 nM, P = 0.006). Overall, 24 patients showed ≥ 1 feature of tumor aggressiveness (T3-T4, nodal/distant metastases, Ki67 > 5%, microvascular/perineural invasion, necrosis). The median percentage decrease in VS-1 plasma levels was 63% (IQR 28-88%) among patients with aggressive tumors, compared to 13% (IQR 0-57%) in the remaining population (P = 0.033). No significant differences in terms of PST (P = 0.870) and VS-2 (P = 0.909) were observed between preoperative and postoperative time.

CONCLUSION

VS-1 provides an early assessment of surgical efficacy in patients who undergo resection for NF-PanNETs, especially in those with aggressive neoplasms. Total-CgA, PST and VS-2 have no clinical utility in this setting.

Performance Evaluation of the KRYPTOR Compact PLUS Analyzer-Based B.R.A.H.M.S. CgA Ⅱ KRYPTOR Assay for Chromogranin A Measurement

Numerous immunoassays have been developed to measure the levels of chromogranin A (CgA), a useful biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring generally heterogeneous neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Here, we evaluated the imprecision and linearity of three such assays: KRYPTOR (ThermoFisher Scientific), NEOLISA (EuroDiagnostica), and CgA-RIA (CisBio), using 123 samples for each assay. The correlation coefficients between the assays were 0.932 (CgA-RIA versus NEOLISA), 0.956 (KRYPTOR versus CgA-RIA), and 0.873 (NEOLISA versus KRYPTOR). KRYPTOR showed good precision, with percent coefficients of variation less than 5% for low and high concentration quality controls. Linearity was maintained over a wide concentration range. Comparison of CgA levels from three disease entities (NETs, non-NET pancreatic tumors, and prostate cancer) and healthy controls showed that patients with NETs had significantly higher CgA levels (n = 57, mean: 1.82 ± 0.43 log ng/mL) than healthy individuals (n = 20, mean: 1.51 ± 0.23 log ng/mL; p = 0.018). No other significant differences between groups were observed. All three immunoassays showed strong correlations in measured CgA levels. Because KRYPTOR operation uses a fully automated random-access system and requires shorter incubation times and smaller sample volumes, the KRYPTOR assay may improve laboratory workflow while maintaining satisfactory analytical performance.

Antibody-Free Quantification of Serum Chromogranin A by Targeted Mass Spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CgA) is a 48 kDa protein that serves as a diagnostically sensitive, but nonspecific, serum biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors. Immunoassays for CgA are not standardized and have a narrow dynamic range, which requires dilution of concentrated specimens. We developed and validated an antibody-free, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based method for CgA without these limitations.

METHODS

CgA was extracted from serum using a mixed-mode anion exchange solid-phase extraction plate, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using well-characterized CgA calibration standards. After validation, the mass spectrometry method was compared with the CISBIO immunoassay using 200 serum specimens previously submitted for CgA analysis. Specimens with discordant results were reanalyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry- (HRMS) -based methods to assess the contribution of truncated and post-translationally modified forms of CgA.

RESULTS

The assay had a linear range of 50 to 50 000 ng/mL, recoveries between 89% and 115%, and intra- and interassay imprecision <10%. LC-MS/MS assay results showed a Pearson's correlation of r = 0.953 with the CISBIO immunoassay, with CgA values being a mean 2- to 4-fold higher. Concordance for CgA between the 2 assays was 80.9% (95% CI 72.8%-89.2%), showing substantial agreement. Truncation and posttranslational modification, including 2 phosphorylation sites that had not been previously observed or predicted to our knowledge, did not appear to contribute directly to discordance between the 2 assays.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of CgA by LC-MS/MS provides an analytically sensitive and reproducible alternative to commercially available immunoassays.

Evaluation of three commercially available ELISA kits for the determination of chromogranin A

Chromogranin A (CgA) is currently the most valuable tumor biomarker for diagnostic work-up, management and follow-up of neuro-endocrine tumors (NET). The aim of our study was to compare three different commercially available CgA ELISA kits and to evaluate their analytical and clinical performance. CgA was measured with three different commercial ELISA kits on leftover sera from 40 patients: Chromoa R assay (Cis), Hu chromogranin A ELISA (Dia), and Neolisa chromogranin A (Euro). Analytical and clinical performance was evaluated by measuring precision, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, correlation coefficients and Passing and Bablok regression analyses. Precision (CV%) was acceptable for all evaluated ELISA's (Cis 10.3%; Dia 9.8%; Euro 14.5%). The area under the curve (AUC) was comparable between the three assays (Cis 0.693; Dia 0.627; Euro 0.721). Sensitivity varied between 41.2% and 64.7%. Specificity ranged between 69.6% and 82.6%. Pairwise comparison revealed significant systematic and proportional differences when comparing Cis versus Dia (Cis = 25.30 + 1.94 Dia) and Euro versus Dia (Euro = 26.54 + 1.92 Dia). Analytical and clinical performance was comparable for the three ELISA's. CgA results obtained with different ELISA's are not interchangeable.AbbreviationsCgA: Chromogranin A; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IRMA: Immunoradiometric assay; NET: Neuroendocrine tumors; PPI: Proton-pump inhibitors; RIA: Radioimmunoassay.

Evaluation of CisBio ELISA for Chromogranin A Measurement

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CgA) is a nonspecific marker for the presence of neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine differentiation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CisBio CgA ELISA.

METHODS

Precision, linearity, limit of blank, and recovery of the CisBio CgA ELISA were evaluated. Seventy waste serum samples obtained from the clinical laboratory at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were analyzed by the CisBio CgA ELISA. Results were compared to those obtained from a reference laboratory that used a proprietary ELISA for serum CgA measurement. Paired waste plasma samples were also collected from 24 of these patients to assess possible differences between CgA in serum and plasma. Finally, a preliminary reference range study was performed with samples from healthy volunteers in serum (n = 60) and plasma (n = 60).

RESULTS

Within-run and between-run precision ranged from 3.0% to 5.1% and 4.8% to 12.9%, respectively. The limit of blank was 2.4 ng/mL. Recovery ranged from 88% to 102%. A statistically significant bias was observed when the CisBio CgA assay results were compared to those of a reference laboratory. Comparison of the 2 assays yielded a slope of 9.05, intercept of -18.0, and a correlation coefficient of 0.955. CgA values in serum correlated well to values measured in plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

The analytical performance of the CisBio CgA ELISA was acceptable. However, CgA results are method-specific owing to lack of standardization and use of different antibodies. This lack of standardization results in several challenges for the clinical laboratory when evaluating a CgA assay.

Prognostic significance of Chromogranin A in small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

The incidence of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2cm is rising. The biologic behavior of these tumors is variable; thus, their management remains controversial. Chromogranin A upregulation is a useful diagnostic biomarker of neuroendocrine tumors; however, the prognostic significance of Chromogranin A is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether Chromogranin A levels have prognostic value in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and may help guide management.

METHODS

We evaluated the National Cancer Database over a 10-year period (2004-2013). Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors measuring ≤2cm, without distant metastases, were identified and categorized as Chromogranin A high (>420ng/mL) or Chromogranin A low (≤420ng/mL), and those lacking data on Chromogranin A levels were excluded from the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model. Cut-point determination was performed using the Contal and O'Quigley method.

RESULTS

Of the 445 eligible patients, 352 (79%) were Chromogranin A low and 93 (21%) were Chromogranin A high. Median Chromogranin A level was 71ng/mL (interquartile range, 24-294ng/mL). Chromogranin levels were associated with clinical nodal status and grade. Furthermore, on multivariate analysis, Chromogranin A levels (Chromogranin A high versus Chromogranin A low) independently predicted overall survival after controlling for tumor size, grade, clinical nodal status, and academic status of the facility (hazard ratio: 7.90, 95%CI: 2.34-26.69, P = .001). The greatest benefit of surgical resection was noted in patients in the Chromogranin A high subgroup (log-rank P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Serum Chromogranin A levels can be incorporated in surgical decision-making for patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Patients in the Chromogranin A low group can be considered for observation, whereas patients in the Chromogranin A high group should be strongly considered for resection.

Prognostic value of chromogranin A in patients with GET/NEN in the pancreas and the small intestine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the chromogranin A (CgA) determination in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the digestive system and to analyse the association between concentration of the marker and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Serum concentrations of CgA were determined before the treatment in 131 patients with NENs, including patients with tumours located in the pancreas, the small intestine, caecum, appendix and in the colon. No significant associations were identified in CgA concentrations between the control group and patients with NENs in appendix and colon. In patients with NENs of the pancreas and NENs of the small intestine and caecum, increased CgA levels were associated with lymph node involvement, distant metastases and a baseline liver involvement. Analyses revealed significantly higher CgA concentrations in patients with active disease compared to those without symptoms of NEN. In patients with NENs of the pancreas, CgA concentration was correlated with tumour grade and Ki67. Significantly higher CgA levels were also found in patients who died compared to those who lived. Analyses of PFS and OS revealed that CgA concentration was not a prognostic factor in patients with NENs of the pancreas. In patients with NENs of the small intestine and caecum, increased CgA concentrations are independent, poor prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. In conclusion, in patients with NENs in pancreas, CgA levels are associated with disease progression, while in patients with NENs in small intestine and caecum, its concentration is a predictive indicator for PFS and OS.

Survival and Predictors of Death for Patients with Bronchopulmonary Carcinoid at a Danish Tertiary NET Centre

BACKGROUND/AIM

Bronchopulmonary carcinoids comprise of typical carcioids (TC) and atypical carcinoids (AC). We present characteristics and associated mortality in patients with TC and AC followed-up at a Danish NET Centre between 2000-2014.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from medical records, computed tomographic scans, and pathology reports. Mortality was investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

We included 68 patients, 55 with TC (81%) and 13 with AC (19%). Median follow-up was 5.6 years (range=1.0-26.3). Fourteen patients died; 13 were smokers, and nine had a Ki67 index >2%. Metastatic disease, smoking and male gender were significantly associated with risk of dying within the first 5 years (log-rank, all p<0.05), while Ki67 index >2% showed a trend for being associated with risk of death (p=0.11).

CONCLUSION

Survival is strongly associated with tumor type and current/previous smoking. Metastatic disease at diagnosis and male gender are predictors of death within 5 years.