Acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis: a manifestation of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngitis: An Updated Review

BACKGROUND

Group A ß-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) is the leading bacterial cause of acute pharyngitis in children and adolescents worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to familiarize clinicians with the clinical manifestations, evaluation, diagnosis, and management of GABHS pharyngitis.

METHODS

A search was conducted in December 2022 in PubMed Clinical Queries using the key term "group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis". This review covers mainly literature published in the previous ten years.

RESULTS

Children with GABHS pharyngitis typically present with an abrupt onset of fever, intense pain in the throat, pain on swallowing, an inflamed pharynx, enlarged and erythematous tonsils, a red and swollen uvula, enlarged tender anterior cervical lymph nodes. As clinical manifestations may not be specific, even experienced clinicians may have difficulties diagnosing GABHS pharyngitis solely based on epidemiologic or clinical grounds alone. Patients suspected of having GABHS pharyngitis should be confirmed by microbiologic testing (e.g., culture, rapid antigen detection test, molecular point-of-care test) of a throat swab specimen prior to the initiation of antimicrobial therapy. Microbiologic testing is generally unnecessary in patients with pharyngitis whose clinical and epidemiologic findings do not suggest GABHS. Clinical score systems such as the Centor score and McIssac score have been developed to help clinicians decide which patients should undergo diagnostic testing and reduce the unnecessary use of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial therapy should be initiated without delay once the diagnosis is confirmed. Oral penicillin V and amoxicillin remain the drugs of choice. For patients who have a non-anaphylactic allergy to penicillin, oral cephalosporin is an acceptable alternative. For patients with a history of immediate, anaphylactic-type hypersensitivity to penicillin, oral clindamycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are acceptable alternatives.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment are recommended to prevent suppurative complications (e.g., cervical lymphadenitis, peritonsillar abscess) and non-suppurative complications (particularly rheumatic fever) as well as to reduce the severity of symptoms, to shorten the duration of the illness and to reduce disease transmission.

Immune reconstitution disorders in patients with HIV infection: from pathogenesis to prevention and treatment

An immune reconstitution disorder occurs in up to 40 % of severely immunodeficient HIV patients who commence antiretroviral therapy (ART), with an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) being encountered most commonly. Differences in the immunopathogenesis of an IRIS associated with different types of pathogen have become apparent but common features have also been defined. These include severe immunodeficiency prior to commencing ART associated with a high pathogen load and 'compensatory' immune responses, particularly innate immune responses, which inadequately control the pathogen and increase the risk of immunopathology as the immune system recovers on ART. Prevention of an IRIS may be achieved by optimising therapy for opportunistic infections before ART is commenced, delaying ART or using immunomodulatory therapy to prevent or suppress the immune response that causes the immunopathology. However, further clinical studies are required to examine these options in a systematic manner for the various types of IRIS.