1
|
Gidding SS, Ballantyne CM, Cuchel M, de Ferranti S, Hudgins L, Jamison A, McGowan MP, Peterson AL, Steiner RD, Uveges MK, Wang Y. It is Time to Screen for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States. Glob Heart 2024; 19:43. [PMID: 38708402 PMCID: PMC11067975 DOI: 10.5334/gh.1316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an ultra-rare inherited condition that affects approximately one in 300,000 people. The disorder is characterized by extremely high, life-threatening levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from birth, leading to significant premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, if left untreated. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is severely underdiagnosed and undertreated in the United States (US), despite guidelines recommendations for universal pediatric lipid screening in children aged 9-11. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are critical in averting premature cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by HoFH. Yet, an unacceptably high number of people living with HoFH remain undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and/or receive a late diagnosis, often after a major cardiovascular event. The emergence of novel lipid-lowering therapies, along with the realization that diagnosis is too often delayed, have highlighted an urgency to implement policies that ensure timely detection of HoFH in the US. Evidence from around the world suggests that a combination of universal pediatric screening and cascade screening strategies constitutes an effective approach to identifying heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Nevertheless, HoFH and its complications manifest much earlier in life compared to HeFH. To date, little focus has been placed on the detection of HoFH in very young children and/or infants. The 2023 Updated European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on HoFH has recommended, for the first time, broadening pediatric guidelines to include lipid screening of newborn infants. Some unique aspects of HoFH need to be considered before implementing newborn screening. As such, insights from pilot studies conducted in Europe may provide some preliminary guidance. Our paper proposes a set of actionable measures that states can implement to reduce the burden of HoFH. It also outlines key research and policy gaps that need to be addressed in order to pave the way for universal newborn screening of HoFH in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marina Cuchel
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, US
| | | | | | | | - Mary P. McGowan
- Family Heart Foundation, US
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, US
| | - Amy L. Peterson
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, US
| | - Robert D. Steiner
- Leadiant, Mirum, PTC-Consultant, PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-Employee with equity, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, US
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nennstiel U, Odenwald B, Throner V, Blankenstein O, Vieth A, Ratzel R, Coenen M, Brockow I. [Newborn blood spot screening (NBS) in Germany : Status quo and presentation of a concept for further development]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2023; 66:1195-1204. [PMID: 37815611 PMCID: PMC10622373 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-023-03771-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Newborn screening from dried blood spots (NBS) is a highly effective secondary prevention measure that has been established for many years. Against the background of the inclusion of "new diseases" that meet the screening criteria, a concept for the further advancement of NBS was developed on behalf of the GKV-Spitzenverband. This was based on a systematic literature review and a survey of the status quo of NBS in Germany using quantitative and qualitative methods.It is essential for the success of NBS that all newborns affected by a target disease are diagnosed and treated at an early stage and that the harm to be expected with each screening (e.g., due to false positive findings) is kept as low as possible. This requires the organisation of screening in the sense of an integrated programme through central coordination with standardised structures, continuous quality management and digitalisation in line with data protection requirements.Although in general NBS is being implemented successfully in Germany, the research project presented here also reveals weaknesses and a need for action. Proposals and recommendations were compiled in a concept paper, which shows approaches for further development of NBS in line with the current state of research in consideration of changing demands on the infrastructure and processes in the health system. This review article summarises the challenges, current status and possible solutions for the central topics of the concept paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uta Nennstiel
- Sachgebiet GP1: Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LGL), Oberschleißheim, Bayern, Deutschland.
| | - Birgit Odenwald
- Sachgebiet GP1: Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LGL), Oberschleißheim, Bayern, Deutschland
| | - Veronika Throner
- Lehrstuhl für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Medizinische Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Bayern, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Blankenstein
- Institut für Experimentelle Pädiatrische Endokrinologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Vieth
- Philosophisches Seminar, Universität Münster, Münster, NRW, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Ratzel
- Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Ratzel Rechtsanwälte, München, Bayern, Deutschland
| | - Michaela Coenen
- Lehrstuhl für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Medizinische Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Bayern, Deutschland
| | - Inken Brockow
- Sachgebiet GP1: Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LGL), Oberschleißheim, Bayern, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Odenwald B, Brockow I, Hanauer M, Lüders A, Nennstiel U. Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:35. [PMID: 37489488 PMCID: PMC10366861 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening using dried blood spots (NBS) is widely acknowledged as a highly successful procedure in secondary prevention. For a number of congenital disorders, severe disability or death are impressively prevented by early detection and early treatment through NBS. However, as with any other screening, NBS can also cause harm, and the principle that "the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harms" must be considered when introducing and implementing NBS programmes. This publication compiles the results of a systematic literature research on requirements for NBS infrastructure and procedures which was conducted as part of a research project on the quality and shortcomings of the NBS pathway in Germany. The compilation contains the requirements and recommendations for realising the principle of "maximise benefits and minimise harms" in relevant NBS pathway components such as parental education and information, coverage, timeliness, laboratory quality assurance, follow-up of abnormal results, confirmatory diagnostics, documentation, and evaluation. The results reflect the complexity of NBS infrastructure, and thus, they illustrate the importance of considering and implementing NBS as a well-coordinated public health programme with continuous quality management. Special attention should be paid to the perspectives of parents and families. Some NBS issues can substantially benefit from digital instruments or international cooperation. The literature review presented here has contributed to a concept of proposals for the advancement of NBS in Germany, and despite different settings, it may as well be of interest for other countries to achieve the best possible course and outcome of NBS for each child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Odenwald
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Uta Nennstiel
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plumb RS, Gethings LA, Rainville PD, Isaac G, Trengove R, King AM, Wilson ID. Advances in high throughput LC/MS based metabolomics: A review. Trends Analyt Chem 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
5
|
A Window of Opportunity for Newborn Screening. Mol Diagn Ther 2022; 26:253-261. [PMID: 35507129 PMCID: PMC9098569 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-022-00590-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Molecular diagnostics and therapies play a central role in an era of precision medicine, with the promise of more accurate diagnoses and more effective treatments. Universal newborn screening (NBS) identifies those health conditions that must be treated in early life and before clinical symptoms become apparent, to maximize effectiveness, prevent morbidity, and reduce or eliminate mortality. However, enthusiasm about NBS as the logical platform for early identification is tempered by the realization that NBS under public health authority exists in a complex ecology in which technology and medicine intersect with politics, ethics, advocacy, and resource constraints-a classic translational challenge that is exacerbated when considering the possible introduction of genome sequencing and molecular therapies in NBS. Substantial change is inevitable if the current model of NBS can be prepared for an envisioned future of greatly expanded molecular diagnostics and therapies. A window of opportunity for modernization now exists, but what changes are needed? The purpose of this commentary is to identify five major initiatives to stimulate focused discussion on how modernization might be achieved: (1) build systems for more rapid collection and integration of extant data relevant to NBS; (2) establish a national network of NBS research centers to design and conduct prospective research studies addressing critical NBS questions; (3) create a network of regional NBS laboratories to expedite state implementation of new methodologies or screening for newly recommended conditions; (4) establish a new stream of federal funding to provide financial support for states and incentivize national harmonization; and (5) integrate solutions in a way that is strategic and effective. Some aspects of these recommendations suggest that radical policy changes are needed to implement molecular testing in NBS and take advantage of emerging molecular therapies. I focus on recommendations for modernizing NBS in the US, some of which may be applicable in other countries.
Collapse
|
6
|
Conway M, Vuong TT, Hart K, Rohrwasser A, Eilbeck K. Pain points in parents' interactions with newborn screening systems: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:167. [PMID: 35361157 PMCID: PMC8967687 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Objectives This study aims to explore and elucidate parents’ experience of newborn screening [NBS], with the overarching goal of identifying desiderata for the development of informatics-based educational and health management resources. Methods We conducted four focus groups and four one-on-one qualitative interviews with a total of 35 participants between March and September 2020. Participants were grouped into three types: parents who had received true positive newborn screening results; parents who had received false positive results; and soon-to-be parents who had no direct experience of the screening process. Interview data were subjected to analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach. Results Results are divided into five sections: (1) experiences related to the process of receiving NBS results and prior knowledge of the NBS program; (2) approaches to the management of a child’s medical data; (3) sources of additional informational and emotional support; (4) barriers faced by parents navigating the health system; and (5) recommendations and suggestions for new parents experiencing the NBS process. Conclusion Our analysis revealed a wide range of experiences of, and attitudes towards the newborn screening program and the wider newborn screening system. While parents’ view of the screening process was – on the whole – positive, some participants reported experiencing substantial frustration, particularly related to how results are initially communicated and difficulties in accessing reliable, timely information. This frustration with current information management and education resources indicates a role for informatics-based approaches in addressing parents’ information needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Conway
- School of Computing and Information Systems , University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Truc Thuy Vuong
- Cell, Molecular, and Cancer Biology Graduate Program and Medical Sciences Graduate Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Kim Hart
- Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Karen Eilbeck
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bailey DB, Porter KA, Andrews SM, Raspa M, Gwaltney AY, Peay HL. Expert Evaluation of Strategies to Modernize Newborn Screening in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2140998. [PMID: 34964853 PMCID: PMC8717100 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Novel therapies, including cell and gene therapies, can radically improve outcomes among patients with rare disorders, especially if provided early. Newborn screening (NBS) could support early access to novel therapies, but the speed of new therapy development is a disruptive event for which the public health NBS system and state newborn screening programs are unprepared. OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate possible solutions for modernizing NBS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this survey study, NBS experts representing clinical research, federal or state advisory boards, patient advocacy groups, industry, or state laboratories completed an online survey in which they considered 20 potential solutions for modernizing NBS and rated each. EXPOSURES Participants considered 20 potential solutions in the 5 following domains: (1) timeliness of disorder review, (2) alternative mechanisms to offer screening for new disorders not currently part of NBS, (3) expanded data collection, (4) support for states, and (5) emerging methods of screening and their consequences. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean ratings for each solution on efficacy, acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability. RESULTS The survey was completed by 40 NBS experts (median [range] age, 54 [37-73] years; 22 [55.0%] women). Participants acknowledged that substantial change is needed to prepare the NBS system for rapid expansion of novel therapies; on a scale of 0 (no change) to 10 (extensive change), the median (range) score was 8 (2-10), with 18 respondents (45.0%) believing that the NBS would need many new components or an entirely new system to accommodate the changes. All solutions for modernization were considered potentially efficacious by at least 23 respondents (57.5%). The 2 most strongly endorsed were to establish mechanisms for cross-state data coordination for provisional disorders (38 respondents [95.0%]) and create a network of regional screening laboratories (36 [90.0%]). These were closely followed by aligning programs across federal agencies (35 [87.5%]), expanding funding for research (34 [85.0%]), expanding funding to states (34 [85.0%]), building capacity to identify genetic variants and an associated clinical database (34 [85.0%]), and conducting surveillance to study long-term outcomes (34 [85.0%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, there was consensus among experts that NBS needs to change if the system is to be prepared for a rapid increase in transformative therapies. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic inventory of potential solutions for modernizing NBS and expert perceptions of each. The findings suggest that the modernization of NBS will require the integration of highly rated solutions, strategic planning, and coordination among multiple stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Melissa Raspa
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | | | - Holly L. Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gregornik D, Salyakina D, Brown M, Roiko S, Ramos K. Pediatric pharmacogenomics: challenges and opportunities: on behalf of the Sanford Children's Genomic Medicine Consortium. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2020; 21:8-19. [PMID: 32843689 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-020-00181-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The advent of digital, electronic, and molecular technologies has allowed the study of complete genomes. Integrating this information into drug development has opened the door for pharmacogenomic (PGx) interventions in direct patient care. PGx allows clinicians to better identify drug of choice and optimize dosing regimens based on an individual's genetic characteristics. Integrating PGx into pediatric care is a priority for the Sanford Children's Genomic Medicine Consortium, a partnership of ten children's hospitals across the US committed to the innovation and advancement of genomics in pediatric care. In this white paper, we review the current state of PGx research and its clinical utility in pediatrics, a largely understudied population, and make recommendations for advancing cutting-edge practice in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gregornik
- Pharmacogenomics Program, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Daria Salyakina
- Research Institute and Personalized Medicine Initiative, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn Brown
- Research Institute and Personalized Medicine Initiative, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Samuel Roiko
- Children's Research Institute, Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kenneth Ramos
- Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sohn H, Timmermans S. Inequities in newborn screening: Race and the role of medicaid ☆. SSM Popul Health 2019; 9:100496. [PMID: 31867436 PMCID: PMC6904787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn Screening (NBS) is a State-run program that mandates all newborns to be screened for a panel of medical conditions to reduce infant mortality and morbidity. Medicaid is a public health insurance program that expanded access to care for low-income infants. NBS mandates and Medicaid rolled out state-by-state in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, which are considered significant programs that improved infant health in the latter half of the 20th Century. This article utilized variation in States' timing of NBS mandates and Medicaid implementation to examine changes in infant mortality rates among white and African American infants associated with NBS, Medicaid, and their interaction. The analyses used data from birth and death certificates in the US Vital Statistics from 1959 to 1995. We find that the implementation of NBS mandates alone was not associated with significant declines in infant mortality and coincided with increases in within-state racial inequities. States experienced mortality declines and reduction in racial inequities after implementing Medicaid with NBS mandates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeju Sohn
- California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 337 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Stefan Timmermans
- Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, 216 Haines Hall, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Analyzing Patterns in NewSTEPs Site Review Recommendations: Practical Applications for Newborn Screening Programs. Int J Neonatal Screen 2019; 5:13. [PMID: 33072973 PMCID: PMC7510203 DOI: 10.3390/ijns5010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The Newborn Screening Technical assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs) conducts non-regulatory site reviews of state newborn screening programs in the US with the goal of providing comprehensive reports and recommendations to support quality improvements within the system. A detailed coding and qualitative analysis of data extracted from reports of seven programs visited between 2012 and 2017, of thirteen pre-site visit surveys completed by state newborn screening programs, and of information from interviews conducted with three site review experts revealed four common themes that exist across states within the national newborn screening system. These themes include opportunities to implement improvements in: (1) communications inside and outside of the state newborn screening program, (2) education, (3) information technology, and (4) operations. The cross-cutting recommendations provided by NewSTEPs within the comprehensive site review reports may prove valuable for all state programs to consider and to incorporate as quality improvement measures in the absence of a full site review. The analysis of the site review process and recommendations identified important opportunities for improvement, many of which were previously unknown to be common across programs, and also provided affirmation of known challenges.
Collapse
|
11
|
Prosser LA, Lam KK, Grosse SD, Casale M, Kemper AR. Using Decision Analysis to Support Newborn Screening Policy Decisions: A Case Study for Pompe Disease. MDM Policy Pract 2018; 3. [PMID: 30123835 PMCID: PMC6095138 DOI: 10.1177/2381468318763814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Newborn screening is a public health program to identify conditions associated with significant morbidity or mortality that benefit from early intervention. Policy decisions about which conditions to include in newborn screening are complex because data regarding epidemiology and outcomes of early identification are often incomplete. Objectives: To describe expected outcomes of Pompe disease newborn screening and how a decision analysis informed recommendations by a federal advisory committee. Methods: We developed a decision tree to compare Pompe disease newborn screening with clinical identification of Pompe disease in the absence of screening. Cases of Pompe disease were classified into three types: classic infantile-onset disease with cardiomyopathy, nonclassic infantile-onset disease, and late-onset disease. Screening results and 36-month health outcomes were projected for classic and nonclassic infantile-onset cases. Input parameters were based on published and unpublished data supplemented by expert opinion. Results: We estimated that screening 4 million babies born each year in the United States would detect 40 cases (range: 13–56) of infantile-onset Pompe disease compared with 36 cases (range: 13–56) detected clinically without screening. Newborn screening would also identify 94 cases of late-onset Pompe disease that might not become symptomatic for decades. By 36 months, newborn screening would avert 13 deaths (range: 8–19) and decrease the number of individuals requiring mechanical ventilation by 26 (range: 20–28). Conclusions: Pompe disease is a rare condition, but early identification can improve health outcomes. Decision analytic modeling provided a quantitative data synthesis that informed the recommendation of Pompe disease newborn screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Prosser
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (LAP), Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (KKL), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (SDG), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (MC), Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (ARK)
| | - K K Lam
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (LAP), Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (KKL), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (SDG), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (MC), Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (ARK)
| | - Scott D Grosse
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (LAP), Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (KKL), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (SDG), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (MC), Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (ARK)
| | - Mia Casale
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (LAP), Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (KKL), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (SDG), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (MC), Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (ARK)
| | - Alex R Kemper
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (LAP), Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (KKL), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (SDG), Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (MC), Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (ARK)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khoury MJ, Bowen MS, Clyne M, Dotson WD, Gwinn ML, Green RF, Kolor K, Rodriguez JL, Wulf A, Yu W. From public health genomics to precision public health: a 20-year journey. Genet Med 2017; 20:574-582. [PMID: 29240076 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we review the evolution of the field of public health genomics in the United States in the past two decades. Public health genomics focuses on effective and responsible translation of genomic science into population health benefits. We discuss the relationship of the field to the core public health functions and essential services, review its evidentiary foundation, and provide examples of current US public health priorities and applications. We cite examples of publications to illustrate how Genetics in Medicine reflected the evolution of the field. We also reflect on how public-health genomics is contributing to the emergence of "precision public health" with near-term opportunities offered by the US Precision Medicine (AllofUs) Initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muin J Khoury
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - M Scott Bowen
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mindy Clyne
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - W David Dotson
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Marta L Gwinn
- Office of Advanced Molecular Detection, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ridgely Fisk Green
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Katherine Kolor
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anja Wulf
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Wei Yu
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grosse SD, Riehle-Colarusso T, Gaffney M, Mason CA, Shapira SK, Sontag MK, Braun KVN, Iskander J. CDC Grand Rounds: Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss and Critical Congenital Heart Disease. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2017; 66:888-890. [PMID: 28837548 PMCID: PMC5687816 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6633a4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening is a public health program that benefits 4 million U.S. infants every year by enabling early detection of serious conditions, thus affording the opportunity for timely intervention to optimize outcomes (1). States and other U.S. jurisdictions decide whether and how to regulate newborn screening practices. Most newborn screening is done through laboratory analyses of dried bloodspot specimens collected from newborns. Point-of-care newborn screening is typically performed before discharge from the birthing facility. The Recommended Uniform Screening Panel includes two point-of-care conditions for newborn screening: hearing loss and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). The objectives of point-of-care screening for these two conditions are early identification and intervention to improve neurodevelopment, most notably language and related skills among infants with permanent hearing loss, and to prevent death or severe disability resulting from delayed diagnosis of CCHD. Universal screening for hearing loss using otoacoustic emissions or automated auditory brainstem response was endorsed by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 2000 and 2007* and was incorporated in the first Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2005. Screening for CCHD using pulse oximetry was recommended by the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children in 2010 based on an evidence review† and was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011.§.
Collapse
|
14
|
Grosse SD, Thompson JD, Ding Y, Glass M. The Use of Economic Evaluation to Inform Newborn Screening Policy Decisions: The Washington State Experience. Milbank Q 2017; 94:366-91. [PMID: 27265561 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
POLICY POINTS Newborn screening not only saves lives but can also yield net societal economic benefit, in addition to benefits such as improved quality of life to affected individuals and families. Calculations of net economic benefit from newborn screening include the monetary equivalent of avoided deaths and reductions in costs of care for complications associated with late-diagnosed individuals minus the additional costs of screening, diagnosis, and treatment associated with prompt diagnosis. Since 2001 the Washington State Department of Health has successfully implemented an approach to conducting evidence-based economic evaluations of disorders proposed for addition to the state-mandated newborn screening panel. CONTEXT Economic evaluations can inform policy decisions on the expansion of newborn screening panels. This article documents the use of cost-benefit models in Washington State as part of the rule-making process that resulted in the implementation of screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and 4 other metabolic disorders in 2004, cystic fibrosis (CF) in 2006, 15 other metabolic disorders in 2008, and severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) in 2014. METHODS We reviewed Washington State Department of Health internal reports and spreadsheet models of expected net societal benefit of adding disorders to the state newborn screening panel. We summarize the assumptions and findings for 2 models (MCAD and CF) and discuss them in relation to findings in the peer-reviewed literature. FINDINGS The MCAD model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 3.4 to 1 based on assumptions of a 20.0 percentage point reduction in infant mortality and a 13.9 percentage point reduction in serious developmental disability. The CF model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 4.0-5.4 to 1 for a discount rate of 3%-4% and a plausible range of 1-2 percentage point reductions in deaths up to age 10 years. CONCLUSIONS The Washington State cost-benefit models of newborn screening were broadly consistent with peer-reviewed literature, and their findings of net benefit appear to be robust to uncertainty in parameters. Public health newborn screening programs can develop their own capacity to project expected costs and benefits of expansion of newborn screening panels, although it would be most efficient if this capacity were shared among programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Grosse
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
| | - John D Thompson
- Washington State Department of Health, Office of Newborn Screening
| | - Yao Ding
- Association of Public Health Laboratories
| | - Michael Glass
- Washington State Department of Health, Office of Newborn Screening.,Deceased
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peake RWA, Bodamer OA. Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders. J Pediatr Genet 2016; 6:51-60. [PMID: 28180027 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Newborn screening is one of the most important public health initiatives to date, focusing on the identification of presymptomatic newborn infants with treatable conditions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The number of screening conditions continues to expand due to advances in screening technologies and the development of novel therapies. Consequently, some of the lysosomal storage disorders are now considered as candidates for newborn screening, although many challenges including identification of late-onset phenotypes remain. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current state of newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy W A Peake
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Olaf A Bodamer
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ding Y, Thompson JD, Kobrynski L, Ojodu J, Zarbalian G, Grosse SD. Cost-Effectiveness/Cost-Benefit Analysis of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency in Washington State. J Pediatr 2016; 172:127-35. [PMID: 26876279 PMCID: PMC4846488 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the expected cost-effectiveness and net benefit of the recent implementation of newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in Washington State. STUDY DESIGN We constructed a decision analysis model to estimate the costs and benefits of NBS in an annual birth cohort of 86 600 infants based on projections of avoided infant deaths. Point estimates and ranges for input variables, including the birth prevalence of SCID, proportion detected asymptomatically without screening through family history, screening test characteristics, survival rates, and costs of screening, diagnosis, and treatment were derived from published estimates, expert opinion, and the Washington NBS program. We estimated treatment costs stratified by age of identification and SCID type (with or without adenosine deaminase deficiency). Economic benefit was estimated using values of $4.2 and $9.0 million per death averted. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the influence of key variables on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of net direct cost per life-year saved. RESULTS Our model predicts an additional 1.19 newborn infants with SCID detected preclinically through screening, in addition to those who would have been detected early through family history, and 0.40 deaths averted annually. Our base-case model suggests an ICER of $35 311 per life-year saved, and a benefit-cost ratio of either 5.31 or 2.71. Sensitivity analyses found ICER values <$100 000 and positive net benefit for plausible assumptions on all variables. CONCLUSIONS Our model suggests that NBS for SCID in Washington is likely to be cost-effective and to show positive net economic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Ding
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Newborn Screening and Genetics, Silver Spring, MD
| | - John D. Thompson
- Washington State Department of Health, Office of Newborn Screening, Shoreline, WA
| | - Lisa Kobrynski
- Allergy Division, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jelili Ojodu
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Newborn Screening and Genetics, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Guisou Zarbalian
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Newborn Screening and Genetics, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Scott D. Grosse
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Abstract
After a review of the current health scene in India, the authors suggest that the Government of India should consider seriously, the introduction of new born screening. As a first step, a central advisory committee should be constituted to recommend what is required to be done to strengthen the infrastructure and the manpower to carry out new born screening, and the disorders to be screened. In the urban hospitals newborn screening (NBS) for three disorders can be easily introduced (congenital hypothyroidism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and G-6-PD deficiency), while in the rural areas this should begin with congenital hypothyroidism, especially in the sub Himalayan areas. Concurrently, logistic issues regarding diets and special therapies for inborn errors of metabolism should be sorted out, laboratories to confirm the diagnosis should be set up, and a cadre of metabolic physicians should be build up to treat those identified to have inborn errors of metabolism. Once these are established on a firm footing, tandem mass spectrometry should be introduced as it allows the identification of a number of disorders in an affordable manner. The recent improvements and current trends in health care in India have created the necessary infrastructure for adopting NBS for the benefit of infants in India.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
With the recognition of genetic disorders in the newborn, there is the potential to offer new lifesaving therapies. For other conditions such as hypothyroidism in Down syndrome or hypercalemia in the 22q11 microdeltion syndrome, the early identification of an untreatable condition permits prompt screening for potential comorbid conditions. DNA testing for disorders and DNA-based screening are rapidly evolving. With new more powerful tests, there is an increasing ability to see into a potential future and change the outcome for newborns. However, there remain significant ethical and structural issues to be considered before routine implementation of DNA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Dimmock
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 West Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| | - David P Bick
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 West Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|