1
|
Lunke S, Bouffler SE, Downie L, Caruana J, Amor DJ, Archibald A, Bombard Y, Christodoulou J, Clausen M, De Fazio P, Greaves RF, Hollizeck S, Kanga-Parabia A, Lang N, Lynch F, Peters R, Sadedin S, Tutty E, Eggers S, Lee C, Wall M, Yeung A, Gaff C, Gyngell C, Vears DF, Best S, Goranitis I, Stark Z. Prospective cohort study of genomic newborn screening: BabyScreen+ pilot study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081426. [PMID: 38569677 PMCID: PMC11146401 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is a highly successful public health programme that uses biochemical and other assays to screen for severe but treatable childhood-onset conditions. Introducing genomic sequencing into NBS programmes increases the range of detectable conditions but raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence from prospectively ascertained cohorts is required to guide policy and future implementation. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate a genomic NBS (gNBS) pilot programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The BabyScreen+ study will pilot gNBS in three phases. In the preimplementation phase, study materials, including education resources, decision support and data collection tools, will be designed. Focus groups and key informant interviews will also be undertaken to inform delivery of the study and future gNBS programmes. During the implementation phase, we will prospectively recruit birth parents in Victoria, Australia, to screen 1000 newborns for over 600 severe, treatable, childhood-onset conditions. Clinically accredited whole genome sequencing will be performed following standard NBS using the same sample. High chance results will be returned by genetic healthcare professionals, with follow-on genetic and other confirmatory testing and referral to specialist services as required. The postimplementation phase will evaluate the feasibility of gNBS as the primary aim, and assess ethical, implementation, psychosocial and health economic factors to inform future service delivery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project received ethics approval from the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Research Ethics Committee: HREC/91500/RCHM-2023, HREC/90929/RCHM-2022 and HREC/91392/RCHM-2022. Findings will be disseminated to policy-makers, and through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophie E Bouffler
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jade Caruana
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Christodoulou
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul De Fazio
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ronda F Greaves
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sebastian Hollizeck
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anaita Kanga-Parabia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nitzan Lang
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Simon Sadedin
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Tutty
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanie Eggers
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crystle Lee
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meaghan Wall
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Yeung
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groden CM, Vetter CJ, Salih ZNI. Parental Experiences of Genetic Testing. Neoreviews 2024; 25:e151-e158. [PMID: 38425197 DOI: 10.1542/neo.25-3-e151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly used in clinical practice in the neonatal period, including in NICUs. This testing may have psychological consequences for parents. To best support families, neonatal clinicians should be aware of the various ways in which parents view and respond to genetic testing. In this review, we summarize research on the parental experience of having a newborn infant undergo genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cecelia J Vetter
- Ruth Lily Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Zeynep N I Salih
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Sun Y, Zhao JY, Guan XW, Wang YY, Hong DY, Zhang ZL, Li YH, Yang PY, Jiang T, Xu ZF. Utility, benefits, and risks of newborn genetic screening carrier reports for families. J Glob Health 2024; 14:04044. [PMID: 38389402 PMCID: PMC10884785 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Newborn genetic screening (NBGS) based on next-generation sequencing offers enhanced disease detection and better detection rates than traditional newborn screening. However, challenges remain, especially around reporting the NBGS carrier results. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the NBGS carrier parents' views on NBGS and NBGS reports in China. Methods We distributed a survey querying demographic information, knowledge and perceptions of NBGS, the impact of NBGS on a total of 2930 parents, and their decision-making to parents of newborns reported as carriers in NBGS in Nanjing, China in 2022. Results The average age of the survey respondents was 30.7 years (standard deviation = 3.6). Most (68.38%) felt informed about NBGS, especially women, the highly educated, and high earners. Nearly all (98.74%) saw NBGS as crucial for early disease detection, with 73.18% believing it positively impacts their future. However, 19.16% felt it might cause anxiety, especially among the less educated. Concerns included potential discrimination due to exposed genetic data and strained family ties. Many suggested NBGS coverage by medical insurance to ease financial burdens. Conclusions Through our study, we gained insights into parents' perspectives and concerns regarding the NBGS carrier result reporting, thus providing relevant information for further refinement and clinical promotion of the NBGS project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yun Sun
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | | | - Xian-Wei Guan
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yan-Yun Wang
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Dong-Yang Hong
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhi-Lei Zhang
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Ya-Hong Li
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Pei-Ying Yang
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng-Feng Xu
- Genetic Medicine Center, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Carlo C, Mighton C, Clausen M, Joshi E, Casalino S, Kim THM, Kowal C, Birken C, Maguire J, Bombard Y. Parents' attitudes towards research involving genome sequencing of their healthy children: a qualitative study. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:171-175. [PMID: 37864046 PMCID: PMC10853502 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01476-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
With widespread genomic sequencing research efforts, there is increasing impetus to return results to participants. Parents of healthy children are increasingly asked to participate in genomic research, yet there are limited studies of parental expectations for the return of results amongst healthy children. We explored parental attitudes towards their healthy children's participation in genomic research and expectations for return of results. Data collection involved semi-structured telephone interviews with parents of healthy children participating in a primary care research network. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using constant comparison. A total of 26 parents were interviewed: 22 were female, 19 self-reported as White/European, and 20 were aged 30-39. Three themes emerged: (1) Reciprocity; Parents preferred to receive medically actionable, childhood-onset results and expected recontact overtime in exchange for their research participation. (2) Downstream impacts of testing; Parents expected future clinical benefits but were concerned about the risk of genetic discrimination. (3) Power and empowerment; Some parents felt empowered to take preventative action for their child and relatives, while others did not want to limit their child's autonomy. Considering these tensions may help to inform participant-centered approaches to optimize parental decision-making and participation, as well as maximize the utility of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Di Carlo
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esha Joshi
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Selina Casalino
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theresa H M Kim
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Catherine Birken
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathon Maguire
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lynch F, Best S, Gaff C, Downie L, Archibald AD, Gyngell C, Goranitis I, Peters R, Savulescu J, Lunke S, Stark Z, Vears DF. Australian Public Perspectives on Genomic Newborn Screening: Risks, Benefits, and Preferences for Implementation. Int J Neonatal Screen 2024; 10:6. [PMID: 38248635 PMCID: PMC10801595 DOI: 10.3390/ijns10010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent dramatic reductions in the timeframe in which genomic sequencing can deliver results means its application in time-sensitive screening programs such as newborn screening (NBS) is becoming a reality. As genomic NBS (gNBS) programs are developed around the world, there is an increasing need to address the ethical and social issues that such initiatives raise. This study therefore aimed to explore the Australian public's perspectives and values regarding key gNBS characteristics and preferences for service delivery. We recruited English-speaking members of the Australian public over 18 years of age via social media; 75 people aged 23-72 participated in 1 of 15 focus groups. Participants were generally supportive of introducing genomic sequencing into newborn screening, with several stating that the adoption of such revolutionary and beneficial technology was a moral obligation. Participants consistently highlighted receiving an early diagnosis as the leading benefit, which was frequently linked to the potential for early treatment and intervention, or access to other forms of assistance, such as peer support. Informing parents about the test during pregnancy was considered important. This study provides insights into the Australian public's views and preferences to inform the delivery of a gNBS program in the Australian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Melbourne Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Alison D. Archibald
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Riccarda Peters
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madhiri E, Wang H, Tedross M, Vidal V, Young C, Martinez D, Chen WJ, Robbins-Furman P, Page R, Montalvo-Liendo N, Chen LS. Benefits and concerns of expanded carrier screening: what do pregnant Latina women in Texas think? J Community Genet 2023; 14:605-612. [PMID: 37837504 PMCID: PMC10725381 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00676-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends carrier screening for all pregnant women regardless of race or ethnicity. In recent years, the ACMG broadened the guidelines to include expanded carrier screening (ECS) which can screen for 112 conditions. This study seeks to explore the perceptions of pregnant Latina women about the benefits and concerns related to ECS use. Partnering with prenatal clinics in Texas, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 32 pregnant Latina women in their second or third trimester of pregnancy. NVivo 8 was used to conduct content analysis and emergent coding of the data. Participants reported the benefits of ECS as helping them prepare for the baby's arrival, informing them of the baby's risk for genetic conditions, ensuring the health of their baby, and preventing diseases before birth. The ECS-related concerns expressed by the participants included worries surrounding potential positive ECS results, insufficient knowledge about the genetic diseases screened for by ECS, the accuracy of the ECS, the potential harm ECS may cause the baby, and the affordability of ECS. After weighing both their perceived benefits and concerns, nearly all the participants believed that ECS should be offered to all pregnant women. This study contributes to an understudied research area in the genetic/genomic field. Our findings can help increase the awareness of obstetricians, genetic professionals, and other healthcare providers regarding pregnant Latina women's views on ECS and inform the design of culturally appropriate care as ECS is adopted into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Embedzayi Madhiri
- Deparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Haocen Wang
- School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Melodie Tedross
- Deparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Victoria Vidal
- Deparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Christine Young
- Department of Hospital Administration, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Denise Martinez
- Deparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Ju Chen
- Department of Psychology, University of Texas Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, USA
| | | | - Robin Page
- School of Nursing, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Deparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Slavotinek A. Genetics in Pediatric Practice: From Baby Steps to Running Fast. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023; 70:885-894. [PMID: 37704347 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
In the last few decades, medical genetics has undergone a revolution because of the development of technologies and informatics approaches that can generate and analyze large amounts of genomic data. Pediatricians have been hugely affected by these changes. The early age of presentation for birth defects and neurocognitive disorders, together with a shortage of trained genetics professionals, has increased consultations for conditions with a genetic cause, not only in pediatric practice but also in other subspecialties. In the future, genetic testing in childhood is likely to include pediatricians, who can initiate testing in partnership with trained genetics professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Slavotinek
- Medical Genetics, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liang NSY, Watts-Dickens A, Chitayat D, Babul-Hirji R, Chakraborty P, Hayeems RZ. Parental Preferences for Expanded Newborn Screening: What Are the Limits? CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:1362. [PMID: 37628361 PMCID: PMC10453746 DOI: 10.3390/children10081362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
The use of next-generation sequencing technologies such as genomic sequencing in newborn screening (NBS) could enable the detection of a broader range of conditions. We explored parental preferences and attitudes towards screening for conditions for which varying types of treatment exist with a cross-sectional survey completed by 100 parents of newborns who received NBS in Ontario, Canada. The survey included four vignettes illustrative of hypothetical screening targets, followed by questions assessing parental attitudes. Chi-square tests were used to compare frequency distributions of preferences. Results show that most parents supported NBS for conditions for which only supportive interventions are available, but to a significantly lesser degree than those with disease-specific treatments (99% vs. 82-87%, p ≤ 0.01). For conditions without an effective treatment, the type of supportive care and age of onset of the condition did not significantly alter parent perceptions of risks and benefits. Parents are interested in expanded NBS for conditions with only supportive interventions in childhood, despite lower levels of perceived benefit for the child and greater anticipated anxiety from screen-positive results. These preferences suggest that the expansion of NBS may require ongoing deliberation of perceived benefits and risks and enhanced approaches to education, consent, and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole S. Y. Liang
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Abby Watts-Dickens
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - David Chitayat
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Riyana Babul-Hirji
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | | | - Robin Z. Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Green RC, Shah N, Genetti CA, Yu T, Zettler B, Uveges MK, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Lebo MS, Pereira S, Agrawal PB, Parad RB, McGuire AL, Christensen KD, Schwartz TS, Rehm HL, Holm IA, Beggs AH. Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1034-1045. [PMID: 37279760 PMCID: PMC10357495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Newborn genomic sequencing (NBSeq) to screen for medically important genetic information is of considerable interest but data characterizing the actionability of such findings, and the downstream medical efforts in response to discovery of unanticipated genetic risk variants, are lacking. From a clinical trial of comprehensive exome sequencing in 127 apparently healthy infants and 32 infants in intensive care, we previously identified 17 infants (10.7%) with unanticipated monogenic disease risks (uMDRs). In this analysis, we assessed actionability for each of these uMDRs with a modified ClinGen actionability semiquantitative metric (CASQM) and created radar plots representing degrees of penetrance of the condition, severity of the condition, effectiveness of intervention, and tolerability of intervention. In addition, we followed each of these infants for 3-5 years after disclosure and tracked the medical actions prompted by these findings. All 17 uMDR findings were scored as moderately or highly actionable on the CASQM (mean 9, range: 7-11 on a 0-12 scale) and several distinctive visual patterns emerged on the radar plots. In three infants, uMDRs revealed unsuspected genetic etiologies for existing phenotypes, and in the remaining 14 infants, uMDRs provided risk stratification for future medical surveillance. In 13 infants, uMDRs prompted screening for at-risk family members, three of whom underwent cancer-risk-reducing surgeries. Although assessments of clinical utility and cost-effectiveness will require larger datasets, these findings suggest that large-scale comprehensive sequencing of newborns will reveal numerous actionable uMDRs and precipitate substantial, and in some cases lifesaving, downstream medical care in newborns and their family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Nidhi Shah
- Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dartmouth Health Children's, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Casie A Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Timothy Yu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Melissa K Uveges
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Matthew S Lebo
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pankaj B Agrawal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Holtz Children's Hospital, Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Richard B Parad
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Talia S Schwartz
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
White S, Mossfield T, Fleming J, Barlow-Stewart K, Ghedia S, Dickson R, Richards F, Bombard Y, Wiley V. Expanding the Australian Newborn Blood Spot Screening Program using genomic sequencing: do we want it and are we ready? Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:703-711. [PMID: 36935418 PMCID: PMC10250371 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01311-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of genome sequencing in medicine, the factors involved in deciding how to integrate this technology into population screening programs such as Newborn Screening (NBS) have been widely debated. In Australia, participation in NBS is not mandatory, but over 99.9% of parents elect to uptake this screening. Gauging stakeholder attitudes towards potential changes to NBS is vital in maintaining this high participation rate. The current study aimed to determine the knowledge and attitudes of Australian parents and health professionals to the incorporation of genomic sequencing into NBS programs. Participants were surveyed online in 2016 using surveys adapted from previous studies. The majority of parents (90%) self-reported some knowledge of NBS, with 77% expressing an interest in NBS using the new technology. This was significantly lower than those who would utilise NBS using current technologies (99%). Although, many health professionals (62%) felt that new technologies should currently not be used as an adjunct to NBS, 79% foresaw the use of genomic sequencing in NBS by 2026. However, for genomic sequencing to be considered, practical and technical challenges as well as parent information needs were identified including the need for accurate interpretation of data; pre-and post-test counselling; and appropriate parental consent and opt-out process. Therefore, although some support for implementing genomic sequencing into Australian NBS does exist, there is a need for further investigation into the ethical, social, legal and practical implications of introducing this new technology as a replacement to current NBS methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie White
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tamara Mossfield
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Genea, Sydney CBD, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Fleming
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sondhya Ghedia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Dickson
- Genea, Sydney CBD, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Richards
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Children's Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Veronica Wiley
- NSW Newborn Screening Programme, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Miller EG, Young JL, Rao A, Ward-Lev E, Halley MC. Demographic Characteristics Associated With Perceptions of Personal Utility in Genetic and Genomic Testing: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2310367. [PMID: 37145601 PMCID: PMC10163389 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The expansion of genetic and genomic testing in health care has led to recognition that these tests provide personal as well as clinical utility to patients and families. However, available systematic reviews on this topic have not reported the demographic backgrounds of participants in studies of personal utility, leaving generalizability unclear. Objective To determine the demographic characteristics of participants in studies examining the personal utility of genetic and genomic testing in health care. Evidence Review For this systematic review, we utilized and updated the results of a highly cited 2017 systematic review on the personal utility of genetics and genomics, which identified relevant articles published between January 1, 2003, and August 4, 2016. We also used the original methods to update this bibliography with literature published subsequently up to January 1, 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies reported empirical data on the perspectives of patients, family members, and/or the general public in the US on the personal utility of any type of health-related genetic or genomic test. We utilized a standardized codebook to extract study and participant characteristics. We summarized demographic characteristics descriptively across all studies and by subgroup based on study and participant characteristics. Findings We included 52 studies with 13 251 eligible participants. Sex or gender was the most frequently reported demographic characteristic (48 studies [92.3%]), followed by race and ethnicity (40 studies [76.9%]), education (38 studies [73.1%]), and income (26 studies [50.0%]). Across studies, participants disproportionately were women or female (mean [SD], 70.8% [20.5%]), were White (mean [SD], 76.1% [22.0%]), had a college degree or higher (mean [SD], 64.5% [19.9%]), and reported income above the US median (mean [SD], 67.4% [19.2%]). Examination of subgroups of results by study and participant characteristics evidenced only small shifts in demographic characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review examined the demographic characteristics of individual participants in studies of the personal utility of health-related genetic and genomic testing in the US. The results suggest that participants in these studies were disproportionately White, college-educated women with above-average income. Understanding the perspectives of more diverse individuals regarding the personal utility of genetic and genomic testing may inform barriers to research recruitment and uptake of clinical testing in currently underrepresented populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily G. Miller
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jennifer L. Young
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anoushka Rao
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Eliana Ward-Lev
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Meghan C. Halley
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pereira S, Gutierrez AM, Robinson JO, Christensen KD, Genetti CA, Blout Zawatsky CL, Hsu RL, Zettler B, Uveges MK, Parad RB, Beggs AH, Holm IA, Green RC, McGuire AL. Parents' decision-making regarding whether to receive adult-onset only genetic findings for their children: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med 2023; 25:100002. [PMID: 36549595 PMCID: PMC9992280 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.100002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Most professional guidelines recommend against genetic screening for adult-onset only (AO) conditions until adulthood, yet others argue that there may be benefit to disclosing such results. We explored parents' decision-making on this issue in the BabySeq Project, a clinical trial of newborn genomic sequencing. METHODS We conducted interviews with parents (N = 24) who were given the option to receive actionable AO results for their children. Interviews explored parents' motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO genetic disease risk information, their decision-making process, and their suggestions for supporting parents in making this decision. RESULTS Parents noted several motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO results. Most commonly, parents cited early intervention/surveillance (n = 11), implications for family health (n = 7), and the ability to prepare (n = 6) as motivations to receive these results. The most common reasons to decline were protection of the child's future autonomy (n = 4), negative effect on parenting (n = 3), and anxiety about future disease (n = 3). Parents identified a number of ways to support parents in making this decision. CONCLUSION Results show considerations to better support parental decision-making that aligns with their values when offering AO genetic information because it is more commonly integrated into pediatric clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
| | - Amanda M Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Casie A Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Carrie L Blout Zawatsky
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; The MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca L Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Richard B Parad
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vockley J, Aartsma-Rus A, Cohen JL, Cowsert LM, Howell RR, Yu TW, Wasserstein MP, Defay T. Whole-genome sequencing holds the key to the success of gene-targeted therapies. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2023; 193:19-29. [PMID: 36453229 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Rare genetic disorders affect as many as 3%-5% of all babies born. Approximately 10,000 such disorders have been identified or hypothesized to exist. Treatment is supportive except in a limited number of instances where specific therapies exist. Development of new therapies has been hampered by at least two major factors: difficulty in diagnosing diseases early enough to enable treatment before irreversible damage occurs, and the high cost of developing new drugs and getting them approved by regulatory agencies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) techniques have become exponentially less expensive and more rapid since the beginning of the human genome project, such that return of clinical data can now be achieved in days rather than years and at a cost that is comparable to other less expansive genetic testing. Thus, it is likely that WGS will ultimately become a mainstream, first-tier NBS technique at least for those disorders without appropriate high-throughput functional tests. However, there are likely to be several steps in the evolution to this end. The clinical implications of these advances are profound but highlight the bottlenecks in drug development that still limit transition to treatments. This article summarizes discussions arising from a recent National Institute of Health conference on nucleic acid therapy, with a focus on the impact of WGS in the identification of diagnosis and treatment of rare genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Vockley
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lex M Cowsert
- National Phenylketonuria Alliance, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - R Rodney Howell
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Timothy W Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Defay
- Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith HS, Sanchez CE, Maag R, Buentello A, Murdock DR, Metcalf GA, Hadley TD, Riconda DL, Boerwinkle E, Wehrens XH, Ballantyne CM, Gibbs RA, McGuire AL, Pereira S. Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Precision Cardiology Care: Findings From the HeartCare Study. CIRCULATION. GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2022; 15:e003605. [PMID: 36282588 PMCID: PMC10163837 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.121.003605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine genome-wide screening for cardiovascular disease risk may inform clinical decision-making. However, little is known about whether clinicians and patients would find such testing useful or acceptable within the context of a genomics-enabled learning health system. METHODS We conducted surveys with patients and their clinicians who were participating in the HeartCare Study, a precision cardiology care project that returned results from a next-generation sequencing panel of 158 genes associated with cardiovascular disease risk. Six weeks after return of results, we assessed patients' and clinicians' perceived utility and disutility of HeartCare, the effect of the test on clinical recommendations, and patients' attitudes toward integration of research and clinical care. RESULTS Among 666 HeartCare patients with a result returned during the survey study period, 42.0% completed a full or partial survey. Patient-participants who completed a full survey (n=224) generally had positive perceptions of HeartCare independent of whether they received a positive or negative result. Most patient-participants considered genetic testing for cardiovascular disease risk to have more benefit than risk (88.3%) and agreed that it provided information that they wanted to know (81.2%), while most disagreed that the test caused them to feel confused (77.7%) or overwhelmed (78.0%). For 122 of their patients with positive results, clinicians (n=13) reported making changes in clinical care for 66.4% of patients, recommending changes in health behaviors for 36.9% of patients, and recommending to 33.6% of patients that their family members have clinical testing. CONCLUSIONS Both patients and clinicians thought the HeartCare panel screen for cardiovascular disease risk provided information that was useful in terms of personal or health benefits to the patient and that informed clinical care without causing patients to be confused or overwhelmed. Further research is needed to assess perceptions of genome-wide screening among the US cardiology clinic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Clarissa E. Sanchez
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Ronald Maag
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Alexandria Buentello
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - David R. Murdock
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Ginger A. Metcalf
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Trevor D. Hadley
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel L. Riconda
- Dept of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- School of Health Professions, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Eric Boerwinkle
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Xander H.T. Wehrens
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dept of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Christie M. Ballantyne
- Dept of Medicine, Section of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Richard A. Gibbs
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chad L, Anderson J, Cagliero D, Hayeems RZ, Ly LG, Szuto A. Rapid Genetic Testing in Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care: A Scoping Review of Emerging Ethical Issues. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:e347-e359. [PMID: 36161483 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid genome-wide sequencing (rGWS) is being increasingly used to aid in prognostication and decision-making for critically ill newborns and children. Although its feasibility in this fast-paced setting has been described, this new paradigm of inpatient genetic care raises new ethical challenges. OBJECTIVE A scoping review was performed to (1) identify salient ethical issues in this area of practice; and (2) bring attention to gaps and ethical tensions that warrant more deliberate exploration. METHODS Data sources, Ovid Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched up to November 2021. Articles included were those in English relating to rGWS deployed rapidly in a critical care setting. Publications were examined for ethical themes and were further characterized as including a superficial or in-depth discussion of that theme. New themes were inductively identified as they emerged. RESULTS Ninety-nine studies, published in 2012 or thereafter, met inclusion criteria. Themes identified elaborated upon established ethical principles related to beneficence and nonmaleficence (ie, clinical utility, medical uncertainty, impact on family, and data security) autonomy (ie, informed consent), and justice (ie, resource allocation and disability rights). Many themes were only narrowly discussed. CONCLUSIONS The application of rGWS in neonatal and pediatric acute care is inherently tied to ethically charged issues, some of which are reported here. Attention to the ethical costs and benefits of rGWS is not always discussed, with important gaps and unanswered questions that call for ongoing focus on these ethical considerations in this next application of acute care genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Chad
- Divisions of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics.,Departments of Bioethics.,Departments of Paediatrics
| | | | | | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute,Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto,Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linh G Ly
- Neonatology.,Departments of Paediatrics
| | - Anna Szuto
- Genetic Counselling, Hospital for Sick Children,Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Molecular Genetics
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kingsmore SF, Smith LD, Kunard CM, Bainbridge M, Batalov S, Benson W, Blincow E, Caylor S, Chambers C, Del Angel G, Dimmock DP, Ding Y, Ellsworth K, Feigenbaum A, Frise E, Green RC, Guidugli L, Hall KP, Hansen C, Hobbs CA, Kahn SD, Kiel M, Van Der Kraan L, Krilow C, Kwon YH, Madhavrao L, Le J, Lefebvre S, Mardach R, Mowrey WR, Oh D, Owen MJ, Powley G, Scharer G, Shelnutt S, Tokita M, Mehtalia SS, Oriol A, Papadopoulos S, Perry J, Rosales E, Sanford E, Schwartz S, Tran D, Reese MG, Wright M, Veeraraghavan N, Wigby K, Willis MJ, Wolen AR, Defay. T. A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109:1605-1619. [PMID: 36007526 PMCID: PMC9502059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) dramatically improves outcomes in severe childhood disorders by treatment before symptom onset. In many genetic diseases, however, outcomes remain poor because NBS has lagged behind drug development. Rapid whole-genome sequencing (rWGS) is attractive for comprehensive NBS because it concomitantly examines almost all genetic diseases and is gaining acceptance for genetic disease diagnosis in ill newborns. We describe prototypic methods for scalable, parentally consented, feedback-informed NBS and diagnosis of genetic diseases by rWGS and virtual, acute management guidance (NBS-rWGS). Using established criteria and the Delphi method, we reviewed 457 genetic diseases for NBS-rWGS, retaining 388 (85%) with effective treatments. Simulated NBS-rWGS in 454,707 UK Biobank subjects with 29,865 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with 388 disorders had a true negative rate (specificity) of 99.7% following root cause analysis. In 2,208 critically ill children with suspected genetic disorders and 2,168 of their parents, simulated NBS-rWGS for 388 disorders identified 104 (87%) of 119 diagnoses previously made by rWGS and 15 findings not previously reported (NBS-rWGS negative predictive value 99.6%, true positive rate [sensitivity] 88.8%). Retrospective NBS-rWGS diagnosed 15 children with disorders that had been undetected by conventional NBS. In 43 of the 104 children, had NBS-rWGS-based interventions been started on day of life 5, the Delphi consensus was that symptoms could have been avoided completely in seven critically ill children, mostly in 21, and partially in 13. We invite groups worldwide to refine these NBS-rWGS conditions and join us to prospectively examine clinical utility and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F. Kingsmore
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA 91711, USA,Corresponding author
| | - Laurie D. Smith
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Matthew Bainbridge
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Sergey Batalov
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Wendy Benson
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Eric Blincow
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Sara Caylor
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Christina Chambers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | | | - David P. Dimmock
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Yan Ding
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Katarzyna Ellsworth
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Annette Feigenbaum
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Erwin Frise
- Fabric Genomics, Inc., Oakland, CA 94612, USA
| | - Robert C. Green
- Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, Ariadne Labs and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Lucia Guidugli
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Christian Hansen
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Charlotte A. Hobbs
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Mark Kiel
- Genomenon Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
| | - Lucita Van Der Kraan
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Yong H. Kwon
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Lakshminarasimha Madhavrao
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Jennie Le
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Mardach
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | | | - Danny Oh
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Mallory J. Owen
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Gunter Scharer
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Mari Tokita
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Albert Oriol
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - James Perry
- Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Edwin Rosales
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Erica Sanford
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Duke Tran
- Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA 92122, USA
| | | | - Meredith Wright
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Narayanan Veeraraghavan
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | - Kristen Wigby
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA 92123, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Mary J. Willis
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Thomas Defay.
- Alexion, Astra Zeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Callahan KP, Mueller R, Flibotte J, Largent EA, Feudtner C. Measures of Utility Among Studies of Genomic Medicine for Critically Ill Infants: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2225980. [PMID: 35947384 PMCID: PMC9366540 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Genomic medicine holds promise to revolutionize care for critically ill infants by tailoring treatments for patients and providing additional prognostic information to families. However, measuring the utility of genomic medicine is not straightforward and has important clinical and ethical implications. OBJECTIVE To review the ways that researchers measure or neglect to measure the utility of genomic medicine for critically ill infants. EVIDENCE REVIEW This systematic review included prospective full-text studies of genomic medicine of both whole exome and genome sequencing in critically ill infants younger than 1 year. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched with an English language restriction for articles published from the inception of each database through May 2022. Search terms included variations of the following: gene, sequencing, intensive care, critical care, and infant. From the included articles, information on how utility was defined and measured was extracted and synthesized. Information was also extracted from patient cases that authors highlighted by providing additional information. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to evaluate the association between study size and utility. FINDINGS Synthesized data from the 21 included studies reflected results from 1654 patients. A mean of 46% (range, 15%-72%) of patients had a positive genetic test result, and a mean of 37% (range, 13%-61%) met the criteria for experiencing utility. Despite heterogeneity in how studies measured and reported utility, a standardized framework was created with 5 categories of utility: treatment change, redirection of care, prognostic information, reproductive information, and screening or subspecialty referral. Most studies omitted important categories of utility, notably personal utility (patient-reported benefits) (20 studies [95%]), utility of negative or uncertain results (15 [71%]), and disutility (harms) (20 [95%]). Studies disproportionally highlighted patient cases that resulted in treatment change. Larger studies reported substantially lower utility (r = -0.65; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review found that genomic medicine offered various categories of utility for a substantial proportion of critically ill infants. Studies measured utility in heterogeneous ways and focused more on documenting change than assessing meaningful benefit. Authors' decisions about which cases to highlight suggest that some categories of utility may be more important than others. A more complete definition of utility that is used consistently may improve understanding of potential benefits and harms of genetic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Press Callahan
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rebecca Mueller
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - John Flibotte
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily A. Largent
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Chris Feudtner
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bick D, Ahmed A, Deen D, Ferlini A, Garnier N, Kasperaviciute D, Leblond M, Pichini A, Rendon A, Satija A, Tuff-Lacey A, Scott RH. Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8030040. [PMID: 35892470 PMCID: PMC9326745 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8030040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening for treatable disorders is one of the great public health success stories of the twentieth century worldwide. This commentary examines the potential use of a new technology, next generation sequencing, in newborn screening through the lens of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Each of the ten criteria are examined to show how they might be applied by programmes using genomic sequencing as a screening tool. While there are obvious advantages to a method that can examine all disease-causing genes in a single assay at an ever-diminishing cost, implementation of genomic sequencing at scale presents numerous challenges, some which are intrinsic to screening for rare disease and some specifically linked to genomics-led screening. In addition to questions specific to routine screening considerations, the ethical, communication, data management, legal, and social implications of genomic screening programmes require consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bick
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Arzoo Ahmed
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Dasha Deen
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alessandra Ferlini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | | | - Dalia Kasperaviciute
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Mathilde Leblond
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Amanda Pichini
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Augusto Rendon
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Aditi Satija
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alice Tuff-Lacey
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Richard H. Scott
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rahimzadeh V, Friedman JM, de Wert G, Knoppers BM. Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward. Front Genet 2022; 13:865400. [PMID: 35860465 PMCID: PMC9289115 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Population-based newborn screening (NBS) is among the most effective public health programs ever launched, improving health outcomes for newborns who screen positive worldwide through early detection and clinical intervention for genetic disorders discovered in the earliest hours of life. Key to the success of newborn screening programs has been near universal accessibility and participation. Interest has been building to expand newborn screening programs to also include many rare genetic diseases that can now be identified by exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS). Significant declines in sequencing costs as well as improvements to sequencing technologies have enabled researchers to elucidate novel gene-disease associations that motivate possible expansion of newborn screening programs. In this paper we consider recommendations from professional genetic societies in Europe and North America in light of scientific advances in ES/GS and our current understanding of the limitations of ES/GS approaches in the NBS context. We invoke the principle of proportionality—that benefits clearly outweigh associated risks—and the human right to benefit from science to argue that rigorous evidence is still needed for ES/GS that demonstrates clinical utility, accurate genomic variant interpretation, cost effectiveness and universal accessibility of testing and necessary follow-up care and treatment. Confirmatory or second-tier testing using ES/GS may be appropriate as an adjunct to conventional newborn screening in some circumstances. Such cases could serve as important testbeds from which to gather data on relevant programmatic barriers and facilitators to wider ES/GS implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Vasiliki Rahimzadeh,
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kingsmore SF. Dispatches from Biotech beginning BeginNGS: Rapid newborn genome sequencing to end the diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2022; 190:243-256. [PMID: 36218021 PMCID: PMC9588745 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In this Dispatch from Biotech, we briefly review the urgent need for extensive expansion of newborn screening (NBS) by genomic sequencing, and the reasons why early attempts had limited success. During the next decade transformative developments will continue in society and in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, informatics, and medical sectors that enable prompt addition of genetic disorders to NBS by rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) upon introduction of new therapies that qualify them according to the Wilson and Jungner criteria (Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G., World Health Organization. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650). Herein we describe plans, progress, and clinical trial designs for BeginNGS (Newborn Genome Sequencing to end the diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey), a new international, pre-competitive, public-private consortium that proposes to implement a self-learning healthcare delivery system for screening all newborns for over 400 hundred genetic diseases, diagnostic confirmation, implementation of effective treatment, and acceleration of orphan drug development. We invite investigators and stakeholders worldwide to join the consortium in a prospective, multi-center, international trial of the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of BeginNGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F. Kingsmore
- Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, Rady Children's HospitalSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang H, Page R, Lopez D, Arkatkar S, Young C, Martinez D, Robbins-Furman P, Montalvo-Liendo N, Chen LS. Pregnant Latinas' views of adopting exome sequencing into newborn screening: A qualitative study. Genet Med 2022; 24:1644-1652. [PMID: 35579624 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are, currently, conflicting opinions about the adoption of exome sequencing (ES) into the standard newborn screening program. This study aimed to explore the views of pregnant Latinas, a hard-to-reach, underserved, and understudied population, about pursuing ES for their newborns. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 32 pregnant Latinas who predominately lived in rural areas and had low levels of income and education. An emergent coding approach was used to analyze the qualitative data collected. RESULTS Our entire sample believed that ES should be offered as a part of newborn screening, which could empower pregnant Latinas to better understand their children's health and take early treatment actions. Although some participants were concerned about potentially bad ES results and had questions about the accuracy of ES results, nearly all interviewees reported that they would be willing to have their newborns undergo ES. The main reasons given were to be informed of diseases that the baby may have, and the perception that ES is a procedure that involves minimal risk. CONCLUSION Pregnant Latinas in this study had favorable attitudes toward newborn ES. Their perspectives should be considered when decisions are made about incorporating ES into newborn screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haocen Wang
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Robin Page
- College of Nursing, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Daniela Lopez
- Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | | | - Christine Young
- Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
| | - Denise Martinez
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | | | | | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Armstrong B, Christensen KD, Genetti CA, Parad RB, Robinson JO, Blout Zawatsky CL, Zettler B, Beggs AH, Holm IA, Green RC, McGuire AL, Smith HS, Pereira S. Parental Attitudes Toward Standard Newborn Screening and Newborn Genomic Sequencing: Findings From the BabySeq Study. Front Genet 2022; 13:867371. [PMID: 35571041 PMCID: PMC9091188 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: With increasing utility and decreasing cost of genomic sequencing, augmentation of standard newborn screening (NBS) programs with newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has been proposed. Before nGS can be integrated into newborn screening, parents' perspectives must be better understood. Objective: Using data from surveys administered to parents of healthy newborns who were enrolled in the BabySeq Project, a randomized clinical trial of nGS alongside NBS, this paper reports parents' attitudes regarding population-based NBS and nGS assessed 3 months after results disclosure. Methods: Parental attitudes regarding whether all newborns should receive, and whether informed consent should be required for, NBS and nGS, as well as whether nGS should be mandated were assessed using 5-point scales from strongly disagree (=1) to strongly agree (=5). Parents' interest in receiving types of results from nGS was assessed on a 5-point scale from not at all interested (=1) to very interested (=5). Survey responses were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests, paired t-tests, and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: At 3 months post-disclosure, 248 parents of 174 healthy newborns submitted a survey. Support for every newborn receiving standard NBS (mean 4.67) was higher than that for every newborn receiving nGS (mean 3.60; p < 0.001). Support for required informed consent for NBS (mean 3.44) was lower than that for nGS (mean 4.27, p < 0.001). Parents' attitudes toward NBS and nGS were not significantly associated with self-reported political orientation. If hypothetically receiving nGS outside of the BabySeq Project, most parents reported being very interested in receiving information on their baby's risk of developing a disease in childhood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (86.8%) and their risk of developing a disease during adulthood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (84.6%). Discussion: Parents' opinions are crucial to inform design and delivery of public health programs, as the success of the program hinges on parents' trust and participation. To accommodate parents' preferences without affecting the current high participation rates in NBS, an optional add-on consent to nGS in addition to NBS may be a feasible approach. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittan Armstrong
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kurt D. Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casie A. Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Richard B. Parad
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carrie L. Blout Zawatsky
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Robert C. Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morton SU, Christodoulou J, Costain G, Muntoni F, Wakeling E, Wojcik MH, French CE, Szuto A, Dowling JJ, Cohn RD, Raymond FL, Darras BT, Williams DA, Lunke S, Stark Z, Rowitch DH, Agrawal PB. Multicenter Consensus Approach to Evaluation of Neonatal Hypotonia in the Genomic Era: A Review. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:405-413. [PMID: 35254387 PMCID: PMC10134401 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Importance Infants with hypotonia can present with a variety of potentially severe clinical signs and symptoms and often require invasive testing and multiple procedures. The wide range of clinical presentations and potential etiologies leaves diagnosis and prognosis uncertain, underscoring the need for rapid elucidation of the underlying genetic cause of disease. Observations The clinical application of exome sequencing or genome sequencing has dramatically improved the timely yield of diagnostic testing for neonatal hypotonia, with diagnostic rates of greater than 50% in academic neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US, which compose the International Precision Child Health Partnership (IPCHiP). A total of 74% (17 of 23) of patients had a change in clinical care in response to genetic diagnosis, including 2 patients who received targeted therapy. This narrative review discusses the common causes of neonatal hypotonia, the relative benefits and limitations of available testing modalities used in NICUs, and hypotonia management recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance This narrative review summarizes the causes of neonatal hypotonia and the benefits of prompt genetic diagnosis, including improved prognostication and identification of targeted treatments which can improve the short-term and long-term outcomes. Institutional resources can vary among different NICUs; as a result, consideration should be given to rule out a small number of relatively unique conditions for which rapid targeted genetic testing is available. Nevertheless, the consensus recommendation is to use rapid genome or exome sequencing as a first-line testing option for NICU patients with unexplained hypotonia. As part of the IPCHiP, this diagnostic experience will be collected in a central database with the goal of advancing knowledge of neonatal hypotonia and improving evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah U Morton
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John Christodoulou
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gregory Costain
- Division of Clinical & Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Program for Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesco Muntoni
- National Institute for Health Research Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,North East Thames Regional Genetic Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Wakeling
- North East Thames Regional Genetic Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Monica H Wojcik
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Courtney E French
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Szuto
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James J Dowling
- Program for Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald D Cohn
- Division of Clinical & Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Program for Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - F Lucy Raymond
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Basil T Darras
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David H Rowitch
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Pankaj B Agrawal
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes toward Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Acute Care. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9030357. [PMID: 35327729 PMCID: PMC8947383 DOI: 10.3390/children9030357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to characterize knowledge and attitudes about rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) implementation of a broad constituency of healthcare professionals at hospitals participating in a statewide initiative to implement rWGS for hospitalized neonates and children up to 18 years of age meeting clinical criteria for testing. We surveyed 307 healthcare professionals from eight hospitals about their knowledge and attitudes regarding rWGS. We examined survey internal reliability using exploratory factor analysis and associations between respondent characteristics and attitudes toward rWGS with linear regression. We thematically analyzed free-text responses. Views about rWGS implementation in respondents’ own setting and respondents’ personal capability to implement rWGS were generally neutral (M = 3.44 (SD = 0.74); M = 3.30 (SD = 0.85), respectively). Views about the potential for rWGS in clinical practice were overall positive (M = 4.12 (SD = 0.57)). The degree of positivity of attitudes about rWGS was strongly influenced by perceived knowledge, clinical or non-clinical role, concerns about future insurance coverage for rWGS as a first-tier test, and future adverse impact of genomics health information on patients or families. We identified several actionable factors influencing attitudes toward rWGS of pediatric healthcare professionals. Expanded education and ongoing implementation research are needed for the full potential of rWGS in pediatrics to be realized.
Collapse
|
25
|
Schwartz TS, Christensen KD, Uveges MK, Waisbren SE, McGuire AL, Pereira S, Robinson JO, Beggs AH, Green RC, Bachmann GA, Rabson AB, Holm IA. Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:218-229. [PMID: 34309124 PMCID: PMC8789951 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Much emphasis has been placed on participant's psychological safety within genomic research studies; however, few studies have addressed parental psychological health effects associated with their child's participation in genomic studies, particularly when parents meet the threshold for clinical concern for depression. We aimed to determine if parents' depressive symptoms were associated with their child's participation in a randomized-controlled trial of newborn exome sequencing. Parents completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at baseline, immediately post-disclosure, and 3 months post-disclosure. Mothers and fathers scoring at or above thresholds for clinical concern on the EPDS, 12 and 10, respectively, indicating possible Major Depressive Disorder with Peripartum Onset, were contacted by study staff for mental health screening. Parental concerns identified in follow-up conversations were coded for themes. Forty-five parents had EPDS scores above the clinical threshold at baseline, which decreased by an average of 2.9 points immediately post-disclosure and another 1.1 points 3 months post-disclosure (both p ≤ .014). For 28 parents, EPDS scores were below the threshold for clinical concern at baseline, increased by an average of 4.7 points into the elevated range immediately post-disclosure, and decreased by 3.8 points at 3 months post-disclosure (both p < .001). Nine parents scored above thresholds only at 3 months post-disclosure after increasing an average of 5.7 points from immediately post-disclosure (p < .001). Of the 82 parents who scored above the threshold at any time point, 43 (52.4%) were reached and 30 (69.7%) of these 43 parents attributed their elevated scores to parenting stress, balancing work and family responsibilities, and/or child health concerns. Only three parents (7.0%) raised concerns about their participation in the trial, particularly their randomization to the control arm. Elevated scores on the EPDS were typically transient and parents attributed their symptomatology to life stressors in the postpartum period rather than participation in a trial of newborn exome sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia S Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa K Uveges
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan E Waisbren
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Gloria A Bachmann
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Arnold B Rabson
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Murdock DR, Rosenfeld JA, Lee B. What Has the Undiagnosed Diseases Network Taught Us About the Clinical Applications of Genomic Testing? Annu Rev Med 2022; 73:575-585. [PMID: 35084988 PMCID: PMC10874501 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042120-014904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing has undergone a revolution in the last decade, particularly with the advent of next-generation sequencing and its associated reductions in costs and increases in efficiencies. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) has been a leader in the application of such genomic testing for rare disease diagnosis. This review discusses the current state of genomic testing performed within the UDN, with a focus on the strengths and limitations of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing in clinical diagnostics and the importance of ongoing data reanalysis. The role of emerging technologies such as RNA and long-read sequencing to further improve diagnostic rates in the UDN is also described. This review concludes with a discussion of the challenges faced in insurance coverage of comprehensive genomic testing as well as the opportunities for a larger role of testing in clinical medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Murdock
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
| | - Jill A Rosenfeld
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
| | - Brendan Lee
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
- Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Habib A, Azize NAA, Rahman SA, Yakob Y, Suberamaniam V, Nazri MIBA, Abdullah Sani H, Ch'ng GS, Yin LH, Olpin S, Lock-Hock N. Novel mutations associated with carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase and carnitine palmitoyl transferase 2 deficiencies in Malaysia. Clin Biochem 2021; 98:48-53. [PMID: 34626609 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carnitine-acylcarnitine Translocase (CACT) deficiency (OMIM 212138) and carnitine palmitoyl transferase 2 (CPT2) deficiency (OMIM 60065050) are rare inherited disorders of mitochondrial long chain fatty acid oxidation. The aim of our study is to review the clinical, biochemical and molecular characteristics in children diagnosed with CACT and CPT2 deficiencies in Malaysia. DESIGN AND METHODS This is a retrospective study. We reviewed medical records of six patients diagnosed with CACT and CPT2 deficiencies. They were identified from a selective high-risk screening of 50,579 patients from January 2010 until Jun 2020. RESULTS All six patients had either elevation of the long chain acylcarnitines and/or an elevated (C16 + C18:1)/C2 acylcarnitine ratio. SLC25A20 gene sequencing of patient 1 and 6 showed a homozygous splice site mutation at c.199-10 T > G in intron 2. Two novel mutations at c.109C > T p. (Arg37*) in exon 2 and at c.706C > T p. (Arg236*) in exon 7 of SLC25A20 gene were found in patient 2. Patient 3 and 4 (siblings) exhibited a compound heterozygous mutation at c.638A > G p. (Asp213Gly) and novel mutation c.1073 T > G p. (Leu358Arg) in exon 4 of CPT2 gene. A significant combined prevalence at 0.01% of CACT and CPT2 deficiencies was found in the symptomatic Malaysian patients. CONCLUSIONS The use of the (C16 + C18:1)/C2 acylcarnitine ratio in dried blood spot in our experience improves the diagnostic specificity for CACT/CPT2 deficiencies over long chain acylcarnitine (C16 and C18:1) alone. DNA sequencing for both genes aids in confirming the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anasufiza Habib
- Biochemistry Unit, Specialised Diagnostic Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia.
| | - Nor Azimah Abdul Azize
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Specialised Diagnostic Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Salina Abd Rahman
- Inborn Errors of Metabolism & Genetics Unit, Nutrition, Metabolic & Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Selangor, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Yusnita Yakob
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Specialised Diagnostic Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Vengadeshwaran Suberamaniam
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Specialised Diagnostic Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Muhammad Irfan Bukhari Ahmad Nazri
- Biochemistry Unit, Specialised Diagnostic Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Huzaimah Abdullah Sani
- Department of Pathology, Women and Children's Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Gaik-Siew Ch'ng
- Department of Genetic, Penang Hospital, Penang, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Leong Huey Yin
- Department of Genetic, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| | - Simon Olpin
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ngu Lock-Hock
- Department of Genetic, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Newborn screening with targeted sequencing: a multicenter investigation and a pilot clinical study in China. J Genet Genomics 2021; 49:13-19. [PMID: 34474183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Different newborn screening (NBS) programs have been practiced in many countries since the 1960s. It is of considerable interest whether next-generation sequencing is applicable in NBS. We have developed a panel of 465 causative genes for 596 early-onset, relatively high incidence, and potentially actionable severe inherited diseases in our Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program to screen 11,484 babies in 8 Women and Children's hospitals nationwide in China retrospectively. The positive rate from preliminary screening of NESTS was 7.85% (902/11,484). With 45.89% (414/902) follow-up of preliminary positive cases, the overall clinically confirmative diagnosis rate of monogenic disorders was 12.07% (50/414), estimating an average of 0.95% (7.85% × 12.07%) clinical diagnosis rate, suggesting that monogenic disorders account for a considerable proportion of birth defects. The disease/gene spectrum varied in different regions of China. NESTS was implemented in a hospital by screening 3923 newborns to evaluate its clinical application. The turn-around time of a primary report, including the sequencing period of < 7 days, was within 11 days by our automatic interpretation pipeline. Our results suggest that NESTS is feasible and cost-effective as a first-tier NBS program, which will change the status of current clinical practice of NBS in China.
Collapse
|
29
|
Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021; 23:2029-2037. [PMID: 34211152 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) in the care of pediatric patients with one or more congenital anomalies (CA) with onset prior to age 1 year or developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID) with onset prior to age 18 years. METHODS The Pediatric Exome/Genome Sequencing Evidence-Based Guideline Work Group (n = 10) used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) framework based on the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) systematic review, and an Ontario Health Technology Assessment to develop and present evidence summaries and health-care recommendations. The document underwent extensive internal and external peer review, and public comment, before approval by the ACMG Board of Directors. RESULTS The literature supports the clinical utility and desirable effects of ES/GS on active and long-term clinical management of patients with CA/DD/ID, and on family-focused and reproductive outcomes with relatively few harms. Compared with standard genetic testing, ES/GS has a higher diagnostic yield and may be more cost-effective when ordered early in the diagnostic evaluation. CONCLUSION We strongly recommend that ES/GS be considered as a first- or second-tier test for patients with CA/DD/ID.
Collapse
|
30
|
Snir M, Nazareth S, Simmons E, Hayward L, Ashcraft K, Bristow SL, Esplin ED, Aradhya S. Democratizing genomics: Leveraging software to make genetics an integral part of routine care. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2020; 187:14-27. [PMID: 33296144 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing can provide definitive molecular diagnoses and guide clinical management decisions from preconception through adulthood. Innovative solutions for scaling clinical genomics services are necessary if they are to transition from a niche specialty to a routine part of patient care. The expertise of specialists, like genetic counselors and medical geneticists, has traditionally been relied upon to facilitate testing and follow-up, and while ideal, this approach is limited in its ability to integrate genetics into primary care. As individuals, payors, and providers increasingly realize the value of genetics in mainstream medicine, several implementation challenges need to be overcome. These include electronic health record integration, patient and provider education, tools to stay abreast of guidelines, and simplification of the test ordering process. Currently, no single platform offers a holistic view of genetic testing that streamlines the entire process across specialties that begins with identifying at-risk patients in mainstream care settings, providing pretest education, facilitating consent and test ordering, and following up as a "genetic companion" for ongoing management. We describe our vision for using software that includes clinical-grade chatbots and decision support tools, with direct access to genetic counselors and pharmacists within a modular, integrated, end-to-end testing journey.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bonkowsky JL, deVeber G, Kosofsky BE. Pediatric Neurology Research in the Twenty-First Century: Status, Challenges, and Future Directions Post-COVID-19. Pediatr Neurol 2020; 113:2-12. [PMID: 32979654 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The year 2020 marked a fundamental shift in the pediatric neurology field. An impressive positive trajectory of advances in patient care and research faced sudden global disruptions by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and by an international movement protesting racial, socioeconomic, and health disparities. The disruptions revealed obstacles and fragility within the pediatric neurology research mission. However, renewed commitment offers unique opportunities for the pediatric neurology research community to enhance and prioritize research directions for the coming decades. METHODS The Research Committee of the Child Neurology Society evaluated the challenges and opportunities facing the pediatric neurology research field, including reviewing published literature, synthesizing publically available data, and conducting a survey of pediatric neurologists. RESULTS We identified three priority domains for the research mission: funding levels, active guidance, and reducing disparities. Funding levels: to increase funding to match the burden of pediatric neurological disease; to tailor funding mechanisms and strategies to support clinical trial efforts unique to pediatric neurology; and to support investigators across their career trajectory. Active guidance: to optimize infrastructure and strategies, to leverage novel therapeutics, enhance data collection, and improve inclusion of children in clinical trials. Reducing disparities: to reduce health disparities in children with neurological disease, to develop proactive measures to enhance workforce diversity and inclusion, and increase avenues to balance work-life obligations for investigators. CONCLUSIONS In this uniquely challenging epoch, the pediatric neurology research community has a timely and important mission to re-engage the public and government, advancing the health of children with neurological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua L Bonkowsky
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Primary Children's Hospital, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Gabrielle deVeber
- Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barry E Kosofsky
- Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cakici JA, Dimmock DP, Caylor SA, Gaughran M, Clarke C, Triplett C, Clark MM, Kingsmore SF, Bloss CS. A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants. Am J Hum Genet 2020; 107:953-962. [PMID: 33157008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing recently became feasible for infants in intensive care units (ICUs). However, research regarding parents' perceived utility, adequacy of consent, and potential harms and benefits is lacking. Herein we report results of parental surveys of these domains from the second Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study, a randomized, controlled trial of rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing of infants in regional ICUs. More than 90% of parents reported feeling adequately informed to consent to diagnostic genomic sequencing. Despite only 23% (27) of 117 infants receiving genomic diagnoses, 97% (156) of 161 parents reported that testing was at least somewhat useful and 50.3% (88/161) reported no decisional regret (median 0, mean 10, range 0-100). Five of 117 families (4.3%) reported harm. Upon follow-up, one (1%) confirmed harm to child and parent related to negative results/no diagnosis, two (2%) reported stress or confusion, and two (2%) denied harm. In 81% (89) of 111 infants, families and clinicians agreed that genomic results were useful. Of the families for whom clinicians perceived harm from genomic testing, no parents reported harm. Positive tests/genomic diagnosis were more frequently perceived to be useful by parents, to benefit their infant, and to help manage potential symptoms (p < .05). In summary, the large majority of parents felt that first-tier, rapid, diagnostic genomic sequencing was beneficial for infants lacking etiologic diagnoses in ICUs. Most parents in this study perceived being adequately informed to consent, understood their child's results, and denied regret or harm from undergoing sequencing.
Collapse
|
33
|
Aldridge CE, Osiovich H, Hal Siden H, Elliott AM. Rapid genome-wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:616-629. [PMID: 33131147 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post-return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents' perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents' perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi-structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post-results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin E Aldridge
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Horacio Osiovich
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harold Hal Siden
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Esquerda M, Palau F, Lorenzo D, Cambra FJ, Bofarull M, Cusi V, Interdisciplinar En Bioetica G. Ethical questions concerning newborn genetic screening. Clin Genet 2020; 99:93-98. [PMID: 32779199 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening is a public health strategy used to identify certain diseases in the first days of life and, therefore, facilitate early treatment before the onset of symptoms. The decision of which diseases should be included in a screening goes beyond the medical perspective, including reasons for public health and health economics. There are a number of characteristics to include a disease in the screening, such as that the disorder must be a significant health problem, the natural history of the disease must be well known, a feasible and accurate test must be available, there must be a treatment that is most effective when applied before the onset of clinical symptoms and a health system must be in place that is capable of performing the procedure and subsequent monitoring. Currently, newborn screening programs are currently based on the use of biochemical markers that detect metabolites, hormones or proteins, but recently, the availability of new technology has allowed the possibility of a genetic screening. In addition to technical problems, the possibility of neonatal screening also presents a number of ethical problems. We identified and discussed six areas of particular concern: type of illness, overdiagnosis or overtreatment, information management and informed consent, data confidentiality and protection, justice and legal regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Esquerda
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Universitat de Lleida - Facultat de Medicina, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Palau
- Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.,Fundacion Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Lorenzo
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Sant Joan de Deu School of Nursing, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Jose Cambra
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Victoria Cusi
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hitchcock EC, Study C, Elliott AM. Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1254. [PMID: 32383361 PMCID: PMC7336726 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consent forms for exome and/or genome sequencing, collectively called genome-wide sequencing (GWS), frequently contain detailed information on complex topics such as sequencing analysis and incidental findings. Considering recent endeavors by the health care community to simplify GWS consent forms, it is important to gain stakeholders' perspectives on the content, length, and use of consent forms. METHODS Thematic analysis was conducted on data obtained from focus groups with two participant cohorts: parents who previously provided consent for trio-based GWS as part of the translational pediatric GWS CAUSES Study, and genetic health care providers (HCP) who provide pre-test counseling for GWS. RESULTS Genetic HCP indicated that consent forms cannot replace pre-test counseling, and as such, a simplified consent form focusing on the implications of GWS would be beneficial to both patients and HCP. Although parents' primary concerns varied when considering GWS, they all highly valued information. Parents also indicated the need for community and support after the return of GWS results. Both participant cohorts recommended that consent forms be available online and include an appendix for supplementary information. CONCLUSION It is important to include both parents and HCP in the design of GWS consent forms, and also, to help connect families who have a shared diagnosis after the post-test counseling session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Hitchcock
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Causes Study
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mackay ZP, Dukhovny D, Phillips KA, Beggs AH, Green RC, Parad RB, Christensen KD. Quantifying Downstream Healthcare Utilization in Studies of Genomic Testing. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:559-565. [PMID: 32389220 PMCID: PMC7293136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The challenges of understanding how interventions influence follow-up medical care are magnified during genomic testing because few patients have received it to date and because the scope of information it provides is complex and often unexpected. We tested a novel strategy for quantifying downstream healthcare utilization after genomic testing to more comprehensively and efficiently identify related services. We also evaluated the effectiveness of different methods for collecting these data. METHODS We developed a risk-based approach for a trial of newborn genomic sequencing in which we defined primary conditions based on existing diagnoses and family histories of disease and defined secondary conditions based on unexpected findings. We then created patient-specific lists of services associated with managing primary and secondary conditions. Services were quantified based on medical record reviews, surveys, and telephone check-ins with parents. RESULTS By focusing on services that genomic testing would most likely influence in the short-term, we reduced the number of services in our analyses by more than 90% compared with analyses of all observed services. We also identified the same services that were ordered in response to unexpected findings as were identified during expert review and by confirming whether recommendations were completed. Data also showed that quantifying healthcare utilization with surveys and telephone check-ins alone would have missed the majority of attributable services. CONCLUSIONS Our risk-based strategy provides an improved approach for assessing the short-term impact of genomic testing and other interventions on healthcare utilization while conforming as much as possible to existing best-practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë P Mackay
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dmitry Dukhovny
- Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Philip R Lee Institute for Health Policy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard B Parad
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Precision Medicine Translational Research Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Smith HS, Swint JM, Lalani SR, de Oliveira Otto MC, Yamal JM, Russell HV, Lee BH. Exome sequencing compared with standard genetic tests for critically ill infants with suspected genetic conditions. Genet Med 2020; 22:1303-1310. [PMID: 32336750 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0798-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As exome sequencing (ES) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool, we aimed to compare ES with status quo genetic diagnostic workup for infants with suspected genetic disorders in terms of identifying diagnoses, survival, and cost of care. METHODS We studied newborns and infants admitted to intensive care with a suspected genetic etiology within the first year of life at a US quaternary-referral children's hospital over 5 years. In this propensity-matched cohort study using electronic medical record data, we compared patients who received ES as part of a diagnostic workup (ES cohort, n = 368) with clinically similar patients who did not receive ES (No-ES cohort, n = 368). RESULTS Diagnostic yield (27.4% ES, 25.8% No-ES; p = 0.62) and 1-year survival (80.2% ES, 84.8% No-ES; p = 0.10) were no different between cohorts. ES cohort patients had higher cost of admission, diagnostic investigation, and genetic testing (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION ES did not differ from status quo genetic testing collectively in terms of diagnostic yield or patient survival; however, it had high yield as a single test, led to complementary classes of diagnoses, and was associated with higher costs. Further work is needed to define the most efficient use of diagnostic ES for critically ill newborns and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - John M Swint
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Seema R Lalani
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jose-Miguel Yamal
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heidi V Russell
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brendan H Lee
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Downie L, Halliday J, Lewis S, Lunke S, Lynch E, Martyn M, Gaff C, Jarmolowicz A, Amor DJ. Exome sequencing in newborns with congenital deafness as a model for genomic newborn screening: the Baby Beyond Hearing project. Genet Med 2020; 22:937-944. [PMID: 31974413 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0745-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genomic newborn screening raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence is required to build a framework to introduce this technology safely and effectively. We investigated the choices made by a diverse group of parents with newborns when offered tiered genomic information from exome sequencing. METHODS This population-derived cohort comprised infants with congenital deafness. Parents were offered exome sequencing and choice regarding the scope of analysis. Options were choice A, diagnostic analysis only; choice B, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with medical actionability; or choice C, diagnostic analysis plus childhood-onset diseases with or without medical actionability. RESULTS Of the 106 participants, 72 (68%) consented to receive additional findings with 29 (27.4%) selecting choice B and 43 (40.6%) opting for choice C. Family size, ethnicity, and age of infant at time of recruitment were the significant predictors of choice. Parents who opted to have additional findings analysis demonstrated less anxiety and decisional conflict. CONCLUSIONS These data provide evidence from a culturally diverse population that choice around additional findings is important and the age of the infant when this choice is offered impacts on their decision. We found no evidence that offering different levels of genomic information to parents of newborns has a negative psychological impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Downie
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Jarmolowicz
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia. .,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. .,Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Joshi E, Mighton C, Clausen M, Casalino S, Kim THM, Kowal C, Birken C, Maguire JL, Bombard Y. Primary care provider perspectives on using genomic sequencing in the care of healthy children. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 28:551-557. [PMID: 31804631 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0547-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) studies involving healthy children can advance scientific knowledge of genetic variation. Little research has examined primary care providers' views on using GS in this context. This study explored primary care provider perspectives on the use of GS in research and the care of healthy children. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 providers discussing their views on GS research and receiving results. Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis and constant comparison. Participants were family physicians (11/16) and primary care pediatricians (5/16) in practice for >10 years (11/16). Participants valued GS in healthy children for research purposes; however, opinions diverged on using the results in primary care. Proponents valued using results for surveillance and prevention in healthy children. Skeptics questioned the clinical utility of results and the appropriateness of applying research data in primary care. Both groups shared concerns over opportunistic screening, validity, and interpretation of results, increased health system costs and inequities, and genetic discrimination. Primary care providers were ambivalent about the appropriateness and utility of GS in the care of healthy children. Providers feel unprepared and unsure of their obligations in disclosing these results. Providers do not feel they are equipped with the necessary resources and training to support their patients in using GS results in their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esha Joshi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Selina Casalino
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theresa H M Kim
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Catherine Birken
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathon L Maguire
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee H, Lim J, Shin JE, Eun HS, Park MS, Park KI, Namgung R, Lee JS. Implementation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Constitutional Newborn Screening in High-Risk Neonates. Yonsei Med J 2019; 60:1061-1066. [PMID: 31637888 PMCID: PMC6813152 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Newborn screening (NBS) programs are important for appropriate management of susceptible neonates to prevent serious clinical problems. Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) are at a potentially high risk of false-positive results, and repetitive NBS after total parenteral nutrition is completely off results in delayed diagnosis. Here, we present the usefulness of a targeted next-generation sequencing (TNGS) panel to complement NBS for early diagnosis in high-risk neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS The TNGS panel covered 198 genes associated with actionable genetic and metabolic diseases that are typically included in NBS programs in Korea using tandem mass spectrometry. The panel was applied to 48 infants admitted to the NICU of Severance Children's Hospital between May 2017 and September 2017. The infants were not selected for suspected metabolic disorders. RESULTS A total of 13 variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic were detected in 11 (22.9%) neonates, including six genes (DHCR7, PCBD1, GAA, ALDOB, ATP7B, and GBA) associated with metabolic diseases not covered in NBS. One of the 48 infants was diagnosed with an isobutyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, and false positive results of tandem mass screening were confirmed in two infants using the TNGS panel. CONCLUSION The implementation of TNGS in conjunction with conventional NBS can allow for better management of and earlier diagnosis in susceptible infants, thus preventing the development of critical conditions in these sick infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunjoo Lee
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joohee Lim
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Shin
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Sun Eun
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Soo Park
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kook In Park
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ran Namgung
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sung Lee
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Berrios C, Koertje C, Noel-MacDonnell J, Soden S, Lantos J. Parents of newborns in the NICU enrolled in genome sequencing research: hopeful, but not naïve. Genet Med 2019; 22:416-422. [PMID: 31467447 PMCID: PMC7004847 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0644-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In 2014, our institution launched a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing rapid genome sequencing (GS) to standard clinical evaluations of infants with suspected genetic disorders. This study aimed to understand parental response to the use of GS for their newborn babies. Methods: 23 of 128 parents whose infant had enrolled in the RCT completed a retrospective survey and interview addressing attitudes about GS and responses to receiving diagnostic information. We also collected information about participants’ genetic literacy, genetic knowledge, numeracy, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Results: The majority reported positive, 13 (56.5%), or neutral, 4 (17.4%), feelings when approached about GS for their infant and 100% felt that GS was generally beneficial. The 12 participants who had received a unifying diagnosis for their child’s symptoms described personal utility of the information. Some reported the diagnosis led to changes in medical care. Participants showed understanding of some of the psychological risks of GS. For example, 21 (91.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that genetic testing could reveal disturbing results. Conclusion: Parents who enrolled their newborn in a RCT of GS demonstrated awareness of a psychological risk, but generally held positive beliefs about GS and perceived the benefits outweighed the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Berrios
- Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA. .,School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| | - Catherine Koertje
- Division of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Janelle Noel-MacDonnell
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.,Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Soden
- Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.,School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.,Division of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - John Lantos
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.,Bioethics Center, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|