Local Anesthesia With General Anesthesia for Pediatric Bone Marrow Procedures

A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option for Procedural and Surgical Pain

This narrative review examines the evolving role of opioids in managing procedural and surgical pain in pediatric oncology patients. The review evaluates studies on opioid use across various oncological surgeries including thoracic, abdominal, orthopedic, and neurosurgical procedures, as well as for common painful procedures such as bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures. While opioids remain important for acute procedural and postoperative pain management in pediatric oncology patients, there is an increasing emphasis on multimodal, opioid-sparing approaches. The evidence presented within this review highlights the growing focus on judicious postoperative opioid prescribing to mitigate risks of adverse effects and persistent use or potential misuse. The review synthesizes findings from studies investigating various analgesic regimens, including the use of regional anesthesia techniques like epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve blocks, which have shown promise in reducing opioid requirements. For procedural pain, the review explores the efficacy of combining opioids with sedatives like midazolam or propofol, as well as the potential of ketamine as an opioid-sparing alternative. Key findings indicate that opioid-sparing techniques can effectively reduce overall opioid consumption without compromising pain control or patient satisfaction. Several studies demonstrated that regional anesthesia techniques and non-opioid adjuncts can significantly lower postoperative opioid requirements across various surgical procedures. For procedural pain, ketamine-based regimens often showed comparable or superior pain control to opioid-based approaches, with some studies reporting better patient satisfaction. This review also addresses the importance of tailored postoperative opioid prescribing, with some studies presenting algorithms to predict outpatient opioid needs more accurately. These approaches aim to ensure adequate pain control while minimizing excess opioid dispensing.

A need for greater awareness: a mixed methods study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the diagnosis journey for haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to better understand and raise awareness of the diagnosis journey and quantify any barriers for timely diagnosis of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), to support patients' struggle with diagnosis and reduce time to diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with, or caregivers for those diagnosed with primary or secondary HLH and physicians involved in the treatment of HLH were recruited. Quantitative interviews were undertaken with patients/caregivers to quantify key elements of the diagnosis journey, followed by qualitative interviews with participants. Interviews took place between March-May 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients/caregivers and nine physicians took part in this mixed methods study. Lack of physician awareness of HLH was a common frustration for patients/caregivers, causing delayed diagnosis. All physicians indicated bone-marrow testing is a key step in the diagnosis process, and some patients/caregivers had frustrations around testing. Emergency care doctors, although not usually involved in the diagnosis process, were among the most-seen specialists by patients/caregivers. Patients/caregivers suggested potential improvements in available information, such as providing information on treatment options and condition management.

DISCUSSION

Patients/caregivers and physicians agreed on the need to raise overall awareness of HLH signs/symptoms among priority groups of physicians to recognise how signs/symptoms can progress and develop. Improvements in the testing process and communication would directly impact the speed of diagnosis and support patients/caregivers during the diagnostic journey, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Raising awareness of key issues, such as signs/symptoms, tests and diagnostic procedures, and improved communication and support for patients/caregivers, are key to speeding up HLH diagnosis and improving outcomes.

Blast-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Plasma of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Predict Responses to Chemotherapy

The small extracellular vesicles (sEV) accumulating in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients' plasma are mixtures of vesicles produced by leukemic and non-malignant cells. sEV originating from leukemia blasts could serve as potential non-invasive biomarkers of AML response to therapy. To isolate blast-derived sEV from patients' plasma, we developed a bioprinted microarray-based immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for leukemia-associated antigens (LAAs) and mAbs specific for a mix of tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, and CD81). We determined the proportion of LAA+ sEV relative to total plasma sEV (the LAA+/total sEV ratio) in serially collected samples of newly diagnosed AML patients prior to, during, and after chemotherapy. At AML diagnosis, the LAA+/total sEV ratio was significantly higher in patients than in healthy donors (HDs). In patients who achieved complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy, the LAA+/total sEV ratios significantly decreased after each chemotherapy cycle to levels seen in HDs. In contrast, the LAA+/total sEV ratios in AML patients with persistent leukemia after therapy remained elevated during and after therapy, as did the percentage of leukemic blasts in these patients' bone marrows. The LAA+/total sEV ratio emerges as a promising non-invasive biomarker of leukemia response to therapy.