The efficacy of a percutaneous expandable titanium device in anatomical reduction of vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine

Applications of the SpineJack device in the surgical management of type A4 lumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Type A4 lumbar burst fractures are severe spinal injuries typically treated with posterior pedicle screw constructs, with or without corpectomy. However, traditional approaches can be highly invasive and are often limited in their ability to reconstruct the anterior column. The SpineJack device offers a minimally invasive alternative or complement to posterior fixation.

OBSERVATIONS

Four neurologically intact patients with lumbar type A4 fractures were treated using the SpineJack device, either alone or in combination with different posterior fixation techniques. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up. The procedure led to significant pain relief and rapid mobilization for all patients. Radiologically, it restored vertebral body height (VBH), increased spinal canal patency, and corrected preoperative deformities, with minimal loss of correction at follow-up.

LESSONS

The SpineJack device is a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional pedicle screw constructs and serves as an effective adjunct for stabilization, potentially replacing corpectomy in some cases. It restores VBH and alignment, maintains load-bearing capacity, and reduces the need for additional hardware. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes, especially in younger patients. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24821.

Surgical treatment of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis including intravertebral expansive implants-clinical, functional and imaging outcomes and a center experience over 7 years

Background

The effective treatment of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis continues to be an under discussion and controversial subject. Armed kyphoplasty with expansive intravertebral implants is an emerging procedure, which, in theory, allow for a more effective preservation of the restored vertebral height. The development of the indications for these recent devices has given rise to auspicious outcomes in vertebral non-union situations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes of the surgical treatment of situations of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis, following a therapeutic algorithm that includes armed kyphoplasty with intravertebral expansive implants and bridge pedicular stabilization, according to a predefined necrosis stage.

Methods

We present a retrospective observational study, in which 35 patients took part, including a total of 35 cases of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis submitted to surgical treatment over 7 years (between 2016 and 2023) at the same center according to a defined therapeutic algorithm. The cases were staged according to vertebral morphology (non-plana or plana) and mobility (mobile or immobile)-stages 1m (mobile necrotic vertebra non-plana), 1i (immobile necrotic vertebra non-plana), 2m (mobile necrotic vertebra plana), and 2i (immobile necrotic vertebra plana)-and the following surgeries were performed: armed kyphoplasty with intravertebral expansive implants filled with bone cement, associated or not to adjacent pedicle instrumentation; or bridge pedicle fixation of the adjacent levels. Clinical results [Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] as well as imaging outcomes (restoration and preservation of the heights of the vertebral body) were studied. The mean follow-up time corresponded to 3.17 years (range, 1-7.5 years).

Results

Most of the clinical-functional and imaging parameters showed important improvements after surgical treatment, with few complications. A statistically significant greater degree of functional improvement was found in plana vertebrae when compared to non-plana, which reflects that the first are quite symptomatic and disabling at the beginning and improve a lot with surgical treatment. Significant indirect correlations were found between the time from the initial fracture to surgical intervention after diagnosis of vertebral necrosis and the anterior sagittal height in the immediate postoperative time and at the ending of the follow-up. Also, a significant direct correlation was identified between this time and the VAS for pain at the end of the follow-up and the PGIC scale in the same period. It was also found that patients with surgical complications had a statistically significantly longer time between the initial fracture and surgery for post-traumatic necrosis.

Conclusions

We present the results of a surgical therapeutic algorithm that includes the use of recent expansive intravertebral implants at post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis, resulting in satisfactory clinical, functional and imaging results. This work shows a pioneering statistical demonstration of the clinical, functional and imaging importance of early detection of this condition (ideally in vertebrae non-plana morphology stages), so that there is still sufficient bone tissue in the vertebral body to permit the stabilization and restoration of its anatomy through a minimally invasive interior reconstruction, with percutaneous access and quicker convalescence, that is to say, armed kyphoplasty, avoiding the unwanted disease progression that will require more aggressive surgical solutions that doesn't allow anatomical restauration.

The role of kyphoplasty and expandable intravertebral implants in the acute treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the role of kyphoplasty and expandable intravertebral implants in the treatment of traumatic vertebral compression fractures.

Design

This is a systematic review.

Methods

A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE database according to PRISMA guidelines regarding kyphoplasty and expandable intravertebral implants in the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.

Results

A total of 611 records were screened. In total, 51 studies were obtained referring to traumatic vertebral fractures treated with kyphoplasty; however, of these, only studies addressing traumatic burst fractures were selected, resulting in 12 studies: 10 about kyphoplasty and 2 regarding armed kyphoplasty. In all studies, there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical and functional parameters, restoration of vertebral height and decreasing of vertebral and segmental kyphosis. Overall, there was only a residual loss of height and a slight increase in kyphosis throughout the follow-up period, while complications consisted essentially of cement leakage, all with no clinical repercussions.

Conclusion

After the discussion, where we address the concepts of direct and indirect reduction, the association of kyphoplasty with pedicle fixation, the potential advantages of expandable intravertebral implants, as well as the vertebral body type of filling in kyphoplasty, it is concluded that kyphoplasty demonstrates favorable outcomes as a method of posterior percutaneous transpedicular access for reconstruction of the anterior column in burst fractures. It allows for the reconstruction of the vertebral body closer to its original anatomy, carried out in a minimally invasive and safe way, which provides a clinical-functional and imaging improvement maintained at the medium-long term.

Anatomical reconstruction of complete burst vertebral fracture case report-combined reduction methods and armed kyphoplasty with stents filled with bone graft

Background

Minimally invasive techniques used to augment the fractured vertebral body have acquired popularity thanks to their capacity to stabilize the anterior spine via the percutaneous posterior pathway.

Case Description

We present a clinical case of a 50-year-old male patient with a traumatic complete burst fracture of L1 vertebral body treated by L1 laminectomy, percutaneous pedicle instrumentation D11-D12-L2-L3 and indirect fracture reduction, followed by direct reduction by armed kyphoplasty with stents filled with bone graft. We describe the details of the surgical technique, as well as clinical and imaging outcomes. After 3-year follow-up, the patient is practically asymptomatic and control computed tomography demonstrates vertebral body fracture healing and maintenance of the vertebral heights recorded in the immediate postoperative period, without signs of loosening, migration or failure of intrasomatic stents or pedicle screws, as well as of bone graft resorption, which indicates its osseointegration and healing. We discuss the concepts of indirect and direct reduction and the rationale for anatomical vertebral restoration and for the use of intrasomatic bone graft.

Conclusions

We present a detailed description of a promising surgical technique combining indirect and direct reduction and vertebral body interior replacement with stents filled with bone graft, as a treatment that allows for a complete burst fracture to be anatomically restored by a posterior and minimally invasive approach. Also, we demonstrate a fast and full recovery, avoiding the morbidity and risk of serious complications of anterior approaches. Nevertheless, long-term prospective studies are necessary so as to prove the effectiveness and assets of this surgical option versus other common techniques in complete burst fractures.

EXPANDABLE INTRAVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS IN POST-TRAUMATIC VERTEBRAL NECROSIS - NEW CLASSIFICATION SUGGESTION

The progressive evolution of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis and consequent loss of structural integrity of the vertebral body along with neurological risk, makes it one of the most feared and unpredictable pathologies in spine traumatology. Several studies have addressed the role of vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and corpectomy in its treatment; however, it remains a controversial concept without a defined therapeutic algorithm. The recent emergence of expandable intravertebral implants, which allow, by a percutaneous transpedicular application, the capacity for intrasomatic filling and maintenance of the height of the vertebral body, makes them a viable option, not only in the treatment of acute vertebral fractures, but also in non-union cases. In this study, we present a review of the current evidence on the application of expandable intravertebral implants in cases of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis. Based on the available scientific literature, including previous classifications of post-traumatic necrosis, and on the mechanical characteristics of the main expandable intravertebral implants currently available, we propose a simplified classification of this pathology, considering parameters that influence surgical therapeutic guidance, the morphology and the dynamics of the necrotic vertebra's mobility. According to its stages and based on authors' experience and on the scarce literature, we propose an initial therapeutic algorithm and suggest preventive strategies for this disease, considering its main risk factors, that is, fracture comminution and impairment of vertebral vascularity. Therefore, expandable intravertebral implants have a promising role in this condition; however, large prospective studies are needed to confirm their efficacy, to clarify the indications of each of these devices, and to validate the algorithm suggestion regarding treatment and prevention of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis. Level of Evidence III, Systematic Review/Actualization.

Sagittal correction after short percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar compression fractures: comparison of the combination of SpineJack® kyphoplasty and fractured vertebra screw fixation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare two percutaneous pedicle fixations for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: one associating a jack kyphoplasty (SpineCut) and the other using intermediate screws (Trident).

METHODS

All adult patients treated for single-level Magerl/AO type A thoracolumbar traumatic fractures in four orthopaedic departments, with SpineCut or Trident, with a one year minimum follow-up, were retrospectively included. Neurological disorders and osteoporotic fractures were not included. The following data were collected: age, sex, Magerl/AO type, type of surgery, and complications. Radiological parameters were analyzed on pre-operative CT scan, and on standing X-rays before discharge, at three months and one year post-operative: vertebral wedge angle (VWA), regional kyphosis angle (RKA), and traumatic regional angulation (TRA: difference between RKA and physiological values for each vertebra).

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included, with 42 patients in SpineCut group and 38 in Trident group. Mean age was 41 ± 15.7 years. TRA correction did not differ between the groups: respectively 11.2 ± 8.1° in SpineCut versus 10.2 ± 9.1° in Trident group (p = 0.52). TRA loss of correction between early post-operative and three months was statistically higher in Trident group: -4 ± 5.1° versus -1.5 ± 3.8° (p = 0.03). After 3 months, TRA correction loss was comparable between the groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pre-operative VWA was the only factor significantly associated with early TRA correction loss (p = 0.01). VWA correction and loss of correction did not differ significantly between the groups. No complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous pedicle fixations of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures associating jack kyphoplasty and intermediate screws are both safe and efficient techniques.

"Double Cross Sign" Could Be an Indicator of an Adequate Amount of Bone Cement in Kyphoplasty with the SpineJack System: A Retrospective Study

Kyphoplasty with the SpineJack system was able to restore vertebral height and stabilize the vertebra with an injection of bone cement. The goal of this study was to seek a reliable assessing method during the surgery in determining the minimum amount of bone cement required for the SpineJack system to restore vertebral height and stabilize the vertebra. We defined the “double cross sign” as bone cement that expanded vertically along the bilateral SpineJack system, and spread across the midline of the vertebral body as viewed in the anteroposterior (AP) view of the radiographic image. Sixty-five patients aged 74.5 ± 8.5 years with vertebral compression fracture were included in the study. Patients with a positive double cross sign had better ODI score than those without the double cross sign (20.0 ± 6.9 vs. 32.3 ± 8.2; p < 0.001). Postoperative regional kyphotic and local kyphotic angle were significantly better in the positive double cross sign group (11 ± 8.8 degrees vs. 5.3 ± 3.2 degrees; p = 0.001/11.7 ± 6.2 degrees vs. 6.6 ± 4.1 degrees; p = 0.001, respectively). The more stable construct was built once the double cross sign was achieved during surgery. In this study, a convenient and intuitive method in identifying the minimum but sufficient quantity of injected cement during the SpineJack procedure was developed.

Is vertebral stenting kyphoplasty a good choice in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture? A series of 47 patients (v2)

BACKGROUND

The incidence of vertebral fragility fracture is increasing over last three decades with an essential impact on quality of life. Some devices were proposed to improve conventional kyphoplasty in the last five years, known as vertebral stenting kyphoplasty (VSK).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) treated with VSK, single-level fracture without neurological impairment, and with more than 24 months of follow-up were included in the study. We recorded fracture types according to DGOU classification, fracture level, regional kyphosis angle (RKA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and complications.

RESULTS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included. RKA significantly improved from pre to postoperative values (p<0.000001) and to follow-up values (p<0.00001). A significant difference was found between preoperative RKA of (OF2+OF3) and OF4 (p<0.00001), confirmed immediately after surgery (p= 0.005425) and at last follow up (p= 0.000947). A significant difference was found in correction of RKA between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 at injury time and after treatment (p<0.00001), and it was confirmed at the last follow-up (p=0.000026). ODI showed a significant difference between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 type of fractures (p=0.038216). We recorded five complications: 2 cases of leakage without neurological impairment, two progressions of kyphosis, and one implant migration.

CONCLUSIONS

VSK is an excellent and reliable option in the treatment of OVF, with good clinical results and preservation of obtained RKA at the time of treatment. However, in case of vertebral collapse with the involvement of both vertebral plates, surgeons must be aware of possible implant failure or migration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: SpineJack vs. posterior arthrodesis-comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar fractures sometimes require anterior support and post-traumatic deformity correction. SpineJack proved favorable results in cadaveric and clinical studies, with satisfactory pain relief, vertebral height restoration, and low rates of above adjacent fractures, in neurologically intact fractures. We compared patients' clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar fractures treated either with posterior arthrodesis or SpineJack.

METHODS

We prospectively collected A2 split and A3, and A4 burst fractures between 2017 and 2021. Patients were stratified in posterior arthrodesis (PA group) and SpineJack (SJ group) and included if age ≥18 years, T11-L3 level, emergent or elective surgery, single or multiple, and neurologically intact. Age, sex, type and level, pain, operative and discharge time, vertebral body heights (VBH), posterior wall retropulsion (PWR), vertebral kyphosis (VK) and local kyphosis (LK) angles, vertebral body (VB) volume, and complications were collected. We then compared clinical-radiographic outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in median postoperative pain while operative time and discharge time were shorter for SJ patients than PA ones (P<0.001). Mean anterior VBH increase was 20.7%, mid-VBH was 25.5%, and posterior VBH was 8.8%, while increase in VB volume was 26.2%. SJ patients had non-inferior VK e LK angles correction to PA ones. Mean PWR value between pre and post SJ implantation was 0.15±0.65 mm, and no adjacent above-level fractures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed satisfactory outcomes in a selected range of neurologically intact thoracolumbar split or burst fractures. SJ leads to shorter operative and discharge time and good VB angles and diameters restoration.

INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES

Current scientific evidence enhances the importance of the anatomic restauration of vertebral bodies with compression fractures aiming, as with other human body joints, to obtain a biomechanic and functional spine as close as the one prior to the fracture as possible. We consider that anatomic reduction of these fractures is only completely possible using intravertebral expandable implants, restoring vertebral endplate morphology, and enabling a more adequate intervertebral disc healing. This enables avoiding disc and osteodegenerative changes to that vertebral segment and its adjacent levels, as well as the anterior overload of adjacent vertebral bodies in older adults - a consequence of post-traumatic vertebral flattening - thus minimizing the risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. The ability of vertebral body fracture reduction and height maintenance over time and its percutaneous transpedicular application make the intra-vertebral expandable implants a very attractive option for treating these fractures. The authors show the direct and indirect reduction concepts of vertebral fractures, review the biomechanics, characteristics and indications of intravertebral expandable implants and present a suggestion for updating the algorithm for the surgical treatment of vertebral compression fractures which includes the use of intravertebral expandable implants. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.

Expandable Intravertebral Implants: A Narrative Review on the Concept, Biomechanics, and Outcomes in Traumatology

Expandable intravertebral implants are self-expanding devices applied percutaneously by the posterior transpedicular approach. These devices introduce the concept of anatomical restoration of vertebral body endplates and direct anatomical reduction performed from the interior of the vertebral body with a compression fracture. This paper aims to provide a narrative review on the concept, indications, biomechanical characteristics, as well as functional and radiographic outcomes of the main expandable intravertebral implants currently available, in terms of their application to thoracolumbar spine traumatology. To this end, we performed a search in July 2021 on the MEDLINE/PubMed platform with the words "expandable intravertebral implant", "armed kyphoplasty", "Vertebral Body Stenting" or "stentoplasty" and "SpineJack". The search yielded 144 papers, and of those, we included 15 in this review. We concluded that percutaneous transpedicular posterior access, the ability to reduce vertebral body fractures, particularly of the vertebral endplates and to maintain the vertebral body height, makes the application of expandable intravertebral implants an attractive option in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. However, more prospective, randomized, and large-scale blinded studies are still warranted, especially comparative studies between treatments and about the preferential use of an expansive implant over others, in order to gain definitive insights into the effectiveness and indications of each of these devices.

Vertebral Fragility Fractures (VFF)-Who, when and how to operate

Vertebral Fragility Fractures (VFF) are common and lead to pain, long term disability and increased mortality. Most patients will have mild to moderate pain symptoms and can be managed conservatively. However, patients with severe pain who have minimal or no pain relief with potent analgesia, or who only achieve adequate pain relief with high doses of morphine based analgesia which results in significant adverse events, should be considered for vertebral augmentation. Ideally, for vertebral augmentation, patients should present within four months of the fracture (onset of acute pain) and have at least 3 weeks of failure of conservative treatment although early intervention may be more appropriate for hospitalised patients, who tend to be older, more frail and likely to be less tolerant to the adverse effects of conservative treatment. The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) recommends Percutaneous Vertebroplasty as the first line surgical augmentation technique for VFF in older people, which has been shown to improve pain symptoms, allow early restoration of functional mobility and may reduce the risk of further vertebral collapse. CIRSE recommends percutaneous Balloon Kyphoplasty as second line treatment in VFF, although the optimal indication is for acute traumatic vertebral fractures (less than 7-10 days) in younger people. Assessment and treatment of underlying osteoporosis is important to reduce the risk of further fractures in older people with VFF.

Better Height Restoration, Greater Kyphosis Correction, and Fewer Refractures of Cemented Vertebrae by Using an Intravertebral Reduction Device: a 1-Year Follow-up Study

PURPOSE

This study compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes of kyphoplasty with intravertebral reduction device (IRD) and vertebroplasty (VP) in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 75 patients with OVCFs who were aged >60 years and treated them through VP or kyphoplasty with IRD. The radiologic outcomes, namely the anterior and middle body heights (ABH and MBH, respectively) and kyphotic angle (KA), were measured preoperatively and at postoperative 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The refracture was identified on the basis of a decrease in ABH, MBH, or KA compared with those at postoperative 1 week. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and complications were recorded. The incidence of adjacent and nonadjacent fractures was also recorded.

RESULTS

We treated 36 patients with kyphoplasty with IRD (IRD group) and 39 through VP (VP group). The patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The KA and its restoration were more favorable after IRD than after VP. Although ABHs were not different in either group, their restoration was more efficient after IRD than after VP. MBHs, their restoration, and their refracture rates were better after IRD than after VP. VAS pain scores and complication rates were not different between the groups. The incidences of adjacent or nonadjacent fractures were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal significantly more efficient height restoration and kyphosis correction and fewer refractures in the IRD group. IRD may not increase the risk of adjacent or nonadjacent fractures.

Clinical Performance and Safety of 108 SpineJack Implantations: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Multicentre Single-Arm Registry Study

This prospective, consecutive, multicentre observational registry aimed to confirm the safety and clinical performance of the SpineJack system for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCF) of traumatic origin. We enrolled 103 patients (median age: 61.6 years) with 108 VCF due to trauma, or traumatic VCF with associated osteoporosis. Primary outcome was back pain intensity (VAS). Secondary outcomes were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol-VAS, and analgesic consumption. 48 hours after surgery, a median relative decrease in pain intensity of 81.5% was observed associated with a significant reduction in analgesic intake. Improvements in disability (91.3% decrease in ODI score) and in quality of life (increase 21.1% of EQ-VAS score) were obtained 3 months after surgery. All results were maintained at 12 months. A reduction in the kyphotic angulation was observed postoperatively (-5.4 ± 6.3°; p < 0.001), remained at 12 months (-4.4 ± 6.0°, p = 0.002). No adverse events were implant-related and none required device removal. Three patients (2.9%) experienced procedure-related complications. The overall adjacent fracture rate up to 1 year after surgery was 2.9%. The SpineJack procedure is an effective, low-risk procedure for patients with traumatic VCF allowing a fast and sustained improvement in quality of life over 1 year after surgery.