Comparison of high resolution ultrasonography with clinical findings in patients with ankle pain

Role of Ultrasound in Evaluating Ligament Injuries Around the Ankle: A Narrative Review

Ultrasound has emerged as a valuable imaging modality for evaluating ligamentous injuries around the ankle joint, offering several advantages over traditional imaging techniques. It is more cost-effective and widely available than MRI, and it avoids the ionizing radiation exposure associated with X-rays, making it a safer option, particularly for pediatric and adolescent populations. In cases of inversion ankle sprains, ultrasound allows for more accurate assessment of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) compared to X-rays and manual examination and yields diagnostic results comparable to MRI. For high ankle sprains involving syndesmosis injuries, ultrasound-especially stress ultrasound-has shown high diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, ultrasound evaluation of the deltoid ligament (DL) in cases of ankle fractures can aid surgeons in determining the need for ligament repair in conjunction with fracture management. This review explores recent developments in ultrasound imaging of the lateral, medial, and syndesmotic ligaments of the ankle joint and discusses its potential applications for evaluating the spring and posterior ligaments. The review provides a comprehensive overview of the ever-expanding role of ultrasound in the management of ankle ligamentous injuries.

Anterior talofibular ligament's superior fascicle as a cause of ankle microinstability can be routinely identified by ultrasound

PURPOSE

Chronic pain can affect up to 40% of patients after ankle inversion sprains. The current hypothesis to explain this high percentage of chronic pain is a partial/total rupture of anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) superior fascicle, a structure that has recently been described as intra-articular and as having a different function than ATFL's inferior fascicle. This has created the need for diagnosing ATFL superior and inferior fascicles independently. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate if the ATFL's superior fascicle can be visualized on ultrasound, and to describe its ultrasonographic appearance.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen ankle specimens were used in this 4-phases study. First, the specimens were scanned on US to identify what was believed to be ATFL's superior fascicle. Second, ATFL's superior fascicle was sutured under direct arthroscopic vision. Next, the specimens were scanned on US to obtain an image of the sutured structure. Finally, the specimens were dissected to confirm that the suture was indeed placed on ATFL's superior fascicle.

RESULTS

On the 20 specimens studied, full correlation was obtained between US, arthroscopic suture and specimen dissection. ATFL's superior fascicle US appearance is provided.

CONCLUSION

ATFL's superior fascicle can be visualized on US, which will allow to undergo diagnosis of isolated injuries to that fascicle, a common finding in ankle microinstability. The results of this study will facilitate the diagnosis of partial or complete rupture of ATFL's superior fascicle, likely increasing the amount of ankle microinstability diagnosis, impacting clinical management of ankle sprain consequences.

Ultrasound or MRI in the Evaluation of Anterior Talofibular Ligament (ATFL) Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Ankle sprains represent the second most common cause of emergency department access for musculoskeletal injury and lateral ankle ligament complex tears account for 850,000 cases annually in the United States with a relapse rate of 70%. Clinical examination is limited due to its subjectivity and the difficulty of identifying a specific involvement of the ligament; therefore, US and MRI are frequently requested. Therefore, the goal of this study is to analyze the available literature on the use of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose injuries to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) with a meta-analytic approach.

METHODS

According to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, all studies regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging ATFL injuries were searched and assessed. The data were obtained from two independent reviewers with 12 and 3 years of experience in meta-analysis. A QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) checklist was carried out to assess the risk of biases. From the selected studies, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy data were extracted.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrate a greater sensitivity for ultrasound [96.88 (95% CI: 94-99) (fixed effects); 97 (95% CI: 94-99) (random effects)] compared to MRI [88.50 (95% CI: 85-91) (fixed effects); 86.98 (95% CI: 77-94) (random effects)], p < 0.05. The result of this meta-analysis shows that the less expensive diagnostic technique is also the most sensitive for the diagnosis of ATFL tears. Ultrasound articles resulted to have non-heterogeneity [(p = 0.2816; I° = 21.4607%)].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that US appears to be a highly sensitive diagnostic technique for diagnosing tears of the ATFL. Compared to MRI, the sensitivity of US result was higher.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests Assessing Ligamentous Injury of the Talocrural and Subtalar Joints: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Context:

Ankle sprains are the most common acute musculoskeletal injury. Clinical tests represent the first opportunity to assess the sprain’s severity, but no systematic review has compared these tests to contemporary reference standards.

Objective:

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests assessing the talocrural and subtalar joint ligaments after ankle sprain.

Data Sources:

CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, hand-searching, and PubMed-related article searches (inception to November 18, 2020).

Study Selection:

Eligible diagnostic studies compared clinical examination (palpation, joint laxity) against imaging or surgery. Studies at a high risk of bias or with high concerns regarding applicability on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 were excluded from the meta-analysis.

Study Design:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3a.

Data Extraction:

True-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative findings were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. If ordinal data were reported, these were extracted to calculate Cohen’s kappa.

Results:

A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria (6302 observations; 9 clinical tests). No test had both sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. Palpation of the anterior talofibular ligament is highly sensitive (sensitivity 95%-100%; specificity 0%-32%; min-max; n = 6) but less so for the calcaneofibular ligament (sensitivity 49%-100%; specificity 26%-79%; min-max; n = 6). Pooled data from 6 studies (885 observations) found a low sensitivity (54%; 95% CI 35%-71%) but high specificity (87%; 95% CI 63%-96%) for the anterior drawer test.

Conclusion:

The anterior talofibular ligament is best assessed using a cluster of palpation (rule out), and anterior drawer testing (rule in). The talar tilt test can rule in injury to the calcaneofibular ligament, but a sensitive clinical test for the ligament is lacking. It is unclear if ligamentous injury grading can be done beyond the binary (injured vs uninjured), and clinical tests of the subtalar joint ligaments are not well researched. The generalizability of our findings is limited by insufficient reporting on blinding and poor study quality.

Registration:

Prospero ID: CRD42020187848.

Data Availability:

Data are available in a public, open access repository on publication, including our RevMan file and the CSV file used for meta-analysis: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4917138

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury

Background:

This study was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods:

This cross-sectional study was performed on 31 patients with soft-tissue injury or fracture, referring to the MRI imaging center of Alzahra and Kashani Hospitals in Isfahan from October 2018 to March 2019. After an MRI, an ultrasound of the affected ankle was performed for all patients. Sonography and MRI were performed by two radiologists who were blinded to the results of each other's reports. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of sonography were determined.

Results:

In this study, 31 patients with ankle trauma were studied. The mean age of the patients was 30.73 ± 10.15 years; 32.3% were male and 67.7% were female. The sensitivity of ultrasound relative to MRI to detect damage to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) was 66.67%, 50%, and 100%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity was 92.86%, 93.10%, and 93.10%, respectively. According to Kappa test, the agreement between ultrasound and MRI methods for detecting injury to ATFL (κ = 0.51), PTFL (κ = 0.35), and CFL (κ= 0.63) was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Ultrasound is an appropriate modality for the diagnosis of injuries to CFL and ATFL and has shown acceptable results for PTFL. It could be used as an alternative in cases where access to MRI is not available.