Assessment of the genotype MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid resistance detection on sputum samples in Cote d'Ivoire

Drug resistance profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates by genotype MTBDRplus line probe assay in Zambia: findings and implications

Background

The emergence of drug resistance is a threat to global tuberculosis (TB) elimination goals. This study investigated the drug resistance profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) using the Genotype MTBDRplus Line Probe Assay at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL) in Zambia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2020. GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay records for patients at the NTRL were reviewed to investigate drug susceptibility profiles of M. tuberculosis isolates to rifampicin and isoniazid. Data analysis was done using Stata version 16.1.

Results

Of the 241 patient records reviewed, 77% were for females. Overall, 44% of patients were newly diagnosed with TB, 29% had TB relapse, 10% treatment after failure and 8.3% treatment after loss to follow-up. This study found that 65% of M. tuberculosis isolates were susceptible to rifampicin and isoniazid. Consequently, 35% of the isolates were resistant to rifampicin and/or isoniazid and 21.2% were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Treatment after failure [relative risk ratios (RRR) = 6.1, 95% CI: 1.691-22.011] and treatment after loss to follow-up (RRR = 7.115, 95% CI: 1.995-25.378) were significantly associated with MDR-TB. Unknown HIV status was significantly associated with isoniazid mono-resistance (RRR = 5.449, 95% CI: 1.054-28.184).

Conclusions

This study found that 65% of M. tuberculosis isolates were susceptible to rifampicin and isoniazid while 35% were resistant. Consequently, a high prevalence of MDR-TB is of public health concern. There is a need to heighten laboratory surveillance and early detection of drug-resistant TB to prevent the associated morbidity and mortality.

Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of rifampicin resistance in different regions: a meta-analysis

Background

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance in different regions, a meta-analysis was carried out.

Methods

Several databases were searched for relevant studies up to March 3, 2019. A bivariate random-effects model was used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy.

Results

We identified 97 studies involving 26,037 samples for the diagnosis of rifampicin resistance. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance detection were 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95), 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99), respectively. For different regions, the pooled sensitivity were 0.94(95% CI 0.89–0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88–0.94), the pooled specificity were 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99), and the AUC were 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) in high and middle/low income countries, respectively. The pooled sensitivity were 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.94), the pooled specificity were 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99), and the AUC were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) in high TB burden and middle/low prevalence countries, respectively.

Conclusions

The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for rifampicin resistance detection was excellent.

Diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Discordant results by diagnostic methods

The performance of the Xpert© MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus assays for the detection of rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis was compared to culture-based drug susceptibility testing in 30 specimens with rifampicin-resistant and rifampicin-indeterminate Xpert MTB/RIF results collected between March 2012 and March 2014. Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were 100% sensitive and 100% concordant for rifampicin resistance detection, but 3 of 13 samples (23%) positive for rifampicin resistance on Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were negative for rifampicin resistance on mycobacteria growth indicator tube drug susceptibility testing. Specificity was 72% for Xpert MTB/RIF and 80% for MTBDRplus. Positive predictive value for Xpert MTB/RIF for multidrug resistant tuberculosis was 47.8% for new patients and 77.8% for previously treated patients; negative predictive value was 100% for both new and previously treated patients. The discordant rifampicin resistance test results indicate a need to fully characterise circulating rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Zambia and to inform the development of guidelines for decision-making in relation to diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Performance of GenoType® MTBDRplus assay in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Tangier, Morocco

OBJECTIVES

In Morocco, tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem with high morbidity and mortality. The main problem faced by the national TB programme is the high rate of drug-resistant (DR), particularly multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains. Diagnosis of DR-TB is mainly performed by conventional techniques that are time consuming with limited efficacy. In 2014, the GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay was introduced in Morocco for drug susceptibility testing (DST). In this regard, the present study was planned to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay.

METHODS

A total of 70 samples from suspected TB cases in Tangier (Morocco) were analysed by conventional DST and GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay.

RESULTS

Among the 70 samples, 37.1% were MDR, whereas monoresistance to isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) was detected in 186% and 17.1% of strains, respectively, by DST. Using the GenoType^® MTBDRplus approach, 12 isolates (17.1%) were identified as INH monoresistant, 9 (12.9%) as RIF monoresistant and 26 (37.1%) as MDR. rpoB531 and katG315 mutations were the most common mutations associated with resistance to RIF and INH, respectively. Significantly, all phenotypically MDR strains were also MDR by GenoType^® MTBDRplus. The sensitivity of GenoType^® MTBDRplus was 92.1% for RIF resistance and 97.4% for INH resistance, whereas the specificity was 100% for the two tested drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay is a rapid, reliable and accurate tool for the detection of DR-TB in clinical specimens. Its routine use will be of a great interest to prevent the dissemination of DR-TB in the community.

Accuracy of line probe assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Only 25% of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases are currently diagnosed. Line probe assays (LPAs) enable rapid drug-susceptibility testing for rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance and Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Genotype MTBDRplusV1 was WHO-endorsed in 2008 but newer LPAs have since been developed.

This systematic review evaluated three LPAs: Hain Genotype MTBDRplusV1, MTBDRplusV2 and Nipro NTM+MDRTB. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. Bivariate random-effects meta-analyses were performed for direct and indirect testing. Results for RIF and INH resistance were compared to phenotypic and composite (incorporating sequencing) reference standards. M. tuberculosis detection results were compared to culture.

74 unique studies were included. For RIF resistance (21 225 samples), pooled sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) were 96.7% (95.6–97.5%) and 98.8% (98.2–99.2%). For INH resistance (20 954 samples), pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90.2% (88.2–91.9%) and 99.2% (98.7–99.5%). Results were similar for direct and indirect testing and across LPAs. Using a composite reference standard, specificity increased marginally. For M. tuberculosis detection (3451 samples), pooled sensitivity was 94% (89.4–99.4%) for smear-positive specimens and 44% (20.2–71.7%) for smear-negative specimens.

In patients with pulmonary TB, LPAs have high sensitivity and specificity for RIF resistance and high specificity and good sensitivity for INH resistance. This meta-analysis provides evidence for policy and practice.

Line probe assays have high accuracy for detection of RIF resistance and INH resistancehttp://ow.ly/USX5305tqFV

A performance evaluation of MTBDRplus version 2 for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of a recently updated rapid molecular diagnostic test, GenoType® MTBDRplus version 2, designed to detect drug resistance in both acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear-negative and -positive specimens.

DESIGN

Sputum samples from 1128 patients at risk for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) were tested using MTBDRplus v2 and compared with reference standard MGIT™ 960™ drug susceptibility testing. The relationship of participant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, diabetic status, previous treatment, and smear gradation to the likelihood of obtaining an interpretable result was assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of MTBDRplus v2 for detecting MDR-TB, when compared to a reference standard, were respectively 96.0% (95%CI 93.5-97.6) and 99.2% (95%CI 97.0-99.9) in AFB smear-positive specimens and 82.8% (95%CI 63.5-93.5) and 98.3% (95%CI 89.9-99.9) in AFB smear-negative specimens. A dose-response relationship was observed between the proportion of interpretable test results and AFB smear bacterial load after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, HIV status, previous treatment and diabetic status.

CONCLUSION

While MTBDRplus v2 performs well among both AFB smear-positive and -negative specimens, smear gradation appears to influence both the probability of obtaining an interpretable result and test sensitivity, indicating a significant association between bacillary load and test performance.

Diagnostic usefulness of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis using AFB smear-negative specimens with positive TB-PCR result

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay in detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) by using acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear-negative specimens with positive TB-PCR results.

METHODS

The MTBDRplus assay was performed with 2 different categories of 117 samples, including AFB smear-positive specimens (n = 53) and AFB smear-negative specimens (n =64), which exhibited positive TB-PCR results, at a single institution. The results were retrospectively compared with the results of the phenotypic drug susceptibility test (DST), for reference.

RESULTS

A total of 105 tests were finally analyzed. Of these, 54 tests were conducted using AFB smear-negative specimens with positive TB-PCR results. The MTBDRplus assay for these 54 samples demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 75%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% in detecting rifampicin resistance. With these same species, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values for the MTBDRplus assay were 83.3%, 97.9%, 83.3%, and 97.9%, respectively, for the detection of isoniazid resistance. The overall correlation between the MTBDRplus assay and phenotypic DST demonstrated excellent agreement for detection of rifampicin resistance (κ = 0.847) and for detection of INH resistance (κ = 0.812), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTBDRplus assay can be used effectively even on AFB smear-negative specimens from TB patients, when the TB-PCR is positive. This result might help clinicians to manage patients with suspected DR-TB in difficult situations.