Outbreak of Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis Caused by Human Adenovirus Type D53 in an Eye Care Clinic - Los Angeles County, 2017

Outbreak of adenovirus D8 in a neonatal intensive care unit involving multiple simultaneous transmission pathways

BACKGROUND

Adenovirus (ADV) outbreaks in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) can lead to durable transmission and serious adverse outcomes. This study describes the investigation and control of an ADV-D8 outbreak in an NICU, associated with ophthalmologic equipment used during retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. Cases were observed in neonates, parents and nurses.

METHODS

The outbreak investigation was performed including sampling patients, parents and health care workers as well as the environment for molecular detection of ADV DNA. The investigation was also conducted in the guest house where some parents were temporary residents. A retrospective cohort study focused on neonates hospitalized during the epidemic period to assess the risk associated with ROP examination.

RESULTS

Fifteen cases were identified in neonates; all but one presented with conjunctivitis. Two healthcare workers and 18 parents acquired conjunctivitis. ADV DNA was identified on the RetCam and on the freezer shared by parents. All ADV-positive samples were typed as ADV-D8. ADV infections occurred more frequently in neonates who had ROP examinations (37.8% (14/37) vs (0.9% (1/110); P<0.001) (relative risk 41.6; (5.7-305.8)). The RetCam was disinfected between two examinations using a disinfectant that was virucidal on ADV after a 30-min contact.

CONCLUSION

This outbreak was significantly associated with ROP examination with a RetCam that had a disinfection protocol ill-adapted to rapid patient turnover. In addition, nosocomial transmission via the parents to neonates and parent-to-parent transmission is likely to have played a role in the dissemination of cases. No further cases were observed after the new disinfection procedure was enforced.

Efficacy and tolerability of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine 0.6% treatment in adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of the employment of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (PVP-I) 0.6% eye drop on the clinical course of patients affected by Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis (AKC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with clinical signs of AKC and positive results of AdenoPlus test were enrolled from four Italian Centres. Patients were randomized to receive: PVP-I 0.6% eye drops four times/daily for 20 days (Group A) or hyaluronate-based tear substitutes four times/daily for 20 days (Group B). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) Optovue iVue pachymetry map; corneal haze; conjunctival injection and chemosis; subepithelial corneal infiltrates (SEIs); corneal and conjunctival staining and corneal densitometry were recorded at diagnosis and at every follow-up visit. The primary outcome was the resolution time of AKC.

RESULTS

Overall, 59 AKC patients (34 for Group A and 25 for Group B) completed the study. Patients of Group A showed a significantly shorter resolution time and lower incidence of SEIs compared to patients of Group B. In particular, SEIs were present at the last visit in 3/34 (8.82%) patients of the Group A vs 11/25 (44%) of the Group B (p = 0.005). Patients of Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of corneal haze compared to patients of Group B (0/34 vs 3/25; p = 0.038). No side effects were reported for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further clinical evaluations are needed, according to our data the use of PVP-I 0.6% eye drop in the setting of AKC reduces the risk of SEIs as well as the resolution time of the disease.

Comprehensive Compositional Analysis of the Slit Lamp Bacteriota

Slit lamps are routinely used to examine large numbers of patients every day due to high throughput. Previous, cultivation-based results suggested slit lamps to be contaminated with bacteria, mostly coagulase-negative staphylococci, followed by micrococci, bacilli, but also Staphylococcus aureus. Our study aimed at obtaining a much more comprehensive, cultivation-independent view of the slit lamp bacteriota and its hygienic relevance, as regularly touched surfaces usually represent fomites, particularly if used by different persons. We performed extensive 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyse the bacteriota, of 46 slit lamps from two tertiary care centers at two sampling sites, respectively. 82 samples yielded enough sequences for downstream analyses and revealed contamination with bacteria of mostly human skin, mucosa and probably eye origin, predominantly cutibacteria, staphylococci and corynebacteria. The taxonomic assignment of 3369 ASVs (amplicon sequence variants) revealed 19 bacterial phyla and 468 genera across all samples. As antibiotic resistances are of major concern, we screened all samples for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using qPCR, however, no signals above the detection limit were detected. Our study provides first comprehensive insight into the slit lamp microbiota. It underlines that slit lamps carry a highly diverse, skin-like bacterial microbiota and that thorough cleaning and disinfection after use is highly recommendable to prevent eye and skin infections.

Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Diagnosis of Ocular Infections

The variety and complexity of ocular infections have increased significantly in the last decade since the publication of Cumitech 13B, Laboratory Diagnosis of Ocular Infections (L. D. Gray, P. H. Gilligan, and W. C. Fowler, Cumitech 13B, Laboratory Diagnosis of Ocular Infections, 2010). The purpose of this practical guidance document is to review, for individuals working in clinical microbiology laboratories, current tools used in the laboratory diagnosis of ocular infections. This document begins by describing the complex, delicate anatomy of the eye, which often leads to limitations in specimen quantity, requiring a close working bond between laboratorians and ophthalmologists to ensure high-quality diagnostic care. Descriptions are provided of common ocular infections in developed nations and neglected ocular infections seen in developing nations. Subsequently, preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic aspects of laboratory diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are explored in depth.

An outbreak of adenovirus D8 keratoconjunctivitis in Leicester, United Kingdom, from March to August 2019

We report a large epidemic (n = 126) of keratoconjunctivitis predominantly with two lineages of adenovirus (AdV) type D8 in patients seen in eye casualty between march and August 2019. Other AdV species identified by viral sequencing included B, C, and E. Despite various features of more severe eye disease being present, these were not significantly different between the different AdV species, with similar rates of pseudomembrane formation and keratitis observed in patients with AdV species B as for those with AdV species D.

Cost Savings From a Policy to Diagnose and Prevent Transmission of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis in Employees of a Large Academic Medical Center

IMPORTANCE

Adenoviral conjunctivitis is highly contagious, can be associated with systemic infections, and can cause chronic visual impairment. It accounts for a large proportion of acute conjunctivitis. Outbreaks of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) are costly in terms of productivity loss from work furloughs and spread to patients and have resulted in clinic and departmental closures.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the institutional cost savings of a policy to diagnose adenoviral conjunctivitis and triage and furlough medical center employees with this condition to prevent outbreaks.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This quality improvement study assessed Johns Hopkins Medicine employees with red eye from November 1, 2011, through October 31, 2018, who were triaged at the occupational health clinic whose conditions were diagnosed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) validated for adenoviral conjunctivitis.

INTERVENTIONS

Only employees with positive PCR test results were furloughed, with furlough length tailored to subtype (a minimum of 2 weeks for EKC and 1 week otherwise).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Total number of furloughs avoided and cost savings associated with reducing unnecessary furloughs.

RESULTS

Of 2142 employees with red eye, 1520 (71.0%) underwent PCR testing; 130 (8.6%) had positive adenoviral PCR test results, of whom 41 (31.5%) had EKC. Furloughing 130 employees with positive PCR test results vs furloughing all 1520 employees clinically suspected of having adenoviral conjunctivitis represented an estimated annual savings of $442 073, or $3 094 511 during 7 years. The cost of performing PCR on employees suspected of having adenoviral conjunctivitis was 5.0% of the cost associated with furloughing all employees with red eye. No outbreaks occurred.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this quality improvement study, this policy, notable for development and use of PCR for adenoviral conjunctivitis on a large scale, resulted in substantial cost savings from fewer work furloughs compared with the number of employees who would have been furloughed based on clinical diagnosis. These results may provide impetus for policy adoption by other institutions and for development of a rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic test for adenoviral conjunctivitis.

The eye as the discrete but defensible portal of coronavirus infection

Oculo-centric factors may provide a key to understanding invasion success by SARS-CoV-2, a highly contagious, potentially lethal, virus with ocular tropism. Respiratory infection transmission via the eye and lacrimal-nasal pathway elucidated during the 1918 influenza pandemic, remains to be explored in this crisis. The eye and its adnexae represent a large surface area directly exposed to airborne viral particles and hand contact. The virus may bind to corneal and conjunctival angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors and potentially to the lipophilic periocular skin and superficial tear film with downstream carriage into the nasopharynx and subsequent access to the lungs and gut. Adenoviruses and influenza viruses share this ocular tropism and despite differing ocular and systemic manifestations and disease patterns, common lessons, particularly in management, emerge. Slit lamp usage places ophthalmologists at particular risk of exposure to high viral loads (and poor prognosis) and as for adenoviral epidemics, this may be a setting for disease transmission. Local, rather than systemic treatments blocking virus binding in this pathway (advocated for adenovirus) are worth considering. This pathway is accessible with eye drops or aerosols containing drugs which appear efficacious via systemic administration. A combination such as hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc, all of which have previously been used topically in the eye and which work at least in part by blocking ACE2 receptors, may offer a safe, cost-effective and resource-sparing intervention.

Current Trends in Tonometry and Tonometer Tip Disinfection

PRECIS

A survey among members of the American Glaucoma Society (AGS) and the American Optometry Association (AOA) on tonometer preference and tonometer disinfection indicates a shift to disposable tonometer tips compared with 1987.

PURPOSE

This survey's purpose was to determine how eye care providers responded to the 2008 Centers of Disease Control (CDC) tonometer disinfection guidelines, which recommend 10% hypochlorite (dilute bleach) for reusable tonometers. Tonometers measure the eye pressure when they touch the cornea, an essential part of the eye examination.

METHODS

AGS and AOA members were surveyed on tonometer preference, tonometer use, disinfection process, disinfectants, disinfection timing, and tonometer damage.

RESULTS

Survey responses from 79 AOA members and 197 AGS members are included. The Goldmann tonometer is considered most accurate (70, 89% AOA and 161, 82% AGS). It is preferred by 54 (70%) AOA and 193 (98%) AGS members. Many providers (165) use reusable Goldmann tonometer tips (77, 79% AOA, 88, 45% AGS), and most clean with 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes 59 (77%) AOA and 54 (61%) AGS. In summary, 126 of 276 participants (8, 10% AOA and 118, 60% AGS) follow CDC guidelines by using disposable tips (2 AOA and 109 AGS) or disinfecting reusable tips with 10% hypochlorite (6 AOA and 9 AGS).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of AGS providers follow current CDC tonometer disinfection guidelines by shifting to disposable Goldmann tonometer tips. Only a minority of providers who use reusable tonometer tips disinfect with dilute bleach. Continued education on proper tonometer disinfection is critical to prevent eye-care related infection due to improper disinfection.

Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-use Plastics at a Large Ophthalmology Outpatient Service

PRéCIS:: The use of disposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses at a large ophthalmology outpatient service incurs significant financial and environmental waste that may not be justified given the limited data surrounding arguments for their use.

PURPOSE

To quantify the economic and environmental burden of single-use plastics from an ophthalmology outpatient service at a large tertiary hospital and describe the relative value and evidence for the safety of disposable versus nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses.

METHODS

The total number of single-use applanation tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses used per year at Boston Medical Center (BMC) was estimated, and the average dollars spent and plastic waste generated in kilograms per year were then determined. These values were compared with the total spending and waste that would be produced if the clinic were to use nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses exclusively.

RESULTS

Single-use tonometer prisms cost an average of $70,282 per year and produce ~100.8 kg of plastic waste per year at BMC. Single-use gonioscopy lenses cost ~$9,040 per year and produce 8.8 kg of plastic waste per year at BMC. An excess of $65,185 and 109.6 kg of plastic waste could be avoided each year by only using nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses at the BMC ophthalmology outpatient service.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-use plastics in ophthalmology outpatient services generate significant environmental waste and financial cost compared with nondisposable instruments. This cost may outweigh the benefits of these instruments given the limited data surrounding arguments for their use.

The COVID-19 pandemic: Important considerations for contact lens practitioners

A novel coronavirus (CoV), the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2), results in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As information concerning the COVID-19 disease continues to evolve, patients look to their eye care practitioners for accurate eye health guidance. There is currently no evidence to suggest an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 through contact lens (CL) wear compared to spectacle lens wear and no scientific evidence that wearing standard prescription spectacles provides protection against COVID-19 or other viral transmissions. During the pandemic there will potentially be significant changes in access to local eyecare. Thus, it is imperative CL wearers are reminded of the steps they should follow to minimise their risk of complications, to reduce their need to leave isolation and seek care. Management of adverse events should be retained within optometric systems if possible, to minimise the impact on the wider healthcare service, which will be stretched. Optimal CL care behaviours should be the same as those under normal circumstances, which include appropriate hand washing (thoroughly with soap and water) and drying (with paper towels) before both CL application and removal. Daily CL cleaning and correct case care for reusable CL should be followed according to appropriate guidelines, and CL exposure to water must be avoided. Where the availability of local clinical care is restricted, practitioners could consider advising patients to reduce or eliminate sleeping in their CL (where patients have the appropriate knowledge about correct daily care and access to suitable lens-care products) or consider the option of moving patients to daily disposable lenses (where patients have appropriate lens supplies available). Patients should also avoid touching their face, including their eyes, nose and mouth, with unwashed hands and avoid CL wear altogether if unwell (particularly with any cold or flu-like symptoms).

Hand hygiene and instrument sanitization in ophthalmology clinics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the various challenges in infection control in eye clinics and successful measures taken to prevent nosocomial infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Center for Disease Control recommends hand-washing when hands are visibly soiled, and after direct contact with patients, and inanimate objects such as medical equipment. Published studies have identified poor hygiene in clinical settings as a major cause of nosocomial outbreaks, particularly in cases of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC). Some studies of EKC outbreaks are able to support direct observation of hygiene lapses with molecular analysis that can match viral strains on particular instruments to those found in infected patients. Although most studies are about adenoviral infection and tonometer use, researchers have found viral and bacterial loads on other common surfaces, indicating a need for further research.

SUMMARY

Proper hygiene in eye clinics requires special attention because of the potential to examine many patients at a time and because multiple instruments are often used during a single exam. Studies reinforce the link between hygiene and outbreak prevention, and more research can be done to determine the specific links between certain instruments and nosocomial infections.