1
|
Bozek A, Rogala B, Miodonska M, Canonica GW. Progressive clinical effects of the combination omalizumab and HDM - allergen immunotherapy in asthma. J Asthma 2024; 61:532-538. [PMID: 38064236 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2293057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The combination of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and omalizumab is used to treat patients at risk of anaphylaxis. There is currently a very little evidence that this combination increases the effectiveness of AIT in patients with inhalant allergies. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HDM-SCIT therapy (injection immunotherapy for house dust mites) in combination with omalizumab in treating HDM-induced asthma. METHODS This study was a placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial including 82 patients with HDM-driven mild to moderate asthma. Omalizumab alone (A), HDM SCIT + omalizumab (B), SCIT alone (C), or placebo (D) for 24 months were applied. All patients received asthma treatment in accordance with GINA recommendations. The treatment efficacy was defined by a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled steroids (ICS) and a reduction in the number of asthma exacerbations (AX). RESULTS After 24 months of therapy, a statistically significant reduction in the daily doses of ICS in groups A and B was observed (p = 0.021 and p = 0.008). Daily ICS reduction was considerably more significant in group B (p = 0.01). During 24 months of observation, the AX was significantly reduced in all study groups, with the greatest significant difference observed between groups A and B and groups C and D (placebo) as follows: 0.42 patient/per year vs. 0.39 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.91 (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION The combination of HDM SCIT and omalizumab is significantly and progressively reducing ICS use and AX in a 24-month study. The combination is significantly more effective than the single treatments or placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Bozek
- Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Martyna Miodonska
- Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Head Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy Clinic-Humanitas, Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zemelka-Wiacek M, Agache I, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Casale TB, Dramburg S, Jahnz-Różyk K, Kosowska A, Matricardi PM, Pfaar O, Shamji MH, Jutel M. Hot topics in allergen immunotherapy, 2023: Current status and future perspective. Allergy 2024; 79:823-842. [PMID: 37984449 DOI: 10.1111/all.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
The importance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is multifaceted, encompassing both clinical and quality-of-life improvements and cost-effectiveness in the long term. Key mechanisms of allergen tolerance induced by AIT include changes in memory type allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses towards a regulatory phenotype with decreased Type 2 responses, suppression of allergen-specific IgE and increased IgG1 and IgG4, decreased mast cell and eosinophil numbers in allergic tissues and increased activation thresholds. The potential of novel patient enrolment strategies for AIT is taking into account recent advances in biomarkers discoveries, molecular allergy diagnostics and mobile health applications contributing to a personalized approach enhancement that can increase AIT efficacy and compliance. Artificial intelligence can help manage and interpret complex and heterogeneous data, including big data from omics and non-omics research, potentially predict disease subtypes, identify biomarkers and monitor patient responses to AIT. Novel AIT preparations, such as synthetic compounds, innovative carrier systems and adjuvants, are also of great promise. Advances in clinical trial models, including adaptive, complex and hybrid designs as well as real-world evidence, allow more flexibility and cost reduction. The analyses of AIT cost-effectiveness show a clear long-term advantage compared to pharmacotherapy. Important research questions, such as defining clinical endpoints, biomarkers of patient selection and efficacy, mechanisms and the modulation of the placebo effect and alternatives to conventional field trials, including allergen exposure chamber studies are still to be elucidated. This review demonstrates that AIT is still in its growth phase and shows immense development prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Division of Allergy and Immunology, Joy McCann Culverhouse Clinical Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karina Jahnz-Różyk
- Department of Internal Diseases, Pneumonology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kosowska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
罗 明, 华 山, 魏 文. [Clinical efficacy of omalizumab for treatment of moderate or severe allergic asthma in children with serum immunoglobulin E levels >1 500 IU/mL: a prospective study]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2023; 25:959-965. [PMID: 37718403 PMCID: PMC10511235 DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2303102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of moderate or severe allergic asthma in children with serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels >1 500 IU/mL. METHODS A total of 95 children with moderate or severe allergic asthma, who were treated at the Department of Respiratory Medicine in Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital from December 2020 to May 2022, were enrolled. Based on their serum total IgE levels and whether they received omalizumab treatment, they were divided into a control group (IgE >1 500 IU/mL, no omalizumab treatment), a normal treatment group (IgE levels between 30 and 1 500 IU/mL, omalizumab treatment), and an ultra-high IgE treatment group (IgE >1 500 IU/mL, omalizumab treatment). The differences in clinical characteristics, Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) scores before and after treatment, the proportion of acute attacks, IgE levels, pulmonary function indicators, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentrations were analyzed among the three groups. RESULTS At the 8th week of treatment, the normal treatment group and the ultra-high IgE treatment group had higher C-ACT scores, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) as a percentage of predicted value (FEV1%pred), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (FEV1/FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) as a percentage of predicted value (PEF%pred), as well as a lower proportion of acute attacks and FeNO concentration compared to the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of various indicators between the ultra-high IgE treatment group and the normal treatment group (P>0.05). At the 16th week of treatment, the normal treatment group and the ultra-high IgE treatment group had higher C-ACT scores and pulmonary function indicators including FEV1%pred, FEV1/FVC, PEF%pred, and forced expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity (FEF25) as a percentage of predicted value (FEF25%pred) compared to the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of acute attacks and FeNO concentration in the ultra-high IgE treatment group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of various indicators between the ultra-high IgE treatment group and the normal treatment group (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Omalizumab therapy has a certain clinical efficacy in children with moderate or severe allergic asthma and serum total IgE levels >1 500 IU/mL, with no significant difference in efficacy compared to children with serum total IgE levels between 30 and 1 500 IU/mL.
Collapse
|
4
|
Reginald K, Chew FT. Current practices and future trends in cockroach allergen immunotherapy. Mol Immunol 2023; 161:11-24. [PMID: 37480600 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review evaluates the current modes of allergen-specific immunotherapy for cockroach allergens, in terms of clinical outcomes and explores future trends in the research and development needed for a more targeted cockroach immunotherapy approach with the best efficacy and minimum adverse effects. SUMMARY Cockroach allergy is an important risk factor for allergic rhinitis in the tropics, that disproportionately affects children and young adults and those living in poor socio-economic environments. Immunotherapy would provide long-lasting improvement in quality of life, with reduced medication intake. However, the present treatment regime is long and has a risk of adverse effects. In addition, cockroach does not seem to have an immuno-dominant allergen, that has been traditionally used to treat allergies from other sources. Future trends of cockroach immunotherapy involve precision diagnosis, to correctly identify the offending allergen. Next, precision immunotherapy with standardized allergens, which have been processed in a way that maintains an immunological response without allergic reactions. This approach can be coupled with modern adjuvants and delivery systems that promote a Th1/Treg environment, thereby modulating the immune response away from the allergenic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Reginald
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Fook Tim Chew
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Filippo M, Votto M, Caminiti L, Carella F, Castro GD, Landi M, Olcese R, Panasiti I, Vernich M, Barberi S, Ciprandi G, Marseglia GL. Omalizumab and allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergies: A mini-review from the Allergen-Immunotherapy Committee of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP). Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2022; 50:47-52. [PMID: 36335444 DOI: 10.15586/aei.v50i6.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Although currently approved to treat severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, omalizumab has also been an effective and safe add-on treatment for other allergic diseases. Namely, omalizumab has been proposed to be used as add-on therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma and undergoing specific allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is the only treatment that modifies the natural history of IgE-mediated diseases. This brief review summarizes the available evidence and controversies on the efficacy and safety of omalizumab combined with specific AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria De Filippo
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Martina Votto
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy;
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Carella
- Pediatric Unit, Azienza Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Landi
- Pediatric National Healthcare System, Turin, Italy - Istituto di Biomedicina e Immunologia molecolare, Italian National Research Council, Palermo, Italy; Department of Biomedicine, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Olcese
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Center, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilenia Panasiti
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Gian Luigi Marseglia
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|