Relationship Between Implant Connection and Implant Fracture: Systematic Review

The design of dental implants has undergone minor modifications over the years to reduce possible future complications that may arise from implant rehabilitation. One critical element from a clinical point of view is the implant connection. Given this, the team of authors of the present study decided to biomechanically analyze the effect of implant connection obtained in a possible implant fracture through a systematic review of the published literature. To this end, a search was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases. Only finite element studies carried out in vitro and simulation studies were included, discarding clinical studies and related reviews. A total of 19 studies were obtained for analysis and complete study. The conical type is the connection design that demonstrates the best biomechanical behavior. However, there was also significant heterogeneity in the design of the studies, which translates into a substantial source of bias, as well as different types of specific designs within the conical connection. In conclusion, it was established that the design of the connection seems to play a fundamental role in the fatigue resistance of the implant when subjected to load. However, more studies are needed to determine the most optimal specific design.

Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region

OBJECTIVE

Stress distribution assessment by finite elements analysis in poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) implant and abutment as retainers of single crowns in the anterior region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five 3D models were created, varying implant/abutment manufacturing materials: titanium (Ti), zirconia (Zr), pure PEEK (PEEKp), carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (PEEKc), glass fiber-reinforced PEEK (PEEKg). A 50 N load was applied 30o off-axis at the incisal edge of the upper central incisor. The Von Mises stress (σvM) was evaluated on abutment, implant/screw, and minimum principal stress (σmin) and maximum shear stress (τmax) for cortical and cancellous bone.

RESULTS

The abutment σvM lowest stress was observed in PEEKp group, being 70% lower than Ti and 74% than Zr. On the implant, PEEKp reduced 68% compared to Ti and a 71% to Zr. In the abutment screws, an increase of at least 33% was found in PEEKc compared to Ti, and of at least 81% to Zr. For cortical bone, the highest τmax values were in the PEEKp group, and a slight increase in stress was observed compared to all PEEK groups with Ti and Zr. For σmin, the highest stress was found in the PEEKc. Stress increased at least 7% in cancellous bone for all PEEK groups.

CONCLUSION

Abutments and implants made by PEEKc concentrate less σvM stress, transmitting greater stress to the cortical and medullary bone.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The best stress distribution in PEEKc components may contribute to decreased stress shielding; in vitro and in vivo research is recommended to investigate this.

Effects of the internal contact surfaces of dental implants on screw loosening: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The effects of the internal contact surfaces of dental implants on screw loosening have yet to be investigated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) study was to evaluate and compare the mechanical effects of the abutment implant angle (θ), the abutment screw head diameter (D), and the abutment screw length (L) on screw loosening.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 27 models presenting various mechanical scenarios were built by using combinations of 3 different θ (30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees), D (2.65 mm, 2.75 mm, and 2.85 mm), and L (4 mm, 5 mm, and 6 mm). In FEA, a static test with a 200-N force inclined 30 degrees in the implant axial direction was applied to the upper surface of the abutment to evaluate and compare the maximum von Mises stresses of the implant components and the maximum total deformation in all models. In addition, modal analysis was applied to identify the natural frequencies in all models under free (unforced) vibration, and a Kruskal-Wallis statistical test (α=.05) was performed, followed by multiple pairwise comparisons by using the Dunn test.

RESULTS

The Kruskal-Wallis test found a significant influence of the θ on implant stress, total deformation, and natural frequency (P<.001). For example, increasing the θ from 30 degrees to 45 degrees and 60 degrees can considerably reduce the model's natural frequencies to 18% and 26%, respectively. Similarly, the test underscored the significant impact of the D on both abutment screw stress and abutment stress (P=.010 and P=.002, respectively). However, the L appeared to have no significant effect on any of the dependent variables (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The θ and the D significantly influenced the stresses of dental implant components, total deformation, and natural frequency of the model, which may impact the mechanical stability of the screw joint. However, the L does not appear to affect these values significantly.

Survival of Four Conical Implant Abutment Connections After Removal of the Abutment Screw and Simulated Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Comparative Study

This in vitro study evaluated the mechanical behavior of different conical connection implant systems after abutment screw withdrawal. Four conical connection systems were selected based on different conical half-angles: Ankylos (5.7°), Cowell (7.0°), Straumann (7.5°), and Astra (11.0°). In each system, 5 implants and abutments were used (n = 5). According to the recommended value, each abutment screw was torqued to settle the abutment and then withdrawn through a predesigned hole of the cemented crown. The retentiveness of the abutment was evaluated by the following mechanical testing. All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading of 20-200 N, 30°, and 4-mm off-axis to the implant axis, for 106 cycles. The pullout forces and axial displacements of the abutments were measured. The data of the Cowell system was obtained from our previous work. All groups other than Astra group, in which abutment loosened after abutment screw withdrawal, passed the cyclic loading test. Straumann group demonstrated a significantly lower pullout force (27.4 ± 21.1 N) than Ankylos (160.1 ± 41.4 N) and Cowell (183.7 ± 30.5 N) groups. All groups showed abutment rebound after screw withdrawal except Straumann group. In addition, Ankylos, Cowell, and Straumann groups demonstrated axial displacement after cyclic loading. In terms of the retentiveness of the abutment after abutment screw withdrawal examined in this study, Ankylos and Cowell groups had much higher retentiveness than Straumann group, while Astra group had none. Conical angle could be a key design parameter to make abutment screw withdrawal after conical abutment settlement feasible, but more studies must be conducted for clinical application.

A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal

Conical implant–abutment connections are popular for their stability; however, in other conditions, such as excessive force, implants and abutments can absorb all the stress. Some connections with three points of support can resist more than conical connections. In recent years, different studies has shown that the design of a connection affects its stability. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the stresses in finite elements (FEs) in a newly proposed conical triangular connection in implants with hexagonal and conical connections. A nonlinear 3D FE parametric model was developed using SOLIDWORKS 2017^®. All the connections, i.e., external and internal hexagons, morse taper, conical connection, and the new conical triangular proposal were compared when axial forces of 150, 250, and 350 N were applied to the occlusal. The maximum stress was found in the external hexagon. The maximum stress was concentrated at the level of the neck of the abutment, implant, and bone, except for the morse taper; at the level of the crown and abutment, the lowest stress occurred in the new proposal. Conclusions: The new conical triangular (CT) connection and the conical connection (CC) generate similar stress in the implant, abutment, and crown. However, the CT connection improves the CC by reducing stress at the bone level, adding an advantage to having three retention points.

A retrospective study of 12,538 internal conical connection implants: focused on the long-term integrity of implant-abutment complexes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term integrity of implant-abutment complexes in implant systems with two internal conical angles.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

12,538 bone-level implants of two systems placed between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Cumulative abutment/implant fracture rates in systems with larger (LA, 7.5°) and smaller (SA, 5.7°) internal conical angles were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups. The association between implant systems and jammed abutment retrievability was evaluated by multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression modelling.

RESULTS

For LA, the 8-year cumulative incident rate was 0.10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-0.24%) for implant fracture and 0.26% (95% CI: 0.11%-0.41%) for abutment fracture, demonstrating a significant difference in gender (p = 0.03), implant diameter (p = 0.01), jaw (p = 0.006) and antagonist tooth (p < 0.001). For SA, the 8-year cumulative incident rate was 0.38% (95% CI: 0-0.79%) for implant fracture and 2.62% (95% CI: 0.05%-5.13%) for abutment fracture, which was influenced by implant diameter (p < 0.001) and site (p = 0.03). The cumulative implant/abutment fracture rate was lower for LA implants, particularly for LA implant-supported single crowns (SCs) (p < 0.05). The abutment-retrieval success rate was 92.8% for LA, and 57.1% for SA (p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

LA implants exhibited a lower incidence of fracture in abutment-implant complexes and a relatively higher retrievability success rate for jammed abutments.

Rotational tolerances of a titanium abutment in the as-received condition and after screw tightening in a conical implant connection

PURPOSE

The success of an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation is influenced by good implant health and an excellent implant-prosthetic coupling. The stability of implant-prosthetic connection is influenced by the rotational tolerance between anti-rotational features on the implant and those on the prosthetic component. The aim of this study is to investigate the rotational tolerance of a conical connection implant system and its titanium abutment counterpart, in various conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

10 preparable titanium abutments, having zero-degree angulation (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) with an internal 5-degree conical connection, and 10 implants (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea) were used. Rotational tolerance between the connection of implant and titanium abutments was measured through the use of a tridimensional optics measuring system (Quick Scope QS250Z, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan) in the as-received condition (Time 0), after securing with a titanium screw tightening at 35 Ncm (Time 1), after tightening 4 times at 35 Ncm (Time 2), after tightening one more time at 45 Ncm (Time 3), and after tightening another 4 times at 45 Ncm (Time 4).

RESULTS

The group "Time 0" had the lowest values of rotational freedom (0.22 ± 0.76 degrees), followed by the group Time 1 (0.46 ± 0.83 degrees), the group Time 2 (1.01 ± 0.20 degrees), the group Time 3 (1.30 ± 0.85 degrees), and the group Time 4 (1.49 ± 0.17 degrees).

CONCLUSION

The rotational tolerance of a conical connection is low in the "as received" condition but increases with repetitive tightening and with application of a torque greater than 35 Ncm.

The use of implant-level connection in screw-retained fixed partial dentures: A 3-year randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

This randomised controlled trial compares the 3-year outcomes, that is, marginal bone-level (MBL) changes and clinical parameters, between an abutment-level (AL) and implant-level (IL) connection for implants with an internal conical connection (ICC) supporting a screw-retained fixed partial denture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty patients with 119 implants were randomly allocated to either the AL or IL group. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed after one, two, and 3 years. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the differences between groups.

RESULTS

The MBL change was not significantly different between the groups at any point. The MBL was 0.12 ± 0.31 mm (AL) and 0.23 ± 0.26 mm (IL) after 1 year; 0.15 ± 0.34 mm (AL) and 0.17 ± 0.22 mm (IL) after 2 years; 0.18 ± 0.39 mm (AL) and 0.15 ± 0.21 mm (IL) after 3 years. The bleeding on probing was 43.44 ± 39.24% (AL) and 58.19 ± 41.20% (IL) after 1 year; 35.78 ± 39.22% (AL) and 50.43 ± 41.49% (IL) after 2 years; 51.27 ± 44.63% (AL) and 49.57 ± 37.31% (IL) after 3 years and was significantly different (p = .025) between 1 and 2 years. The probing depth showed a significant difference at each time point while the plaque was not significant between the groups. The overall technical, biological and prosthetic complication rates were 5.04%, 3.36%, and 16.00%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBL change was similar in the groups. The slight differences in the soft tissue complications between the groups are likely not of clinical relevance. An IL connection is considered to be a valid alternative to an AL set-up in ICC implants.

Mechanical Pull-Out Test of a New Hybrid Fixture-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study

Implant abutment connection was described among the main causes of peri-implant bone resorption. The aim of this in vitro study was to test the coupling capacity, the surface modification of a new hybrid connection and the influence of repeated connection activations caused during the main clinical and laboratory phases. A total of 40 implant-abutment screw retained systems with 10°-conical and internal hexagon connection were tested. The connection was screwed, fixed to the universal test machine, removed the screw and a pull-out test was performed. Test was repeated five times in succession. Also Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to detect microscopically surface modification. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for the statistical analysis. Pull-out test reveals a mean value of 131.35 ± 16.52 Newton Centimeter (N·cm). For each single activation, results from first to fifth were: 113.9 ± 13.02, 126.1 ± 12.81, 138.11 ± 15.15, 138.8 ± 11.90 and 140 ± 12.99 N·cm. A statistically significant difference between the measurements and an increase in the removal force was shown. The collected data supports the use of this new type of connection, resulting in a very strong interface between implant and abutment. Also, repeated activation of connection can promote a better coupling of the implant-abutment interface.

Abutment screw withdrawal after conical abutment settlement: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of abutment screw withdrawal after conical abutment settlement on the stability of the implant-abutment connection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty implants of a conical connection system were used. Two two-piece abutment designs were used: cone only (n = 10; NI) and cone plus octagonal index design (n = 10; I); for each design, five samples were used with (S) and without (NS) abutment screw withdrawal before a cyclic test. Finally, four groups, namely Gr S(NI), Gr S(I), Gr NS(NI), and Gr NS(I), were included. The cyclic test included cyclic loading of 20-200 N, 30°, and 4-mm off-axis to implant axis at 10 Hz for 10⁶ cycles, simulating a clinical time interval of 40 months. The fatigue cycles were recorded. The axial displacement of the conical abutments during abutment settlement, screw withdrawal, and cyclic loading were measured. Abutment morphology was examined through scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Only Gr NS(NI) failed the test, indicating that without the index design and abutment screw withdrawal, and connection stability seriously deteriorated. Gr NS(I) exhibited significantly higher axial displacement into the implant after abutment settlement than did Gr NS(NI). It also exhibited continuous axial displacement into the implant after cyclic loading. SEM after cyclic testing in Gr NS(I) revealed marked burnishing on lateral edges of the index, indicating that the index design provides an antitorsional ability.

CONCLUSION

Although this study has few limitations, abutment screw withdrawal is feasible in this conical implant-abutment connection system with index design.