Medication Reconciliation: An Educational Module

Insight into Risk Factors, Pharmacogenetics/Genomics, and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly: A Narrative Review

The European Medicine Agency (EMA) has defined Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) as "a noxious and unintended response to a medicine", not including poisoning, accidental, or intentional overdoses. The ADR occurrence differs based on the approach adopted for defining and detecting them, the characteristics of the population under study, and the research setting. ADRs have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults, and represent a financial burden for health services. Between 30% and 60% of ADRs might be predictable and preventable, emerging as a result of inappropriate prescription, drug chemistry inherent toxicity, cell-specific drug toxicity, age- and sex-related anomalies in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in combination therapies or when a patient is treated with different drugs for concomitant disorders. This is particularly important in chronic diseases which require long-term treatments. Rapid developments in pharmacogenetics/genomics have improved the understanding of ADRs accompanied by more accurate prescriptions and reduction in unnecessary costs. To alleviate the burden of ADRs, especially in the elderly, interventions focused on pharmaceutical principles, such as medication review and reconciliation, should be integrated into a broader assessment of patients' characteristics, needs, and health priorities. Digital health interventions could offer valuable solutions to assist healthcare professionals in identifying inappropriate prescriptions and promoting patient adherence to pharmacotherapies.

One Size Does Not Fit All: Medication Reconciliation and Review at the Hospital at Home

Mistakes in the medication process are frequent and a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Medication reconciliation (MRec) and medication review (MRev) are the processes of creating the most accurate medication list and adapting it to optimize the effectiveness of medicines and minimize adverse effects. This is crucial in all stages of medical care, especially at discharge. The present study aims to evaluate and describe the process of MRec and MRev, with a focus on deprescribing, that we conduct at the Hospital at Home. We performed a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted at our Hospital at Home from 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2023. MRec and MRev were applied during hospitalization, according to patients' characteristics and clinical evolution, and then communicated to patients upon discharge. Our study involved 125 patients, with an average age of 67.6±18.0 years, and half of them had polypharmacy. We discovered discrepancies in 43.2% of patient's medication and did deprescribing in one-third of them. In the deprescribing group, patients were significantly older (mean age, 76.1 versus 66.4 years; p=0.044). It is imperative to create mechanisms to identify patients at a greater risk of adverse drug events and to minimize the burden of care and harms associated with treatments. The Hospital at Home could be an opportunity, although further research is essential.

Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital.

METHOD

Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22.

RESULTS

We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favoured deprescription.