The multidisciplinary management of giant cell tumor of bone

Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

The benign aggressive tumour known as a giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) frequently affects the knee bones. Patients suffering from GCTB present with pain, swelling, joint effusion, loss of ability to bear weight on the involved extremity and a restriction in the range of motion of the afflicted joint may also exist, depending on the tumour's size. GCTB makes up 20% of benign skeletal tumours and 5% of all primary bone tumours. Although it has an equal distribution of the sexes, the majority reveal a higher frequency among women. Eighty per cent of GCTB instances were recorded in patients between the ages of 20 and 50 during the third decade. The femur, tibia and radius are where GCTB is most frequently discovered. Lesions can be rated using the Campanacci grading method based on the plain radiograph's results. Plain radiography, CT and MRI are used to diagnose the tumour. Surgery is the only curative treatment which is determined by the Campanacci grade and the tumour's location. Recurrence of GCTB is observed in about 25% of patients, with curettage being associated with rates as high as 50%. We evaluated the GCTB-related articles and summarised the developments in diagnosis, treatment and reducing risk of recurrence.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Metastatic giant cell tumour of bone: a narrative review of management options and approaches

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive bone neoplasm with a rare tendency to metastasise, most commonly to the lungs. The management of metastatic GCTB (metGCTB) is controversial due to its unpredictable behaviour. Asymptomatic patients should be monitored radiologically and undergo treatment only when disease progression occurs. Surgery is recommended for resectable metGCTB. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody which inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor‐κB ligand, is recommended for unresectable metGCTB with evidence from phase II trials demonstrating its safety and efficacy. Relapse after denosumab withdrawal may occur and prolonged treatment may be associated with serious adverse events, thus further research is warranted to inform a maintenance regimen with reduced dosing and frequency. Combined denosumab and bisphosphonate therapy has the potential to achieve sustained disease control or remission in unresectable metGCTB without requiring long‐term treatment and should be evaluated in prospective trials. Various novel agents have demonstrated in vitro and anecdotal efficacy and warrant further evaluation.

Outcome of lung metastases due to bone giant cell tumor initially managed with observation

Background

The outcomes of patients with lung metastases from giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) vary from spontaneous regression to uncontrolled growth. To investigate whether observation is an appropriate first-line management approach for patients with lung metastases from GCTB, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who were initially managed by observation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 22 patients with lung metastases from histologically confirmed GCTB who received observation as a first-line treatment approach. The median follow-up period was 116 months.

Results

Disease progression occurred in 12 patients (54.5%). The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and progression was 8 months. Eight patients underwent metastasectomy following initial observation. The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and treatment by metastasectomy was 13.5 months. None of the patients experienced spontaneous regression. Of the 22 patients, 36.4% needed a metastasectomy, and 9.1% required denosumab treatment during the course of the follow-up period. Disease progression occurred in 45.5% of the 11 patients with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm, while all five of the patients with lung nodules > 5 mm experienced disease progression. Progression-free survival was significantly worse in the group with lung nodules > 5 mm compared to the group with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm (p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Observation is a safe first-line method of managing patients with lung metastases from GCTB. According to radiological imaging, approximately half of the patients progressed, and approximately half required a metastasectomy or denosumab treatment. However, patients with lung nodules > 5 mm should receive careful observation because of the high rate of disease progression in this group.

Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone

A review of the literature indicated denosumab is gaining favorability in the oncology community, particularly with increasing frequency in GCTB. Will denosumab be the breakthrough GCTB treatment? Here, we provide a pertinent case example, a review of the literature regarding the history and basic science behind the use of denosumab for GCTB, highlight the newest insights into the dosing and duration of treatment, and note advancements in the field.

Denosumab for cancer-related bone loss

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged use of anti-cancer treatments in breast and prostate tumors alters physiological bone turnover leading to adverse skeletal related events, such as osteoporosis, loss of bone mass, and increased risk of fractures. These complications known as cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) should be managed with bone targeting agents such as the bisphosphonates and denosumab. The latter is a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) that suppresses osteoclasts function and survival increasing bone mass.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on the mechanisms associated with bone loss induced by cancer treatments and the most recent evidence about the use of denosumab as preventive and therapeutic strategy to protect bone health. Moreover, we will discuss several key aspects regarding the clinical practical use of denosumab to optimize the management of CTLIB in breast and prostate cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Denosumab treatment strongly prevents cancer therapies-related skeletal issues in breast and prostate cancer with a good safety profile. Adjuvant six-monthly denosumab delays the time to first fracture onset in early stage breast cancer patients with normal or altered bone mineral density (BMD). Similarly, denosumab treatment is able to prevent fractures and BMD loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients.

THE USE OF DENOSUMAB IN GIANT CELL TUMORS IN THE SACRUM

ABSTRACT Giant Cell Tumor (GCT), a benign tumor with local aggression, corresponds to 5% of primary tumors. Fifteen percent of these are located in the sacrum. En bloc resection is an effective treatment, but when it cannot be performed, Denosumab may be indicated as an alternative treatment. The objectives of this work are: to justify the indication; determine the best dose and time of use; and recognize the need for post-treatment surgery. Methods A systematic search of clinical trials. Twenty-five articles were selected, ten of which met the inclusion criteria. The use of Denosumab is justified in advanced stages, with a dose of 120 mg administered subcutaneously, every 7 days in the first month and then maintained every 4 weeks, for 2.5 to 13 months. Adverse events are mild and can be observed in 84% of patients. With Denosumab, surgery may be less aggressive or even unnecessary. The bibliography justifies the indication of Denosumab in advanced stages of GCT, with a dose of 120 mg administered subcutaneously; there is no consensus as to the maintenance dose, which is a weekly dose in the first month and then every four weeks for 2.5 to 13 months. Complications are frequent but mild. Level of evidence III; Systematic review.

A novel subchondral bone-grafting procedure for the treatment of giant-cell tumor around the knee: A retrospective study of 27 cases

The vast majority of giant-cell tumors occur around the knee and characteristically affect the subchondral bone. Thermal damage to the articular cartilage arising from the application of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or extensive intralesional curettage presents a challenging problem to orthopedic surgeons and patients due to compliance issues. For this reason, we developed a new subchondral bone-grafting procedure to restore massive bone defects and reduce degenerative changes in the knee.The aim of this study was to describe the novel subchondral bone-grafting procedure and evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with giant-cell tumors around the knee.This retrospective single-center study included a total of 27 patients with giant-cell tumors in the distal femur and proximal tibia admitted to our department from January 2012 to December 2015 and treated with aggressive intralesional curettage. Eleven males and 16 females were included. All cases underwent subchondral autograft bone grafting followed by bone cement reconstruction and instrument internal fixation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and short form-36 (SF-36) were applied to assess the functional outcome of the knee joint and quality of life. Tumor recurrence, Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade, and the distance of the cement to the articular surface were assessed throughout the sample.All cases were followed up after surgery for an average of 32.9 ± 7.1 months (range 25-57 months). At the end of the follow-up period, all patients were alive and free from pulmonary metastasis. Complications associated with this surgery occurred only in 1 patient (3.7%), who presented with an incision infection that resolved with regular dressing and antibiotics. No fractures, instrument breakage, or joint fluid leakage occurred. Local recurrence occurred in 1 case (3.7%) at the distal femur after 23 months and was treated by wide resection followed by prosthesis reconstruction. Twenty-four patients (89%) did not develop radiographic findings of osteoarthritis: at the final follow-up 2 patients (7.4%), had progressed to KL1 and 1 patient had progressed to KL2. According to the MSTS scoring system, the functional score of the affected knee joint at the last follow-up ranged from 80% to 97%, with an average of 87.3%. The quality of life parameters assessed by the SF-36 survey at the last follow-up ranged from 47 to 96, with an average of 77.For patients with giant-cell tumor of bone near the knee, subchondral bone grafting combined with bone cement reconstruction is recommended as a feasible and effective treatment modality.

Development and proposal of a scoring system for giant cell tumour of the bone around the knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide the surgeons with effective and reliable guidelines for surgical decision-making by establishing a scoring system for giant cell tumour (GCTSS) based on evidence and expert opinion.

METHODS

The modified Delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process were used to establish the GCTSS. The GCTSS was defined and classified based on different surgical methods using data from 207 patients collected retrospectively between October 2003 and December 2014. Finally, prospective data of 40 patients between December 2014 and October 2015 were used to analyze concordance between score categorization and experts' consensus on surgical procedure.

RESULTS

A novel GCTSS included pathological fracture, cortical bone destruction, tumour size, and articular surface involved. The total scores ranged from 1 to 12 points. The strategy for each patient was decided: a total score of 1-4 suggested intralesional curettage alone for excellent post-operative function; 5-9 points indicated intralesional curettage with internal fixation for less surgery-related complications; and 10-12 points indicated prosthesis replacement for long-term local control. The κ-statistic for the predictive validity of total score was 0.611. The κ coefficient of each group represented moderate or substantial agreement, which was acceptable. The intraclass correlation coefficient for inter- and intra-observer reliability of total score was 0.831 and 0.740, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel GCTSS is a comprehensive scoring system with content validity that can aid surgeons in assessing the aggressiveness or severity of giant cell tumour and might become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making.

Combining of serial embolization and denosumab for large sacropelvic giant cell tumor: Case report of 3 cases

RATIONALE

Both serial arterial embolization (SAE) and denosumab have been proved to be effective in treatment for giant cell tumor (GCT). There is potential synergic effect of combining two methods. The purpose of current study is to justify a new treatment strategy of combination of SAE and denosumab as neoadjuvant or stand-alone treatment for large sacropelvic giant cell tumor.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Pelvic and sacral GCTs tend to be very large size and vascular. The concerns of surgical treatment were invasiveness of extensive surgery, intraoperative hemorrhage, nerve function jeopardized and local recurrence. However, SAE alone may not be adequate for complete removal of the tumor.

DIAGNOSES

All the three cases were proved to be GCT by core-needle biopsy. Post-treatment pathological change was confirmed by further biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient in Case 1 diagnosed of large recurrent sacral GCT received 6 times of endovascular embolizations with 2-month interval and started on denosumab simultaneously after first session of embolization. The second case was a 22-year-old female presented with a massive iliosacral tumor. SAE was performed for 3 sessions and the denosumab was started simultaneously. The patients was on treatment for half year. Both patients experienced a dramatic decrease in symptoms and concomitant improvement in function after the first embolization and weekly injection of denosumab. Tumor removal was performed on patient in case 2. The last case was a pelvic GCT and the patient received SAE and denosumab for half year. The tumor was then removed with purpose of complete cure.

OUTCOMES

The first patient was still on denosumab with stable tumor. The other two patients were both free of recurrence after surgical removal of the tumors. No denosumab was used postoperatively.

LESSONS

We reported the first three cases treated by combination of SAE and denosumab in the literature and aim to raise an alternative method for large GCT at challenging anatomical locations, for which surgery would carry significant risk. SAE and denosumab can synergically promote sclerosis and result in significant decrease in pain. It is reasonable to consider using SAE combined with denosumab neoadjuvantly to reduce the extensiveness and morbidity of surgery, however further investigation is warranted.