Epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease

Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels predict cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 10-year prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) level is known to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the data that has been reported on the association between the Lp(a) level and CVD in type 2 diabetes has been limited and incoherent. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Lp(a) concentration and new onset CVD in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

From March 2003 to December 2004, patients with type 2 diabetes without a prior history of CVD were consecutively enrolled. CVD was defined as the occurrence of coronary artery disease or ischemic stroke. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the associations between the Lp(a) and CVD after adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of the 1,183 patients who were enrolled, 833 participants were evaluated with a median follow-up time of 11.1 years. A total of 202 participants were diagnosed with CVD (24.2%). The median Lp(a) level for 1st and 4th quartile group was 5.4 (3.5 to 7.1) and 55.7 mg/dL (43.1 to 75.3). Compared with patients without CVD, those with CVD were older, had a longer duration of diabetes and hypertension, and used more insulin and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers at baseline. A Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that the development of CVD was significantly associated with serum Lp(a) level (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 2.92; p < 0.001, comparing the 4th vs. 1st quartile of Lp[a]).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated Lp(a) level was an independent predictable risk factor for CVD in type 2 diabetes. Other cardiovascular risk factors should be treated more intensively in type 2 diabetic patients with high Lp(a) levels.

Lipoprotein(a) predicts a new onset of chronic kidney disease in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

We investigated the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study from March 2003 to December 2004 with a median follow-up time of 10.1 years. Patients aged 25-75 years with Type 2 diabetes and without CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ) were consecutively enrolled. The eGFR was measured at least twice every year , and new-onset CKD was defined as a decreased eGFR status of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) using a Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

RESULTS

Of the 862 patients who were enrolled, 560 (65.0%) completed the follow-up and 125 (22.3%) progressed to CKD. The mean age and duration of diabetes were 53.3 ± 9.6 and 7.5 ± 6.0 years, respectively. The baseline eGFR was 101.8 ± 11.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) . After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, a Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that the third tertile of Lp(a) was significantly associated with the development of CKD during the observation period when compared with the first tertile [hazard ratio 2.12 (95% confidence interval 1.33-3.36); P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study, we demonstrated that the Lp(a) level was an independent prognostic factor for the future development of CKD in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) predicts major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease. The predictive power of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease is diminished in patients with CKD. The serum level of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] can be a risk factor for adverse events, but the clinical implications of Lp(a) in patients with CKD who have been treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the role of Lp(a) on long-term outcomes in patients with CKD after PCI.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 904 patients with CKD among 3508 patients who underwent a first PCI between 1997 and 2011 at our institution. We divided patients into 2 groups [high (n=454) or low (n=450)] according to median levels of Lp(a). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar and the median follow-up period was 4.7 years. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly worse for the group with high, than low Lp(a) (P=0.01). Multivariable analysis indicated a high Lp(a) level as an independent predictor of primary outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.82; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

A high Lp(a) value is associated with a poor prognosis after PCI for patients with CKD.

Relation of serum lipids and lipoproteins with progression of CKD: The CRIC study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hyperlipidemia is common in patients with CKD. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether measures of plasma lipids and lipoproteins predict progression of kidney disease in patients with CKD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Prospective cohort study in adults (n=3939) with CKD aged 21-74 years recruited between 2003 and 2008 and followed for a median of 4.1 years. At baseline, total cholesterol, triglycerides, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), apoA-I , apoB, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] were measured. The outcomes were composite end point of ESRD or 50% decline in eGFR from baseline (rate of change of GFR).

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 58.2 years, and the mean GFR was 44.9 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); 48% of patients had diabetes. None of the lipid or lipoprotein measures was independently associated with risk of the composite end point or rate of change in GFR. However, there were significant (P=0.01) interactions by level of proteinuria. In participants with proteinuria<0.2 g/d, 1-SD higher LDL-C was associated with a 26% lower risk of the renal end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59 to 0.92; P=0.01), and 1-SD higher total cholesterol was associated with a 23% lower risk of the renal end point (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.02). In participants with proteinuria>0.2 g/d, neither LDL-C (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) nor total cholesterol levels were associated with renal outcomes. Treatment with statins was reported in 55% of patients and was differential across lipid categories.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with CKD, total cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-C, apoA-I, apoB, and Lp(a) were not independently associated with progression of kidney disease. There was an inverse relationship between LDL-C and total cholesterol levels and kidney disease outcomes in patients with low levels of proteinuria.

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic heart disease--a causal association? A review

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Evidence for causality includes reproducible associations of a proposed risk factor with risk of disease in epidemiological studies, evidence from in vitro and animal studies in support of pathophysiological effects of the risk factor, and preferably evidence from randomized clinical trials documenting reduced morbidity in response to interventions targeting the risk factor. Elevated and in particular extreme lipoprotein(a) levels have in prospective studies repeatedly been associated with increased risk of IHD, although results from early studies are inconsistent. Data from in vitro and animal studies implicate lipoprotein(a), consisting of a low density lipoprotein particle covalently bound to the plasminogen-like glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), in both atherosclerosis and thrombosis, including accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic plaques and attenuation of t-PA mediated plasminogen activation. No randomized clinical trial of the effect of lowering lipoprotein(a) levels on IHD prevention has ever been conducted. Lacking evidence from randomized clinical trials, genetic studies, such as Mendelian randomization studies, can also support claims of causality. Levels of lipoprotein(a) are primarily determined by variation in the LPA gene coding for the apolipoprotein(a) moiety of lipoprotein(a), and genetic epidemiologic studies have documented association of LPA copy number variants, influencing levels of lipoprotein(a), with risk of IHD. In conclusion, results from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and genetic epidemiologic studies support a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of IHD, while results from randomized clinical trials are presently lacking.

Genetic-epidemiological evidence on genes associated with HDL cholesterol levels: a systematic in-depth review

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles exhibit multiple antiatherogenic effects. They are key players in the reverse cholesterol transport which shuttles cholesterol from peripheral cells (e.g. macrophages) to the liver or other tissues. This complex process is thought to represent the basis for the antiatherogenic properties of HDL particles. The amount of cholesterol transported in HDL particles is measured as HDL cholesterol (HDLC) and is inversely correlated with the risk for coronary artery disease: an increase of 1mg/dL of HDLC levels is associated with a 2% and 3% decrease of the risk for coronary artery disease in men and women, respectively. Genetically determined conditions with high HDLC levels (e.g. familial hyperalphalipoproteinemia) often coexist with longevity, and higher HDLC levels were found among healthy elderly individuals. HDLC levels are under considerable genetic control with heritability estimates of up to 80%. The identification and characterization of genetic variants associated with HDLC concentrations can provide new insights into the background of longevity. This review provides an extended overview on the current genetic-epidemiological evidence from association studies on genes involved in HDLC metabolism. It provides a path through the jungle of association studies which are sometimes confusing due to the varying and sometimes erroneous names of genetic variants, positions and directions of associations. Furthermore, it reviews the recent findings from genome-wide association studies which have identified new genes influencing HDLC levels. The yet identified genes together explain only a small amount of less than 10% of the HDLC variance, which leaves an enormous room for further yet to be identified genetic variants. This might be accomplished by large population-based genome-wide meta-analyses and by deep-sequencing approaches on the identified genes. The resulting findings will probably result in a re-drawing and extension of the involved metabolic pathways of HDLC metabolism.

Carotid Plaques and Their Predictive Value for Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients Considering Renal Transplantation: A Decade Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Carotid plaque formation is very common in dialysis patients. The prognostic value of plaques, both calcified and noncalcified, rarely was investigated prospectively in these patients. By using a carotid plaque score, this study aims to determine the risk for combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality in 165 hemodialysis patients in a long-term follow-up considering phases of renal transplantation.

METHODS

Baseline carotid ultrasonography was performed in 165 hemodialysis patients to screen for carotid plaques. Patients subsequently were followed up for a period up to 13 years (average, 86 months). Because of biases associated with renal transplantation, 3 methods of multivariate analysis were compared by using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Plaques were present in 107 of 165 patients (65%). During the observation period, 50 patients (30%) experienced a combined CVD event, 95 patients (58%) died, and 79 patients (48%) underwent at least 1 renal transplantation. Mean plaque score differed significantly between patients who reached an end point and those who did not (CVD events, 3.1 +/- 2.7 versus 2.0 +/- 2.4; P = 0.01; all-cause mortality, 3.5 +/- 2.6 versus 0.9 +/- 1.3; P < 0.001). Plaque score entered all 3 tested Cox regression models for CVD events and all-cause mortality. The lowest statistical power was associated with censoring at the time of renal transplantation. Not considering transplantation at all neglected a major change in risk.

CONCLUSION

We identified carotid plaque score and treatment modality as highly significant predictors for CVD events and all-cause mortality.

Dyslipidemia and nephrotic syndrome: Recent advances

Patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) have one of the most pronounced secondary changes in lipoprotein metabolism known, and the magnitude of the changes correlates with the severity of the disease. These changes are of a quantitative as well as a qualitative nature. All apolipoprotein B (apo B)-containing lipoproteins, such as very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], are elevated in nephrotic syndrome. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) are reported to be unchanged or reduced. In addition to these quantitative changes, the lipoprotein composition is markedly changed, with a higher ratio of cholesterol to triglycerides in the apo B-containing lipoproteins and an increase in the proportion of cholesterol, cholesterol ester, and phospholipids compared with proteins. Also apolipoproteins show major changes, with an increase in apolipoprotein A-I, A-IV, B, C, and E. Particularly the changes in apo C-II, which is an activator of the enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and apo C-III, an inhibitor of LPL, with an increase of the C-III to C-II ratio, might contribute to the impaired lipoprotein catabolism in NS. The mechanisms for these changes in lipoprotein metabolism are discussed in this review as far as they are known. Furthermore, the tremendous elevations of Lp(a) in nephrotic syndrome and its primary and secondary causes are reviewed. Primary causes became recently apparent by a significantly higher frequency of low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes in patients compared with controls. The secondary causes were shown by an increase of Lp(a) in all apo(a) isoform groups. Because Lp(a) is an LDL-like particle that is usually included in the measured or calculated LDL cholesterol fraction, the influence of the extremely high Lp(a) levels in NS on the measurement of LDL cholesterol is discussed.