Is early initiated cardiorespiratory fitness training within a model of stroke-integrated cardiac rehabilitation safe and feasible?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of an early initiated stroke-integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation program.

METHODS

People with acute first or recurrent ischaemic stroke, admitted to Epworth HealthCare were screened for eligibility and invited to participate. In addition to usual care neurorehabilitation, participants performed 1) cardiorespiratory fitness training 3-days/week during inpatient rehabilitation (Phase 1), and/or 2) 2-days/week centre-based cardiorespiratory fitness training plus education and 1-day/week home-based cardiorespiratory fitness training for 6-weeks during outpatient rehabilitation (Phase 2). Safety was determined by the number of adverse and serious adverse events. Feasibility was determined by participant recruitment, retention, and attendance rates, adherence to exercise recommendations, and participant satisfaction.

RESULTS

There were no study-related adverse or serious adverse events. Of 117 eligible stroke admissions, 62 (53%) were recruited, while 10 (16.1%) participants withdrew. Participants attended 189 of 201 (94%) scheduled cardiorespiratory fitness training sessions in Phase 1 and 341/381 (89.5%) scheduled sessions in Phase 2. Only 220/381 (58%) scheduled education sessions were attended. The minimum recommended cardiorespiratory fitness training intensity (40% heart rate reserve) and duration (20 minutes) was achieved by 57% and 55% of participants respectively during Phase 1, and 60% and 92% respectively during Phase 2. All respondents strongly agreed (69%) or agreed (31%) they would recommend the stroke-integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation program to other people with stroke.

CONCLUSION

Cardiorespiratory fitness training in line with multiple clinical practice guidelines included within a model of stroke-integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation appears to be safe and feasible in the early subacute phase post-stroke.

Global physical activity levels - Need for intervention

Substantial evidence shows that physical inactivity (PI) and sedentary behavior (SB) increases the risk of many chronic diseases and shortens life expectancy. We describe evidence that certain domains of physical activity (PA) in the United States (US) population have declined substantially over 5 decades. The prevalence of PI is very high worldwide, which has contributed to 6%-10% of the burden of many chronic diseases and premature mortality. Reduction or elimination of PI would likely produce substantial increases in life expectancy of the world's population. Great efforts are needed to reduce PI and SB and increase levels of PA in the US and worldwide.

An Update on the Role of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Structured Exercise and Lifestyle Physical Activity in Preventing Cardiovascular Disease and Health Risk

The cardiovascular disease (CVD) pandemic has placed considerable strain on healthcare systems, quality of life, and physical function, while remaining the leading cause of death globally. Decades of scientific investigations have fortified the protective effects of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), exercise training, and physical activity (PA) against the development of CVD. This review will summarize recent efforts that have made significant strides in; 1) the application of novel analytic techniques to increase the predictive utility of CRF; 2) understanding the protective effects of long-term compliance to PA recommendations through large cohort studies with multiple points of assessment; 3) and understanding the potential harms associated with extreme volumes of PA.

Let Us Talk About Moving: Reframing the Exercise and Physical Activity Discussion

Noncommunicable and chronic disease are interchangeable terms. According to the World Health Organization, "they are of long duration and generally slow progression. The 4 main types of chronic diseases are cardiovascular diseases (ie, heart attacks and stroke), cancers, chronic respiratory diseases (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma), and diabetes." We have known about the benefits of physical activity (PA) for thousands of years. Perhaps our approach, from public health messaging to the individual clinical encounter, as to how PA and exercise are discussed and prescribed can be improved upon, with the ultimate goal of increasing the likelihood that an individual moves more; ultimately moving more should be the goal. In fact, there is an incongruence between the evidence for the benefits of physical movement and how we message and integrate PA and exercise guidance into health care, if it is discussed at all. Specifically, evidence clearly indicates any migration away from the sedentary phenotype toward a movement phenotype is highly beneficial. As we necessarily move to a proactive, preventive healthcare model, we must reconceptualize how we evaluate and treat conditions that pose the greatest threat, namely chronic disease; there is a robust body of evidence supporting the premise of movement as medicine. The purpose of this perspective paper is to propose an alternate model for promoting, assessing, discussing, and prescribing physical movement.

The P4 Health Spectrum - A Predictive, Preventive, Personalized and Participatory Continuum for Promoting Healthspan

Chronic diseases (i.e., noncommunicable diseases), mainly cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory diseases and type-2-diabetes, are now the leading cause of death, disability and diminished quality of life on the planet. Moreover, these diseases are also a major financial burden worldwide, significantly impacting the economy of many countries. Healthcare systems and medicine have progressively improved upon the ability to address infectious diseases and react to adverse health events through both surgical interventions and pharmacology; we have become efficient in delivering reactive care (i.e., initiating interventions once an individual is on the verge of or has actually suffered a negative health event). However, with slowly progressing and often 'silent' chronic diseases now being the main cause of illness, healthcare and medicine must evolve into a proactive system, moving away from a merely reactive approach to care. Minimal interactions among the specialists and limited information to the general practitioner and to the individual receiving care lead to a fragmented health approach, non-concerted prescriptions, a scattered follow-up and a suboptimal cost-effectiveness ratio. A new approach in medicine that is predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory, which we label here as "P4" holds great promise to reduce the burden of chronic diseases by harnessing technology and an increasingly better understanding of environment-biology interactions, evidence-based interventions and the underlying mechanisms of chronic diseases. In this concept paper, we propose a 'P4 Health Continuum' model as a framework to promote and facilitate multi-stakeholder collaboration with an orchestrated common language and an integrated care model to increase the healthspan.