Fixed dose combination abacavir/lamivudine in the treatment of HIV-1 infection

Eco-friendly graphene quantum dots as a novel spectrofluorimetric probe for lamivudine quantification with evaluation of its greenness and blueness profiles

In this study, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) were employed for quantitatively analyzing lamivudine using a fluorescence quenching technique. This approach allows for sensitive determination of the concentration of lamivudine in different matrices without requiring derivatization. The mechanism behind the fluorescence intensity quenching between GQDs and lamivudine molecules was explored using the Stern Volmer equation, revealing dynamic quenching behavior. Additionally, various factors affecting fluorescence quenching efficiency such as pH, GQDs concentration, and incubation time were carefully tuned. Moreover, our developed method successfully met ICH guidelines for validation parameters including linearity, accuracy, precision, and selectivity demonstrating excellent performance. The results showed good accuracy and precision, with a mean recovery value of 101.91% for method accuracy and a relative standard deviation of 0.682 and 1.489 for intraday and interday precision, respectively. Finally, the greenness and blueness of the developed method were also investigated to assess its environmental friendliness and analytical practicality. Greenness evaluation using the AGREE tool demonstrated that the developed method has a low environmental impact with an AGREE score of 0.75, Besides, the blueness evaluating using the BAGI tool indicated that the developed method is practical, reliable, and well-suited for routine analysis of lamivudine in various samples.

Analysis of transmitted HIV drug resistance from 2005 to 2015 in Victoria, Australia: a comparison of the old and the new

Background Baseline genotyping is part of standard-of-care treatment. It reveals that transmitted drug resistance (TDR) continues to be important for the management of HIV infection. Attention is typically focused on determining whether resistance to the protease inhibitors (PI) and reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) occurs. However, the increasing use of integrase inhibitors (INIs) raises a concern that TDR to this class of antiretroviral drug may also occur.

METHODS

PI and RTI drug resistance genotyping was performed on blood samples collected between 2005 and 2015 from 772 treatment-naïve Victorian patients infected with HIV within the previous 12 months. Integrase genotyping was performed on 461 of the 485 patient samples collected between 2010 and 2015.

RESULTS

In the period 2005-10, 39 of 343 patients (11.4%) had at least one PI- or RTI-associated mutation, compared with 34 of 429 (7.9%) during the period 2011-15. Compared with 2005-10, during 2011-15 there was a significant decline in the prevalence of the non-nucleoside-associated mutation K103N and the nucleoside-associated mutations at codons M41 and T215. One patient was detected with a major INI resistance mutation, namely G118R. However, this mutation is rare and its effect on susceptibility is unclear. A small number of patients (n=12) was infected with HIV containing accessory resistance mutations in the integrase gene.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of transmitted resistance to INIs is consistent with a low level of resistance to this class of drugs in the treated population. However, continued surveillance in the newly infected population is warranted as the use of INIs increases.

Successful implementation of a national HLA-B*5701 genetic testing service in Canada

Abacavir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that is used in combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. It is currently recommended as a preferred or an alternative NRTI in antiretroviral-naïve patients. The major toxicity of abacavir is a hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), which occurs in approximately 5% of treated patients. There is a strong association between the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*5701 allele and abacavir HSR, which has allowed for rapid acceptance of genetic screening for HLA-B*5701 in clinical use. Canadian clinicians working in hospital centers with HLA typing capacity opted to launch a pilot project in 2006 to offer the screening test as standard of care to HIV-infected patients. Currently, more than 11,000 HLA-B*5701 tests have been performed, among which 6.3% are positive. Continued efforts have been made to ensure that testing is available to all HIV-infected patients to widen the patients' therapeutic options. HLA-B*5701 screening shows clinical use and preliminary data suggest cost-effectiveness.

Randomized, multicentre assessment of the efficacy and safety of ASAQ--a fixed-dose artesunate-amodiaquine combination therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Background

The use of artemisinin derivative-based combination therapy (ACT) such as artesunate plus amodiaquine is currently recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Fixed-dose combinations are more adapted to patients than regimens involving multiple tablets and improve treatment compliance. A fixed-dose combination of artesunate + amodiaquine (ASAQ) was recently developed. To assess the efficacy and safety of this new combination and to define its optimum dosage regimen (once or twice daily) in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, a multicentre clinical study was conducted.

Methods

A multicentre, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded, parallel-group study was conducted in five African centers in Cameroon, Madagascar, Mali and Senegal from March to December 2006. Efficacy and safety of ASAQ were assessed compared to those of artemether + lumefantrine (AL). The WHO protocol with a 28-day follow-up for assessing the drug therapeutic efficacy was used. Patients suffering from uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomized to receive ASAQ orally once daily (ASAQ1), ASAQ twice daily (ASAQ2) or AL twice daily (AL) for three days. The primary outcome was PCR-corrected parasitological cure rate and clinical response.

Results

Of 941 patients initially randomized and stratified into two age groups (<5 years, and ≥5 years), 936 (99.5%) were retained for the intent to treat (ITT) analysis, and 859 (91.3%) patients for the per protocol (PP) analysis. Among ITT population, up to D28, PCR-corrected adequate parasitological and clinical response rates were 95.2% in the ASAQ1 group, 94.9% in the ASAQ2 group and 95.5% in the AL group. Moreover, the cure rate evaluated among PP population was ≥98.5% in both ASAQ therapeutic arms. Therapeutic response rates did not display any significant differences between age groups or between one geographical site and another. Altogether, this demonstrates the non-inferiority of ASAQ1 regimen compared to both ASAQ2 and AL regimens. During follow-up mild and moderate adverse events including gastrointestinal and/or nervous disorders were reported in 29.3% of patients, with no difference between groups in the nature, frequency or intensity of adverse events.

Conclusion

The non-inferiority of ASAQ compared with AL was demonstrated. The fixed-dose combination artesunate + amodiaquine (ASAQ) is safe and efficacious even in young children under 5 years of age. Whilst administration on a twice-a-day basis does not improve the efficacy of ASAQ significantly, a once-a-day intake of this new combination clearly appears as an effective and safe therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria both in adults and children. Implications of such findings are of primary importance in terms of public health especially in African countries. As most national policies plan to strengthen malaria control to reach the elimination of this disease, anti-malarial drugs such as the artesunate + amodiaquine fixed-dose ACT will play a pivotal role in this process.

Trial registration

The protocol was registered with the www.clinicaltrials.gov open clinical trial registry under the identifier number NCT00316329.

Short-term safety and tolerability of a once-daily fixed-dose abacavir-lamivudine combination versus twice-daily dosing of abacavir and lamivudine as separate components: findings from the ALOHA study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term (12 wks) safety and tolerability of a once-daily, fixed-dose abacavir-lamivudine combination versus twice-daily dosing of the separate components, both with background antiretroviral therapy.

DESIGN

Phase IIIB, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study.

SETTING

One hundred forty-six human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics.

PATIENTS

Six hundred eighty antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients with HIV type 1 RNA greater than 1000 copies/ml at baseline.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 manner to receive either abacavir 600 mg-lamivudine 300 mg once/day or abacavir 300 mg twice/day and lamivudine 150 mg twice/day. Subjects were stratified based on choice of third or fourth antiretroviral drug (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI], NNRTI, or protease inhibitor), assigned before randomization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was occurrence of grades 2-4 adverse events and serious adverse events; abacavir hypersensitivity reactions were considered serious adverse events. Baseline characteristics were similar between the once-daily (455 patients) and twice-daily (225 patients) groups. The rates of all grades 2-4 adverse events were similar: once-daily 33% (150 patients), twice-daily 31% (69). A slightly larger proportion of patients in the twice-daily group experienced drug-related grades 2-4 adverse events: once-daily 10% (47), twice-daily 16% (36). Rates of all serious adverse events (once-daily 11% [49], twice-daily 10% [22]) and drug-related serious adverse events (once-daily 5% [21], twice-daily 8% [17]) were similar. The rate of suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reaction was 5.3% (once-daily 4.4% [20], twice-daily 7.1% [16]), with a higher rate for the NNRTI stratum of the twice-daily group (8.6% [10]) than in any other stratum (once-daily, NNRTI 4.3% [10]; twice-daily, protease inhibitor 5.6% [6]; once-daily, protease inhibitor 4.6% [10]).

CONCLUSION

In the short-term, the rates of adverse events in the once-daily and twice-daily groups appeared to be similar. The rate of suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in the once-daily group was lower than the rate in the twice-daily group.

Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction: an update

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical features, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (HSR).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE (1950-October 2007) and EMBASE (1980-October 2007) search using key words abacavir, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, hypersensitivity reaction, HLA-B(*)5701, and patch tests was conducted. Conference abstracts and article bibliographies were reviewed to identify relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies that investigated the clinical and immunogenetic risk factors for abacavir hypersensitivity and the benefit of genetic screening, as well as articles that focused on the clinical presentation, assessment, and management of abacavir HSR, were considered for this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Abacavir hypersensitivity is an immune-mediated reaction that typically occurs within the first 6 weeks of therapy. Signs and symptoms of abacavir HSR are nonspecific, which makes the diagnosis challenging, particularly in medically complex patients. Patch testing may improve the diagnosis and confirmation of abacavir HSR, but it remains experimental. Clinical management is aimed at supportive therapy and discontinuation of abacavir. Rechallenge with abacavir is contraindicated due to the risk of precipitating a life-threatening reaction. Appropriate patient education and a clear communication plan are essential for the safe use of this medication. Identification of patients at risk of developing abacavir hypersensitivity through routine genetic screening for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) HLA-B(*)5701 represents a significant advance in the field of pharmacogenomics, with an apparent 100% negative predictive value when used to screen for abacavir HSR. Preliminary data suggest that pharmacogenetic testing for HLA-B(*)5701 is cost effective. However, until routine testing is available, pharmacovigilance is necessary for the safe and effective use of abacavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Serious adverse events associated with the use of abacavir can be avoided by appropriate recognition and management of the HSR. Screening patients for HLA-B(*)5701 prior to initiation of abacavir represents a tool to further decrease the risk of HSRs as well as unnecessary discontinuation of this drug.

Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction after switching from the twice-daily to the once-daily formulation

A 36-year-old man with HIV infection developed a reaction compatible with an abacavir hypersensitivity reaction after switching from the twice-daily to the once-daily formulation. The switch was determined by a more convenient intake. The patient was treated with abacavir twice-daily plus lamivudine and efavirenz for more than 5 years with no side effects. At the time of this change, his CD4 count was 1069 cell/mm(3) and HIV-RNA undetectable. Our case suggests that patients should be carefully monitored after switching, and warned about the potential effects.

Allergic skin reactions in the tropics

Cutaneous allergic reactions are relatively common in tropical countries, with some caused by the tropical environment and others by changes in the traditional living conditions combined with poverty. HIV infection is a major contributory factor. A large number of reactions are eczematous. Atopic dermatitis is on the increase together with contact allergic reactions. Available products are often of inferior quality and contain irritants and allergens that may be forbidden elsewhere in the world. The extensive and uncontrolled use of drugs and indigenous medications together with an increase in HIV prevalence leads to drug eruptions such as the Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Poverty plays an important role in the prevalence of insect bites and resulting papular urticaria and possibly in acropustulosis infantum. Many unexplained environmentally induced blistering diseases occur, ranging from phytophotodermatitis to fogo selvagem and from pemphigus foliaceus to chronic bullous dermatosis of childhood. This article describes the allergic conditions that occur in the tropics. Special attention is given to those cases of eczema and eruptions that are specific to tropical countries. Available treatments are also discussed.