Performance of the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer in thoracic procedures in a Japanese cohort: a case series report

BACKGROUND

Advanced vessel sealing electrosurgical systems have been widely adopted for grasping, cutting, and sealing vessels. Data remain sparse with regard to its use in thoracic procedures. Thus, a prospective case series, utilizing the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer (X1CJ) and its companion energy source, the Generator 11 (GEN11), in thoracic procedures was performed in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited at two Japanese surgical sites. The primary endpoint of this post-market study was the achievement of hemostasis (≤ Grade 3) for each thoracic vessel transection. Performance endpoints included scores for tasks completed with X1CJ (adhesiolysis, lymphatics or tissue bundles divided, tissue grasping, tissue cutting, or tissue dissection); hemostasis grading vessel transected; additional products required to achieve hemostasis for Grade 4 vessel transections. Safety was evaluated by evaluating device-related adverse events. All endpoint data were summarized.

RESULTS

Forty subjects (50.0% female) of Asian ethnicity with a mean age of 67.6 ± 11.3 years underwent a lung resection. Estimated mean blood loss was 39.5 mL. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.5% of vessel transections. Thirty-seven vessel sealings resulted in a hemostatic Grade 1 (92.5%). All surgeons reported satisfaction/neutral in terms of tissue grasping (100.0%) while most reported satisfaction/neutral with tissue cutting (95.7%). One device-related serious adverse event was reported (2.5%), a chylothorax requiring an extension of hospitalization. There was no post-operative bleeding or deaths reported during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The X1CJ demonstrated safe and effective performance without any reports of significant intra-operative or post-operative hemorrhage in thoracic vessel sealing.

A new bipolar device for sealing and cutting: ex and in vivo studies for performance evaluation

INTRODUCTION

A novel multipurpose bipolar radiofrequency instrument, the Erbe Dissector (EDS), which simultaneously seals and cuts tissue, was developed. Ex vivo sealing rate and time, burst pressure, jaw temperature and thermal spread were studied in porcine renal arteries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In vivo, 13 surgical tasks were performed in two pigs: beside sealing rate and time, overall performance in sharp and blunt dissection, tissue sticking, hemostasis, precision, etc., were evaluated by four surgeons compared with ENSEAL G2 (EG2) using surveys on a Likert scale (1 = very poor; 5 = very good).

RESULTS

Ex vivo, the EDS sealing rate was 91.7% (33/36 arteries) at an average sealing time of 2.1 s (range 1.7-2.8) and a burst pressure of 1040 ± 350 mmHg. The maximum jaw temperature was 87 ± 4 °C and the mean lateral thermal spread was 0.8 ± 0.2 mm. In vivo, the sealing rate for arteries and veins was 92.6% (50/54) and the median seal and cut time was 1.6 s (range: 1.3-2.9). The average EDS performance score across all tasks was 4.4 ± 0.6 Likert points. For five shared tasks, EDS was better than EG2 (4.4 ± 0.5 versus 3.4 ± 0.6 Likert points; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

EDS seals and cuts arteries and veins rapidly with good safety and user-friendliness.

ENSEAL® Hemorrhoidectomy, a Novel Technique, Versus Conventional Open Method for the Management of Grade III and IV Hemorrhoids

Background

Surgical removal of hemorrhoids is the gold-standard treatment for symptomatic grade III and IV hemorrhoid disease. There are numerous ways the hemorrhoidectomy surgical procedure is done but the most effective and least painful way is still to be elucidated.

Objective

To compare the outcomes of ENSEAL® (Ethicon, Inc., Raritan, USA) versus gold standard Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients presenting with grade-III and IV hemorrhoids

Materials and methods

After ethical approval, the Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Unit III, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, between January 2020 and January 2022. In this study, 140 patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited after informed consent. Patients were split randomly into two equal groups using a lottery technique. In group A, hemorrhoidectomy was carried out with ENSEAL®, whereas in group B, open hemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan-Morgan method. the surgery duration and blood loss were noted. After the operation, patients were transferred to and discharged from the post-anesthesia recovery room. Patients were further followed up for pain scores after 24 hours. Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Data was categorized for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), degree of hemorrhoids, and duration of hemorrhoids. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

140 patients were included in this study. Group A patients underwent ENSEAL® hemorrhoidectomy, and group B was formed from those who underwent the Milligan-Morgan procedure. In group A, there were 41 (58.5%) males and 29 (41.4%) females, while in group B, there were 43 (61.4%) males and 27 (38.5%) females. The mean age of group A patients was 49.97 ± 7.36 years and 43.2 ± 8.01 years in group B. In group A, the mean operative time was 20.87 ± 3.05 min, while 27.10 ± 3.42 min in group B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. In group A, mean blood loss was 9.79 ± 2.87 ml, while 13.36 ± 3.73 ml in group B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. In group A, the mean pain score was 2.7 ± 1.08, while 3.34 ± 1.16 in group B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001.

Conclusion

When considering the length of the procedure and blood loss, ENSEAL® hemorrhoidectomy has been determined to be an effective treatment that the patients tolerated well. Therefore, ENSEAL® hemorrhoidectomy can be a safe and efficient alternative to conventional treatment for hemorrhoids that are causing symptoms.

Experimental assessment of three electrosurgical tissue-sealing devices in a porcine model

Three electrosurgical tissue-sealing devices (EnSeal ETSDRC-01, LigaSure LS1500 and Thunderbeat TB-0535PC) were compared regarding sealing time (ST), maximum working temperature (WTmax) and the total (MTZtotal) as well as the collateral microscopic thermal injury zone (MTZcollat) using laparoscopic handpieces 5 mm in diameter on four types of tissue (liver, mesentery, cross striated muscle and spleen) in an in vivo porcine model. LigaSure had the lowest mean ST in spleen, mesentery, muscle and liver, followed by Thunderbeat and EnSeal with significant differences between all types of tissues and devices. The significantly lowest mean WTmax was obtained for EnSeal in mesentery, muscle and liver. LigaSure and EnSeal operated at the lowest temperature in spleen without a significant difference between them. Thunderbeat produced significantly higher temperature peaks in all cases. The lowest mean MTZtotal was caused by LigaSure and EnSeal in spleen, mesentery and muscle without significant differences between them, followed by the significantly higher values of Thunderbeat. Nevertheless, Thunderbeat produced the significantly lowest mean MTZtotal in the liver. EnSeal produced the lowest mean MTZcollat in the liver, followed by LigaSure and Thunderbeat showing significant differences. EnSeal and LigaSure produced the lowest mean MTZcollat in the spleen, mesentery and muscle without significant differences between them, followed by the significantly higher values of Thunderbeat. Based on the results of this study, Thunderbeat seems to be more invasive to tissue integrity (even without the activation of the ultrasonic scissor function) than EnSeal or LigaSure, that operate at lower temperatures and were found to cause negligible collateral thermal damage.

Vessel-Sealing Capability of Novel Microwave Sealer: Experimental Study in Animal Models

Background. Ultrasonically activated dissectors (UADs) and radiofrequency-based devices have been considered excellent surgical devices because of their reliability and flexibility. Meanwhile, microwave-based devices have demonstrated potential with their unique heating mechanism. This study aims to compare the sealing function of a newly invented forceps-like microwave sealer (MS) with that of currently available UADs. Materials and Methods. MS and 2 examples of UADs (Harmonic Focus+ [HF+] and Sonicision [SNC]) were employed to perform mesenterectomies (in vivo) and sealing sizable vessels (ex vivo). Vessel diameter, seal time, burst pressure (BP), sealing completion, and instrument sticking were recorded. The samples underwent histological investigation for thermal damage evaluation. Results. During mesenterectomies, MS required 3 seconds and 30 W to secure a complete seal. The BP achieved by the MS seal was higher than that of HF+ and SNC on arteries (851 ± 203.7 vs 682.4 ± 287.3, P < .05; vs 833.1 ± 251.2 mmHg, P = .4523, respectively) but was not statistically different on veins (324.9 ± 203.5 vs 460.1 ± 320.3 vs 508.3 ± 350.7 mmHg, P = .215). In all trials, MS caused less sticking but exhibited similar heat-induced alterations to UADs. MS's thermal spread was not statistically more extended than that of UADs on either arteries or veins. Conclusions. MS was capable of not only sealing tiny vessels but also achieving high-pressure endurance on sizable vessels. Its forceful grasping and synchronous heating process helped create solid stumps with an acceptable thermal spread.