Higher order aberrations in keratoconus‏

INTRODUCTION

Keratoconus is a progressive disorder of the cornea that causes thinning (Sedaghat et al. in Sci Rep 11(1):11971, 2021), ectasia, and irregular astigmatism, resulting in poor visual acuity that cannot be corrected with standard sphero-cylindrical spectacle lenses. One feature distinguishing keratoconic corneas is ocular aberrations, manifesting up to five or six times the amount of higher-order aberrations than a normal, healthy eye. These aberrations can cause visual disturbances even at the very early stages of the disease.

METHODS

In the past, a diagnosis was derived from clinical symptoms, but technological advances have revealed multiple pre-clinical features, allowing for the differentiation between keratoconic and normal eyes at a much earlier stage. These include anterior and posterior corneal surface elevations, the corneal pachymetry profile, corneal epithelial patterns, wavefront aberration metrics, and corneal biomechanics (Sedaghat et al. in Sci Rep 11(1):11971, 2021).This review discusses the aberrations associated with keratoconus, how to measure them, and treatment methods to minimize their negative influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis can lead to early treatment and may allow for arresting progression, thereby improving the long-term prognosis. With the acceleration of refractive surgery, it is important to identify patients with keratoconus, as they are usually contraindicated for refractive surgery.

The effect of transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking treatment on optical quality of the cornea in keratoconus: 12-month clinical results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment on the optical performance of the cornea at 12-month follow-up after CXL in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

One hundred and ten eyes of 67 patients were included. The following corneal optical aberrations over the 4-mm-diameter pupil were recorded via Sirius dual-scanning corneal tomography: total, anterior and posterior amount of corneal higher order aberrations [HOAs], vertical coma, horizontal coma, vertical trefoil, oblique trefoil, and spherical aberration, and Strehl ratio of point spread function (PSF).

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in mean root mean square error values for corneal total HOA, total coma, anterior HOA, anterior coma, and vertical coma following CXL (P > 0.05, for all). No significant changes were found in the posterior aberometric parameters. PSF value did not change after CXL (P > 0.05). The corneal topographic measurements not revealed a change in the mean simulated keratometry-1, simulated keratometry-2, and maximum keratometry compared with the baseline measurements (P > 0.05, for all). At 12 months, there was a significant improvement in the uncorrected (UCVA) and best corrected (BCVA) visual acuity (P < 0.001, both). Most corneal aberrations correlated significantly with postoperative BCVA, but changes in HOAs were not statistically associated with improvements in visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Transepithelial CXL was effective in stabilizing the keratometric indices and improving the most corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes 1 year after the procedure. While the healing effect on aberrations after CXL was in total and anterior parameters, no significant changes were observed in the posterior surface. In addition, it was observed that transepithelial CXL treatment did not cause a significant change in PSF distribution data.

Comparison of LASEK, mechanical microkeratome LASIK and Femtosecond LASIK in low and moderate myopia

PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective study to determine the best treatment option for patients with low-to-moderate spherical myopia or myopic astigmatism who are considered equally eligible for LASEK with mitomycin-C (MMC) and LASIK with either mechanical microkeratome or femtosecond laser flap creation.

METHODS

Forty-six adult patients (86 eyes) who underwent LASEK with MMC (16 patients, 31 eyes), and mechanical microkeratome LASIK (13 patients, 23 eyes) or Femtosecond LASIK (17 patients, 32 eyes) were assessed for clinical outcomes 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, all eyes in all three groups were within 1 D of the intended refractive change. UCVA 20/20 or better was achieved in 96% of eyes undergoing LASEK with MMC 88% of eyes in the mechanical microkeratome LASIK and 72% of eyes in the Femtosecond LASIK group at 6 months. Mean spherical equivalent was -0.12 ± 0.22 D, -0.09 ± 0.28 D and -0.25 ± 0.28 D in the three groups, respectively (p = 0.077). Patients in the LASEK with MMC group had less high order aberrations at 3 and 6 months compared to the two LASIK groups. None of the three procedures were associated with early- or late-onset complications or loss of 2 or more lines after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

After an initially slower visual improvement, LASEK with MMC, and to lesser extent, LASIK with mechanical microkeratome, produced better visual acuity and less corneal aberrations compared to Femtosecond LASIK at 3 and 6 months after surgery. These observations deserve further investigation in a randomized controlled trial.