Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia - Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, immune-mediated complication following heparin exposure and is considered to be the most severe adverse reaction to heparin treatment that is not associated with bleeding. Development of autoantibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) - heparin complex constitutes the basis of the pathophysiological changes in patients suffering from HIT, which then binds to the surface of platelets and monocytes, thus provoking their activation and subsequent aggregation, ultimately leading to the formation of thrombosis. Formation of arterial and venous thrombosis is aggravated by the simultaneous activation of platelets and monocytes with a substantial mortality rate. The incidence of HIT is reported to be significantly lower in pediatric patients compared with adults. Diagnosis of HIT in pediatric population remains a clinical entity supplemented by laboratory evaluation. The positive predictive value of laboratory evaluation is further elevated by the use of scoring systems and predictive models used for hastening the diagnosis of HIT. Use of alternative anticoagulants like direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment in cases of HIT, however, more prospective studies would be required in the pediatric population to delineate definitive guidelines for proper management of patients in this age-group. This article delivers diagnostic and treatment approach in case of patients with HIT, wherein the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach and the management of patients with HIT has been described.

The Relevance of Anti-PF4 Antibody Isotypes and Endogenous Glycosaminoglycans and their Relationship with Inflammatory Biomarkers in Pulmonary Embolism Patients

Introduction

Previous studies have shown that inflammation may contribute to the interplay of endogenous glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and anti-PF4 antibodies. In this study, we quantified the levels of anti-PF4 antibody isotypes and endogenous GAGs together with inflammatory biomarkers in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients to determine whether there is a relationship in between. Identification of this relationship may provide insight to the complex pathophysiology of PE and HIT and may also be useful for development of potential prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Materials and Methods

Plasma samples from PE patients (n: 210) were analyzed for anti-PF4 antibody isotypes and various thrombo-inflammatory cytokines utilizing commercially available biochip array and ELISA methods. The endogenous GAG levels in PE patients’ plasma were quantified using a fluorescence quenching method. The collected data analyzed to demonstrate the relationship between various parameters.

Results

The endogenous GAG levels were increased in the PE group (P < .05). The levels of anti-PF4 antibody isotypes were higher in varying levels in comparison to the normal group (P < .05). Inflammatory cytokines have shown varying levels of increase with IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 showing the most pronounced values. Mortality outcome was related to increased GAGs and some of the cytokines.

Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrated increased levels of anti-PF4 antibody isotypes, endogenous GAGs, and inflammatory biomarkers in a large patient cohort in PE. The levels of the endogenous GAGs and inflammatory biomarkers were associated with PE severity and mortality. More studies are needed to understand this complex pathophysiology.

Dabigatran Use after Argatroban for Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis: A Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenia following the use of heparin, which contributes to a high limb-amputation rate and mortality if not appropriately handled. There is growing evidence suggesting that novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may be effective for treating HIT.

METHODS

We described five rare cases of patients with HIT associated with deep vein thrombosis treated with dabigatran, a member of NOACs. We also reviewed representative cases and literature investigating the use of NOACs to treat patients with HIT to further discuss the efficacy and safety.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Following the treatment of dabigatran after argatroban, the platelet count of patients with HIT gradually elevated and reached the normal range eventually. There was no incidence of new symptomatic, objectively-confirmed arteriovenous thromboembolism observed within the 90-day-period follow up. The patient in case 3 presented with gastric bleeding after dabigatran treatment and died in the end. The results suggested that dabigatran use after argatroban may be effective in the treatment of patients with HIT. However, safety should be reconsidered since severe complications were observed in case 3.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and COVID-19

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has not been included as a possible cause of thrombocytopenia in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We report a case of HIT in a patient with COVID-19 treated with heparin. A 78-yearold man was admitted to our hospital for acute respiratory failure and acute renal failure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection; in intensive care unit, one 5000IU heparin dose (day 0, platelet count 305000/μL). On day 2, haemoglobin started to decrease and heparin was stopped. On day 10, platelet count was 153000/μL and 5000IU calcium heparin subcutaneously twice daily was started. The platelet further decreased, reaching 49000/μL on day 17, and the patient was investigated for suspected HIT: an IgG specific chemiluminescence test for heparin- PF4 antibodies was positive and a femoral DVT was found at ultrasound. Argatroban was started, platelet count increased without any bleeding and thrombosis complication. Our experience shows that HIT may develop in heparin treated COVID-19 patients and should be included among the possible cause of thrombocytopenia in such patients.

Failure of Fondaparinux in Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune adverse reaction to heparin that is associated with life-threatening thrombotic complications. More rarely, HIT may begin after stopping of heparin or after flushes of heparin (autoimmune HIT). Fondaparinux has been proposed as a candidate treatment for HIT, but there are few data on its use in autoimmune HIT. An 86-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia was admitted to our hospital for carotid endarterectomy. During surgery, only one heparin dose of 5,000 U was used. Platelet count started to decrease on the 11th day after surgery. Since the patient was not receiving heparin treatment/prophylaxis, HIT was not suspected. On day 19, platelet count was 61 × 10 ³ /μL, and the patient was investigated for a diagnosis of HIT. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-G-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was positive and HIT was confirmed by a platelet aggregation test; fondaparinux 5 mg once a day was started. During fondaparinux treatment, platelet count did not increase and a lower leg deep vein thrombosis occurred. Fondaparinux was stopped and rivaroxaban 15 mg twice a day was started. Platelet count returned to base line after 10 days from fondaparinux withdrawal. There was no thrombotic event or bleeding complication during rivaroxaban treatment. Anecdotal evidence suggests risk of failure of fondaparinux treatment for autoimmune HIT and supports the use of rivaroxaban for treatment of HIT, justifying larger studies.

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), even rare, is a life-threatening, immune-mediated complication of heparin exposure. It is considered the most severe non-bleeding adverse reaction of heparin treatment and one of the most important adverse drug reactions. The pathophysiological basis of HIT results from the formation of an immunocomplex consisting of an auto-antibody against platelet factor 4 (PF4) - heparin complex, which binds to the surface of platelets and monocytes, provoking their activation by cross-linking FcgIIA receptors. Platelets and monocyte activation, leads to the generation of catastrophic arterial and venous thrombosis, with a mortality rate of 20%, without early recognition. The definitive diagnosis of HIT i.e., clinical and laboratory evidence, can not be done at the onset of symptoms because laboratory results may not be available for several days. Thus, the initial approach is to predict the likelihood of HIT, because in highly suspected patients immediate heparin cessation and initiation of alternative anticoagulation treatment are crucial for the prevention of the devastating thrombotic sequelae. Herein, we describe the pathophysiology, the clinical manifestations, the diagnostic approach, and the management of patients with HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis: Preventing your Thrombolysis Practice from Taking a HITT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT) is an under-recognized cause of deep venous thrombosis treatment failure and of complications during catheter-directed thrombolysis. After a review of HITT pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, three different cases are presented in this article. Each case highlights subtleties and challenges of HITT diagnosis and management. An example of a practical approach to the diagnosis of HITT is presented.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a profoundly dangerous, potentially lethal, immunologically mediated adverse drug reaction to unfractionated heparin or, less commonly, to low-molecular weight heparin. In this comprehensive review, the authors highlight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia's risk factors, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic principles, and treatment. The authors place special emphasis on the management of patients requiring procedures using cardiopulmonary bypass or interventions in the catheterization laboratory. Clinical vigilance of this disease process is important to ensure its recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Misdiagnosis of the syndrome, as well as misunderstanding of the disease process, continues to contribute to its morbidity and mortality.