Framework for implementing treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus routine clinical care: consensus statements from an international task force

Implementation of Treat-to-Target (T2T) in routine clinical practice remains low in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Real-world data reveal excessive use of glucocorticoids (GCs) and frequently inadequate disease control. Here, an international task force convened to develop a consensus framework for implementing T2T in routine clinical care of adult patients with SLE. This T2T task force comprised an international panel of 22 physicians involved in the care of SLE and 3 lupus patient research partners. Following a scoping review and online discussions, during which definitions and instruments available for T2T in SLE were examined, the panel developed potential framework statements for implementing T2T in SLE, which were extensively discussed before being agreed upon by Delphi consensus. Additionally, the current challenges of implementing T2T in SLE and how future research may address these issues were analyzed. The framework comprises 5 overarching principles and 11 statements. Despite the absence of formal evidence that T2T offers superiority to conventional SLE management, T2T in SLE has been recommended for over a decade. This task force offers a framework for effectively implementing T2T in SLE from a real-life perspective, informing a wide range of physicians, including those outside the limited circle of lupus specialists.

A meta-analysis of clinical manifestations in asian systemic lupus erythematous: The effects of ancestry, ethnicity and gender

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Asians is a unique patient group that has been thought to present with more severe organ involvement in comparison to their non-Asian counterparts. We set out to perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical manifestations between ancestries, with a focus on Southeast Asian ethnicities and gender.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in conjunction with a meta-analysis to identify differences in prevalences of SLE clinical manifestations. Searches were conducted on Medline for articles comparing between: (i) Asian and non-Asian ancestry; (ii) Southeast Asian ethnicities (Chinese, Malay and Indian); and (iii) male and female Asians. Using random effects model, effect sizes as odd ratios were pooled with DerSimonian and Laird's model.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles were identified and pooled together with our study for this meta-analysis. Comparing among patients of Asian with Non-Asian/European ancestries, no significance difference was found in severe organ manifestations such as renal and neurological involvement [odds ratio (OR): 1.398, p= 0.320 and OR: 1.224, p= 0.526 respectively]. There was significantly greater proportion of Asian SLE patients with thrombocytopenia compared to non-Asian SLE. Chinese SLE patients were less likely to have oral ulcers compared to Indian SLE patients. Lastly, Asian male SLE patients had greater incidence of renal involvement and thrombocytopenia compared to Asian female SLE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe SLE manifestations such as renal and neurological involvement were not significantly more frequent in Asian SLE compared to non-Asian/European SLE in this analysis.

Remission in SLE-do DORIS criteria match the treating physician's judgment? A cross-sectional study to assess reasons for discordance

OBJECTIVES

The definition of an accurate target for a treat-to-target approach in SLE has been challenging over past years, and recently the DORIS definitions of remission were presented by the international DORIS task force. It was our aim to assess the frequency of DORIS remission and LLDAS in our SLE cohort and their agreement with the treating physician's (DORIS-) independent remission judgement. Patient characteristics leading to lack of agreement and incoherence ought to be identified.

METHODS

In this monocentric cross-sectional study, patients with SLE were enrolled and assessed between September 2016 and December 2017. DORIS remission definitions were applied and after the clinical consultation, the treating physicians gave his/her opinion on whether the patient was in remission. Regression analyses were performed to identify parameters influencing physician remission.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were included (87.6% female); 99 (42.5%) patients fulfilled any of the four DORIS remission definitions, while 126 patients were in remission according to their physician's judgement. We observed discordance in the assessment of remission in 53 patients (22.7%). Physician remission was influenced by disease activity [odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.90], disease and/or treatment-related damage (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.98) and the presence of ds-DNA antibodies (OR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.06, 6.04).

CONCLUSIONS

DORIS remission proved an achievable target in our outpatient clinic. Still we found discordance regarding DORIS remission and the treating physician's judgement with a greater number of patients considered in remission by their physicians.

Lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a form of glomerulonephritis that constitutes one of the most severe organ manifestations of the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Most patients with SLE who develop LN do so within 5 years of an SLE diagnosis and, in many cases, LN is the presenting manifestation resulting in the diagnosis of SLE. Understanding of the genetic and pathogenetic basis of LN has improved substantially over the past few decades. Treatment of LN usually involves immunosuppressive therapy, typically with mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide and with glucocorticoids, although these treatments are not uniformly effective. Despite increased knowledge of disease pathogenesis and improved treatment options, LN remains a substantial cause of morbidity and death among patients with SLE. Within 10 years of an initial SLE diagnosis, 5-20% of patients with LN develop end-stage kidney disease, and the multiple comorbidities associated with immunosuppressive treatment, including infections, osteoporosis and cardiovascular and reproductive effects, remain a concern. Clearly, early and accurate diagnosis of LN and prompt initiation of therapy are of vital importance to improve outcomes in patients with SLE.

Prevalence of remission and its effect on damage and quality of life in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To study the prevalence of remission and its effect on damage and quality of life (QOL) in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Patients who fulfilled ≥4 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE were identified. Their remission status at last clinic visits was determined by the European consensus criteria (complete/clinical remission ± immunosuppressive drugs). The increase in SLE damage index (SDI) in the preceding 5 years was compared between patients who were and were not in remission for ≥5 years. QOL of patients as assessed by the validated Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 (SF36) and the LupusPRO was also compared between the remission and non-remission groups by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

769 SLE patients were studied (92% women; age: 46.4±14.6 years; SLE duration: 12.6±8.1 years). At last visit, clinical remission was present in 259 (33.7%) patients and complete remission was present in 280 (36.4%) patients. Clinical and complete remissions for ≥5 years were achieved in 64 (8.3%) and 129 (16.8%) of the patients, respectively. Patients remitted for ≥5 years were older, and had significantly lower prevalence of renal involvement, leucopenia or thrombocytopaenia. Fifty-three (6.9%) patients in remission ≥5 years were taken off all medications, including hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (drug-free). Patients who remitted for ≥5 years but off-therapy (except HCQ) had significantly less SDI increment than those who did not remit (0.17±0.53 vs 0.67±1.10; p<0.001). Among 453 patients who had QOL assessment, remission for ≥5 years was associated with significantly higher SF36 and the total health-related scores of the LupusPRO.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable remission can be achieved in a quarter of patients with SLE. Patients with remission for ≥5 years have significantly less damage accrual and better QOL. Prolonged remission is an appropriate criterion for outcome assessment in SLE.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: still a challenge for physicians

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a complex clinical picture, and a number of defects in the immune system have been described in patients with the disease. Most organs can be involved in SLE, and in addition to the typical major organ manifestations (e.g. from kidneys and the central nervous system), early cardiovascular disease is a major determinant of prognosis. Several important findings during the last decade have increased the understanding of the mechanisms behind the disease characteristics and the underlying autoimmune process. Amongst, these are defects in the handling of apoptotic cells, increased expression of type I interferon-regulated genes and activation of autoreactive B cells, with both the type I interferon system and the B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) having key roles. In addition, a large number of genes have been identified that contribute to these abnormalities. It has also become clear that certain SLE risk genes are associated with some organ manifestations, such as STAT4 with nephritis and IRF8 with myocardial infarction. Furthermore, environmental factors that can induce SLE or trigger a disease flare have been identified. As a consequence of this increased knowledge, new treatments for SLE have been developed. The most recently approved drug for SLE is belimumab, which blocks BLyS, and several new therapies and therapeutic strategies are in the pipeline for clinical application.

Future Perspectives on Pathogenesis of Lupus Nephritis: Facts, Problems, and Potential Causal Therapy Modalities

Divergent incommensurable models have been developed to explain the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Most contemporary models favor a central role for anti-chromatin antibodies. How they exert their pathogenic effect has, however, endorsed conflicts that at least for now preclude insight into definitive pathogenic pathways. The following paradigms are contemporarily in conflict with each other: i) the impact of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies that cross-react with inherent renal antigens, ii) the impact of anti-dsDNA antibodies targeting exposed chromatin in glomeruli, and iii) the impact of relative antibody avidity for dsDNA, chromatin fragments, or cross-reacting antigens. Aside from these three themes, the pathogenic role of T cells in lupus nephritis is not clear. These different models should be tested through a collaboration between scientists belonging to the different paradigms. If it turns out that there are different pathogenic pathways in lupus nephritis, the emerging pathogenic mechanism(s) may be encountered with new individual causal therapy modalities. Today, therapy is still unspecific and far from interfering with the cause(s) of the disorder. This review attempts to describe what we know about processes that may cause lupus nephritis and how such basic processes may be affected if we can specifically interrupt them. Secondary inflammatory mechanisms, cytokine signatures, activation of complement, and other contributors to inflammation will not be discussed herein; rather, the events that trigger these factors will be discussed.