Alitretinoin as a Treatment Modality for Ichthyosis in Women of Childbearing Age: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Acitretin, a synthetic vitamin A derivative, is the most studied and widely used oral retinoid for ichthyoses. Its major disadvantage is the need for contraceptive measures during 3 years after discontinuation. An alternative is needed for women of childbearing age. With alitretinoin, another retinoid, pregnancy is considered safe 1 month after discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to provide evidence for alitretinoin as an alternative for acitretin for ichthyosis in women of childbearing age. Our experience is shared in a case series combined with an overview of the current literature.

METHODS

Nine women of childbearing age (19-31 years, median 21) with different subtypes of ichthyosis (autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis, (superficial) epidermolytic ichthyosis, erythrokeratoderma variabilis, and epidermolytic epidermal nevi, a mosaic form of epidermolytic ichthyosis) were included and treated with 30 mg alitretinoin during 2-28 months. Severity was measured by Ichthyosis Area Severity Index (IASI) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA). A literature search in Pubmed using the Mesh terms "alitretinoin," "skin diseases, genetic" and "ichthyosis" was performed.

RESULTS

Significant reduction in the mean scores of IGA, IASI-erythema, IASI-scaling, and IASI-total was seen. Seven patients are still being treated, 1 patient stopped to become pregnant, 1 patient discontinued due to financial reasons. Observed side effects were reversible headache (n = 6), asteatotic eczema (n = 1), "not feeling well" temporarily (n = 1), and easier blistering of the feet (n = 1). The literature search resulted in six case reports and case series about alitretinoin in ichthyosis and ichthyosis syndromes with in total 29 patients. The vast majority of articles (21/29) reported significant improvement or even complete remission of skin symptoms. However, validated outcome measures to support these results were lacking. Side effects (n = 16) were relatively mild, except for benign intracranial hypertension (n = 1) and autoimmune hypothyroidism (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows, with validated outcome measures, that alitretinoin is effective to mitigate the symptoms of ichthyosis in women of childbearing age and a suitable alternative to acitretin.

Alitretinoin for the treatment of severe chronic eczema of the hands

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a frequent skin disorder affecting up to 10% of the population and strongly reduces Quality of Life (QoL). The first-line therapeutic strategies for the management of CHE include a change of lifestyle, an education program for the skin and the application of specific emollients. Topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors are the most used anti-inflammatory drugs. However, up to 65% of patients require systemic options. Alitretinoin, a retinoid structurally related to vitamin A, is the first systemic treatment approved in the European Union (EU) for severe CHE refractory to potent topical corticosteroids.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety profile of oral alitretinoin for the treatment of CHE.

EXPERT OPINION

Alitretinoin can be considered as a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of CHE in patients not responding to ordinary treatments. Clinical trials and real-life experiences showed that it acts effectively on both objective and subjective clinical signs, resulting in a significant improvement in QoL of patients. As for other retinoids, caution should be taken in patients with certain chronic diseases (hepatopathies, kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, thyroid dysfunction) or childbearing potential women.

Efficacy and Safety of Alitretinoin Therapy in Korean Elderly Patients with Chronic Hand Eczema: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Background

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) tends to be refractory to conventional therapy. Previous clinical trials have found that alitretinoin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for CHE. However, there is a relative lack of data on the effectiveness of alitretinoin in elderly patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin in elderly patients with moderate to severe CHE in Korea.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 46 CHE patients who were treated with either 10 mg or 30 mg of alitretinoin between June of 2016 and July of 2018. The physician's global assessment (PGA) was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. All adverse events were retrospectively evaluated with respect to laboratory testing, including complete blood cell count, fasting blood chemistry, lipid profile, and liver and thyroid function tests.

Results

The mean patient age in this study was 71.0±5.1 years. The treatment period was over eight weeks. A total of 38 of 46 patients (82.6%) exhibited clinical improvement with PGA ratings of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear.’ There were 13 patients (28.3%) who experienced an adverse effect, with the most common being headache (13.0%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (8.7%) followed by xerosis (6.5%). A total of 13 patients developed or exhibited worsening hypertriglyceridemia (28.3%).

Conclusion

Alitretinoin can be considered a safe and effective treatment option in elderly patients with moderate to severe CHE.

Interventions for hand eczema

BACKGROUND

Hand eczema is an inflammation of the skin of the hands that tends to run a chronic, relapsing course. This common condition is often associated with itch, social stigma, and impairment in employment. Many different interventions of unknown effectiveness are used to treat hand eczema.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of topical and systemic interventions for hand eczema in adults and children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following up to April 2018: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, LILACS, GREAT, and four trials registries. We checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared interventions for hand eczema, regardless of hand eczema type and other affected sites, versus no treatment, placebo, vehicle, or active treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were participant- and investigator-rated good/excellent control of symptoms, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 RCTs, conducted in secondary care (5469 participants with mild to severe chronic hand eczema). Most participants were over 18 years old. The duration of treatment was short, generally up to four months. Only 24 studies included a follow-up period. Clinical heterogeneity in treatments and outcome measures was evident. Few studies performed head-to-head comparisons of different interventions. Risk of bias varied considerably, with only five studies at low risk in all domains. Twenty-two studies were industry-funded.Eighteen trials studied topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors; 10 studies, phototherapy; three studies, systemic immunosuppressives; and five studies, oral retinoids. Most studies compared an active intervention against no treatment, variants of the same medication, or placebo (or vehicle). Below, we present results from the main comparisons.Corticosteroid creams/ointments: when assessed 15 days after the start of treatment, clobetasol propionate 0.05% foam probably improves participant-rated control of symptoms compared to vehicle (risk ratio (RR) 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38 to 3.91; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 8; 1 study, 125 participants); the effect of clobetasol compared to vehicle for investigator-rated improvement is less clear (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.40). More participants had at least one adverse event with clobetasol (11/62 versus 5/63; RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.06), including application site burning/pruritus. This evidence was rated as moderate certainty.When assessed 36 weeks after the start of treatment, mometasone furoate cream used thrice weekly may slightly improve investigator-rated symptom control compared to twice weekly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.61; 1 study, 72 participants) after remission is reached. Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Some mild atrophy was reported in both groups (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.83; 5/35 versus 3/37). This evidence was rated as low certainty.Irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light: local combination ultraviolet light therapy (PUVA) may lead to improvement in investigator-rated symptom control when compared to local narrow-band UVB after 12 weeks of treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.16; 1 study, 60 participants). However, the 95% CI indicates that PUVA might make little or no difference. Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Adverse events (mainly erythema) were reported by 9/30 participants in the narrow-band UVB group versus none in the PUVA group. This evidence was rated as moderate certainty.Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% over two weeks probably improves investigator-rated symptom control measured after three weeks compared to vehicle (14/14 tacrolimus versus 0/14 vehicle; 1 study). Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Four of 14 people in the tacrolimus group versus zero in the vehicle group had well-tolerated application site burning/itching.A within-participant study in 16 participants compared 0.1% tacrolimus to 0.1% mometasone furoate but did not measure investigator- or participant-rated symptoms. Both treatments were well tolerated when assessed at two weeks during four weeks of treatment.Evidence from these studies was rated as moderate certainty.Oral interventions: oral cyclosporin 3 mg/kg/d probably slightly improves investigator-rated (RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.99; 1 study, 34 participants) or participant-rated (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.27) control of symptoms compared to topical betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% after six weeks of treatment. The risk of adverse events such as dizziness was similar between groups (up to 36 weeks; RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.86, n = 55; 15/27 betamethasone versus 19/28 cyclosporin). The evidence was rated as moderate certainty.Alitretinoin 10 mg improves investigator-rated symptom control compared with placebo (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.07; NNTB 11, 95% CI 6.3 to 26.5; 2 studies, n = 781) and alitretinoin 30 mg also improves this outcome compared with placebo (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.20 to 3.43; NNTB 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 2 studies, n = 1210). Similar results were found for participant-rated symptom control: alitretinoin 10 mg RR 1.73 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.40) and 30 mg RR 2.75 (95% CI 2.18 to 3.48). Evidence was rated as high certainty. The number of adverse events (including headache) probably did not differ between alitretinoin 10 mg and placebo (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.55; 1 study, n = 158; moderate-certainty evidence), but the risk of headache increased with alitretinoin 30 mg (RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.45 to 4.81; 2 studies, n = 1210; high-certainty evidence). Outcomes were assessed between 48 and 72 weeks.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most findings were from single studies with low precision, so they should be interpreted with caution. Topical corticosteroids and UV phototherapy were two of the major standard treatments, but evidence is insufficient to support one specific treatment over another. The effect of topical calcineurin inhibitors is not certain. Alitretinoin is more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but advantages over other treatments need evaluating.Well-designed and well-reported, long-term (more than three months), head-to-head studies comparing different treatments are needed. Consensus is required regarding the definition of hand eczema and its subtypes, and a standard severity scale should be established.The main limitation was heterogeneity between studies. Small sample size impacted our ability to detect differences between treatments.