Breast Reconstruction Trends in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: Analysis of Practices among Plastic Surgeons in the United States

Radiation is an integral part of breast cancer therapy. The ideal type and timing of breast reconstruction with relation to radiation delivery are not well established. The study aimed to identify reconstructive practices among American plastic surgeons in the setting of pre- and postmastectomy radiation.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of members of the American Society of Plastic Surgery was performed. Practice/demographic information and breast reconstruction protocols were queried. Univariate descriptive statistics were calculated, and outcomes were compared across cohorts with χ² and Fischer exact tests.

Results

Overall, 477 plastic surgeons averaging 16.3 years in practice were surveyed. With respect to types of reconstruction, all options were well represented, although nearly 60% preferred autologous reconstruction with prior radiation and 55% preferred tissue expansion followed by implant/autologous reconstruction in the setting of unknown postoperative radiation. There was little consensus on the optimal timing of reconstruction in the setting of possible postoperative radiation. Most respondents wait 4-6 or 7-12 months between the end of radiation and stage 2 implant-based or autologous reconstruction. Common concerns regarding the effect of radiation on reconstructive outcomes included mastectomy flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, capsular contracture, tissue fibrosis, and donor vessel complications.

Conclusions

Despite considerable research, there is little consensus on the ideal type and timing of reconstruction in the setting of pre- and postoperative radiation. Understanding how the current body of knowledge is translated into clinical practice by different populations of surgeons allows us to forge a path forward toward more robust, evidence-based guidelines for patient care.

Research on the Role of Marriage Status Among Women Underwent Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: A Competing Risk Analysis Model Based on the SEER Database, 1998–2015

Background

Marital status is an important foundation of social public relations in modern society, but little is known about the role of marriage status among women who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy. This research mainly aimed to investigate the prognostic value of marital status in breast cancer women who underwent breast reconstruction.

Methods

The demographic and clinical data of patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database. The eligible population was assessed on overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) through propensity score matching (PSM) method, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis, competing risk model analysis, multivariate competing risk regression model analysis, and subgroup analysis.

Results

Of the 54,683 women included in the current study, a total of 38,110 participants were married patients (married group), and 16,573 participants were unmarried patients (unmarried group). Patients in the married group tended to have better OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.397, 95% CI: 1.319–1.479, p < 0.001), BCSS (HR = 1.332, 95% CI: 1.244–1.426, p < 0.001), cumulative BCSD incidence (Gray's test, p < 0.001), and other causes-specific death (OCSD) incidence (Gray's test, p < 0.001) than those in the unmarried group. In subgroup analysis, subjects with HR+/HER2– subtype breast cancer in the married group showed improved OS (1.589, 95% CI: 1.363–1.854, p < 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 1.512, 95% CI: 1.255–1.82, p < 0.001) than those in the unmarried group.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the inexistence of marriage was associated with poorer OS and BCSS, especially for HR+/HER2– breast cancer women who underwent breast reconstruction.