A debate on locoregional treatment of the primary tumor in patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer

The Valuable Role of ARMC1 in Invasive Breast Cancer as a Novel Biomarker

Background

Invasive breast carcinoma (BRCA) is a common type of breast cancer with a high clinical incidence. Thus, it is significant to find effective biomarkers for BRCA diagnosis and treatment. Although some members of armadillo (ARM) repeat family of proteins are confirmed to be biomarkers in cancers, the role of armadillo repeat-containing 1 (ARMC1) in BRCA remains unknown.

Methods

We firstly analyzed the ARMC1 expression in normal breast tissues and BRCA samples and its association with overall survival by the public database. Next, the χ² test was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of ARMC1 expression in TCGA-BRCA patient samples. The ARMC1 mutations in BRCA were explored in the cBioportal database. Besides, the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were used to explore the biological functions of ARMC1 in BRCA. Finally, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining were performed to validate the ARMC1 expression in BRCA.

Results

ARMC1 expression in tumor samples was significantly higher than that in normal tissues, and higher expression of ARMC1 was related to lower survival. Moreover, the tumor stage and histology of BRCA patients were associated with ARMC1 expression. ARMC1 genetic mutations occurred in 32% of BRCA patients, and the amplification and high expression of ARMC1 accounted for most of them. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis suggested that ARMC1 might be involved in the cell cycle in BRCA. Ultimately, increased ARMC1 expression was found in clinical breast carcinoma tissues by our confirmatory experiments.

Conclusions

ARMC1 may play a significant role in BRCA and act as a biomarker, which provides valuable clues for the treatment and diagnosis of BRCA.

Large Breast Tumor Ulceration and Quality of Life in an 80-Year-Old Woman

Advanced breast cancer with skin ulceration, bleeding, and odor is associated with impaired quality of life (QoL). In patients with metastatic breast cancer, treatment aims to relieve symptoms, improve QoL, and slow the progression of cancer. Occasionally, it is extremely difficult to alleviate symptoms and improve QoL in patients with breast cancer and skin ulceration, especially elderly patients. Since patient age, patient preferences, and the expected survival benefit from treatment are factors that influence the selection of therapy, physicians should provide an optimal treatment for patients with metastatic disease depending on the situation. In this study, we report the case of an elderly patient with metastatic breast cancer who had substantial skin ulceration. In this patient, multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery resulted in significantly improved QoL.

Palliative radiation therapy for symptomatic advance breast cancer

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of palliative breast radiation therapy (RT), with single fraction RT compared with fractionated RT. Our study showed that both RT fractionation schemas provide palliation. Single fraction RT allowed for treatment with minimal interference with systemic therapy, whereas fractionated RT provided a more durable palliative response. Due to equivalent palliative response, at our institution we have increasingly been providing single fraction RT palliation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Male Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study

PURPOSE

Male breast cancer (MBC) represents < 1% of breast cancer patients, and limited data exists regarding metastatic MBC. To better characterize this patient subset, we performed a population-based study examining prognostic factors among patients with stage IV MBC.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV MBC diagnosed between 1988 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 394 patients had metastatic disease meeting inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 21 months. The 5-year OS and CSS rates were 21.1% and 38.3%, respectively. Of those with known progesterone receptor (PR) status, 52% were PR-positive, which was associated with better OS (P < .001) and CSS (P = .003). Overall, 197 patients (50%) received surgery for the primary tumor, and 197 (50%) did not. Patients undergoing surgery had longer median CSS than those who did not (36 vs. 21 months; P < .001). Additional factors that correlated with prolonged OS and CSS were smaller tumor size (≤ 2 cm; P < .05) and younger age (≤ 65 years; P < .05). In multivariate analysis, smaller tumor size, PR-positivity, younger age, and resection of the primary tumor were associated with longer OS and CSS (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although stage IV MBC has poor OS and CSS, patients with PR-positive disease, younger age (≤ 65 years), tumor size ≤ 2 cm, or who undergo surgery of the primary tumor have better OS and CSS. This is the largest study of stage IV MBC to date, and these findings address some of the questions regarding this rare presentation of breast cancer.

Surgery of primary tumour has survival benefit in metastatic breast cancer with single-organ metastasis, especially bone

BACKGROUND

Surgery for the primary breast tumour is usually not recommended in metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however, some reports have suggested a benefit of locoregional treatment. We designed this study to evaluate the efficacy of locoregional surgery in MBC.

METHODS

Data for patients diagnosed with MBC at Samsung Medical Center between 1995 and 2011 were retrospectively collected. We compared the survival benefit of all treatment modalities using Cox regression analysis. Subgroup analyses based on number of metastases were performed to delineate the indication for each treatment.

RESULTS

Among 262 patients, 40 (15.3%) underwent surgery. Other treatments included chemotherapy (n = 213, 81.3%), radiotherapy (n = 138, 52.7%), hormone therapy (n = 118, 45.0%) and HER2/neu receptor (HER2)-targeted therapy (n = 37, 14.1%). Cox regression analysis showed that surgery (hazard ratios (HR) = 0.51, P < 0.01), hormone therapy (HR = 0.31, P < 0.01) and HER2-targeted therapy (HR = 0.33, P < 0.01) were associated with improved survival, whereas presence of three or more metastatic organs (HR = 1.62, P = 0.03) was associated with poor survival. In patients with metastasis to a single organ, surgery (HR = 0.43, P < 0.01), chemotherapy (HR = 0.62, P = 0.05), hormone therapy (HR = 0.39, P < 0.01) and HER2-targeted therapy (HR = 0.39, P = 0.02) had a survival benefit. Furthermore, for patients with bone-only metastasis, surgery (HR = 0.37, P = 0.02), chemotherapy (HR = 0.42, P < 0.01), hormone therapy (HR = 0.22, P < 0.01) and HER2-targeted therapy (HR = 0.09, P = 0.02) showed a survival benefit. However, only hormone therapy and HER2-targeted therapy had a survival benefit in MBC with metastasis to multiple organs.

CONCLUSION

Surgical control of the primary breast tumour should be considered as a locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy in MBC with metastasis to a single organ, especially bone-only metastasis.

Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 expression correlates to tumor staging in tongue squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The immunohistochemical expression of Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 were analyzed in tongue squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), relating them to the clinical and morphological exhibition of these tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria; clinical data included gender, age, ethnicity and use of licit drugs such as alcohol and tobacco. The TNM staging and histopathological differentiation grading was assessed for each case. In addition, T1 patients were gathered with T2 patients; and T3 patients were gathered with T4 patients to assemble two distinct groups: (T1/T2) and (T3/T4).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 24 months and 30% of the patients died as a consequence of the disease, while 23.3% lived with the disease and 46.7% lived lesion-free. T1 and T2 tumors showed statistically lesser Ki-67 and Cyclin D1 staining when compared to T3 and T4 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Ki-67 and Cyclin D1 pose as auxiliary tools when determining the progression of tongue SCC at the time of diagnosis.

Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of locoregional treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer at first presentation is unclear. Preclinical evidence suggests that such treatment might help the growth of metastatic disease, whereas many retrospective analyses in clinical cohorts have suggested a favourable effect of locoregional treatment in these patients. We aimed to compare the effect of locoregional treatment with no treatment on outcome in women with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited previously untreated patients (≤65 years of age with an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 1 year) presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer from Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive locoregional treatment directed at their primary breast tumour and axillary lymph nodes, or no locoregional treatment, by a computer-generated block randomisation sequence (block size of four). Randomisation was stratified by site of distant metastases, number of metastatic lesions, and hormone receptor status. Patients with resectable primary tumour in the breast that could be treated with endocrine therapy were randomly assigned upfront, whereas those with an unresectable primary tumour were planned for chemotherapy before randomisation. Of the patients who had chemotherapy before randomisation, we randomly assigned patients who had an objective tumour response after six to eight cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00193778.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 7, 2005, and Jan 18, 2013, of the 716 women presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer, we randomly assigned 350 patients: 173 to locoregional treatment and 177 to no locoregional treatment. At data cut-off of Nov 1, 2013, median follow-up was 23 months (IQR 12·2-38·7) with 235 deaths (locoregional treatment n=118, no locoregional treatment n=117). Median overall survival was 19·2 months (95% CI 15·98-22·46) in the locoregional treatment group and 20·5 months (16·96-23·98) in the no-locoregional treatment group (HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·81-1·34; p=0·79), and the corresponding 2-year overall survival was 41·9% (95% CI 33·9-49·7) in the locoregional treatment group and 43·0% (35·2-50·8) in the no locoregional treatment group. The only adverse event noted was wound infection related to surgery in one patient in the locoregional treatment group.

INTERPRETATION

There is no evidence to suggest that locoregional treatment of the primary tumour affects overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation who have responded to front-line chemotherapy, and this procedure should not be part of routine practice.

Current challenges and future perspectives of radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss current issues in the field of radiation oncology for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Large randomized studies involving nodal irradiation have recently been completed. The incremental benefit of treating the internal mammary nodes (IMNs) remains controversial. A randomized study specifically evaluating internal mammary node radiation (IMNR) failed to demonstrate significant benefit. A high impact, population-based study detected a proportional increase in major coronary events with increasing radiation dose. Advanced treatment techniques should be employed to reduce cardiac exposure. In patients with stage IV breast cancer (BCa), there is increasing evidence to suggest that locoregional treatments may improve overall survival (OS). Radiotherapy alone, without surgery, may provide equivalent local control and OS in patients with distant metastasis. High-dose stereotactic radiation regimens can be used to treat breast tumors with good local control rates in as few as three visits.BCa biomarkers are predictive of locoregional recurrence risk and should be used to guide radiotherapy in conjunction with standard staging. Clinically validated genetic profiling can measure tumor radiosensitivity and also help to predict normal tissue toxicity.

SUMMARY

We are entering an era of personalized radiotherapy for LABC. Radiation treatments must be tailored to each individual patient's risk and intrinsic tumor biology.

Increased survival associated with surgery and radiation therapy in metastatic gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic gastric cancer have poor survival. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of metastatic gastric cancer patients stratified by surgery and radiation therapy.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was accessed to identify patients with AJCC M1 stage IV gastric cancer (based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition) between 2004 thru 2008. Patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1, no surgery or radiation; group 2, radiation alone; group 3, surgery alone; group 4, surgery and radiation. Survival analysis was determined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard ratio model.

RESULTS

A total of 5072 patients were identified. Surgery and/or radiation were associated with a survival benefit. Median and 2-year survival for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 7 months and 8.2%, 8 months and 8.9%, 10 months and 18.2%, and 16 months and 31.7%, respectively (P < .00001). MVA for all patients revealed that surgery and radiation were associated with decreased mortality whereas T-stage, N-stage, age, signet ring histology, and peritoneal metastases were associated with increased mortality. In patients treated with surgery, MVA showed that radiation was associated with decreased mortality, whereas T-stage, N-stage, age, removal of < 15 lymph nodes, signet ring histology, and peritoneal metastases was associated with increased mortality. Age was the only prognostic factor in patients who did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and radiation are associated with increased survival in a subset of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Prospective trials will be needed to address the role and sequence of surgery and radiation in metastatic gastric cancer.

Concomitant tumor resistance

Concomitant tumor resistance (CR) is a phenomenon in which a tumor-bearing host is resistant to the growth of secondary tumor implants. This phenomenon has been described in human and animal systems and it can be generated by both immunogenic and non-immunogenic tumors. The relevance of CR to the mechanisms of metastases control has been highlighted by numerous observations showing that the removal of human and murine tumors may be followed by an abrupt increase in metastatic growth, suggesting that a primary tumor may exert a controlling action on its metastases which could be considered as secondary tumor implants developed spontaneously during the primary tumor growth. A more profound understanding of the different mechanisms claimed to be associated with the phenomenon of CR could contribute to develop new and more harmless means to manage malignant diseases, especially by limiting the development of metastases that arise after resection of primary tumors or after other stressors that may promote the escape of metastases from dormancy.

Limited M1 disease: a significant prognostic factor for stage IV breast cancer

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis can vary depending on disease extent. This study evaluates a definition of limited M1 disease in association with survival in a cohort of women presenting with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 692 women referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 1996 and 2005 with M1 breast cancer at presentation. Limited M1 disease was defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite. Extensive M1 disease was defined as ≥ 5 lesions or disease in more than one subsite. Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between subjects with limited (n = 233) versus extensive (n = 459) M1 disease. Multivariable analysis was performed by Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 1.9 years. Five-year Kaplan-Meier OS was significantly higher in patients with limited compared to extensive M1 disease (29.7 vs. 13.1 %, p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, limited M1 disease was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.51, 95 % confidence interval 0.40-0.66, p < 0.001). The only patient subsets with limited M1 disease with poor 5-year OS <15 % were patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥ 2 or estrogen receptor-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited M1 disease, defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite, is a relevant favorable prognostic factor in patients with stage IV breast cancer. This definition may be used in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors to select patients for more aggressive systemic and locoregional treatments.