Nontraditional modes of mechanical ventilation: progress or distraction?

Clinical Characteristics and Complications of Mechanically Ventilated Children in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Iran: Comparing Different Modes

Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is among the most common therapeutic modalities in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), which works based on a defined ventilation mode. Nowadays, conventional and alternative modes including adaptive pressure control (APC) and non-APC modes are frequently employed. Although MV can be helpful in many cases, it may cause some complications resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the demographic features and complications of mechanically ventilated children in a PICU in Iran, as well as to compare different ventilation modes. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in PICUs of children’s medical center hospital - a tertiary referral pediatric hospital. Results: Of 66 patients included in this study, 33 patients were treated with APC modes, whereas 33 patients were treated with non-APC modes. The most common indications for intubation were respiratory failure (53%) and loss of consciousness (13.6%). The mean duration for intubation in patients with and without underlying disorder were 11.7 and 5.2 days, respectively (P-value < 0.01). The means of time for intubation in the APC and non-APC groups were 10 and 11.9 days, respectively (P-value 0.145). A total of 23 (34.8%) patients had complications, including death, misplacement of the endotracheal tube, atelectasis, unplanned extubation, etc. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the rates of complications, except for atelectasis. Thirteen (19.7%) patients had atelectasis (2 patients in APC group (6%) and 11 patients in non-APC group (33.3%)) (P-value = 0.022). The mortality rate was the same for the both groups (P-value = 1). Conclusions: In sum, the most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure. No significant difference was observed among patients treated with the APC, and non-APC modes in terms of the complications occurred, except for atelectasis which occurred more frequently in the non-APC group. Therefore, it was concluded that there was no difference between conventional and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Mechanical Ventilation and Respiratory Support in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit often require respiratory support for the treatment of respiratory distress and failure. Respiratory support comprises both noninvasive modalities (ie, heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, bilevel positive airway pressure, negative pressure ventilation) and invasive mechanical ventilation. In this article, we review the various essential elements and considerations involved in the planning and application of respiratory support in the treatment of the critically ill children.

Emerging approaches in pediatric mechanical ventilation

INTRODUCTION

The use of mechanical ventilation is an invaluable tool in caring for critically ill patients. Enhancing our capabilities in mechanical ventilation has been instrumental in the ability to support clinical conditions and diseases which were once associated with high mortality. Areas covered: Within this manuscript, we will look to discuss emerging approaches to improving the care of pediatric patients who require mechanical ventilation. After an extensive literature search, we will provide a brief review of the history and pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome, an assessment of several ventilator settings, a discussion on assisted ventilation, review of therapy used to rescue in severe respiratory failure, methods of monitoring the effects of mechanical ventilation, and nutrition. Expert opinion: As we have advanced in our care, we are seeing children survive illnesses that would have once claimed their lives. Given this knowledge, we must continue to advance the research in pediatric critical care to understand the means in which we can tailor the therapy to the patient in efforts to efficiently liberate them from mechanical ventilation once their illness has resolved.

Alternative Modes of Mechanical Ventilation

Modern mechanical ventilators are more complex than those first developed in the 1950s. Newer ventilation modes can be difficult to understand and implement clinically, although they provide more treatment options than traditional modes. These newer modes, which can be considered alternative or nontraditional, generally are classified as either volume controlled or pressure controlled. Dual-control modes incorporate qualities of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes. Some ventilation modes provide variable ventilatory support depending on patient effort and may be classified as closed-loop ventilation modes. Alternative modes of ventilation are tools for lung protection, alveolar recruitment, and ventilator liberation. Understanding the function and application of these alternative modes prior to implementation is essential and is most beneficial for the patient.