Driving Trail Making Test part B: a variant of the TMT-B

Processing Speed and Attentional Shift/Mental Flexibility in Patients with Stroke: A Comprehensive Review on the Trail Making Test in Stroke Studies

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most commonly administered tests in clinical and research neuropsychological settings. The two parts of the test (part A (TMT-A) and part B (TMT-B)) enable the evaluation of visuoperceptual tracking and processing speed (TMT-A), as well as divided attention, set-shifting and cognitive flexibility (TMT-B). The main cognitive processes that are assessed using TMT, i.e., processing speed, divided attention, and cognitive flexibility, are often affected in patients with stroke. Considering the wide use of TMT in research and clinical settings since its introduction in neuropsychological practice, the purpose of our review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of TMT in stroke patients. We present the most representative studies assessing processing speed and attentional shift/mental flexibility in stroke settings using TMT and applying scoring methods relying on conventional TMT scores (e.g., time-to-complete part A and part B), as well as derived measures (e.g., TMT-(B-A) difference score, TMT-(B/A) ratio score, errors in part A and part B). We summarize the cognitive processes commonly associated with TMT performance in stroke patients (e.g., executive functions), lesion characteristics and neuroanatomical underpinning of TMT performance post-stroke, the association between TMT performance and patients' instrumental activities of daily living, motor difficulties, speech difficulties, and mood statue, as well as their driving ability. We also highlight how TMT can serve as an objective marker of post-stroke cognitive recovery following the implementation of interventions. Our comprehensive review underscores that the TMT stands as an invaluable asset in the stroke assessment toolkit, contributing nuanced insights into diverse cognitive, functional, and emotional dimensions. As research progresses, continued exploration of the TMT potential across these domains is encouraged, fostering a deeper comprehension of post-stroke dynamics and enhancing patient-centered care across hospitals, rehabilitation centers, research institutions, and community health settings. Its integration into both research and clinical practice reaffirms TMT status as an indispensable instrument in stroke-related evaluations, enabling holistic insights that extend beyond traditional neurological assessments.

Performance of the walking trail making test in older adults with white matter hyperintensities

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that the walking trail making test (WTMT) completion time is significantly higher in patients with developmental coordination disorders and mild cognitive impairments. We hypothesized that WTMT performance would be altered in older adults with white matter hyperintensities (WMH).

AIM

To explore the performance in the WTMT in older people with WMH.

METHODS

In this single-center, observational study, 25 elderly WMH patients admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 served as the WMH group and 20 participants matched for age, gender, and educational level who were undergoing physical examination in our hospital during the same period served as the control group. The participants completed the WTMT-A and WTMT-B to obtain their gait parameters, including WTMT-A completion time, WTMT-B completion time, speed, step length, cadence, and stance phase percent. White matter lesions were scored according to the Fazekas scale. Multiple neuropsychological assessments were carried out to assess cognitive function. The relationships between WTMT performance and cognition and motion in elderly patients with WMH were analyzed by partial Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with WMH performed significantly worse on the choice reaction test (CRT) (0.51 ± 0.09 s vs 0.44 ± 0.06 s, P = 0.007), verbal fluency test (VFT, 14.2 ± 2.75 vs 16.65 ± 3.54, P = 0.012), and digit symbol substitution test (16.00 ± 2.75 vs 18.40 ± 3.27, P = 0.010) than participants in the control group. The WMH group also required significantly more time to complete the WTMT-A (93.00 ± 10.76 s vs 70.55 ± 11.28 s, P < 0.001) and WTMT-B (109.72 ± 12.26 s vs 82.85 ± 7.90 s, P < 0.001). WTMT-A completion time was positively correlated with CRT time (r = 0.460, P = 0.001), while WTMT-B completion time was negatively correlated with VFT (r = -0.391, P = 0.008). On the WTMT-A, only speed was found to statistically differ between the WMH and control groups (0.803 ± 0.096 vs 0.975 ± 0.050 m/s, P < 0.001), whereas on the WTMT-B, the WMH group exhibited a significantly lower speed (0.778 ± 0.111 vs 0.970 ± 0.053 m/s, P < 0.001) and cadence (82.600 ± 4.140 vs 85.500 ± 5.020 steps/m, P = 0.039), as well as a higher stance phase percentage (65.061 ± 1.813% vs 63.513 ± 2.465%, P = 0.019) relative to controls.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with WMH showed obviously poorer WTMT performance. WTMT could be a potential indicator for cognitive and motor deficits in patients with WMH.

The Trail Making Test (part B) is associated with working memory: A concurrent validity study

The Test Making Test (TMT) was originally created as a distributed attention test. Part B (TMT-B) has been proposed as representative of executive functions as effective problem solving and working memory. This study aimed to explore the validity of the TMT-B as an indicator of working memory in adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted by using linear correlation coefficients between the TMT-B and neuropsychological and electrophysiological tests of working memory. Fifty-six individuals participated, all of which had normal cognitive functioning and were aged between 19 and 55 years old. Results show a significant correlation among the TMT-B scores with all subtests, the overall score of the Corsi Block-Tapping Test, the Working Memory Index of the WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) (p ≤ .05) and the auditory Event Related Potentials (p < .01) with the N200 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. These findings are preliminary evidence of the validity of the TMT-B for the evaluation of working memory in adults. Additional studies are required to assess the differential validity of the TMT-B in the evaluation of working memory, through comparative correlational analyzes with the results of various neuropsychological tests that assess other cognitive functions.

Neurologic Injury and Dementia: Update on Current Physiotherapeutic Intervention

Neurologic injury and dementia can lead to devastating outcomes for patients with extended course of disease. Secondary and tertiary injury can progress and lead to continued deficits and rapid neurodegeneration. In this review, we highlight alternative strategies that can target recovery for these patients and prevent further neurologic decline. We discuss the benefit of music therapy and acupuncture. We then look at transcranlal magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Finally, we look at the role of yoga and virtual reality. While several of these modalities are in their infancy, some have been used for generations. We argue for higher quality evidence to confirm effectiveness and clinical utility.

Dual-task intervention based on trail making test: Effects on Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention with dual task based on trail making test on gait, cognition and daily activities execution in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODOLOGY

10 individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD) were divided into dual task group (DTG) and control group (CG). Were realized 16 dual task (DT) training sessions based on the Trail Making Test (TMT) for DTG and a conventional training protocol for CG. Pre and post intervention assessments used the 6 minute walk test (T6), TMT, Katz Index and Falls Efficacy Scale (FES).

RESULTS

Comparing the difference between pre and post intervention values between groups, there was no significant difference for T6 (p=0,36). In TMT there was a significant difference (p=0,03), showing shorter times for DTG. The tests used for time values in the Katz index tasks showed an important difference for the DTG (P=0,02). As for the results of the FES, they did not show pre and post changes in the DTG (0,45) and in the CG (p= 0,29) and not even between the groups (p=0,45).

CONCLUSION

The proposed intervention was able to promote improvements in the performance of daily life activities, learning adaptations and retention of motor and cognitive aspects, which may reflect positively in the daily lives of patients with PD and, consequently, greater autonomy to perform these types of activities.