The effects of bandaging with an additional pad and taping on secondary arm lymphedema in a patient after mastectomy

Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the LLIS and ULL27 in Detecting Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer-related lymphedema occurs in up to 30% of women following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and less commonly following sentinel lymph node biopsy. To quantify disability in these patients, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have proven useful; however, given the overlap of symptoms between ALND and lymphedema, examination of their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting lymphedema in breast cancer patients undergoing ALND is needed.

METHODS

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS) and the Upper Limb Lymphedema 27 scale (ULL27) were administered to patients who had undergone ALND at least 2 years prior and either did or did not develop lymphedema. Survey responses and the degree of disability were compared to generate receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, and the sensitivity and specificity of PROMs to diagnose lymphedema were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both PROMs were highly accurate, sensitive, and specific for detecting lymphedema. The LLIS had an accuracy of 97%, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 84.8% at a cutoff of ≥ 5.88 overall percent impairment score (higher scores indicate worse disability). The ULL27 had an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 88.6%, and specificity of 90.9% at a cutoff of ≤ 83.3 global score (lower scores indicate worse disability).

CONCLUSIONS

The LLIS and the ULL27 appear to be highly specific for lymphedema and capable of differentiating it from symptoms resulting from ALND alone. Our findings suggest that use of these questionnaires with a threshold may be effective for diagnosing lymphedema, potentially reducing the need for frequent clinic visits and time-consuming measurements.

Effectiveness of four types of bandages and kinesio-tape for treating breast-cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized, single-blind, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of four types of bandages and kinesio-tape and determine which one is the most effective in women with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphoedema.

DESIGN

Randomized, single-blind, clinical trial.

SETTING

Physiotherapy department in the Women's Health Research Group at the University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.

SUBJECTS

A total of 150 women presenting breast-cancer-related lymphoedema.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized into five groups (n = 30). All women received an intensive phase of complex decongestive physiotherapy including manual lymphatic drainage, pneumatic compression therapy, therapeutic education, active therapeutic exercise and bandaging. The only difference between the groups was the bandage or tape applied (multilayer; simplified multilayer; cohesive; adhesive; kinesio-tape).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome was percentage excess volume change. Other outcomes measured were heaviness and tightness symptoms, and bandage or tape perceived comfort. Data were collected at baseline and finishing interventions.

RESULTS

This study showed significant differences between the bandage groups in absolute value of excess volume (P < 0.001). The most effective were the simplified multilayer (59.5%, IQR = 28.7) and the cohesive bandages (46.3%, IQR = 39). The bandages/tape with the least difference were kinesio-tape (4.9%, IQR = 17.7) and adhesive bandage (21.7%, IQR = 17.9). The five groups exhibited a significant decrease in symptoms after interventions, with no differences between groups. In addition, kinesio-tape was perceived as the most comfortable by women and multilayer as the most uncomfortable (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Simplified multilayer seems more effective and more comfortable than multilayer bandage. Cohesive bandage seems as effective as simplified multilayer and multilayer bandage. Kinesio taping seems the least effective.

Prognostic Factors of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphic Findings in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the effects of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who underwent pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy and completed 2 weeks of CDT. A total of 18 patients with unilateral BCRL clinical stage II underwent 30-minute sessions of CDT five times per week for 2 weeks. The quantitative asymmetry index (QAI) of the upper extremity, axillary lymph node (LN) uptake, and axillary plus supraclavicular LN uptake from lymphoscintigraphy were calculated. The volume of lymphedema was calculated by percentage excess volume (PEV) at initial and posttreatment. The CDT response was assessed using percentage reduction in excess volume (PREV). Correlation analyses were conducted using Kendall tau rank correlation. There was positive correlation between upper extremity QAI at 2 hours and initial PEV. Negative correlations were found between axillary LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV, and between axillary plus supraclavicular LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV. The PREV showed a positive correlation with axillary LN QAI at 2 hours after injection (tau-b = 0.354, p = 0.041). Conclusion: Quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy have potential value for use in predicting the response to CDT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Using QAIs from lymphoscintigraphy, we could estimate the excess volume of lymphedema.

Effect of taping as treatment to reduce breast cancer lymphedema: literature review

Lymphedema is the most common complication during the postoperative period after surgery for breast cancer and can have a direct impact on daily activities. The objective of this study was to review the use of taping as an alternative/complementary treatment to reduce lymphedema. A literature review was conducted of scientific articles indexed on the PubMed, LILACS, MEDLINE, and PEDro databases and Google Scholar, and nine articles were selected. It was found that taping is a complementary therapy for reducing lymphedema, which may be used as an alternative treatment method, but cannot substitute multilayer compression therapy.