Factors related to self-care behaviors among hospitalized patients with heart failure in Japan, based on the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale

Influence of Sex and Gender on Adherence to Self-care Behaviors for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management in the Global Context: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Adherence to self-care behaviors can prevent or delay adverse outcomes associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Sex and socioculturally constructed gender might impact individuals' ability to adhere to healthy lifestyles.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesize the literature on the influence of sex and gender on adherence to self-care behaviors for CVD risk management in the global context.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Global Health Databases for peer-reviewed original articles published between 2013 and 2023. We selected studies that investigated self-care behaviors, self-care maintenance, or self-care management as outcomes and reported sex- and gender-related factors (such as education level, employment status, and marital status). The data were synthesized in a narrative form.

RESULTS

The search identified 3540 studies, 52 of which met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. Global North countries accounted for 55% of all the studies. Self-reported questionnaire scores were used in most of the studies (n = 47). Better self-care was associated with being a woman (n = 17), attaining a higher education level (n = 15), and having higher perceived social support (n = 10). The associations between adherence to self-care behaviors and employment status, socioeconomic status, marital status, and household size were inconsistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to self-care behaviors for CVD risk management varied widely, based on gender-related factors. Further research is needed to use a consistent measure of self-care adherence behavior and integrate a wider range of gender-related factors.

Heart failure patients' experiences of self-care neglect: a content analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a chronic and common disorder worldwide. Patients with heart failure need self-care behaviors to manage their condition. Despite the importance of self-care in positive health outcomes, many patients with heart failure neglect their self-care behaviors. Therefore, the present study was conducted to explain heart failure patients' experiences of self-care neglect.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis method. Participants included 15 patients with heart failure. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and using purposive sampling method. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached. Data analysis was performed concurrently with data collection. Lincoln and Guba's four criteria were used to ensure the trustworthiness of the data. Data management was performed using MAXQDA version 24 software.

RESULTS

The results were presented in the form of four main categories and 10 subcategories. In analyzing the data of the study, four main categories emerged in the participants' experiences: "false cultural beliefs in self-care", "weakening of mental-psychological power", "synergy of physical problems", and "inappropriate support".

CONCLUSION

The patients in their experiences of neglect in self-care pointed to false cultural beliefs in self-care, weakening of mental-psychological power, synergy of physical problems, and inappropriate support. Knowing the factors that influence self-care neglect and preventing their occurrence can improve self-care skills and prevent neglect-related side effects in patients with heart failure. Healthcare providers can help improve the health of these patients by developing interventions to mitigate these factors. It is suggested that future research be designed in the form of an intervention to reduce the effect of each of these factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This is a qualitative study and has not been registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials.

Evaluating dyadic factors associated with self-care in patients with heart failure and their family caregivers: Using an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Dyadic conditions of patients with heart failure and their caregivers may affect both patient self-care and caregiver contribution to patient self-care (CCPS). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships of patient-caregiver physical function and depressive symptoms to the patient self-care (maintenance and management) and CCPS. Data from 55 were analyzed using an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to address the aim through AMOS. Patient self-care was very poor. Better patient physical function was related to better patient self-care management (actor effect) and poorer CCPS maintenance (partner effect). Better caregiver physical function was related to CCPS management (actor effect). Severer patient depressive symptoms were related to poorer patient self-care maintenance (actor effect) and poorer CCPS management (partner effect). Physical function and depressive symptoms in patient-caregiver dyads were related to patient self-care and CCPS. To improve patient self-care and CCPS, dyadic support for physical function and depressive symptoms is needed.

Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2

AIMS

It is more important for patients with heart failure (HF) to objectively identify their self-care status. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) version 7.2 is a reliable and valid instrument comprising three scales: self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management. We aimed to translate the SCHFI v.7.2 into Japanese and test its validity and reliability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a cross-sectional study. Two translators performed forward and backward translations between English and Japanese. To assess structural validity, confirmatory factor analyses were performed using the structure of the original version. To assess convergent validity, the associations between each scale and self-care self-efficacy were evaluated. To assess internal consistency, model-based internal consistency coefficients were calculated. Participants were 314 Japanese outpatients with HF (mean age: 72.8 ± 12.8 years). Regarding structural validity, all scales showed adequate model fit indices, supporting a two-factor structure with items similar to those in the original version. However, to improve the model fit indices, it was necessary to add error correlations for the self-care maintenance and symptom perception scales. Regarding convergent validity, all scales showed significant associations with self-care self-efficacy. Regarding internal consistency, the model-based internal consistency coefficients were sufficient for all scales (0.739, 0.908, and 0.783 for the self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management scales, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The Japanese version of the SCHFI v.7.2 had adequate validity and reliability. This instrument is useful for assessing self-care in Japanese HF patients. However, factors influencing self-care should be considered when interpreting results.