1
|
Almeida LJM, Silva AV, Silva JSL, Silva JF, Silva JHB, Pereira Neto F, Borba MA, Barreto SSC, Rodrigues HA, Sousa VFO, Pereira WE, Lopes AS, Mielezrski F. Sugarcane productivity and economic viability in response to planting density. BRAZ J BIOL 2024; 84:e279536. [PMID: 38597531 DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.279536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Planting with higher density in sugarcane is one of the practices used to overcome low productivity. However, this planting material is equivalent to 25% of the total cost of production, being one of the main expenses for cultivation. In this sense, the present work aims to evaluate the productivity and economic viability of sugarcane as a function of planting density. The experiment was carried out at Usina Monte Alegre in the municipality of Mamanguape, Paraíba, Brazil, from March 2021 to January 2022 with the variety RB92579. Seven planting density were studied: T1: 7 gems m-1, T2: 10 gems m-1, T3: 12 gems m-1, T4: 11 gems m-1, T5: 15 gems m-1, T6: 17 gems m-1, T7: 24 gems m-1, in randomized blocks with four replications. Growth, productivity and economic viability were evaluated. The highest productivity of cane and sugar, 77.69 ton ha-1 and 10.390 ton ha-1, respectively, was with planting density of 17 and 24 gems-1. While the minimum productivity of cane (61.313 ton ha-1) and sugar (7.924 ton ha-1) was recorded at sowing density of 7 and 11 gems-1. However, cultivation density with 7 and 10 gems m-1 were the ones that provided the highest profitability around 50%, followed by density of 12, 15 and 17 gems m-1 with an average of 45% profit and 11 and 24 gems m-1 with the lowest proportion of profit on average 38%. The cultivation with 17 gems m-1 of cane provides in cane-plant, variety RB92579, greater productivity with a profit rate of 45%, being the most suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J M Almeida
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - A V Silva
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - J S L Silva
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - J F Silva
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - J H B Silva
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - F Pereira Neto
- Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco - UFAPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil
| | - M A Borba
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - S S C Barreto
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - H A Rodrigues
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - V F O Sousa
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - W E Pereira
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - A S Lopes
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| | - F Mielezrski
- Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|