Medication administration – nursing workload and patient safety in clinical wards

Undergraduate nursing student experiences in American clinical learning environments: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Newly qualified nurses are often considered inadequately prepared for practice. During nursing students' educational preparation, clinical learning environments are intended to provide experiences for students to develop skills and clinical judgments needed for safe practice. Yet, a recent systematic review found no quantitative evidence that clinical education models facilitate student learning. In addition, little is known about the frequency and type of skills students perform when in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate undergraduate nursing student experiences with skills and the quality of supervision and feedback received when performing skills in clinical settings.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive.

SETTING

A mid-sized private university in the Midwestern part of the United States.

METHODS

Students completed an online survey after clinical days during one semester. Students self-reported their experiences with medication administration, psychomotor skills and physical assessments via multiple choice items. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft 365 Excel. Content analysis was performed of one open-response survey item.

RESULTS

A total of 496 surveys were completed. On average, during one clinical day, 13.5 % of students administered medication, 20.5 % performed a psychomotor skill, and 64 % completed a physical assessment. Students were most frequently supervised by bedside nurses and reported the quality of their supervision and feedback as "very good" or "good". Some students reported being restricted from administering medication and performing other skills due to a clinical site policy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, students performed few skills and assessments when in clinical settings. Increased clinical experiences are needed for students to develop competencies to better prepare them for safe practice. The findings contribute to the dearth of knowledge related to the clinical learning experiences of undergraduate nursing students, and can guide strategies to improve new nurse preparedness.

Patient Safety in the Process of Pharmacotherapy Carried Out by Nurses-A Polish-Slovak Prospective Observational Study

Pharmacotherapy, i.e., the use of medicines for combating a disease or its symptoms, is one of the crucial elements of patient care. Nursing workloads in the pharmacotherapy process prove that nurses spend 40% of their work on the management of medications. This study was aimed at the determination and comparison of safety levels at the nurse-managed stage of the pharmacotherapy process in Poland and Slovakia by identifying the key risk factors which directly affect patient safety. The study involved a group of 1774 nurses, of whom 1412 were from Poland and 362 were from Slovakia. The original Nursing Risk in Pharmacotherapy (acronym: NURIPH) tool was used. The survey questionnaire was made available online and distributed to nurses. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.832. Nurses from Slovakia most often, i.e., for six out of nine factors (items: one, five, six, seven, eight, and nine), assessed the risk factors as "significant risk (3)", and Polish nurses most often, i.e., for as many as eight out of nine risk factors (items: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and nine), assessed the risk factors as "very significant (5)". It has been found that the safety of the pharmacotherapy process is assessed by Polish nurses to be much lower than by Slovak nurses.

Safety culture in healthcare: mixed method study

PURPOSE

Healthcare providers' perceptions of management's effectiveness in achieving safety culture improvements are low, and there is little information in the literature on the subject. Objective: The overall aim of this study was to examine the patient safety culture within an interprofessional team - physicians, nurses, nurse technicians, speech therapist, psychologist, social worker, administrative support - practicing in an advanced neurology and neurosurgery center in Southern Brazil.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

The authors applied the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in a mixed methods study, with a quan→QUAL sequential explanatory approach.

FINDINGS

In the quantitative phase, the authors found a negative safety climate through the SAQ. In the qualitative phase, the approach enabled participants to identify specific safety problems. For that, participants proposed improvements that were directly and quickly implemented in the workplace during the study. The joint analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data inferred that the information and reflections of the focus group participants supported and validated the SAQ statistical analysis results. This integrated approach illustrated the importance of various safety culture aspects as a multifaceted phenomenon related to healthcare quality.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

This study provides explanations for why management is associated negatively with safety climate in healthcare institutions. In addition, the study provides a novel contribution adding value to mixed methods research methodology.

Nurses' Perceived Causes of Medication Administration Errors: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medication administration errors (MAEs) are a critical patient safety issue. Nurses are often responsible for administering medication to patients, thus their perceptions of causes of errors can provide valuable guidance for the development of interventions aimed to mitigate errors. Quantitative research can overlook less overt causes; therefore, a qualitative systematic review was conducted to present a synthesis of qualitative evidence of nurses' perceived causes of MAEs.

METHODS

Publications from 2000 to February 2019 were searched using four electronic databases. Inclusion criteria were articles that (1) presented results from studies that used a qualitative or mixed methods design, (2) reported qualitative data on nurses' perceived causes of MAEs in health care settings, and (3) were published in the English language. Sixteen individual articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of each article was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic analysis of the data was performed. Perceived causes of errors were labeled as knowledge-based, personal, and contextual factors.

RESULTS

The primary knowledge-based factor was lack of medication knowledge. Personal factors included fatigue and complacency. Contextual factors included heavy workloads and interruptions. Contextual factors were reported in all the studies reviewed and were often interconnected with personal and knowledge-based factors.

CONCLUSION

Causes of MAEs are perceived by nurses to be multifactorial and interconnected and often stem from systems issues. Multifactorial interventions aimed at mitigating medication errors are required with an emphasis on systems changes. Findings in this review can be used to guide efforts aimed at identifying and modifying factors contributing to MAEs.

Adherence to hand hygiene in critical sectors: Can we go on like this?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The rates of healthcare-associated infections are high around the world. Hand hygiene is considered the most effective measure to reduce the transmission of pathogens in the hospital environment. Our objective was to evaluate adherence to hand hygiene in critical units of a tertiary-level hospital in Central-West Brazil.

DESIGN

Observational study employing cross-sectional data. Reporting rigour was demonstrated using the STROBE checklist.

METHODS

Observation of hand hygiene practices of 129 professionals from the health team, including nursing staff, physicians and physical therapists. Data collection was carried out using the World Health Organization form.

RESULTS

A total of 3,025 hand hygiene opportunities were observed, and the overall rate of adherence was only 46.25%. There was a greater frequency of hand hygiene after risk of exposure to bodily fluids and after contact with patients, 60.80% and 53.45%, respectively. Nurses obtained a higher rate of adherence to hand hygiene (59.80%). The neonatal ICU had a higher rate of adherence to hand hygiene when compared to other sectors.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical structure for hand hygiene in the institution was poor, and no professionals reached the minimum time required for execution of hand hygiene techniques. There were low rates of adherence to hand hygiene by professionals at all five times and in all categories and sectors observed, which may have been influenced by poor infrastructure present in the institution.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study is of great relevance to patient safety, given the rates of healthcare-associated infections worldwide, with emphasis on underdeveloped countries. It is hoped that the results of this research can guide organisations to validly and systematically evaluate adherence to hand hygiene and achieve higher rates of adherence to hand hygiene and consequently reduce the number of infections in health environments.