Elaboration, validation and reliability of the safety protocol for pediatric thirst management

[Protocol for the telerehabilitation of the lower limb amputee patient using mobile technologies]

Objective

To design a protocol for telerehabilitation of the lower limb amputee patient using mobile technologies.

Methods

Quantitative descriptive study. For the design of the protocol, a literature search in indexed databases and validation of the content by experts in the field were carried out. Thirteen experts in the field of rehabilitation were convened to evaluate the content of the protocols in terms of adequacy, pertinence and relevance. Subsequently, a consensus was reached to define the protocols used in the software. A Likert-type scale with a score from 1 to 5 was used, where 1 refers to the lowest rating and 5 corresponds to the highest, scores that were then translated into three categories where 1 and 2 became "Not important", 3 and 4 were classified as "Useful, not essential", and 5 was classified as "Essential", for the calculation of the content validity index. The Fleiss Kappa coefficient was estimated for each criterion, where the scale established by Landis and Koch, which qualitatively expresses the strength of agreement between the evaluators, was taken into account for the interpretation.

Results

The protocol has acceptable properties to be used as an intervention tool for lower limb amputee patients, it was provided in a software for cell phones called Apptivate, which was designed through an interprofessional work and contains the number of repetitions and series to be performed for each exercise, with animations, text and descriptive audio.

Validation of a Guideline for Nurses Taking Care of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis in the Context of COVID-19 in the Emergency Department

The objective of this study was to prepare and validate the content of a guideline for nursing care of adult patients with liver cirrhosis and COVID-19 treated in the emergency department. The study was conducted in two stages: first, the guideline was developed based on an integrative literature review and existing guidelines on the topic. The guideline was prepared with six domains and 64 care items. In the second stage, 15 specialists in urgency and emergency services performed content validation of the guideline. The data were analyzed using the Content Validity Index, with reliability assessed through Cronbach's α. The judges validated the guide regarding language clarity, objectivity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence. The value of the guideline's Content Validity Index was 0.96. Cronbach's α reliability reached a value of 0.93. The judges validated all domains and items of the guideline for theoretical relevance and practical pertinence, to be used by researchers and clinical practice professionals in the nursing area.

PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTING THIRST MANAGEMENT IN SURGICAL BURNED PATIENTS, BASED ON KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION

ABSTRACT Objective: to report the path taken to implement the Thirst Management Model using the Knowledge Translation Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality intervention in a Burn unit. Method: an experience report on the implementation, which took place in two stages: Preparation; and Implementation/Change, both requiring a sequence of steps. Results: the implementation was performed in four cycles of the PDSA improvement tool. All had the same indicator collected, with increasing goals to be attained. Considering the barriers identified, multiple combined Knowledge Translation strategies were used, namely: posters; theoretical and practical training sessions, individual or in group; videos; dynamics; music; logo development for implementation visibility; audit and feedback; and didactic and illustrated clinical protocols. Conclusion: the report of the entire implementation process using the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality intervention, pointing out its weaknesses and strengths, proves to be useful, necessary and innovative. This study may assist in future evidence-based implementations that choose to use multifaceted interventions.

Desenvolvimento e validação de um folder educativo para coleta de escarro da tuberculose pulmonar

RESUMO Objetivo: desenvolver e validar um folder educativo para coleta de escarro da tuberculose pulmonar. Método: estudo metodológico, desenvolvido em quatro fases: elaboração do projeto, levantamento bibliográfico, desenvolvimento e validação de conteúdo e aparência. Para validação, adotaram-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo maior ou igual a 0,80, o Coeficiente Kappa e o Suitability Assessment of Materials. Resultados: desenvolveu-se um folder educativo contendo os passos recomendados para coleta de escarro de qualidade. Esse foi validado, por 19 juízes especialistas, no primeiro ciclo de validação, ao obter Índice de Validade de Conteúdo global de 0,90, concordância perfeita entre os juízes, com Kappa total de 0,83 e adequação superior. Conclusão: o material é válido, pois contém linguagem, ilustrações e layout adequados, simples e atraentes, indicando concordância e confiabilidade perfeita. Assim, apresenta potencialidade para auxiliar na realização dos passos recomendados para correta coleta de escarro e possibilitar o diagnóstico correto.

PROCESSO DE IMPLANTAÇÃO DO MANEJO DA SEDE NO PACIENTE QUEIMADO CIRÚRGICO EMBASADO NO KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION

RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar o caminho percorrido para a implantação do Modelo de Manejo da Sede com o uso da intervenção de Knowledge Translation Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (Prática Baseada em Evidência para a Melhoria do Processo de Qualidade) em uma unidade de queimados. Método: Relato de experiência sobre a implantação que ocorreu em duas etapas: Preparação e Implantação/ mudança, ambas obedecendo uma sequência de passos para sua realização. Resultados: A implementação foi realizada em quatro ciclos da ferramenta de melhoria PDSA. Todos tiveram o mesmo indicador coletado, com metas crescentes a serem alcançadas. Considerando as barreiras identificadas, utilizaram-se múltiplas estratégias combinadas de Knowledge Translation: cartazes, capacitações teóricas e práticas, individuais ou em grupo, vídeos, dinâmicas, músicas, desenvolvimento de logo para visibilidade da implantação, auditoria e feedback, protocolos clínicos didáticos e ilustrados. Conclusão: O relato de todo o processo de implantação com o uso da intervenção Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality, apontando suas fragilidades e fortalezas, mostra-se útil, necessária e inovador. Este estudo pode auxiliar futuras implantações de evidências que escolham utilizar intervenções multifacetadas.

Development and validity of an educational folder for pulmonary tuberculosis sputum collection

OBJECTIVE

to develop and validate an educational folder for pulmonary tuberculosis sputum collection.

METHOD

a methodological study, developed in four phases: project design, bibliographic survey, development, and content and appearance validity. For validity, the Content Validity Index greater than or equal to 0.80, the Kappa Coefficient and the Suitability Assessment of Materials were adopted.

RESULTS

an educational folder was developed containing the recommended steps for quality sputum collection. It was validated by 19 expert judges in the first validity cycle, obtaining an overall Content Validity Index of 0.90, perfect agreement among judges, with a total Kappa of 0.83 and superior suitability.

CONCLUSION

the material is valid, as it contains suitable, simple and attractive language, illustrations and layout, indicating perfect agreement and reliability. Thus, it has the potential to assist in carrying out the recommended steps for correct sputum collection and enable the correct diagnosis.

Construction and validation of an instrument for classifying nipple and areola complex lesions resulting from breastfeeding

OBJECTIVES

to construct and validate a classification of nipple and areola complex lesions resulting from breastfeeding, according to content and appearance.

METHODS

this is a methodological study, developed in four stages: operational definition, instrument construction, content and appearance validation. The Delphi technique and a Likert-type scale were used to validate content and appearance, through the participation of ten and sixteen judges, respectively. For analysis, Content Validity Index and Kappa Coefficient were applied.

RESULTS

Content Validity Index obtained an overall value of 0.93 and, for appearance, 0.94. Kappa values ranged between 0.46 and 1. The high rates of agreement among judges demonstrated the quality of the proposed content validity.

CONCLUSIONS

the Nipple and Areola Complex Lesions Classification Instrument developed obtained acceptable values of its indexes, proving to be valid in terms of content and appearance.