Removal of denture adhesives from PMMA and Polyamide denture base materials

Preparation of arginine-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Arg@MSNs) to improve the mechanical and antibacterial properties of denture base resin

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Whether the incorporation of arginine-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Arg@MSNs) into denture base resin can improve the mechanical and antibacterial properties is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to synthesis Arg@MSNs and explore how Arg@MSNs incorporation affects the mechanical and antibacterial properties of denture base resin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Arg@MSNs were synthesized via a sol-gel process and characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The prepared Arg@MSNs at different weight ratio concentrations were added into denture base resin as the experimental group, and unmodified denture base resin was the control. The fracture surface and arginine release behavior of each specimen were detected using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-HESI-MS/MS), respectively. Three-point bend tests were applied using a universal testing machine for evaluation of the mechanical properties of each group (n=5). Antibacterial efficiency (n=3) was evaluated by both quantitative and qualitative analysis using Streptococcus mutans. The cytotoxic effect of the Arg@MSN-modified denture base resin was investigated using a cell counting kit (CCK)-8 test. Data were subjected to 1-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test (ɑ=.05).

RESULTS

The prepared Arg@MSNs had good monodispersity and spherical morphology. Arg@MSN concentration at 0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, and 2.5 wt% resulted in enhanced mechanical properties, while those at 5 wt% were adversely impacted. Biofilm pH values increased with the incorporation of Arg@MSNs, and the antibacterial performance was improved. The CCK-8 test revealed that all formulations were not cytotoxic.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Arg@MSNs into denture base resin can enhance its mechanical properties and improve its antibacterial performance without any apparent cytotoxic effect.

The effect of using denture adhesives on patient satisfaction with complete dentures; a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Denture adhesives can be useful in improving patients' satisfaction with complete dentures. However, comparison clinical trials are lacking. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the satisfaction of edentulous patients and their oral health impact profile when provided with 3 types of denture adhesives.

METHODS

Sixty-four completely edentulous patients seeking complete dentures for their first time were randomly divided into 3 groups. Each group received a set of complete dentures, which were adjusted at review appointments until participants reported no complaints. After 1 month of using the dentures, participants rated their overall satisfaction and their satisfaction regarding comfort, retention, stability, and efficiency of mastication and speech on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Participants also filled out the oral health impact profile for edentulous patients (OHIP-EDENT) questionnaire. Each group was then given 1 type of denture adhesive to use. Group C received Corega Ultra denture fixative cream (GlaxoSmithKline), Group O received Olivafix (Bonyf), and Group S received Sea. Bond adhesive strips (Sea.Bond). Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences in VAS scores before and after using the adhesive within each group and Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to compare OHIP scores and total OHIP values before and after using the adhesive within each group (p = 0.05). Furthermore, Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the differences before and after using the adhesives in VAS and OHIP values between the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Significantly higher VAS values were detected in all groups and significantly lower values for many OHIP items in addition to total OHIP values were detected in all groups after using the adhesives (P < 0.05), except for the ease of cleaning for Group O and Group S (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in VAS and OHIP values between the 3 groups (P > 0.05), except for the ease of cleaning which was significantly different between Group C and Group S (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Using denture adhesives for completely edentulous patients resulted in higher patient satisfaction as indicated by higher VAS scores as well as improved quality of life as indicated by lower OHIP-EDENT scores after using the adhesives. These improvements were not dependent on the type of adhesive, except for ease of cleaning as adhesive strips were easier to clean than paste type adhesives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05496283) on 11/08/2022.

Effect of Denture Disinfectants on the Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Denture Base Materials

Denture care and maintenance are necessary for both denture longevity and underlying tissue health. However, the effects of disinfectants on the strength of 3D-printed denture base resins are unclear. Herein, distilled water (DW), effervescent tablet, and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) immersion solutions were used to investigate the flexural properties and hardness of two 3D-printed resins (NextDent and FormLabs) compared with a heat-polymerized resin. The flexural strength and elastic modulus were investigated using the three-point bending test and Vickers hardness test before (baseline) immersion and 180 days after immersion. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05), and further verified by using electron microscopy and infrared spectroscopy. The flexural strength of all the materials decreased after solution immersion (p < 0.001). The effervescent tablet and NaOCl immersion reduced the flexural strength (p < 0.001), with the lowest values recorded with the NaOCl immersion. The elastic modulus did not significantly differ between the baseline and after the DW immersion (p > 0.05), but significantly decreased after the effervescent tablet and NaOCl immersion (p < 0.001). The hardness significantly decreased after immersion in all the solutions (p < 0.001). The immersion of the heat-polymerized and 3D-printed resins in the DW and disinfectant solutions decreased the flexural properties and hardness.

An in vitro study on the selection of surfactants for removal of cream denture adhesives from dentures and their application to denture cleaners

PURPOSE

Denture adhesives improve the stability of incompatible dentures; however, complete removal of adhesives after use is difficult. Only a few studies have focused on the removal of denture adhesives. Hence, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of surfactants in removing cream denture adhesives from acrylic resin materials.

METHODS

Solutions of twelve surfactants with various hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) values were prepared. Two cream denture adhesives, colored for visualization, were spread onto transparent acrylic resin plates. After immersion into surfactant solutions, the effects of the surfactants on residual adhesives were evaluated. We also investigated the effect of denture cleaners (with or without the surfactants) on the removability of adhesives and artificial oily dirt, and their effects on the surface properties of denture materials. The obtained data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.

RESULTS

Five surfactants [BT-5, BL-4.2, BT-7, BT-9, and Triton X-100 (TX)] with HLB values in the 10.5-13.5 range effectively removed adhesives. Addition of BT-9 and TX (HLB=13.5) to denture cleaners improved the adhesives' removal. Furthermore, the addition of TX to the cleaners did not interfere with the removal of artificial oily dirt and did not damage the denture materials' surface.

CONCLUSION

Surfactants with HLB values in the 10.5-13.5 range are suitable for removal of cream denture adhesives from acrylic resin materials. In particular, TX (HLB=13.5) efficiently removes adhesives without damaging denture materials or impairing original detergency.

Retention Capacity of Original Denture Adhesives and White Brands for Conventional Complete Dentures: An In Vitro Study

(1) Introduction: Denture adhesives (DAs) promote stability, chewing ability, and quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of original brand DAs and white brands in their retention of conventional complete dentures. (2) Methods: This study followed the recommendations of the international standard ISO 10873. Three original brands of DA (Corega® Fixação 3D, GlaxoSmithKline®, Stafford Miller Ltd., Dungarvan Co. Waterford, Ireland), KuKident® Pro Procter & Gamble Technical Centres®, Ltd., Whitehal Lane, Germany and Elgydium® Fix, Laboratórios URGO® SL, Florida, Spain) were compared to three white brands (Fixação Extra Forte Pingo Doce®, Laboratórios Cosmodent®, Cantabria, Spain), Fixador de Próteses (Continente®, Propack®,Gmbh, Ladenburg, Germany) and Creme Fixador de Próteses (Auchan®, Ellipse®, Roubaix, France). Their retention capacities were analyzed using a mechanical test device. (3) Results: The mean retentive ability of original brand adhesives (M = 11.16, SD = 5.27) was significantly higher (t(298) = 11.88; p < 0.001) than that of the white brands (M = 5.92, SD = 1.18). When comparing all brands, statistically significant differences were also observed, F(5.294) = 707.68 (p < 0.001). The generic adhesive results were more homogeneous. The generic brands from Continente® (M = 5.24, SD = 0.94) and Auchan® (M = 5.80, SD = 0.79) were not significantly different, while the Pingo Doce® brand obtained significantly higher mean retention results (M = 6.71, SD = 1.28). (4) Conclusions: The original brands of DA have a significantly higher retentive ability than the white brands. Elygidim® Fix had the worst result of the three original brands, and the product from Pingo Doce® had the best result among the three white brands.