Alteration of the oral environment in patients undergoing esophagectomy during the perioperative period

The impact of perioperative oral care on postoperative infection in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study before and during COVID-19

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact of preoperative oral hygiene on the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (PP) and surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery considering the influence of COVID-19 and developing effective perioperative oral care methods.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery between January 2017 and March 2022 were analyzed. Patient characteristics and the incidence of PP and SSI before and during COVID-19 were compared. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with PP and SSI as the dependent variables.

RESULTS

This analysis included 207 participants. The mean age was 66.6 ± 8.3 years old, and 78.3% were male. There were no significant changes in the incidence of PP or SSI before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preoperative xerostomia significantly increased the risk of PP (odds ratio = 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.10-10.08, p = 0.033), an advanced cancer stage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Surgical procedures and reconstructive organs, but not preoperative oral hygiene factors, were associated with SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PP and SSI in patients with esophageal cancer showed no marked changes before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. Managing preoperative xerostomia may be crucial for reducing the risk of PP.

A multi-center study of symptoms in patients with esophageal cancer postoperatively: A networking analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore symptom clusters and the inter-relationship of symptoms in esophageal cancer (EC) patients during the first week after surgery.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey across multiple centers was carried out using the EORTCQLQ-OES18. Patients with esophageal cancer within a week post-surgery were recruited from the "Be Resilient to Cancer" project in Guangdong, Hunan, and Sichuan provinces between January and September 2024. Exploratory factor analysis with a priori algorithm was used to identify symptom clusters and network analysis was employed to recognize the relationship among core and bridge symptoms.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 501 patients with esophageal cancer, who were predominantly male (83%), married (93%) and 57% were ≥60 years. Three symptom clusters were identified: "reflux-pain", "eating", and "dysphagia-dry mouth". Acid or bile coming up (support = 40.1%, confidence = 1, lift = 2.53), eating difficulties (support = 40.1%, confidence = 0.990, lift = 2.408) and dry mouth (support = 42.9%, confidence = 0.808, lift = 1.298) were marked as sentinel symptoms for these clusters, respectively. Acid indigestion or heartburn was identified as the core symptom (EI = 1.142 without covariates and EI = 1.153 with covariates), and dry mouth served as the bridge symptoms (EI = 0.63 and EI = 0.656).

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing acid or bile coming up, eating difficulties, dry mouth are imperative to help relief symptom burden at the cluster level. Furthermore, targeting acid indigestion and heartburn are crucial to break the chains among different symptom clusters.

Identifying the role of preoperative oral/dental health care in post-esophagectomy pulmonary complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal surgery has traditionally been associated with high morbidity rates. Despite the recent advances in the field of minimally invasive surgery and the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, post-esophagectomy morbidity, especially that attributed to the respiratory system, remains a concern. In that respect, preoperative intensification of oral care or introduction of structured oral/dental hygiene regimens may lead to tangible postoperative benefits associated with reduced morbidity (respiratory or otherwise) and length of hospital stay. A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge and clinicaltrials.gov databases was undertaken for studies reporting use of preoperative oral/dental hygiene improvement regimens in patients scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. After screening 796 unique studies, seven were deemed eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated equivalent postoperative pneumonia rates in the oral pretreatment group and control groups (8.7 vs. 8.5%, respectively); however, the odds for developing pneumonia were reduced by 50% in the pretreatment group (odds ratio 0.5, 95% C.I. 0.37 to 0.69, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was detected in the anastomotic leak (odds ratio 0.93, 95% C.I. 0.38 to 2.24, P = 0.87) and length of stay outcomes (mean difference 0.63, 95% C.I. -3.22 to 4.47, P = 0.75). Oral/dental pretreatment reduces the odds for developing post-esophagectomy pneumonia. This finding should be cautiously interpreted given the significant limitations inherent in this meta-analysis. Further investigation via well-designed clinical trials is thus warranted before implementation in routine practice can be recommended.